Impact Microindentation: Consistency of Serial Measurements and Alterations in Patients With Paget's Disease of the Tibia

Assessment of bovine cortical bone fracture behavior using impact microindentation as a surrogate of fracture toughness

The fracture behavior of bone is critically important for evaluating its mechanical competence and ability to resist fractures. Fracture toughness is an intrinsic material property that quantifies a material's ability to withstand crack propagation under controlled conditions. However, properly conducting fracture toughness testing requires the access to calibrated mechanical load frames and the destructive testing of bone samples, and therefore fracture toughness tests are clinically impractical. Impact microindentation mimicks certain aspects of fracture toughness measurements, but its relationship with fracture toughness remains unknown. In this study, we aimed to compare measurements of notched fracture toughness and impact microindentation in fresh and boiled bovine bone. Skeletally mature bovine bone specimens (n = 48) were prepared, and half of them were boiled to denature the organic matrix, while the other half remained preserved in frozen conditions. All samples underwent a notched fracture toughness test to determine their resistance to crack initiation (KIC) and an impact microindentation test using the OsteoProbe to obtain the Bone Material Strength index (BMSi). Boiling the bone samples increased the denatured collagen content, while mineral density and porosity remained unaffected. The boiled bones also showed significant reduction in both KIC (P < .0001) and the average BMSi (P < .0001), leading to impaired resistance of bone to crack propagation. Remarkably, the average BMSi exhibited a high correlation with KIC (r = 0.86; P < .001). A ranked order difference analysis confirmed the excellent agreement between the 2 measures. This study provides the first evidence that impact microindentation could serve as a surrogate measure for bone fracture behavior. The potential of impact microindentation to assess bone fracture resistance with minimal sample disruption could offer valuable insights into bone health without the need for cumbersome testing equipment and sample destruction.

For older individuals there is greater variance in low mean Bone Material Strength Index values obtained with the OsteoProbe

Purpose

Bone Material Strength Index (BMSi) quantifies the resistance of bone to a specified force in vivo at the mid tibia using impact microindentation (IMI). Anecdotal evidence suggests that within-participant variance in BMSi may be associated with the individual's mean BMSi. This study aimed to investigate associations between mean and variance of IMI measures in a population-based study.

Methods

Participants were men (n = 420) and women (n = 55) from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study who underwent BMSi measurement using the OsteoProbe at recent follow-up phases (men 2016-2022; women 2022-2023). Median age was 63.7 yr (IQR 53.0-71.8). BMSi standard deviation was skewed and therefore natural log transformed (referred to as ln-SD). Linear regression models were developed with ln-SD as the dependent variable and mean BMSi as the independent variable adjusting for sex, age, height and weight.

Results

In unadjusted models, greater BMSi was associated with lower ln-SD (β = -1.58, p = 0.042). This association was sustained after adjustment (p = 0.013), and an interaction between BMSi and age was observed (p = 0.004). In those aged 63.7 yr and over (median age), mean BMSi was inversely associated with ln-SD (β = -3.22, p = 0.002). Sex was not identified as an effect modifier. In younger participants, no BMSi*ln-SD association was observed.

Conclusion

In older men and women, there was greater variance in low BMSi values. This suggests that standard deviation of the BMSi measure may provide additional information in the assessment of bone health and is worthy of further investigation.

Mini abstract

In older men and women, greater variance is observed when BMSi values are low, reflecting potential variation in the bone surface.

Assessment of bovine cortical bone fracture behavior using impact microindentation as a surrogate of fracture toughness

The fracture behavior of bone is critically important for assessing its mechanical competence and ability to resist fractures. Fracture toughness, which quantifies a material's resistance to crack propagation under controlled geometry, is regarded as the gold standard for evaluating a material's resistance to fracture. However properly conducting this test requires access to calibrated mechanical load frames the destruction of the bone samples, making it impractical for obtaining clinical measurement of bone fracture. Impact microindentation offers a potential alternative by mimicking certain aspects of fracture toughness measurements, but its relationship with mechanistic fracture toughness remains unknown. In this study, we aimed to compare measurements of notched fracture toughness and impact microindentation in fresh and boiled bovine bone. Skeletally mature bovine bone specimens (n=48) were prepared, and half of them were boiled to denature the organic matrix, while the other half remained preserved in frozen conditions. Notched fracture toughness tests were conducted on all samples to determine Initiation toughness (KIC), and an impact microindentation test using the OsteoProbe was performed to obtain the Bone Material Strength index. Boiling the bone samples resulted increased the denatured collagen without affecting mineral density or porosity. The boiled bones also showed significant reduction in both KIC (p < 0.0001) and the average Bone Material Strength index (p < 0.0001), leading to impaired resistance of bone to crack propagation. Remarkably, the average Bone Material Strength index exhibited a high correlation with KIC (r = 0.86; p < 0.001). The ranked order difference analysis confirmed excellent agreement between the two measures. This study provides the first evidence that impact microindentation could serve as a surrogate measure for bone fracture behavior. The potential of impact microindentation to non-destructively assess bone fracture resistance could offer valuable insights into bone health without the need for elaborate testing equipment and sample destruction.

Reference Intervals for Bone Impact Microindentation in Healthy Adults: A Multi-Centre International Study

Impact microindentation (IMI) is a novel technique for assessing bone material strength index (BMSi) in vivo, by measuring the depth of a micron-sized, spherical tip into cortical bone that is then indexed to the depth of the tip into a reference material. The aim of this study was to define the reference intervals for men and women by evaluating healthy adults from the United States of America, Europe and Australia. Participants included community-based volunteers and participants drawn from clinical and population-based studies. BMSi was measured on the tibial diaphysis using an OsteoProbe in 479 healthy adults (197 male and 282 female, ages 25 to 98 years) across seven research centres, between 2011 and 2018. Associations between BMSi, age, sex and areal bone mineral density (BMD) were examined following an a posteriori method. Unitless BMSi values ranged from 48 to 101. The mean (± standard deviation) BMSi for men was 84.4 ± 6.9 and for women, 79.0 ± 9.1. Healthy reference intervals for BMSi were identified as 71.0 to 97.9 for men and 59.8 to 95.2 for women. This study provides healthy reference data that can be used to calculate T- and Z-scores for BMSi and assist in determining the utility of BMSi in fracture prediction. These data will be useful for positioning individuals within the population and for identifying those with BMSi at the extremes of the population.

Bone material strength index as measured by in vivo impact microindentation is normal in subjects with high-energy trauma fractures

Bone material properties were assessed using impact microindentation in patients with high-energy trauma fractures. Compared to patients with low-energy trauma fractures, bone material strength index was significantly higher in patients with high-energy trauma fractures, and did not differ between patients with osteopenia and those with osteoporosis within each trauma group.

INTRODUCTION

Impact microindentation (IMI) is a technique to assess tissue-level properties of bone at the tibia. Bone material strength index (BMSi), measured by IMI, is decreased in patients with low-energy trauma fractures, independently of areal bone mineral density (aBMD), but there is no information about BMSi in patients with high-energy trauma fractures. In the present study, we evaluated tissue-level properties of bone with IMI in patients with high-energy trauma fractures.

METHODS

BMSi was measured 3.0 months (IQR 2.0-5.8) after the fracture in 40 patients with high-energy trauma and 40 age- and gender-matched controls with low-energy trauma fractures using the OsteoProbe® device.

RESULTS

Mean age of high- and low-energy trauma patients was 57.7 ± 9.1 and 57.2 ± 7.7 years, respectively (p = 0.78). Fracture types were comparable in high- vs low-energy trauma patients. Lumbar spine (LS)-aBMD, but not femoral neck (FN)-aBMD, was higher in high- than in low-energy trauma patients (LS 0.96 ± 0.13 vs 0.89 ± 0.13 g/cm², p = 0.02; FN 0.75 ± 0.09 vs 0.72 ± 0.09 g/cm², p = 0.09). BMSi was significantly higher in high- than in low-energy trauma patients (84.4 ± 5.0 vs 78.0 ± 4.6, p = 0.001), also after adjusting for aBMD (p = 0.003). In addition, BMSi did not differ between patients with osteopenia and those with osteoporosis within each trauma group.

CONCLUSION

Our data demonstrate that BMSi and LS-aBMD, but not FN-aBMD, are significantly higher in high-energy trauma patients compared to matched controls with similar fractures from low-energy trauma. Further studies of non-osteoporotic patients with high-energy trauma fracture with measurements of BMSi are warranted to determine whether IMI might help in identifying those with reduced bone strength.

Impaired Bone Microarchitecture in Premenopausal Women With Acromegaly: The Possible Role of Wnt Signaling

CONTEXT

Acromegaly can impair bone integrity, increasing the risk of vertebral fractures (VFs).

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of isolated GH/IGF-I hypersecretion on bone turnover markers, Wnt inhibitors, bone mineral density (BMD), microarchitecture, bone strength and vertebral fractures in female patients with acromegaly (Acro), compared with healthy control group (HC).

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS

Cross-sectional study including 83 premenopausal women without any pituitary deficiency:18 acromegaly in remission (AcroR), 12 in group with active acromegaly (AcroA), and 53 HC. Serum procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide, β-carboxy-terminal crosslinked telopeptide of type 1 collagen, osteocalcin, sclerostin, and DKK1 were measured in blood samples. dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) and vertebral fractures evaluation were also assessed simultaneously.

MAIN OUTCOME AND RESULTS

AcroA showed significantly lower sclerostin and higher DKK1 compared with HC. On HR-pQCT of tibia and radius, Acro showed impairment of trabecular (area and trabecular number), increased cortical porosity, and increased cortical area and cortical thickness compared with HC. The only significant correlation found with HR-pQCT parameters was a positive correlation between cortical porosity and serum DKK1 (R = 0.45, P = 0.044). Mild VFs were present in approximately 30% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Eugonadal women with acromegaly without any pituitary deficiency showed increased cortical BMD, impairment of trabecular bone microstructure, and increased VF. Sclerostin was not correlated with any HR-pQCT parameters; however, DKK1 was correlated with cortical porosity in tibia (P = 0.027). Additional studies are needed to clarify the role of Wnt inhibitors on bone microarchitecture impairment in acromegaly.

Associations between Bone Material Strength Index, Calcaneal Quantitative Ultrasound, and Bone Mineral Density in Men

OBJECTIVES

Impact micro-indentation (IMI) measures bone material strength index (BMSi) in vivo. This study investigated how IMI is associated with calcaneal quantitative ultrasound and bone densitometry parameters in men.

METHODS

BMSi was measured on the tibial plateau using the OsteoProbe in 377 men (age 33-96 years) from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study. Broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA), speed of sound (SOS), and stiffness index (SI) were assessed at the calcaneus using an ultrasonometer. Areal BMD was measured at several skeletal sites using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Linear associations between parameters were tested using Pearson's correlation. Multivariable regression techniques were used to determine associations between BMSi and other measures of bone, independent of confounders.

RESULTS

BMSi was negatively correlated with age (r = -0.171, P = .001), weight (r = -0.100, P = .052), and body mass index (r = -0.187, P = .001), and positively with height (r = +0.109, P = .034). There was some evidence to support a positive association between BMSi and BUA (β = 0.052, P = .037), SOS (β = 0.013, P = .144), and SI (β = 0.036, P = .051). After age adjustment, this association was attenuated. No correlations were observed between BMSi and BMD at any skeletal site (r values ranged from -0.006 to +0.079, all P ≥ .13).

CONCLUSION

There was a small positive association between BMSi and quantitative ultrasound (QUS) parameters, which were not independent of age. No associations were detected between BMSi and BMD. This suggests that BMSi and QUS are capturing common age-dependent properties of bone. Further research on the utility of IMI alone and complementary to conventional bone testing methods for predicting fracture risk is warranted.

Normative Data for Impact Microindentation for Australian Men: Cross-Sectional Data From the Geelong Osteoporosis Study

Impact microindentation (IMI) is a novel technique for assessing the bone material strength index (BMSi) in vivo. However, no studies have presented normative data for BMSi. The aim of this study was to develop such normative data using a population-based sample of men, randomly selected from electoral rolls for the Barwon Statistical Division in southeastern Australia to participate in the Geelong Osteoporosis Study. BMSi was measured on the tibial plateau using an OsteoProbe in 405 men (ages 33 to 96 years) during the period 2016 to 2019. Associations between BMSi, age, and anthropometry were examined using linear regression models. BMSi values ranged from 49.0 to 100.5. BMSi was negatively correlated with age (r = -0.152, p = 0.002), weight (r = -0.103, p = 0.039), and BMI (r = -0.187, p < 0.001), and positively correlated with height (r = +0.107, p = 0.032). Mean ± SD BMSi was 82.6 ± 7.0 for the whole group, and ranged from 85.6 ± 6.0 for ages 30 to 39 years to 79.8 ± 6.6 for ages 80+ years. This study provides normative data that can be used to calculate T- and Z-scores for BMSi. These data will be useful for identifying men with low BMSi. Further research is warranted to derive optimal cut points for BMSi that discriminate fracture risk. © 2020 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Treatments of osteoporosis increase bone material strength index in patients with low bone mass

Effects on bone material properties of two-year antiosteoporotic treatment were assessed using in vivo impact microindentation (IMI) in patients with low bone mineral density (BMD) values. Antiresorptive treatment, in contrast to vitamin D ± calcium treatment alone, induced BMD-independent increases in bone material strength index, measured by IMI, the magnitude of which depended on pretreatment values.

INTRODUCTION

Bone material strength index (BMSi), measured by IMI in vivo, is reduced in patients with fragility fractures, but there is no information about changes in values during long-term therapy. In the present study, we assessed changes in BMSi in patients receiving antiosteoporotic treatments for periods longer than 12 months.

METHODS

We included treatment-naive patients with low bone mass who had a BMSi measurement with OsteoProbe® at presentation and consented to a repeat measurement after treatment.

RESULTS

We studied 54 patients (34 women), median age 58 years, of whom 30 were treated with bisphosphonates or denosumab (treatment group) and 24 with vitamin D ± calcium alone (control group). There were no differences in clinical characteristics between the two groups with the exception of a higher number of previous fragility fractures in the treatment group. Baseline hip BMD and BMSi values were lower in the treatment group. After 23.1 ± 6.6 months, BMSi increased significantly in the treatment group (82.4 ± 4.3 vs 79.3 ± 4.1; p < 0.001), but did not change in the control group (81.5 ± 5.2 vs 82.2 ± 4.1; p = 0.35). Changes in BMSi with antiresorptives were inversely related with baseline values (r = - 0.43; p = 0.02) but not with changes in BMD. Two patients in the control group with large decreases in BMSi values sustained incident fractures.

CONCLUSION

In patients at increased fracture risk, antiresorptive treatments induced BMD-independent increases in BMSi values, the magnitude of which depended on pretreatment values.

Impact microindentation measurements correlate with cortical bone material properties measured by Fourier transform infrared imaging in humans

Bone Material Strength index (BMSi) measured by Impact Microindentation is generally lower in subjects with fragility fractures independently of BMD values. We recently reported that in humans, BMSi values are strongly associated with material properties of subperiosteal mineralized bone surface (local mineral content, nanoporosity, pyridinoline content). In the present study we investigated the relationship of BMSi with material properties of the whole bone cortex, by analyzing thin sections of iliac crest biopsies (N = 12) from patients with different skeletal disorders and a wide range of BMD with or without fractures, by Fourier transform infrared imaging (FTIRI). The calculated parameters were: i) mineral and organic matrix content and their ratio (MM), ii) mineral maturity/crystallinity (MMC) and iii) the ratio of pyridinoline (Pyd) and divalent collagen cross-links (XLR). Results were expressed as images, which were converted to histogram distributions. For each histogram the characteristics recorded were: mean value, mode (most often occurring value), skewness, and kurtosis and their association with BMSi values was examined by correlation analysis. BMSi values were significantly correlated only with MM mean and mode values (r = 0.736, p = 0.0063, and r = 0.855, p = 0.0004, respectively), and with XLR mode values (r = -0.632, p = 0.0274). The results of the present study demonstrate that BMSi values are strongly associated with MM, a metric that corrects the mineral content for the organic matrix content, and may also depend on organic matrix quality. These and our previous observations strongly suggest that BMSi assesses material properties of cortical bone.

Impact microindentation assesses subperiosteal bone material properties in humans

Impact microindentation (IMI) is a Reference Point Indentation technique measuring tissue-level properties of cortical bone in humans in vivo. The nature, however, of the properties that can affect bone strength is incompletely understood. In the present study we examined bone material properties in transiliac bone biopsies obtained concurrently with measurements of Bone Material Strength index (BMSi) by IMI in 12 patients with different skeletal disorders and a wide range of BMD, with or without fractures (8 males, 4 females, mean age 48±12.2 (SD) years, range 15-60 years). IMI was performed in the mid-shaft of the right tibia with a hand-held microindenter (OsteoProbe). Cancellous and cortical bone mineralization density distributions (BMDD) were measured in the entire biopsy bone area by quantitative backscattered electron imaging. Raman measurements were obtained right at the outer edge of the cortex, and 5, 50, 100, 500μm inwards. The calculated parameters were: i) Mineral and organic matrix content as well as the mineral / matrix ratio. ii) Nanoporosity. iii) Glycosaminoglycan content. iv) Pyridinoline content. v) Maturity/crystallinity of the apatite crystallites. There was no relationship between BMSi values with any measurement of mineral content of whole bone tissue (BMD, BMDD) or maturity/crystallinity of bone mineral. On the other hand, a positive correlation between BMSi and local mineral content, and an inverse correlation between BMSi and nanoporosity at the mineralized subperiosteal edge of the sample and at 5μm inwards was found. A positive correlation was also observed between BMSi and pyridinoline content at the same locations. These results indicate that local mineral content, nanoporosity and pyridinoline content at the subperiosteal site in the transiliac bone biopsy are linked to the BMSi values measured in the tibia. As both high porosity at the nano level and low pyridinoline content of the bone matrix can negatively impact bone strength, our findings suggest that BMSi most likely assesses subperiosteal bone material properties.

Added Value of Impact Microindentation in the Evaluation of Bone Fragility: A Systematic Review of the Literature

The current gold standard for the diagnosis of osteoporosis and the prediction of fracture risk is the measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). A low BMD is clearly associated with increased fracture risk, but BMD is not the only determinant of bone strength, particularly in secondary osteoporosis and metabolic bone disorders in which components other than BMD are affected and DXA often underestimates true fracture risk. Material properties of bone which significantly contribute to bone strength have become evaluable in vivo with the impact microindentation (IMI) technique using the OsteoProbe® device. The question arises whether this new tool is of added value in the evaluation of bone fragility. To this effect, we conducted a systematic review of all clinical studies using IMI in vivo in humans also addressing practical aspects of the technique and differences in study design, which may impact outcome. Search data generated 38 studies showing that IMI can identify patients with primary osteoporosis and fractures, patients with secondary osteoporosis due to various underlying systemic disorders, and scarce longitudinal data also show that this tool can detect changes in bone material strength index (BMSi), following bone-modifying therapy including use of corticosteroids. However, this main outcome parameter was not always concordant between studies. This systematic review also identified a number of factors that impact on BMSi outcome. These include subject- and disease-related factors such as the relationship between BMSi and age, geographical region and the presence of fractures, and technique- and operator-related factors. Taken together, findings from this systematic review confirm the added value of IMI for the evaluation and follow-up of elements of bone fragility, particularly in secondary osteoporosis. Notwithstanding, the high variability of BMSi outcome between studies calls for age-dependent reference values, and for the harmonization of study protocols. Prospective multicenter trials using standard operating procedures are required to establish the value of IMI in the prediction of future fracture risk, before this technique is introduced in routine clinical practice.

Microhardness distribution of the tibial diaphysis and test site selection for reference point indentation technique

Indentation hardness test is a good in vitro method of bone quality assessment. The purpose of this study is to explore the distribution characteristics of bone tissue microhardness in tibial diaphysis and provide theoretical support for the test site selection of the reference point indentation technique.Three fresh right tibias were obtained from 3 cadaver donors. The tibial diaphysis was evenly divided into 6 sections. Bone specimens with a thickness of 3 mm were cut from each part. After appropriate management, micro-indentation tests were performed in various regions of the specimens to acquire the microhardness values of the tibial diaphysis. Statistical analysis was performed by randomized block design variance analysis to study the distribution characteristics of bone microhardness.72 regions were selected for 360 effective indentations. We found that the bone microhardness is inhomogeneous in tibia diaphysis. Mean hardness value of the anterior, medial, posterior, lateral region of tibia diaphysis was 45.58 ± 4.39 Vickers hardness (HV), 52.33 ± 3.93 HV, 54.00 ± 4.21 HV, 52.89 ± 4.44 HV, respectively. The anterior cortex exhibits lower microhardness value than the other regions (P < .001). Within the same region, microhardness varies significantly with positions in the tibial diaphysis. The variations in indentation hardness are bound to have a significant impact on the comparability of different reference point indentation (RPI) studies.The results of this study indicated the regional microhardness difference in the human tibia diaphysis. The microhardness of different planes in the same region is also inconsistent. Inhomogeneous distribution of indentation microhardness would have considerable influence in the test site selection of RPI technique. The data collected in our study would contribute to the design of highly precise 3D printing implants and bionic bones with gradient elastic modulus.

Clinical measurements of bone tissue mechanical behavior using reference point indentation

Over the last thirty years, it has become increasingly clear the amount of bone (e.g. 'bone quantity') and the quality of the bone matrix (e.g. 'bone quality') both critically contribute to bone's tissue-level mechanical behavior and the subsequent ability of bone to resist fracture. Although determining the tissue-level mechanical behavior of bone through mechanical testing is relatively straightforward in the laboratory, the destructive nature of such testing is unfeasible in humans and in animal models requiring longitudinal observation. Therefore, surrogate measurements are necessary for quantifying tissue-level mechanical behavior for the pre-clinical and clinical evaluation of bone strength and fracture risk in vivo. A specific implementation of indentation known as reference point indentation (RPI) enables the mechanical testing of bone tissue without the need to excise and prepare the bone surface. However, this compromises the ability to carefully control the specimen geometry that is required to define the bone tissue material properties. Yet the versatility of such measurements in clinical populations is provocative, and to date there are a number of promising studies that have utilized this tool to discern bone pathologies and to monitor the effects of therapeutics on bone quality. Concurrently, on-going efforts continue to investigate the aspects of bone material behavior measured by RPI, and the compositional factors that contribute to these measurements. There are currently two variants, cyclic- and impact- RPI, that have been utilized in pre-clinical and clinical studies. This review surveys clinical studies that utilize RPI, with particular emphasis on the clinical instrument, as well as the endeavors to understand the fundamental mechanisms of such measurements. Ultimately, an improved awareness in the tradeoffs and limitations of in vivo RPI is critical towards the effective and successful utilization of this tool for the overall improvement of fragility determination in the clinic.