Using Artificial Intelligence to Diagnose Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures on Plain Radiographs

Automatic AI tool for opportunistic screening of vertebral compression fractures on chest frontal radiographs: A multicenter study

Vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) are the most common type of osteoporotic fractures, yet they are often clinically silent and undiagnosed. Chest frontal radiographs (CFRs) are frequently used in clinical practice and a portion of VCFs can be detected through this technology. This study aimed to develop an automatic artificial intelligence (AI) tool using deep learning (DL) model for the opportunistic screening of VCFs from CFRs. The datasets were collected from four medical centers, comprising 19,145 vertebrae (T6-T12) from 2735 patients. Patients from Center 1, 2 and 3 were divided into the training and internal testing datasets in an 8:2 ratio (n = 2361, with 16,527 vertebrae). Patients from Center 4 were used as the external test dataset (n = 374, with 2618 vertebrae). Model performance was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and the area under the curve (AUC). A reader study with five clinicians of different experience levels was conducted with and without AI assistance. In the internal testing dataset, the model achieved a sensitivity of 83.0 % and an AUC of 0.930 at the fracture level. In the external testing dataset, the model demonstrated a sensitivity of 78.4 % and an AUC of 0.942 at the fracture level. The model's sensitivity outperformed that of five clinicians with different levels of experience. Notably, AI assistance significantly improved sensitivity at the patient level for both junior clinicians (from 56.1 % without AI to 81.6 % with AI) and senior clinicians (from 65.0 % to 85.6 %). In conclusion, the automatic AI tool significantly increases clinicians' sensitivity in diagnosing fractures on CFRs, showing great potential for the opportunistic screening of VCFs.

Artificial intelligence in risk prediction and diagnosis of vertebral fractures

With the increasing prevalence of vertebral fractures, accurate diagnosis and prognostication are essential. This study assesses the effectiveness of AI in diagnosing and predicting vertebral fractures through a systematic review and meta-analysis. A comprehensive search across major databases selected studies utilizing AI for vertebral fracture diagnosis or prognosis. Out of 14,161 studies initially identified, 79 were included, with 40 undergoing meta-analysis. Diagnostic models were stratified by pathology: non-pathological vertebral fractures, osteoporotic vertebral fractures, and vertebral compression fractures. The primary outcome measure was AUROC. AI showed high accuracy in diagnosing and predicting vertebral fractures: predictive AUROC = 0.82, osteoporotic vertebral fracture diagnosis AUROC = 0.92, non-pathological vertebral fracture diagnosis AUROC = 0.85, and vertebral compression fracture diagnosis AUROC = 0.87, all significant (p < 0.001). Traditional models had the highest median AUROC (0.90) for fracture prediction, while deep learning models excelled in diagnosing all fracture types. High heterogeneity (I² > 99%, p < 0.001) indicated significant variation in model design and performance. AI technologies show considerable promise in improving the diagnosis and prognostication of vertebral fractures, with high accuracy. However, observed heterogeneity and study biases necessitate further research. Future efforts should focus on standardizing AI models and validating them across diverse datasets to ensure clinical utility.

Machine learning value in the diagnosis of vertebral fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of machine learning (ML) in detecting vertebral fractures, considering varying fracture classifications, patient populations, and imaging approaches.

METHOD

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted by searching PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science up to December 31, 2023, for studies using ML for vertebral fracture diagnosis. Bias risk was assessed using QUADAS-2. A bivariate mixed-effects model was used for the meta-analysis. Meta-analyses were performed according to five task types (vertebral fractures, osteoporotic vertebral fractures, differentiation of benign and malignant vertebral fractures, differentiation of acute and chronic vertebral fractures, and prediction of vertebral fractures). Subgroup analyses were conducted by different ML models (including ML and DL) and modeling methods (including CT, X-ray, MRI, and clinical features).

RESULTS

Eighty-one studies were included. ML demonstrated a diagnostic sensitivity of 0.91 and specificity of 0.95 for vertebral fractures. Subgroup analysis showed that DL (SROC 0.98) and CT (SROC 0.98) performed best overall. For osteoporotic fractures, ML showed a sensitivity of 0.93 and specificity of 0.96, with DL (SROC 0.99) and X-ray (SROC 0.99) performing better. For differentiating benign from malignant fractures, ML achieved a sensitivity of 0.92 and specificity of 0.93, with DL (SROC 0.96) and MRI (SROC 0.97) performing best. For differentiating acute from chronic vertebral fractures, ML showed a sensitivity of 0.92 and specificity of 0.93, with ML (SROC 0.96) and CT (SROC 0.97) performing best. For predicting vertebral fractures, ML had a sensitivity of 0.76 and specificity of 0.87, with ML (SROC 0.80) and clinical features (SROC 0.86) performing better.

CONCLUSIONS

ML, especially DL models applied to CT, MRI, and X-ray, shows high diagnostic accuracy for vertebral fractures. ML also effectively predicts osteoporotic vertebral fractures, aiding in tailored prevention strategies. Further research and validation are required to confirm ML's clinical efficacy.

Application and Prospects of Deep Learning Technology in Fracture Diagnosis

Artificial intelligence (AI) is an interdisciplinary field that combines computer technology, mathematics, and several other fields. Recently, with the rapid development of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL), significant progress has been made in the field of AI. As one of the fastest-growing branches, DL can effectively extract features from big data and optimize the performance of various tasks. Moreover, with advancements in digital imaging technology, DL has become a key tool for processing high-dimensional medical image data and conducting medical image analysis in clinical applications. With the development of this technology, the diagnosis of orthopedic diseases has undergone significant changes. In this review, we describe recent research progress on DL in fracture diagnosis and discuss the value of DL in this field, providing a reference for better integration and development of DL technology in orthopedics.

Artificial intelligence in fracture detection on radiographs: a literature review

Fractures are one of the most common reasons of admission to emergency department affecting individuals of all ages and regions worldwide that can be misdiagnosed during radiologic examination. Accurate and timely diagnosis of fracture is crucial for patients, and artificial intelligence that uses algorithms to imitate human intelligence to aid or enhance human performs is a promising solution to address this issue. In the last few years, numerous commercially available algorithms have been developed to enhance radiology practice and a large number of studies apply artificial intelligence to fracture detection. Recent contributions in literature have described numerous advantages showing how artificial intelligence performs better than doctors who have less experience in interpreting musculoskeletal X-rays, and assisting radiologists increases diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity, improves efficiency, and reduces interpretation time. Furthermore, algorithms perform better when they are trained with big data on a wide range of fracture patterns and variants and can provide standardized fracture identification across different radiologist, thanks to the structured report. In this review article, we discuss the use of artificial intelligence in fracture identification and its benefits and disadvantages. We also discuss its current potential impact on the field of radiology and radiomics.

An overview of the performance of AI in fracture detection in lumbar and thoracic spine radiographs on a per vertebra basis

PURPOSE

Subtle spinal compression fractures can easily be missed. AI may help in interpreting these images. We propose to test the performance of an FDA-approved algorithm for fracture detection in radiographs on a per vertebra basis, assessing performance based on grade of compression, presence of foreign material, severity of degenerative changes, and acuity of the fracture.

METHODS

Thoracic and lumbar spine radiographs with inquiries for fracture were retrospectively collected and analyzed by the AI. The presence or absence of fracture was defined by the written report or cross-sectional imaging where available. Fractures were classified semi-quantitatively by the Genant classification, by acuity, by the presence of foreign material, and overall degree of degenerative change of the spine. The results of the AI were compared to the gold standard.

RESULTS

A total of 512 exams were included, depicting 4114 vertebra with 495 fractures. Overall sensitivity was 63.2% for the lumbar spine, significantly higher than the thoracic spine with 50.6%. Specificity was 96.7 and 98.3% respectively. Sensitivity increased with fracture grade, without a significant difference between grade 2 and 3 compression fractures (lumbar spine: grade 1, 52.5%; grade 2, 72.3%; grade 3, 75.8%; thoracic spine: grade 1, 42.4%; grade 2, 60.0%; grade 3, 60.0%). The presence of foreign material and a high degree of degenerative changes reduced sensitivity.

CONCLUSION

Overall performance of the AI on a per vertebra basis was degraded in clinically relevant scenarios such as for low-grade compression fractures.

Enhancing Osteoporosis Management: A Thorough Examination of Surgical Techniques and Their Effects on Patient Outcomes

Managing osteoporotic fractures in older individuals is a difficult task in orthopedic surgery. It requires a careful approach that combines advanced diagnostic methods, customized surgical treatments, and comprehensive rehabilitation strategies. This article presents the results of an analysis carried out at the University Emergency Hospital, Bucharest. The analysis specifically examines the treatment of osteoporotic fractures using different osteosynthesis techniques. Although diagnostic tools like dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) have improved, a considerable number of fractures still happen in people who do not have obvious osteoporosis. This emphasizes the importance of using additional diagnostic measures such as high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) and quantitative computed tomography (QCT) to improve the accuracy of predictions. The study demonstrates the intricate nature of surgical decision-making and the significance of adjusting techniques to meet the specific needs of each patient. An instance of osteosynthesis failure resulting from the inappropriate choice of method highlighted the crucial significance of a thorough preoperative assessment. The discussion highlights the importance of early mobilization and rehabilitation in reducing the risks associated with prolonged immobilization and improving patient recovery. This paper strongly supports the use of evidence-based and patient-centered methods in the management of osteoporotic fractures. It emphasizes the importance of utilizing the most recent advancements in diagnostic and surgical technologies. Promising advancements in orthopedic medicine lie in the future, particularly in the integration of interdisciplinary research and personalized medicine. These advancements have the potential to enhance patient outcomes in this population that is at high risk.

Perspectives on Fracture Liaison Service in Austria: clinical and economic considerations

Osteoporosis is a widespread disease and affects over 500,000 people in Austria. Fragility fractures are associated with it and represent not only an individual problem for the patients, but also an enormous burden for the healthcare system. While trauma surgery care is well provided in Vienna, there is an enormous treatment gap in secondary prevention after osteoporotic fracture. Systematic approaches such as the Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) aim to identify patients with osteoporosis after fracture, to clarify diagnostically, to initiate specific therapy, and to check therapy adherence. The aim of this article is to describe the practical implementation and operational flow of an already established FLS in Vienna. This includes the identification of potential FLS inpatients, the diagnostic workup, and recommendations for an IT solution for baseline assessment and follow-up of FLS patients. We summarize the concept, benefits, and limitations of FLS and provide prospective as well as clinical and economic considerations for a city-wide FLS, managed from a central location. Future concepts of FLS should include artificial intelligence for vertebral fracture detection and simple IT tools for the implementation of FLS in the outpatient sector.

The Role of Artificial Intelligence in the Identification and Evaluation of Bone Fractures

Artificial intelligence (AI), particularly deep learning, has made enormous strides in medical imaging analysis. In the field of musculoskeletal radiology, deep-learning models are actively being developed for the identification and evaluation of bone fractures. These methods provide numerous benefits to radiologists such as increased diagnostic accuracy and efficiency while also achieving standalone performances comparable or superior to clinician readers. Various algorithms are already commercially available for integration into clinical workflows, with the potential to improve healthcare delivery and shape the future practice of radiology. In this systematic review, we explore the performance of current AI methods in the identification and evaluation of fractures, particularly those in the ankle, wrist, hip, and ribs. We also discuss current commercially available products for fracture detection and provide an overview of the current limitations of this technology and future directions of the field.

Machine Learning and Deep Learning in Spinal Injury: A Narrative Review of Algorithms in Diagnosis and Prognosis

Spinal injuries, including cervical and thoracolumbar fractures, continue to be a major public health concern. Recent advancements in machine learning and deep learning technologies offer exciting prospects for improving both diagnostic and prognostic approaches in spinal injury care. This narrative review systematically explores the practical utility of these computational methods, with a focus on their application in imaging techniques such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), as well as in structured clinical data. Of the 39 studies included, 34 were focused on diagnostic applications, chiefly using deep learning to carry out tasks like vertebral fracture identification, differentiation between benign and malignant fractures, and AO fracture classification. The remaining five were prognostic, using machine learning to analyze parameters for predicting outcomes such as vertebral collapse and future fracture risk. This review highlights the potential benefit of machine learning and deep learning in spinal injury care, especially their roles in enhancing diagnostic capabilities, detailed fracture characterization, risk assessments, and individualized treatment planning.

Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Detection of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures on Lateral Chest Radiographs in Post-Menopausal Women

Osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs) are often not reported by radiologists on routine chest radiographs. This study aims to investigate the clinical value of a newly developed artificial intelligence (AI) tool, Ofeye 1.0, for automated detection of OVFs on lateral chest radiographs in post-menopausal women (>60 years) who were referred to undergo chest x-rays for other reasons. A total of 510 de-identified lateral chest radiographs from three clinical sites were retrieved and analysed using the Ofeye 1.0 tool. These images were then reviewed by a consultant radiologist with findings serving as the reference standard for determining the diagnostic performance of the AI tool for the detection of OVFs. Of all the original radiologist reports, missed OVFs were found in 28.8% of images but were detected using the AI tool. The AI tool demonstrated high specificity of 92.8% (95% CI: 89.6, 95.2%), moderate accuracy of 80.3% (95% CI: 76.3, 80.4%), positive predictive value (PPV) of 73.7% (95% CI: 65.2, 80.8%), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 81.5% (95% CI: 79, 83.8%), but low sensitivity of 49% (95% CI: 40.7, 57.3%). The AI tool showed improved sensitivity compared with the original radiologist reports, which was 20.8% (95% CI: 14.5, 28.4). The new AI tool can be used as a complementary tool in routine diagnostic reports for the reduction in missed OVFs in elderly women.