Iliac trabecular bone formation predicts radial trabecular bone density changes in type 1 osteoporosis

Role of cortical bone in bone fragility

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Trabecular bone loss and vertebral fractures are historical hallmarks of osteoporosis. During the past 70 years, this view has dominated research aiming to understand the structural basis of bone fragility. We suggest this notion needs to be revised to recognize and include the role of cortical bone deterioration as an important determinant of bone strength throughout life.

RECENT FINDINGS

About 80% of the fragility fractures involve the appendicular skeleton, at regions comprising large amounts of cortical bone. Up to 70% of the age-related bone loss at these locations is the result of intracortical remodeling that cavitates cortical bone producing porosity. It is now possible to accurately quantify cortical porosity in vivo and use this information to understand the pathogenesis of bone fragility throughout life, assist in identifying patients at risk for fracture, and use this as a potential marker to monitor the effects of treatment on bone structure and strength.

SUMMARY

Cortical bone has an important role in determining bone strength. The loss of strength is the result of intracortical and endocortical remodeling imbalance that produces cortical porosity and thinning. Studies are needed to determine whether porosity is an independent predictor of fracture risk and whether a reduction in porosity serves as a surrogate of antifracture efficacy.

Growth and Age-Related Abnormalities in Cortical Structure and Fracture Risk

Vertebral fractures and trabecular bone loss have dominated thinking and research into the pathogenesis and the structural basis of bone fragility during the last 70 years. However, 80% of all fractures are non-vertebral and occur at regions assembled using large amounts of cortical bone; only 20% of fractures are vertebral. Moreover, ~80% of the skeleton is cortical and ~70% of all bone loss is cortical even though trabecular bone is lost more rapidly than cortical bone. Bone is lost because remodelling becomes unbalanced after midlife. Most cortical bone loss occurs by intracortical, not endocortical remodelling. Each remodelling event removes more bone than deposited enlarging existing canals which eventually coalesce eroding and thinning the cortex from 'within.' Thus, there is a need to study the decay of cortical as well as trabecular bone, and to develop drugs that restore the strength of both types of bone. It is now possible to accurately quantify cortical porosity and trabecular decay in vivo. The challenges still to be met are to determine whether measurement of porosity identifies persons at risk for fracture, whether this approach is compliments information obtained using bone densitometry, and whether changes in cortical porosity and other microstructural traits have the sensitivity to serve as surrogates of treatment success or failure.

Gastrointestinal calcium absorption and dietary calcium load: relationships with bone remodelling in vertebral osteoporosis

Patients with vertebral osteoporosis have a wide range of bone loss rates, bone remodelling rates and capacities for gastrointestinal (GI) calcium absorption. To test the hypothesis that variations in GI absorptive capacity determine rates of bone loss or remodelling, we have sought relationships between calcium absorption or vitamin D metabolite levels on the one hand and rates of cancellous and cortical bone loss (measured by serial quantitative computed tomography in the radius; n = 25) or indices of bone remodelling in tetracycline-prelabelled transiliac biopsies (n = 41) on the other, in a sequential untreated group. Calcium absorption (net and true) was measured in 18-day balances and by a two-isotope deconvolution method (fractional absorption and maximum absorption rate, MAR). There was no significant seasonal effect on any of these four measures of calcium absorption (variance ratio, F = 0.52-1.61, p > 0.1) or on 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D levels (F = 0.13, p > 0.1; range 11-69 pg/ml), notwithstanding the expected seasonal effect on 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels (mean 18.7 ng/ml, zenith mid July, semi-amplitude 7.5 ng/ml; F = 6.82, p < 0.01). Neither this metabolite nor 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D correlated with any index of calcium absorption (p > 0.1). No measure of calcium absorption (or intake) had a significant relationship with radial cortical or cancellous bone loss (p all > 0.1) but cancellous bone loss was associated with the rate of endogenous calcium excretion (r = 0.50, p < 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Temporal variations in iliac trabecular bone formation in vertebral osteoporosis

The histologic heterogeneity of osteoporosis relative to normal controls has attracted great interest. There has been controversy as to whether patients with high turnover osteoporosis may convert to a normal or low turnover form, and vice versa. We have studied 44 patients over 12 years by dynamic histomorphometry and 85Sr kinetics+calcium balance performed within 60 days in 20 patients (Group 1) and 75-808 days apart in the remainder (Group 2). In the first group, the histologic tissue level bone formation rate (BFR/BV or BFR/BS) was predictive of the 85Sr measurements of bone formation (r = 0.66 P < 0.01). There was no statistically significant correlation in Group 2 and the regression coefficients were significantly different (P = 0.01). Periodic regression was used to determine if seasonal changes were responsible for this loss of correlation; none was found that was of statistical significance. No systematic changes with time in bone formation were found in Group 2 during the period of observation; nor were consistent secular changes detected when the data for both groups were examined according to procedure date. In conclusion, bone formation may change with time in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Evidence that these changes are systematic was not found and this has implications for the design of treatment studies.