Combination treatment of biomechanical support and targeted intra-arterial infusion of peripheral blood stem cells mobilized by granulocyte-colony stimulating factor for the osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a randomized controlled clinical trial

Cellular therapies for bone repair: current insights

Mesenchymal stem cells are core to bone homeostasis and repair. They both provide the progenitor cells from which bone cells are formed and regulate the local cytokine environment to create a pro-osteogenic environment. Dysregulation of these cells is often seen in orthopaedic pathology and can be manipulated by the physician treating the patient. This narrative review aims to describe the common applications of cell therapies to bone healing whilst also suggesting the future direction of these techniques.

Trans-Arterial Stem Cell Injection (TASI): The Role of Interventional Radiology in Regenerative Medicine

Regenerative medicine is taking a step forward in treating multiple diseases. The possibility of renewing damaged tissues with stem cells has become a topic of interest in recent decades. Still a relatively new research topic, many issues in this discipline are being addressed, from cell culturing to the study of different graft materials, and, moreover, cell delivery. For instance, direct intravenous injection has a big downfall regarding its lack of precision and poorly targeted treatment. Trans-arterial and direct percutaneous infusion to the aimed tissue/organ are both considered ideal for reaching the desired region but require image guidance to be performed safely and precisely. In this context, interventional radiology becomes pivotal for providing different cell delivery possibilities in every case. In this review, we analyze different basic stem cell therapy concepts and the current and future role of interventional radiology with a focus on trans-arterial delivery.

Comparative analysis of surgical interventions for osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Despite several surgical options, there remains no consensus regarding the optimal approach for osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH), a prevalent and refractory disease. To determine the most suitable treatment modality, we compared randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated multiple surgical treatments for ONFH using a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA).

METHODS

The outcomes of 11 different surgical treatments were assessed using NMA comparisons of the rate of progression of femoral head necrosis, the rate of conversion to total hip arthroplasty, and improvement of the Harris hip score (HHS). A random effects model was used to analyze the odds ratio (OR) or mean difference, and risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool for randomized trials. The confidence of the results was assessed using the confidence in network meta-analysis tool.

RESULTS

A total of 18 RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with core decompression (CD), the forest plot showed that autologous bone grafting (ABG), free fibula grafting (FFG), vascularized bone grafting (VBG), autologous bone grafting combined with bone marrow aspirate concentrate (ABG + BMAC), and biomaterial grafting combined with vascularized bone grafting (BMG + VBG) delayed ONFH progression. Among them, ABG + BMAC showed the most promising results (OR 0.019; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.0012-0.25). However, upon comparing CD with different surgical modalities, no significant differences were found in preventing total hip arthroplasty. Furthermore, we cannot draw conclusions regarding the HHS due to attribution and high heterogeneity across the studies.

CONCLUSION

Overall, ABG, VBG, FFG, ABG + BMAC, and BMG + VBG showed significant results in preventing ONFH progression compared with that shown by CD. Based on the surface under the cumulative ranking, ABG + BMAC was the most effective. Moreover, all treatments involving bone grafting were found to be effective, possibly indicating the necessity of its use in the treatment of ONFH.

Clinical Applications of PRP: Musculoskeletal Applications, Current Practices and Update

Musculoskeletal tissues are often subjected to deleterious effects stemming from traumatic injuries or degenerative pathologies, which can impede the body's natural repair response. The advent of regenerative medicine has emerged as a promising therapeutic approach in modern patient care. Among the interventions in this cutting-edge field, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and cell-based therapies, such as mesenchymal stem cells, have garnered significant attention. In this article, we endeavor to provide an overview of the current practices and recent developments in PRP therapy, with a particular emphasis on the clinical applications for musculoskeletal pathologies.

Extracellular vesicles from human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells prevent steroid-induced avascular necrosis of the femoral head via the PI3K/AKT pathway

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) secreted by human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (hucMSC) have excellent therapeutic potential for many diseases. The aim of this study was to define the role of hucMSC-EVs in the prevention and treatment of steroid-induced avascular necrosis of the femoral head (SANFH). After establishing the SANFH rat model, the effects of hucMSC-EVs were assessed by measuring the microstructure of the femoral head using HE staining, micro-computed tomography (micro-CT), and TUNEL staining. The administration of hucMSC-EVs caused a significant reduction to glucocorticoids (GCs)-induced osteoblast apoptosis and empty lacuna of the femoral head, while effectively improving the microstructure. HucMSC-EVs rescued the deactivation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (AKT) signaling pathway induced by GCs, and reversed the proliferation and migration of osteoblasts inhibited by GCs. In addition, hucMSC-EVs attenuated the inhibitory effects of GCs on rat osteoblast osteogenesis, angiogenesis of endothelial cells, and prevented osteoblast apoptosis. However, the promoting effects of hucMSC-EVs were abolished following the blockade of PI3K/AKT on osteoblasts. hucMSC-EVs were found to prevent glucocorticoid-induced femoral head necrosis in rats through the PI3K/AKT pathway.

Icariin-loaded 3D-printed porous Ti6Al4V reconstruction rods for the treatment of necrotic femoral heads

Avascular necrosis of the femoral head is a prevalent hip joint disease. Due to the damage and destruction of the blood supply of the femoral head, the ischemic necrosis of bone cells and bone marrow leads to the structural changes and the collapse of the femoral head. In this study, an icariin-loaded 3D-printed porous Ti6Al4V reconstruction rod (referred to as reconstruction rod) was prepared by 3D printing technology. The mechanical validity of the reconstruction rod was verified by finite element analysis. Through infilling of mercapto hyaluronic acid hydrogel containing icariin into the porous structure, the loading of icariin was achieved. The biological efficacy of the reconstruction rod was confirmed through in vitro cell experiments, which demonstrated its ability to enhance MC3T3-E1 cell proliferation and facilitate cellular adhesion and spreading. The therapeutic efficacy of the reconstruction rod was validated in vivo through a femoral head necrosis model using animal experiments. The results demonstrated that the reconstruction rod facilitated osteogenesis and neovascularization, leading to effective osseointegration between bone and implant. This study provides innovative strategy for the treatment of early avascular necrosis of the femoral head. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: The bioactivity of medical titanium alloy implants plays an important role in bone tissue engineering. This study proposed a medicine and device integrated designed porous Ti6Al4V reconstruction rod for avascular necrosis of the femoral head, whose macroscopic structure was customized by selective laser melting. The bionic porous structure of the reconstruction rod promoted the growth of bone tissue and formed an effective interface integration. Meanwhile, the loaded icariin promoted new bone and vascular regeneration, and increased the bone mass and bone density. Therefore, the implantation of reconstruction rod interfered with the further development of necrosis and provided a positive therapeutic effect. This study provides innovative strategies for the treatment of early avascular necrosis of femoral head.

Stem cell therapy combined with core decompression versus core decompression alone in the treatment of avascular necrosis of the femoral head: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Accumulated clinical trials had been focused on stem cell therapy in combination of core decompression (CD) in the treatment of avascular necrosis of the femoral head (ANFH). Nonetheless, the results were inconclusive. Here, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of previous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective studies to assess whether combined stem cell augmentation with CD improved the outcomes of ANFH compared with CD alone.

METHODS

The current study included 11 RCTs and 7 retrospective studies reporting the clinical outcomes of a total of 916 patients and 1257 hips. 557 and 700 hips received CD and CD plus stem cell therapy, respectively. To compare CD with CD plus stem cell therapy, we examined the clinical evaluating scores, the occurrence of the femoral head, radiologic progression and conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA).

RESULTS

Only 10 studies reported significantly greater improvement in hip functions while combining stem cell procedure with CD. The pooled results in subgroup analysis indicated that stem cell group had a lower collapse rate on a mid-term basis (P = 0.001), when combined with mechanical support (P < 0.00001), and with extracted stem cells (P = 0.0002). Likewise, stem cell group had a lower radiographic progression rate at 2- to 5-year follow-up [P = 0.003], when combined with structural grafting (P < 0.00001), and with extracted stem cells (P = 0.004). Stem cell therapy resulted in an overall lower THA conversion rate (P < 0.0001) except that at a follow-up longer than 5 years.

CONCLUSION

Stem cell therapy combined with core decompression was more effective in preventing collapse, radiographic progression and conversion to THA. Trial Registration The current protocol has been registered in PROSPERO with the registration number: CRD42023417248.

Application of Biomaterials in Treating Early Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head: Research Progress and Future Perspectives

Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH), a progressive pathological process of femoral head ischemia and osteocyte necrosis, is a refractory orthopedic disease caused by multiple etiologies and there is no complete cure at present. With the extension of ONFH duration, osteocyte apoptosis and trabecular bone loss can decrease the load-bearing capacity of the femoral head, which leads to the collapse of the articular cartilage and subchondral bone. Therefore, an urgent clinical need exists to develop effective treatment strategies of early-stage ONFH for maintaining the hip joint function and preventing femoral head collapse. In recent years, extensive attention has been paid to the application of diverse biomaterials in treating early ONFH for sustaining the normal morphology and function of the autologous femoral head, and slowing disease progression. Herein, we review the research progress of bone grafts, metallic materials, bioceramics, bioglasses and polymer materials for early ONFH treatment, and discuss the biological mechanisms of bone repair and regeneration in the femoral-head necrotic area. We propose suggestions for future research directions, from a special perspective of improving the local microenvironment in femoral head by facilitating vessel-associated osteoclasts (VAOs) generation and coupling of bone-specific angiogenesis and osteogenesis, as well as inhibiting bone-associated osteoclasts (BAOs) and BAO-mediated bone resorption. This review can provide ideas for the research, development, and clinical application of biomaterials for treating early ONFH. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: We believe that at least three aspects of this manuscript make it interesting to readers of the Acta Biomaterialia. First, we briefly summarize the incidence, pathogenesis, risk factors, classification criteria and treatment of early osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). Second, we review the research progress in biomaterials for early ONFH treatment and the biological mechanisms of bone repair and regeneration in femoral-head necrotic area. Third, we propose future research progress on improving the local microenvironment in femoral head by facilitating vessel-associated osteoclasts generation and coupling of bone-specific angiogenesis and osteogenesis, as well as inhibiting bone-associated osteoclasts and bone resorption. We hope this review can provide ideas for the research, development, and clinical application of biomaterials for treating early ONFH.

Regenerative medicine for osteonecrosis of the femoral head : present and future

Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2023;12(1):5-8.

The therapeutic effect of adipose-derived lipoaspirate cells in femoral head necrosis by improving angiogenesis

Femoral head necrosis (FHN), one of the most popular joint diseases in the musculoskeletal system, is usually attributed to local ischemia of the femoral head. Thus, regenerating the vascularization capacity and restoring the local perfusion of the femoral head becomes an efficient therapeutic approach for FHN. We investigated the function of autologous lipoaspirate cells (LPCs) in regenerating circulation in FHN animal models and human subjects in this study. We also explored the mechanisms of why LPCs show a superior effect than that of the bone marrow-derived stem cells (BMSCs) in vascularization. Thirty-four FHN patients were recruited for the randomized clinical trial. Harris Hip Score (HHS) and digital subtraction arteriography (DSA) and interventional technique were used to compare the efficacy of LPCs treatment and vehicle therapy in improving femoral head circulation and hip joint function. Cellular mechanism that underlies the beneficial effect of LPCs in restoring blood supply and rescuing bone architecture was further explored using canine and mouse FHN animal models. We found that LPCs perfusion through the medial circumflex artery will promote the femoral head vascularization and bone structure significantly in both FHN patients and animal models. The HHS in LPCs treated patients was significantly improved relative to vehicle group. The levels of angiogenesis factor secreted by LPCs such as VEGF, FGF2, VEC, TGF-β, were significantly higher than that of BMSCs. As the result, LPCs showed a better effect in promoting the tube structure formation of human vascular endothelial cells (HUVEC) than that of BMSCs. Moreover, LPCs contains a unique CD44⁺CD34⁺CD31⁻ population. The CD44⁺CD34⁺CD31⁻ LPCs showed significantly higher angiogenesis potential as compared to that of BMSCs. Taken together, our results show that LPCs possess a superior vascularization capacity in both autonomous and paracrine manner, indicating that autologous LPCs perfusion via the medial circumflex artery is an effective therapy for FHN.

Therapeutic effect of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells in early traumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head

Background

Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is a refractory disease due to its unclear pathomechanism. Therapies during the early stage of ONFH have not achieved satisfactory results. Therefore, this study aims to explore the available evidence for the therapeutic effect of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (HUCMSCs) on early-stage traumatic ONFH.

Methods

Early-stage traumatic ONFH was established. The femoral heads of rats were then locally administered HUCMSCs. Four weeks and eight weeks after surgery, bone repair of the necrotic area in the femoral head was analyzed to evaluate the therapeutic effect of HUCMSCs using micro-CT, histopathological staining, immunofluorescence staining, Luminex.

Results

HUCMSCs were still present in the femoral head four weeks later, and the morphological, micro-CT and histopathological outcomes in the 4-week HUCMSC-treated group were better than those in the model, NS and 8-week HUCMSC-treated groups. Local transplantation of HUCMSCs promoted bone repair and prevented bone loss in the necrotic area of the femoral head.

Conclusions

HUCMSCs can survive and positively affect the femoral head through local transplantation in early-stage traumatic ONFH. The conclusions of this study can provide a treatment option for patients who have ONFH and can serve as basic research on the advanced development of this disease.

The Translational potential of this article

The study indicated that the positive effect of exogenous HUCMSCs in the treatment of early-stage traumatic ONFH provides the solid basis and guidance for the clinical application of HUCMSCs.

Case report: Directional infusion of peripheral blood stem cells into the necrotic zone in femoral heads through the medial circumflex femoral artery: A tracing study

Objective

This study aimed to explore whether peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) infused through the medial circumflex femoral artery to treat osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) could migrate into the necrotic area of femoral head.

Methods

We collected PBSCs from a patient who had bilateral ONFH by apheresis technique using COBE spectra apheresis system (COBE BCT Inc, Lakewood, CO, USA) after subcutaneous injections of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) at a dosage of 10 μg/kg for 4 days to mobilize PBSCs. After that, 100 MBq 2-[¹⁸F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (¹⁸F-FDG) was used to label PBSCs. ¹⁸F-FDG labeled PBSCs were infused into the left femoral head via the medial circumflex femoral artery to treat ONFH. Then the patient was underwent three-dimensional positron emission tomography (3D-PET) examination 60 min after cell infusion to monitor the biological distribution of ¹⁸F-FDG-labeled PBSCs, and to observe whether the transplanted PBSCs could migrate into the necrotic area of femoral head.

Results

The total number of monouclear cells in the peripheral blood stem cell suspension was 1.95 × 10⁸ which contained 2.20 × 10⁶ CD34⁺ cells. The activity of ¹⁸F-FDG in the labeled cells was 1.8Bq/10³ monouclear cells. 3D-PET imaging showed that ¹⁸F-FDG radioactivity was detected in the necrotic area of femoral head, acetabulum and femoral bone marrow cavity after transplantation of ¹⁸F-FDG-labeled PBSCs via the medial circumflex femoral artery. It is worth noting that although PBSCs labeled with ¹⁸F-FDG were widely distributed around the hip, such as femoral bone marrow cavity, femoral head and acetabulum, PBSCs were generally located in the necrotic area of femoral head.

Conclusions

PBSCs could enter into the femoral head and migrate into the necrotic field of femoral head participating in the repair of osteonecrosis after infusion through the medial circumflex femoral artery.

Peripheral Blood-Derived Stem Cells for the Treatment of Cartilage Injuries: A Systematic Review

Background: The treatment of cartilage damage is a hot topic at present, and cell therapy is an emerging alternative therapy. Stem cells derived from peripheral blood have become the focus of current research due to the ease of obtaining materials and a wide range of sources.

Methods: We used a text search strategy using the [“mesenchymal stem cells” (MeSH term) OR “MSC” OR “BMMSC” OR “PBMSC” OR” PBMNC” OR “peripheral blood stem cells”] AND (cartilage injury [MeSH term] OR “cartilage” OR “chondral lesion”). After searching the literature, through the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the last included articles were systematically reviewed.

Result: We found that peripheral blood-derived stem cells have chondrogenic differentiation ability and can induce chondrogenic differentiation and repair in vivo and have statistical significance in clinical and imaging prognosis. It is an improvement of academic differences. Compared with the bone marrow, peripheral blood is easier to obtain, widely sourced, and simple to obtain. In the future, peripheral blood will be a more potential cell source for cell therapy in the treatment of cartilage damage.

Conclusion: Stem cells derived from peripheral blood can repair cartilage and are an important resource for the treatment of cartilage damage in the future. The specific mechanism and way of repairing cartilage need further study.

Nonoperative and Operative Bone and Cartilage Regeneration and Orthopaedic Biologics of the Hip: An Orthoregeneration Network (ON) Foundation Hip Review

Orthoregeneration is defined as a solution for orthopaedic conditions that harnesses the benefits of biology to improve healing, reduce pain, improve function, and, optimally, provide an environment for tissue regeneration. Options include drugs, surgical intervention, scaffolds, biologics as a product of cells, and physical and electromagnetic stimuli. The goal of regenerative medicine is to enhance the healing of tissue after musculoskeletal injuries as both isolated treatment and adjunct to surgical management, using novel therapies to improve recovery and outcomes. Various orthopaedic biologics (orthobiologics) have been investigated for the treatment of pathology involving the hip, including osteonecrosis (aseptic necrosis) involving bone marrow, bone, and cartilage, and chondral injuries involving articular cartilage, synovium, and bone marrow. Promising and established treatment modalities for osteonecrosis include nonweightbearing; pharmacological treatments including low molecular-weight heparin, prostacyclin, statins, bisphosphonates, and denosumab, a receptor activator of nuclear factor-kB ligand inhibitor; extracorporeal shock wave therapy; pulsed electromagnetic fields; core decompression surgery; cellular therapies including bone marrow aspirate comprising mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs aka mesenchymal stem cells) and bone marrow autologous concentrate, with or without expanded or cultured cells, and possible addition of bone morphogenetic protein-2, vascular endothelial growth factor, and basic fibroblast growth factor; and arterial perfusion of MSCs that may be combined with addition of carriers or scaffolds including autologous MSCs cultured with beta-tricalcium phosphate ceramics associated with a free vascularized fibula. Promising and established treatment modalities for chondral lesions include autologous platelet-rich plasma; hyaluronic acid; MSCs (in expanded or nonexpanded form) derived from bone marrow or other sources such as fat, placenta, umbilical cord blood, synovial membrane, and cartilage; microfracture or microfracture augmented with membrane containing MSCs, collagen, HA, or synthetic polymer; mosaicplasty; 1-stage autologous cartilage translation (ACT) or 2-stage ACT using 3-dimensional spheroids; and autologous cartilage grafting; chondral flap repair, or flap fixation with fibrin glue. Hip pain is catastrophic in young patients, and promising therapies offer an alternative to premature arthroplasty. This may address both physical and psychological components of pain; the goal is to avoid or postpone an artificial joint. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, expert opinion.

Cell therapy for osteonecrosis of femoral head and joint preservation

Osteonecrosis of femoral head (ONFH) is a disease of the femoral head and can cause femoral head collapse and arthritis. This can lead to pain and gait disorders. ONFH has various risk factors, it is often progressive, and if untreated results in secondary osteo-arthritis. Biological therapy makes use of bone marrow concentrate, cultured osteoblast and mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) obtained from various sources. These are often used in conjunction with core decompression surgery. In this review article, we discuss the current status of cell therapy and its limitations. We also present the future development of biological approach to treat ONFH.

Efficacy of various core decompression techniques versus non-operative treatment for osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a systemic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

Various Joint-preserving therapy (JPT) methods have been performed and tried in recent decades, but their results and efficacy were inconsistent and controversial. The purpose of this study is to evaluate its effectiveness and whether there are statistical differences in treatment between different interventions based on published RCT studies.

Methods

Following the PRISMA-NMA checklist, Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched and collected related RCT studies. The sources were searched from inception up to October 30, 2020. The primary outcomes including the rate of radiographic progression and conversion to THA and the secondary outcome -Harris Hip Scores (HHS) were extracted and compared in a Network meta-analysis.

Results

Seventeen RCT studies involving 784 patients (918 hips) with seven interventions including CD (core decompression), CD + BG (bone graft), CD + TI (tantalum rod implantation), CD + CT (Cell therapy), CD + BG + CT, VBG (vascularized bone graft), and nonsurgical or conservative treatment for ONFH were evaluated. In the radiographic progression results, CD + CT showed a relatively better result than CD, CD + BG and non-surgical treatment, the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) plot displayed that CD + CT (96.4%) was the best, followed by CD (64.1%).In conversion to THA results, there were no significant differences between the JPT methods and non-surgical treatment. In HHS, there was also no significant difference, other than CD + BG showed a statistical difference than non-surgical treatment only in terms of Cis, but the SUCRA was highest in non-surgical treatment (80.5%) followed by CD + CT (72.8%).

Conclusions

This Net-work meta-analysis demonstrated that there was no statistical difference in the outcome of radiographic progression and conversion to THA, also in HHS, other than CD + CT showed a relatively superior result in radiographic progression than nonsurgical treatment, namely, it’s maybe an effective method for delaying disease progression or reducing disease development based on current evidence.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-021-04808-2.

Efficacy and Safety of Stem Cell Combination Therapy for Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

The treatment results of core decompression (CD) and biomechanical support are not always satisfactory in osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). Stem cell therapy has been incorporated into traditional treatment in order to promote bone regeneration. The efficacy and safety of stem cell therapy combined with CD or biomechanical support on advanced and long-term patients with ONFH were unknown. The aim of this study was to assess whether stem cell combination therapy is superior to single CD or porous tantalum rod implantation treatment in ONFH.

Methods

A systematic search of the literature was performed to evaluate all included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on stem cell combination therapy for patients with ONFH in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase sites. We assessed the quality and risk of bias for the included studies. And the outcomes of Harris hip score (HHS), visual analogue scale (VAS), and adverse events were statistically analyzed.

Results

We included 10 randomized controlled trials, containing a total of 498 patients with 719 hips. Stem cell therapy combined with CD versus CD alone for HHS of ONFH was different (MD = 8.87, 95% CI = [5.53, 12.22], P < 0.00001). The combination of stem cell therapy and CD can effectively improve HHS. Similarly, the VAS of the stem cell combination therapy group also differed compared with the control group (MD = -14.07, 95% CI = [-18.32, -9.82], P < 0.00001). The result showed that stem cell combination therapy can relieve the pain of patients with ONFH. There was no significant difference in adverse response outcome events between the combination therapy group and the control group (RR = 1.57, 95% CI = [0.62, 3.97], P = 0.34).

Conclusions

Stem cell therapy combined with core decompression is an effective and feasible method with few complications in the clinical treatment of early-stage ONFH. Even in the combination of porous tantalum rod implantation and peripheral blood stem cells, stem cell combination therapy is superior to single biomechanical support treatment. But high-quality, large-sample, multicenter, and long-term follow-up RCTs are still needed to corroborate the efficacy and safety of stem cell combination therapy in ONFH treatment.

Porous copper- and lithium-doped nano-hydroxyapatite composite scaffold promotes angiogenesis and bone regeneration in the repair of glucocorticoids-induced osteonecrosis of the femoral head

Glucocorticoids-induced osteonecrosis of the femoral head (GIONFH) is a common refractory disease. In the present study, we aimed to synthesize the nano-hydroxyapatite-copper-lithium (Cu-Li-nHA) composite porous scaffold to promote osteogenesis and angiogenesis functions to repair GIONFH by regulating the Wnt/β-catenin and HIF-1α/VEGF pathways. The physicochemical property of the scaffold was characterized and their osteogenic and angiogenic effects were tested through a serial of experimentsin vitroandin vivo. Results showed that 0.25% Cu-Li-nHA scaffolds possessed the highest mechanical and biocompatibilityin vitro. Then the 0.25% Cu-Li-nHA scaffolds significantly enhanced the new bone formation on defects in GIONFH rabbitsin vivo. Moreover, the scaffold could increase the expression of osteogenic and angiogenic factors along with the activation of factors in Wnt/β-catenin and HIF-1α/VEGF pathwaysin vitroandin vivo. In conclusion, the 0.25% Cu-Li-nHA scaffold could improve the osteogenesis and angiogenesis by upregulating the Wnt/β-catenin and HIF-1α/VEGF pathways which benefited to repair the GIONFH in rabbit models.

Bone Marrow Multipotent Mesenchymal Stromal Cells as Autologous Therapy for Osteonecrosis: Effects of Age and Underlying Causes

Bone marrow (BM) is a reliable source of multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs), which have been successfully used for treating osteonecrosis. Considering the functional advantages of BM-MSCs as bone and cartilage reparatory cells and supporting angiogenesis, several donor-related factors are also essential to consider when autologous BM-MSCs are used for such regenerative therapies. Aging is one of several factors contributing to the donor-related variability and found to be associated with a reduction of BM-MSC numbers. However, even within the same age group, other factors affecting MSC quantity and function remain incompletely understood. For patients with osteonecrosis, several underlying factors have been linked to the decrease of the proliferation of BM-MSCs as well as the impairment of their differentiation, migration, angiogenesis-support and immunoregulatory functions. This review discusses the quality and quantity of BM-MSCs in relation to the etiological conditions of osteonecrosis such as sickle cell disease, Gaucher disease, alcohol, corticosteroids, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, diabetes, chronic renal disease and chemotherapy. A clear understanding of the regenerative potential of BM-MSCs is essential to optimize the cellular therapy of osteonecrosis and other bone damage conditions.

Correlation between continuation of glucocorticoid treatment and risk of femoral head collapse : A retrospective cohort study of patients with glucocorticoid-induced osteonecrosis of femoral head after hip-preserving interventions

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the correlation between continuation of glucocorticoid (GC) treatment and risk of femoral head collapse in patients with glucocorticoid-induced osteonecrosis of the femoral head (GIONFH) after hip-preserving interventions.

METHODS

The cohort included patients with GIONFH who had received a hip-preserving intervention between 1 January 2014 and 1 April 2016. All hips were at the non-collapse stage. The independent variable and the dependent variable were postoperative GC use and femoral head collapse (≥3 mm), respectively. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression were performed to estimate the association of the variables after adjusting for other covariates.

RESULTS

A total of 27 hips (24 patients) were included for the final data analysis of which 6 hips out of 18 developed femoral head collapse (≥3 mm) in patients who discontinued taking GC postoperatively and 6 hips out of 9 developed collapse (≥3 mm) in those requiring GC treatment postoperatively. In the fully adjusted Cox proportional hazards model, the risk of femoral head collapse (≥3 mm) was higher in participants requiring postoperative GC use than those not requiring GC (hazard ratio, HR 3.7, 95% confidence interval, CI 1.1-13.0).

CONCLUSION

The results of this study demonstrated that patients with GIONFH who continued GC treatment postoperatively had a significantly increased risk of femoral head collapse (≥3 mm) compared to those who discontinued use of GC.

Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head Safely Healed with Autologous, Expanded, Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stromal Cells in a Multicentric Trial with Minimum 5 Years Follow-Up

Background: Osteonecrosis (ON) of the femoral head represents a potentially severe disease of the hip where the lack of bone regeneration may lead to femoral head collapse and secondary osteoarthritis, with serious pain and disability. The aim of this European, multicentric clinical trial was to prove safety and early efficacy to heal early femoral head ON in patients through minimally invasive surgical implantation of autologous mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) expanded from bone marrow (BM) under good manufacturing practices (GMP). Methods: Twenty-two patients with femoral head ON (up to ARCO 2C) were recruited and surgically treated in France, Germany, Italy and Spain with BM-derived, expanded autologous MSC (total dose 140 million MSC in 7 mL). The investigational advanced therapy medicinal product (ATMP) was expanded from BM under the same protocol in all four countries and approved by each National Competent Authority. Patients were followed during two years for safety, based on adverse events, and for efficacy, based on clinical assessment (pain and hip score) and imaging (X-rays and MRIs). Patients were also reviewed after 5 to 6 years at latest follow-up for final outcome. Results: No severe adverse event was recalled as related to the ATMP. At 12 months, 16/20 per protocol and 16/22 under intention-to-treat (2 drop-out at 3 and 5 months) maintained head sphericity and showed bone regeneration. Of the 4 hips with ON progression, 3 required total hip replacement (THR). At 5 years, one patient (healed at 2 years visit) was not located, and 16/21 showed no progression or THR, 4/21 had received THR (all in the first year) and 1 had progressed one stage without THR. Conclusions: Expanded MSCs implantation was safe. Early efficacy was confirmed in 80% of cases under protocol at 2 years. At 5 years, the overall results were maintained and 19% converted to THR, all in the first year.

Addition of Bone Marrow Stem Cells Therapy Achieves Better Clinical Outcomes and Lower Rates of Disease Progression Compared With Core Decompression Alone for Early Stage Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is a cause of hip pain and early joint arthrosis in the young patient. Nonarthroplasty interventions aim to decompress vascular congestion in the femoral head and stimulate new bone growth to prevent progression and collapse. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to evaluate the available evidence on the effect of adjuvant bone marrow stem cells (BMSCs) for early stage ONFH.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of the MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases in search of published reports comparing the core decompression (CD) with/without adjuvant BMSCs for ONFH. The cohort was divided into two groups: (1) CD with BMSCs (intervention) and (2) CD alone (control subject). The various outcome parameters including hip pain and function, progression of ONFH, rate of revision surgeries, and complications were analyzed. Data were extracted and aggregated for meta-analysis. Cases with staging beyond Ficat II, UPENN II, or ARCO II were excluded.

RESULTS

Of the published reports, 16 met our inclusion criteria with an aggregated 583 hips in the intervention and 468 hips in the control subject groups, respectively. Addition of bone marrow cells to CD resulted in lower hip pain score (VAS) (MD = -10.88, 95% CI = -16.84 to -4.92, P = 0.003) and higher HHS score (MD = 5.59, 95% CI = 1.13 to 10.04, P = 0.01) compared with CD alone at the 24-month follow-up. For rates of progression to higher stages, 138 progressed in the intervention group compared with 202 in the control subject group (P = 0.0002). Finally, subsequent patients who required total hip arthroplasty surgery were lower in the intervention group (22.5% versus 42.3%, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite heterogeneous and poor data, there is evidence that addition of bone marrow cells to CD appears to result in better clinical outcomes and lower rates of disease progression compared with cored decompression alone.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III.

Stem cell therapy for osteonecrosis of femoral head: Opportunities and challenges

Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is a progressive disease with a complex etiology and unclear pathogenesis, resulting in severe hip pain and dysfunction mainly observed in young patients. Although total hip arthroplasty (THA) is the most effective treatment for patients with ONFH in the terminal stage, the results of THA in young patients or active populations are often not favorable, with some complications related to the prosthesis. With the development of biotechnology, an increasing number of studies pay attention to use of stem cells for the treatment of ONFH. Stem cells are characterized by the ability to self-renew and differentiate into multiple cell types, including differentiation into osteoblasts and endothelial cells to mediate bone repair and angiogenesis. Furthermore, stem cells can offer growth factors to promote blood supply in the necrotic regions by paracrine effects. Therefore, stem cell therapy has become one of the hip-preserving alternatives for ONFH. This review summarized the current trends in stem cell therapy for ONFH, from clinical applications to related basic research, and showed that an increasing number of studies have confirmed the effectiveness of stem cell therapy in ONFH. However, many unsolved problems and challenges in practical applications of stem cell therapy still exist, such as patient selection, standardized procedures, safety assessment, and the fate of transplanted cells in the body. Additional studies are required to find ideal cell sources, appropriate transplantation methods, and the optimal number of cells for transplantation.

•

Diversities in repair processes present a challenge in the targeted treatment of ONFH.

•

Osteogenesis and angiogenesis are the primary mechanisms of MSCs treatment in ONFH.

•

Systematic safety assessment and cell tracing are necessary for stem cell therapy.

•

Optimal numbers and methods of cell transplantation need to be further confirmed.

Efficacy and safety of stem cell therapy for the early-stage osteonecrosis of femoral head: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

Osteonecrosis of femoral head (ONFH) is a seriously degenerative disease with no effective therapies to slow its progression. Several studies have reported short-term efficacy of stem cells on early-stage ONFH. However, its long-term effect was still unclear especially on progression events. This study was performed to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of stem cells and analyze its optimal age group and cell number.

Methods

Our review was registered on PROSPERO (http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO), registration number CRD42020136094. Following PRISMA guideline, we searched 8 electronic databases on January 5, 2020, and rigorous random controlled trials (RCTs) utilizing stem cell therapy on early-stage ONFH were included. Quality and bias were analyzed. Pooled analysis was performed to assess difference between various outcomes.

Results

A total of 13 RCTs (619 patients with 855 hips) were included. The application of stem cells significantly delayed collapse of femoral head(I², 70%; RR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.89; P < .00001) and total hip replacement (THR) (I², 68%; RR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.90; P = .02) in the long term. It effectively decreased the events of collapse of femoral head (≥ 60 months) (I², 0%; RR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.49; P < .00001) and THR (> 36 months) (I², 0%; RR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.44; P < .00001). There existed a beneficial effect for patients under 40 (Collapse of femoral head: I², 56%; RR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.76; P = .004) (THR: I², 0%; RR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.42; P < .00001). In addition, quantity of stem cells at 10⁸ magnitude had better effects on disease progression events (I², 0%; RR, 0.34; 95%CI, 0.16 to 0.74; P = .007). Besides, there were no significant differences on adverse events between the stem cell group and control group (I², 0%; RR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.39 to 1.73; P = .60).

Conclusion

Our findings build solid evidence that stem cell therapy could be expected to have a long-term effect on preventing early-stage ONFH patients from progression events, such as collapse of femoral head and total hip replacement. Furthermore, patients under 40 may be an ideal age group and the optimal cell number could be at 10⁸ magnitude for this therapy. Further studies including strict RCTs are required to evaluate a clear effect of stem cells on ideal patient profile and the procedures of implantation.

Comparison of core decompression and porous tantalum rod implantation with conservative treatment for avascular necrosis of the femoral head: A minimum 18 month follow-up study

Porous tantalum rod implantation is a novel surgical method that is used to treat avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral head (hip). In the present study, the results of core decompression and tantalum rod implantation were compared with non-surgical treatment for AVN, and the survivorship of the femoral head was evaluated. In total, 60 patients with AVN femoral head were recruited and analysed. Non-surgical treatment was selected by 30 patients (41 hips), 7 with a Ficat score of I and 23 with a score of II. Non-surgical treatment included celecoxib, salvia miltiorrhiza and tetramethylypyrazine and a reduction in weight-bearing activities. Surgical treatment and porous tantalum rod implantation were selected by 30 patients (41 hips), 10 with a Ficat score of I and 20 with a score of II. After follow-up (average: 33.5 months), patients were evaluated by assessing post-operative complications, radiology, hip survivorship and Harris hip score. In the surgical group, pre-operative symptoms were significantly alleviated. No complications, including infection, delayed healing or fractures were reported. Final follow-up rates of femoral head survivorship were 4.9% in the non-surgical group and 36.7% in the surgical group. The Harris hip score was significantly improved following surgery when compared with non-surgical treatment (P<0.05). The results indicated that core decompression and porous tantalum rod implantation are beneficial short- and mid-term treatment methods for AVN of the femoral head.

Engineered three-dimensional scaffolds for enhanced bone regeneration in osteonecrosis

Osteonecrosis, which is typically induced by trauma, glucocorticoid abuse, or alcoholism, is one of the most severe diseases in clinical orthopedics. Osteonecrosis often leads to joint destruction, and arthroplasty is eventually required. Enhancement of bone regeneration is a critical management strategy employed in osteonecrosis therapy. Bone tissue engineering based on engineered three-dimensional (3D) scaffolds with appropriate architecture and osteoconductive activity, alone or functionalized with bioactive factors, have been developed to enhance bone regeneration in osteonecrosis. In this review, we elaborate on the ideal properties of 3D scaffolds for enhanced bone regeneration in osteonecrosis, including biocompatibility, degradability, porosity, and mechanical performance. In addition, we summarize the development of 3D scaffolds alone or functionalized with bioactive factors for accelerating bone regeneration in osteonecrosis and discuss their prospects for translation to clinical practice.

•

Engineered three-dimensional scaffolds boost bone regeneration in osteonecrosis.

•

The ideal properties of three-dimensional scaffolds for osteonecrosis treatment are discussed.

•

Bioactive factors-functionalized three-dimensional scaffolds are promising bone regeneration devices for osteonecrosis management.

•

The challenges and opportunities of engineered three-dimensional scaffolds for osteonecrosis therapy are predicted.

Prognosis after autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for osteonecrosis of the femoral head in the pre-collapse stage: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

Autologous peripheral blood stem cell (auto-PBSC) transplantation is an effective therapeutic for the osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) but without prognosis estimation. This study mainly aimed to (1) determine whether auto-PBSC transplantation is a promising option, (2) assess the risk of hip-preservation failure, (3) achieve a predictive model of femoral head survival after the intervention, and (4) eventually identify clinical indications for auto-PBSC transplantation in future.

METHODS

After reviewing the in-patient database of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medicine University from June 2012 to June 2014, 37 eligible patients with Association Research Circulation Osseous stage I or II ONFH who were receiving intra-arterial infusion of auto-PBSCs were recruited. A case form was designed to retrieve relevant data. Hip-preservation failure was defined as the endpoint. All participants were stratified by the categorical risk of collapse, which was statistically tested through log-rank analysis. All significant factors were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression model, and a predictive nomogram plot was generated.

RESULTS

In total, 47 hips were followed up for 53.96 ± 21.09 months; the median survival time was 60.18 months. Among the predictors, body mass index (BMI; P = 0.0015) and Harris hip score (HHS; P < 0.0001) independently affected femoral head survival. Patients with BMI ≥ 24 kg/m² exhibited a 2.58 times higher risk of hip-preservation failure [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.32-5.45] than those with BMI < 24 kg/m², whereas those with HHS ≥ 70 exhibited a 0.19 times lower risk (95% CI, 0.09-0.38) than those with HHS < 70. Hazard ratios associated with age (P = 0.042), BMI (P = 0.012), HHS (P = 0.022), and necrotic volume (P = 0.000) were 1.038 (95% CI, 1.001-1.075), 1.379 (95% CI, 1.072-1.773), 0.961 (95% CI, 0.928-0.994), and 1.258 (95% CI, 1.120-1.412), respectively. A nomogram plot (score test P = 0.000; C-index = 0.8863) was available for the orthopedic doctor to predict hip survival probability.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that intra-arterial infusion of auto-PBSCs prolongs femoral head survival. Age, BMI, HHS, and necrotic volume can influence the efficacy of this intervention. This study was approved by ethics committee of the trial center, number 2019-KL-075-01.

Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Therapy Does Not Improve Outcomes of Femoral Head Osteonecrosis With Cap-Shaped Separated Cartilage Defect

A combination treatment with porous tantalum rod implantation and intra-arterial infusion of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) provides a promise for treating early and intermediate stages of osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). However, its clinical indications and application restrictions remain unclear. This study aims to determine the clinical, histological, and radiological outcomes of a combination treatment using mechanical support and a targeted intra-arterial infusion of PBSCs for painful ONFH with a cap-shaped separation (CSS) cartilage defect. Compared with the standard pain management (control group), this combination treatment did not improve the Harris Hip Score (HHS) at 36 months. Micro-CT and histologic analyses showed severe focal destruction in all CSS-ONFH femoral heads in both the combination and control groups. Femoral heads showed a higher percentage of bone lesions in the combination treatment group than in the control group. There was no significant difference in osteoclast number in the subchondral bone areas between the two groups. A high level of expression of inflammatory cytokines, including tumor necrosis factor-α and interleukin-1β, was detected in blood vessels around the subchondral bone in both groups. The RANKL/OPG (receptor activator of the nuclear factor-kB ligand/osteoprotegerin) ratio was also similar between the control and combination treatment groups. Our results indicate that this combination treatment is not an effective method for the treatment of patients with painful CSS-ONFH. Moreover, this combination treatment did not inhibit inflammatory osteoclastogenesis in patients with more advanced disease. © 2019 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 38:269-276, 2020.

[Update of the German S3 guideline on atraumatic femoral head necrosis in adults]

The update of the German S3 guideline on atraumatic femoral head necrosis in adults aims to provide an overview of diagnosis and treatment. All clinical studies, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses published in German or English between 01.05.2013 and 30.04.2017 were included. Of 427 studies, 28 were suitable for analysis. Risk factors are corticosteroids, chemotherapy, kidney transplants, hemoglobinopathies, and alcoholism. Differential diagnoses are for example bone marrow edema, insufficiency fracture, and destructive arthropathy. Radiography should be performed upon clinical suspicion. In patients with normal radiography findings but persistent complaints, magnetic resonance imaging (ARCO classification) is the method of choice. Computed tomography (CT) can be used to confirm/exclude articular surface collapse. A subchondral sclerosis zone >30% in CT indicates a better prognosis. Left untreated, a subchondral fracture will develop within 2 years. The risk of disease development in the opposite side is high during the first 2 years, but unlikely thereafter. In conservative therapy, iloprost and alendronate can be used in a curative approach, the latter for small, primarily medial necrosis. Conservative therapy alone as well as other drug-based and physical approaches are not suitable for treatment. No particular joint-preserving surgery can currently be recommended. Core decompression should be performed in early stages with <30% necrosis. From ARCO stage IIIc or in stage IV, the indication for total hip arthroplasty should be checked. Results after total hip arthroplasty are comparable with those after coxarthrosis, although the revision rate is higher due to the relatively young age of patients. Statements on the effectiveness of cell-based therapies such as expanded stem cells or bone marrow aspirates cannot currently be made.

A Retrospective Study to Compare the Efficacy and Postoperative Outcome of Total Hip Arthroplasty with Internal Screw Fixation in Patients with Avascular Necrosis of the Femoral Head

Background

This retrospective study compared the effects of total hip arthroplasty (THA) and traditional surgery using internal screw fixation for the treatment of avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral head.

Material/Methods

Two hundred and seventy patients with bilateral AVN of the femoral head were admitted for elective surgery, and 176 patients underwent THA (the THA group), and 94 patients underwent closed reduction screw fixation (the traditional surgery group). The Harris hip score (HHS) was used pre-operatively and to evaluate postoperative outcome.

Results

The mean operation time in the traditional surgery group (82.6±15.6 min) was significantly less compared with the THA group (104.8±14.2 min) (P=0.001). Intraoperative blood loss in the traditional surgery group (219.8±21.6 mL) was significantly less compared with the THA group (339.4±29.4 mL) (P=0.001). After treatment, the mean HHS score of the THA group (76.5±9.2 points) was significantly increased when compared with the traditional surgery group (61.4±10.5 points) (P=0.001). Disease recurrence rate in the THA group was significantly reduced compared with the traditional surgery group (P=0.001). The mean quality of life score of the THA group (85.5±6.4 points) was significantly higher than that of the traditional surgery group (73.4±8.8 points) (P=0.001).

Conclusions

Compared with closed reduction screw fixation, THA for AVN of the femoral head effectively reduced the length of hospital stay, time to recovery, and achieved an improved clinical outcome.

Multiscale Stem Cell Technologies for Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head

The last couple of decades have seen brilliant progress in stem cell therapies, including native, genetically modified, and engineered stem cells, for osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). In vitro studies evaluate the effect of endogenous or exogenous factor or gene regulation on osteogenic phenotype maintenance and/or differentiation towards osteogenic lineage. The preclinical and clinical outcomes accelerate the clinical translation. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells and adipose-derived stem cells have demonstrated better effects in the treatment of femoral head necrosis. Various materials have been used widely in the ONFH treatment in both preclinical and clinical trials. In a word, in vivo and multiscale efforts are expected to overcome obstacles in the approaches for treating ONFH and provide clinical relevance and commercial strategies in the future. Therefore, we will discuss the above aspects in this paper and present our opinions.

Office-Based Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy for the Treatment of Musculoskeletal Disease: A Systematic Review of Recent Human Studies

Background

The use of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in clinical applications for the treatment of musculoskeletal disease is steadily increasing in office-based practice. The so-called “first generation” of MSCs is defined as autologous stem cells that have undergone minimal manipulation and are used for a homologous purpose. Systematic reviews of the clinical trials completed to date of such MSCs enable practitioners to better understand what is currently known about the outcomes and side effects of such treatments.

Study Design

A systematic review of human clinical studies of office-based MSC therapy for the treatment of painful degenerative musculoskeletal conditions.

Methods

A search of the Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus databases was conducted from 2006 through September 2016. Seven hundred sixty-one records were identified from database searching, and two records from reference review of included papers. Studies with human subjects that evaluated treatment of musculoskeletal disease with minimally manipulated MSCs were included.

Results

Eight studies were included in this review based on selection criteria. A total of 941 patients were included, 841 of whom received cellular products, and no significant adverse events were reported. Symptomatology generally improved, though no differences were seen over controls where present.

Conclusion

Support in the literature is strongest for the use of bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) injections for the treatment of knee pain, but applications of the use of BMAC and peripheral blood–derived MSCs for the treatment of hip pain, tendon pain, and disc pain have all been reported. Further research is required, with large randomized controlled trials.

Stem cell therapy for treating osteonecrosis of the femoral head: From clinical applications to related basic research

Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is a refractory disease that is associated with collapse of the femoral head, with a risk of hip arthroplasty in younger populations. Thus, there has been an increased focus on early interventions for ONFH that aim to preserve the native articulation. Stem cell therapy is a promising treatment, and an increasing number of recent studies have focused on this topic. Many clinical studies have reported positive outcomes of stem cell therapy for the treatment of ONFH. To improve the therapeutic effects of this approach, many related basic research studies have also been performed. However, some issues must be further explored, such as the appropriate patient selection procedure, the optimal stem cell selection protocol, the ideal injection number, and the safety of stem cell therapy. The purpose of this review is to summarize the available clinical studies and basic research related to stem cell therapy for ONFH.

[Cell-based and future therapeutic strategies for femoral head necrosis]

BACKGROUND

The application of cell- and growth factor-based techniques in conjunction with conventional surgical approaches has great therapeutic potential for the treatment of avascular necrosis of the femoral head (AVNFH).

OBJECTIVES

This review provides an overview of new strategies for the treatment of AVNFH, with emphasis on cell and growth factor-based approaches.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The results of a literature search are summarised, the most relevant publications are presented and discussed by the authors.

RESULTS

In the focus of new strategies for treatment of AVNFH are bone marrow-derived cell concentrates and ex vivo-expanded mesenchymal stem cells. Besides local application during core decompression, the systemic administration of cells via blood vessels supplying the femoral head is an interesting approach. The application of osteogenic and angiogenic growth factor-laden scaffold materials has also been clinically tested. Initial results of randomised clinical trials using cell- and growth factor-based approaches underline the potential of these innovative therapeutic strategies. Cell-based therapies are governed by EU law and generally require a manufacturing authorization.

CONCLUSION

To date, only few randomized controlled clinical trials are available which additionally display a considerable diversity concerning cell parameters, cell processing, adjuvant surgical techniques and the quality outcome parameters. Therefore, a final statement about the effectiveness of new cell and growth factor-based strategies is currently not possible.

The role of cell therapies and hip arthroscopy in the management of osteonecrosis: an update

The exact pathophysiology of osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is still unknown. There is evidence to suggest that in ON there is decreased population and altered function of the mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) of the femoral head. This could influence both the actual occurrence of ON itself and the repair process that follows. Hence, in such an environment it only is rational to consider the use of cell-based treatments to potentially regenerate lost or damaged bone. The aim of this review is to provide an up-to-date, evidence-based information in the use of cell therapies in the treatment of nontraumatic ONFH and the use of hip arthroscopy in the field.

Effectiveness of various hip preservation treatments for non-traumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Non-traumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is a refractory osteonecrosis disease caused by an abnormal blood supply to bone tissue. However, therapeutic hip preservation strategies are diverse, and the therapeutic outcomes are not ideal.

OBJECTIVE

A network meta-analysis was performed to assess the effect of hip preservation treatments on non-traumatic ONFH.

METHODS

We searched public electronic databases through May 15, 2017 using the following keywords: "femoral head necrosis osteonecrosis"; "femoral head osteonecrosis"; "osteonecrosis of femoral head"; "avascular necrosis of femoral head"; "necrosis of femoral"; and "random*". The primary outcome in the present analysis was the treatment failure rate. Secondary outcomes included the Harris hip and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores.

RESULTS

We included 21 articles assessing a total of 1415 hips in our analysis. In the network meta-analysis, the treatments were ranked by the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). Core decompression (CD) plus cytotherapy was most likely to reduce the treatment failure rate (SUCRA score = 18.9%), followed by alendronate treatment (SUCRA score = 17.8%), cocktail treatments (SUCRA score = 15.6%), extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) plus alendronate (SUCRA score = 15.4%), and avascular biomaterials plus cytotherapy (SUCRA score = 13.8%) in a frequentist framework; similar results were obtained in a Bayesian framework. For the secondary outcomes, ESWT was most likely to improve the Harris hip score (SUCRA score = 33.7%), followed by ESWT plus alendronate (SUCRA score = 33.1%) and cocktail (SUCRA score = 19.6%) treatments in a frequentist framework. A traditional analysis showed that the effect of CD plus cytotherapy was significantly better than the effect of CD alone in improving the WOMAC score (SMD, -6.01; 95% CI, -7.81 to -4.22; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

CD plus cytotherapy is a relatively superior treatment for reducing treatment failure rates in early and intermediate ONFH patients, and ESWT is the most effective treatment for improving Harris hip scores.

The biological basis for concentrated iliac crest aspirate to enhance core decompression in the treatment of osteonecrosis

Core decompression is a surgical procedure that is capable of salvaging the patient's own natural joint, if the operation is performed in the early stages of osteonecrosis, in which the articular surface has not collapsed. The addition of concentrated cells, aspirated from the iliac crest, to the core tract has been shown to enhance the viability of the femoral head, although large, prospective, randomized, blinded multicentre studies are lacking. The rationale for adding these cells to the core decompression tract is to provide osteoprogenitor and vascular progenitor cells to the area of decompressed dead bone, in order to facilitate tissue regeneration and repair. It has become increasingly evident that vast discrepancies exist in different series in regard to the criteria for patient selection, the surgical technique of core decompression, the methods for harvesting, processing, and injecting the cells, and the methodology for determining success or failure in a specific patient cohort. This paper reviews the salient points relevant to the treatment of osteonecrosis by core decompression with addition of concentrated iliac crest aspirates and poses important questions regarding the future successful application of this technique.

Regenerative therapies increase survivorship of avascular necrosis of the femoral head: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to document the available evidence on the use of regenerative techniques for the treatment of femoral head osteonecrosis (or avascular necrosis of femoral head, AVN) and to understand their benefit compared to core decompression (CD) alone in avoiding failure and the need for total hip replacement (THR).

METHODS

The search was conducted on three medical electronic databases according to PRISMA guidelines. The studies reporting number and timing of failures were included in a meta-analysis calculating cumulative survivorship with a Kaplan-Mayer curve. Moreover, the results on failures in treatment groups reported in RCT were compared with those documented in control groups, in order to understand the benefit of biological therapies compared to CD for the treatment of AVN.

RESULTS

Forty-eight studies were included in this systematic review, reporting results of different types of regenerative techniques: mesenchymal stem cell implantation in the osteonecrotic area, intra-arterial infiltration with mesenchymal stem cells, implantation of bioactive molecules, or platelet-rich plasma. Overall, reported results were good, with a cumulative survivorship of 80% after ten year follow-up, and better results when regenerative treatments were combined to CD compared to CD alone (89.9% vs 70.6%, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Regenerative therapies offer good clinical results for the treatment of AVN. The combination of CD with regenerative techniques provides a significant improvement in terms of survivorship over time compared with CD alone. Further studies are needed to identify the best procedure and the most suitable patients to benefit from regenerative treatments for AVN.

Analysis of Cell Therapies Used in Clinical Trials for the Treatment of Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head: A Systematic Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is associated with regional loss of cells within bone, often resulting in pain and mechanical collapse. Our purpose was to analyze the cell-therapies used in clinical trials for the treatment of ONFH with regard to (1) cell-sources, (2) collection techniques, (3) cell-processing, (4) qualitative and quantitative characterizations, and (5) delivery methods.

METHODS

A systematic review of the current literature on the use of cell therapies for the treatment of ONFH was performed. Studies with a level-of-evidence III or higher were evaluated. A total of 1483 articles were screened. Eleven studies met the criteria to be included in this review.

RESULTS

Ten studies used bone-marrow, and 1 study used blood as the cell-source. Nine studies used freshly isolated tissue-derived nucleated cells from bone-marrow, mixed bone marrow-derived nucleated cells, 1 study used mixed blood-derived nucleated cells, and 1 study used culture-expanded cells derived from bone marrow aspirate. Cell dose varied from 2-million to 3-billion cells. Qualitative cell characterization of injected cells using surface markers was done by 5 studies using CD34. Two studies assayed the cell-population using a colony-forming-unit assay.

CONCLUSION

There is a lack of standardization with respect to the quantitative and qualitative characterization of methods for cell-harvest, cell-processing, and cell-transplantation/delivery. Cell-therapy holds promise as a means of restoring local cell populations that are made deficient because of injury or disease. However, the orthopedic community and patients will benefit greatly by a greater investment in blinded, randomized, controlled trials and clinical effectiveness trials that embrace rigorous standards.

Evidence for the Use of Cell-Based Therapy for the Treatment of Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head: A Systematic Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Cell-therapy has been promoted among the therapeutic arsenal that can aid in bone formation and remodeling, in early stages of osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). The purpose of this systematic review was to assess the evidence supporting the (1) clinical efficacy; (2) structural modifying effect, as evaluated radiographically; (3) revision rates; and (4) safety of cell-therapy for the treatment of ONFH.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed including studies with a level-of-evidence of III or higher. A total of 1483 articles were screened. Eleven studies met the criteria for inclusion in this review (level-of-evidence: 6 level-I, 1 level-II, and 4 level-III), including 683 cases of ONFH.

RESULTS

All 10 studies that reported patient-reported outcomes showed improved outcomes in the cell-therapy groups compared with the control group. Overall, 24.5% (93/380 hips) that received cell-therapy showed radiographic progression compared with 40% (98/245 hips) in the control group. Nine of 10 studies that reported failure rates showed a lower total hip arthroplasty conversion rate in the cell-therapy group 16% (62/380 hips) compared with the control group 21% (52/252 hips). There was a low complication rate (<3%) with no major adverse effects.

CONCLUSION

Cell-therapies for the treatment of ONFH have been reported to be safe and suggest improved clinical outcomes with lower disease progression rate. However, there was substantial heterogeneity in the included studies, and in the cell-based therapies used. Specific clinical indications and cell-therapy standardization are required because studies varied widely with respect to cell sourcing, cell characterization, adjuvant therapies, and assessment of outcomes.

Radiologic and Clinical Features of Misdiagnosed Idiopathic Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head

Idiopathic osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) can be correctly diagnosed in accordance with the established criteria. However, some general orthopedic physicians have misdiagnosed patients as having ONFH. The goal of this study was to clarify the radiologic and clinical features of misdiagnosed patients. This study included 50 patients who were referred to the authors' hospital by general physicians with a diagnosis of ONFH. The correct diagnosis was made based on the Japanese Investigation Committee diagnostic criteria for ONFH. Demographic data were compared between patients with and without ONFH. Of the 50 patients, 24 were diagnosed with other diseases: 10 with osteoarthritis, 7 with transient osteoporosis of the femoral head, 4 with rapidly destructive coxopathy, and 3 with subchondral insufficiency fracture. Seventeen patients who did not have ONFH had magnetic resonance imaging findings that showed a bone marrow edema pattern at the femoral head. The mean age of 62.9 years among patients without ONFH was significantly higher than that of 45.2 years among patients with ONFH. There were 18 female patients in the non-ONFH group and 5 female patients in the ONFH group. Bilateral disease was found in 1 patient in the non-ONFH group and 17 patients in the ONFH group. No patients in the non-ONFH group had a history of systemic steroid administration compared with 11 patients in the ONFH group. Clinical features associated with the non-ONFH group were female sex, older age, unilateral disease, and no history of systemic steroid administration. For patients with these features, the diagnosis of ONFH should be made carefully. [Orthopedics. 2017; 40(1):e117-e123.].

Guideline for Diagnostic and Treatment of Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head

There is a new knowledge for clinical presentations and findings of imagine in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) in recent more than ten years. According to clinical data in Chinese huge patients with ONFH, the guideline for diagnosis and treatment of ONFH has been put forward by Chinese specialists. The newer contents of guideline include the definition for predisposing risk factors of ONFH, the new knowledge for clinical manifestations, the new interpretation for changes of imagine, important differential diagnosis. Based on the supplementary and revision for widely used staging and classification system, the new Chinese staging and classification system have been established. The advantages of Chinese staging and classification system accord with clinical and pathological features, it could be predicted the prognosis, and clinical applications are convenient. The guideline gives a brief account of principles for treatment selection and treatment methods for enhancement of diagnosis and treatment for ONFH.

Modified porous tantalum rod technique for the treatment of femoral head osteonecrosis

AIM: To study a modified porous tantalum technique for the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

METHODS: The porous tantalum rod was combined with endoscopy, curettage, autologous bone grafting and use of bone marrow aspirates from iliac crest aspiration in 49 patients (58 hips) with a mean age of 38 years. The majority of the patients had idiopathic osteonecrosis, followed by corticosteroid-induced osteonecrosis. Thirty-eight hips were of Steinberg stage II disease and 20 hips were of stage III disease. Patients were followed for 5 years and were evaluated clinically with the Merle D’Aubigne and Postel score and radiologically. The primary outcome of the study was survival based on the conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA). Secondary outcomes included deterioration of the osteonecrosis to a higher disease stage at 5 years compared to the preoperative period and identification of factors that were associated with survival. The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to evaluate the survivorship of the prosthesis, and the Fisher exact test was performed to test associations between various parameters with survival.

RESULTS: No patient developed any serious intraoperative or postoperative complication including implant loosening or migration and donor site morbidity. During the 5-year follow up, 1 patient died, 7 patients had disease progression and 4 hips were converted to THA. The 5-year survival based on conversion to THA was 93.1% and the respective rate based on disease progression was 87.9%. Stage II disease was associated with statistically significant better survival rates compared to stage III disease (P = 0.04). The comparison between idiopathic and non-idiopathic osteonecrosis and between steroid-induced and non-steroid-induced osteonecrosis did not showed any statistically significant difference in survival rates. The clinical evaluation revealed statistically significantly improved Merle d’Aubigne scores at 12 mo postoperatively compared to the preoperative period (P < 0.001). The mean preoperative Merle d’Aubigne score was 13.0 (SD: 1.8). The respective score at 12 mo improved to 17.0 (SD: 2.0). The 12-mo mean score was retained at 5 years.

CONCLUSION: The modified porous tantalum rod technique presented here showed encouraging outcomes. The survival rates based on conversion to THA are the lowest reported in the published literature.

The role of orthobiologics in hip preservation surgery

The potential regenerative role of different orthobiologics is becoming more recognized for the treatment of chronic and degenerative musculoskeletal conditions. Over the last few years there has been an increasing number of publications on cell therapy and other orthobiologics for the treatment of avascular necrosis of the femoral head and other hip conditions with promising short–term clinical results. In this article, we have used a systematic search of the literature to identify potentially relevant topics on orthobiologics and then selected those most applicable to hip preservation surgery. We identified several innovative strategies and present a summary of the currently available evidence on their potential role in hip preservation surgery. For many of these treatment strategies there was a lack of clinical evidence and therefore we suggest that there is a need for comparative studies in this field.