Diagnostic value of estimated volumetric bone mineral density of the lumbar spine in osteoporosis

The association between physical activity and vertebral dimension change in early adulthood - The Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1986 study

Small vertebral size is a well-known risk factor for vertebral fractures. To help understanding the factors behind vertebral size, we aimed to investigate whether physical activity and participation in high-impact exercise are associated with the growth rate of the vertebral cross-sectional area (CSA) among young adults. To conduct our study, we utilized the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1986 as our study population (n = 375). Questionnaire data about physical activity was obtained at 16, 18 and 19 years of age and lumbar magnetic resonance imaging scans at two timepoints, 20 and 30 years of age. We used generalized estimating equation (GEE) models to conduct the analyses. We did not find any statistically significant associations between vertebral CSA, physical activity, and high-impact exercise in our study sample. We conclude that neither physical activity nor high-impact sports seem to influence the change in vertebral CSA among young adults.

•

Physical activity does not influence the growth rate of the vertebral body.

•

High-impact sports are not associated with the change in vertebral CSA among adults.

•

The study was conducted using longitudinal MRI data.

Baseline anthropometric indices predict change in vertebral size in early adulthood - A 10-year follow-up MRI study

The vertebral cross-sectional area (CSA) has an independent effect on vertebral strength. Recent evidence has shown that vertebral dimensions significantly increase in the third decade of life, and that lifestyle factors such as body size and composition are clearly associated with vertebral CSA. This study aimed to test the hypothesis that general anthropometric traits (stature, total body mass, lean body mass, fat mass, body mass index, waist circumference), each objectively measured at baseline, predict the change in vertebral CSA over the subsequent decade. A representative sample of young Northern Finnish adults was used (n = 371) with repeated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans from ~20 and ~30 years (baseline and follow-up, respectively). Vertebral CSA was measured from the MRI scans with high reliability and low measurement error. The statistical analysis was performed using linear regression models adjusted for sex and exact length of MRI interval. According to the regression models, in descending order of effect size, lean body mass (standardized beta coefficient 0.243 [95% confidence interval 0.065-0.420]), total body mass (0.158 [0.043-0.273]), body mass index (0.125 [0.026-0.224]), waist circumference (0.119 [0.010-0.228]), and fat mass (0.104 [0.004-0.205]) were positively and significantly associated with CSA gain over the follow-up, whereas stature (0.079 [-0.066-0.224]) was not associated with CSA change. The results of this study suggest that anthropometric indices may be used for estimating subsequent change in vertebral size. In particular, greater lean body mass seems to be beneficial for vertebral size and thus potentially also for vertebral strength. Future studies should aim to replicate these associations in a dataset with longitudinal anthropometric trajectories and identify the potential common factors that influence both anthropometric traits and vertebral CSA gain.

Eating Behavior Traits, Weight Loss Attempts, and Vertebral Dimensions Among the General Northern Finnish Population

STUDY DESIGN

A population-based birth cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the associations of eating behavior traits and weight loss attempts with vertebral size among the general Northern Finnish population.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Vertebral fragility fractures are a typical manifestation of osteoporosis, and small vertebral dimensions are a well-established risk factor for vertebral fracturing. Previous studies have associated cognitive eating restraint and diet-induced weight loss with deteriorated bone quality at various skeletal sites, but data on vertebral geometry are lacking.

METHODS

This study of 1338 middle-aged Northern Finns evaluated the associations of eating behavior traits (flexible and rigid cognitive restraint of eating, uncontrolled eating, emotional eating; assessed by the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire-18) and weight loss attempts (assessed by a separate questionnaire item) with magnetic resonance imaging-derived vertebral cross-sectional area (CSA). Sex-stratified linear regression models were used to analyze the data, taking body mass index, leisure-time physical activity, general diet, smoking, and socioeconomic status as potential confounders.

RESULTS

Women with rigid or rigid-and-flexible cognitive eating restraints had 3.2% to 3.4% smaller vertebral CSA than those with no cognitive restraint (P ≤ 0.05). Similarly, the women who reported multiple weight loss attempts in adulthood and midlife had 3.5% smaller vertebral size than those who did not (P = 0.03). Other consistent findings were not obtained from either sex.

CONCLUSION

Rigid cognitive eating restraint and multiple weight loss attempts predict small vertebral size and thus decreased spinal health among middle-aged women, but not among men. Future longitudinal studies should confirm these findings.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Body mass estimation from dimensions of the fourth lumbar vertebra in middle-aged Finns

Although body mass is not a stable trait over the lifespan, information regarding body size assists the forensic identification of unknown individuals. In this study, we aimed to study the potential of using the fourth lumbar vertebra (L4) for body mass estimation among contemporary Finns. Our sample comprised 1158 individuals from the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966 who had undergone measurements of body mass at age 31 and 46 and lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at age 46. MRI scans were used to measure the maximum and minimum widths, depths, and heights of the L4 body. Their means and sum were calculated together with vertebral cross-sectional area (CSA) and volume. Ordinary least squares (OLS) and reduced major axis (RMA) regression was used to produce equations for body mass among the full sample (n = 1158) and among normal-weight individuals (n = 420). In our data, body mass was associated with all the L4 size parameters (R = 0.093-0.582, p ≤ 0.019 among the full sample; R = 0.243-0.696, p ≤ 0.002 among the normal-weight sample). RMA regression models seemed to fit the data better than OLS, with vertebral CSA having the highest predictive value in body mass estimation. In the full sample, the lowest standard errors were 6.1% (95% prediction interval ±9.6 kg) and 7.1% (±9.1 kg) among men and women, respectively. In the normal-weight sample, the lowest errors were 4.9% (±6.9 kg) and 4.7% (±5.7 kg) among men and women, respectively. Our results indicate that L4 dimensions are potentially useful in body mass estimation, especially in cases with only the axial skeleton available.

Dairy- and supplement-based calcium intake in adulthood and vertebral dimensions in midlife-the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966 Study

Among a representative sample of 1064 Northern Finns, we studied the association of dairy- and supplement-based calcium intake in adulthood with vertebral size in midlife. Inadequate calcium intake (< 800 mg/day) from age 31 to 46 predicted small vertebral size and thus decreased spinal resilience among women but not men.

INTRODUCTION

Small vertebral size predisposes individuals to fractures, which are common among aging populations. Although previous studies have associated calcium (Ca) intake with enhanced bone geometry in the appendicular skeleton, few reports have addressed the axial skeleton or the vertebrae in particular. We aimed to investigate the association of dairy- and supplement-based Ca intake in adulthood with vertebral cross-sectional area (CSA) in midlife.

METHODS

A sample of 1064 individuals from the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966 had undergone lumbar magnetic resonance imaging at the age of 46, and provided self-reported data on diet and Ca intake (dairy consumption and use of Ca supplements) at the ages of 31 and 46. We assessed the association between Ca intake (both continuous and categorized according to local recommended daily intake) and vertebral CSA, using generalized estimating equation and linear regression models with adjustments for body mass index, diet, vitamin D intake, education, leisure-time physical activity, and smoking.

RESULTS

Women with inadequate Ca intake (< 800 mg/day) over the follow-up had 3.8% smaller midlife vertebral CSA than women with adequate Ca intake (p = 0.009). Ca intake among men showed no association with vertebral CSA.

CONCLUSIONS

Inadequate Ca intake (< 800 mg/day) from the age of 31 to 46 predicts small vertebral size and thus decreased spinal resilience among middle-aged women. Future studies should confirm these findings and investigate the factors underlying the association of low Ca intake in women but not in men with smaller vertebral size.

Changes in vertebral dimensions in early adulthood - A 10-year follow-up MRI-study

Previous studies have shown that vertebral height increases until the early twenties, but very few studies have been conducted on other vertebral dimensions. Growth in vertebral size is believed to take place in elderly age but not in early adulthood. In this study, we wanted to clarify the potential changes in the dimensions of the lumbar vertebrae during early adulthood. We used the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1986 as our study material, with a final sample size of 375 individuals. We performed lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) when the participants were 20 and 30 years of age (baseline and follow-up, respectively). We recorded the width, depth, height, and cross-sectional area (CSA) of the fourth lumbar vertebra (L4) using the MRI scans. We used generalized estimating equation (GEE) models to analyse the data. Men had 7.6%-26.5% larger vertebral dimensions than women at both baseline and follow-up. The GEE models demonstrated that all the studied dimensions increased during the follow-up period among both sexes (p < 0.001). Men had a higher growth rate in vertebral depth and CSA than women (p < 0.001). Among women, small vertebral width (p = 0.001), depth (p = 0.05) and height (p = 0.02) at baseline were associated with a higher vertebral growth rate during the follow-up than among those with large dimensions at baseline. Among men, small baseline width was associated with higher vertebral growth rate (p = 0.001). Our results clearly indicate that vertebral dimensions increase after 20 years of age among both sexes.

The Association of Body Size, Shape and Composition with Vertebral Size in Midlife - The Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966 Study

Small vertebral size increases the risk of osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Obese individuals have larger vertebral size and potentially lower fracture risk than lean individuals, but scarce data exist on the association between vertebral size and anthropometric measures beyond height, weight, and body mass index (BMI). Here, we evaluated several anthropometric measures (height, weight, BMI, waist circumference, hip circumference, waist-to-hip ratio [WHR], waist-to-height ratio [WHtR], fat mass [FM], lean body mass [LBM], percentage FM [%FM], percentage LBM [%LBM]) as predictors of vertebral cross-sectional area (CSA). We used a representative sample from the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966 (n = 1087), with anthropometric measurements from the ages of 31 and 46, bioimpedance analysis from the age of 46, and lumbar magnetic resonance imaging from the age of 46 years. In our data, height and LBM correlated most strongly with vertebral CSA among both sexes (0.469 ≤ r ≤ 0.514), while WHR, WHtR, %FM, and %LBM had the weakest correlations with vertebral CSA (|r| ≤ 0.114). We conclude that height and LBM have the highest, yet only moderate correlations with vertebral size. High absolute LBM, rather than FM or abdominal mass accumulation, correlates with large vertebral size and thus potentially also with lower osteoporotic vertebral fracture risk.

Estimation of stature from dimensions of the fourth lumbar vertebra in contemporary middle-aged Finns

BACKGROUND

Accurate stature estimation plays an essential role in the identification of unknown deceased individuals. For cases in which conventional methods of stature estimation are not applicable, we studied the stature estimation potential of the fourth lumbar vertebra (L4) among a large living sample of representative contemporary Finns. We also generated stature estimation equations for the middle-aged Finnish population.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Our study population comprised the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966 for which lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans and objective measurements of stature were available from midlife (n=1358). After screening the MRI scans for vertebral pathologies, we measured the maximum and minimum widths, depths and heights of the L4 body with high precision and reliability. We then calculated their sums and means together with approximations of vertebral cross-sectional area and volume. By constructing simple and multiple linear regression models around the L4 parameters, we generated equations for stature prediction, and investigated their accuracy on the basis of the adjusted R squared (R²) and standard error of the estimate (SEE) values of the models.

RESULTS

The multiple linear regression models of the mean width, depth and height of L4 yielded the highest prediction accuracies with the lowest prediction errors (for the entire sample, R²=0.621 and SEE=5.635cm; for men, R²=0.306 and SEE=5.125cm; for women, R²=0.367 and SEE=4.640cm).

CONCLUSION

When conventional methods for estimating stature are not applicable, the lumbar vertebrae may be utilized for this purpose. Relatively accurate stature estimates can be given on the basis of only L4 dimensions.

Body Mass Index Trajectories From Birth to Midlife and Vertebral Dimensions in Midlife: the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966 Study

Vertebral fracture risk is higher among individuals with small vertebral dimensions. Obesity is a global health problem and may also contribute to bone size and fracture risk. In this work we report the association between life course body mass index (BMI) and vertebral cross-sectional area (CSA) in midlife. The Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966 study with its 46-year follow-up provided the material for this study. A subsample of 780 individuals had attended lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at the age of 46 years, and had records of objectively measured BMI from the ages of 0, 7, 15, 31, and 46 years. Of these, MRI-derived data on vertebral size was available for 682 individuals. We identified latent lifelong BMI trajectories by performing latent class growth modeling (LCGM) on the BMI data, and then used sex-stratified linear regression models to compare the identified trajectory groups in terms of midlife vertebral CSA. Gestational age, education years, adult height, lifelong physical activity, lifelong smoking history, and adulthood diet were assessed as potential confounders. Three distinct trajectory groups ("stable slim," "stable average," and "early onset overweight") were identified among both sexes. Comparisons to the stable slim trajectory revealed that vertebral CSA was significantly (p < 0.001) larger among the stable average and early onset overweight trajectories (69.8 and 118.6 mm² larger among men, 57.7 and 106.1 mm² larger among women, respectively). We conclude that lifelong BMI has a positive association with midlife vertebral size among both sexes. Future studies should characterize the mediating factors of this association.

Vertebral Imaging in the Diagnosis of Osteoporosis: a Clinician's Perspective

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Vertebral fractures are the most common osteoporotic fracture and result in functional decline and excess mortality. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the gold standard for the diagnosis of osteoporosis to identify patients at risk for fragility fractures; however, advances in imaging have expanded the role of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in evaluating bone health.

RECENT FINDINGS

The utility of CT and MRI in the assessment of bone density is starting to gain traction, particularly when used opportunistically. DXA, conventional radiography, CT, and MRI can all be used to assess for vertebral fractures, and MRI can determine the acuity of fractures. Finally, advances in imaging allow for non-invasive assessment of measures of bone quality, including microarchitecture, bone strength, and bone turnover, to help identify and treat at-risk patients prior to sustaining a vertebral fracture. CT and MRI techniques remain primarily research tools to assess metabolic bone dysfunction, while use of DXA can be clinically expanded beyond measurement of bone density to assess for vertebral fractures and bone architecture to improve fracture risk assessment and guide treatment.

High-impact exercise in adulthood and vertebral dimensions in midlife - the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966 study

Background

Vertebral size and especially cross-sectional area (CSA) are independently associated with vertebral fracture risk. Previous studies have suggested that physical activity and especially high-impact exercise may affect vertebral strength. We aimed to investigate the association between high-impact exercise at 31 and 46 years of age and vertebral dimensions in midlife.

Methods

We used a subsample of 1023 individuals from the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966 study with records of self-reported sports participation from 31 and 46 years and MRI-derived data on vertebral dimensions from 46 years. Based on the sports participation data, we constructed three impact categories (high, mixed, low) that represented longitudinal high-impact exercise activity in adulthood. We used linear regression and generalized estimating equation (GEE) models to analyse the association between high-impact exercise and vertebral CSA, with adjustments for vertebral height and body mass index.

Results

Participation in high-impact sports was associated with large vertebral CSA among women but not men. The women in the 'mixed' group had 36.8 (95% confidence interval 11.2–62.5) mm² larger CSA and the women in the 'high' group 43.2 (15.2–71.1) mm² larger CSA than the 'low' group.

Conclusions

We suggest that participation (≥ 1/week) in one or more high-impact sports in adulthood is associated with larger vertebral size, and thus increased vertebral strength, among middle-aged women.

Effect of early life physical growth on midlife vertebral dimensions - The Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966 study

Small vertebral size is an independent risk factor for osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Physical growth in early life is related to bone health in later life, but the relationship of early growth versus vertebral size has been inconclusively studied. Utilizing the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966 with a 47-year follow-up, we investigated how physical growth in early life is associated with midlife vertebral dimensions. We obtained several physical growth parameters of 1) birth (gestational age, length, weight, BMI), 2) infancy and childhood (peak height velocity (PHV), peak weight velocity (PWV), adiposity peak (AP), adiposity rebound (AR)), and 3) puberty (BMI at growth spurt take-off (TO), PHV, height change). We also studied 4) the ages at which AP, AR, pubertal TO and pubertal PHV occurred. The outcome variable, vertebral cross-sectional area (CSA), was obtained from magnetic resonance imaging scans at the mean age of 46.7years (n=517). Sex-stratified linear regression analyses were used with adjustments for gestational age, smoking, and education. Birth length/weight/BMI, and adult height/weight/BMI were also used as covariates, depending on the model. According to our results, birth weight (p≤0.006) and infant PWV (p≤0.001) were positively associated with midlife vertebral CSA among both sexes. Length/height variables were associated with vertebral size only before including adult height in the models, and became non-significant thereafter. Among women, BMIs at birth, AP, AR, and pubertal TO were positively associated with midlife vertebral CSA (p<0.05), whereas among men, only high BMI at AR was associated with large vertebral size (p=0.028). Gestational age and timing of growth were not associated with future vertebral CSA. We conclude that early life weight gain is positively associated with midlife vertebral CSA, and suggest that adult height may mediate the effect of height gain on vertebral size.

Effects of Leisure-Time Physical Activity on Vertebral Dimensions in the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966

Vertebral fractures are a common burden amongst elderly and late middle aged people. Vertebral cross-sectional area (CSA) is a major determinant of vertebral strength and thus associated with vertebral fracture risk. Previous studies suggest that physical activity affects vertebral CSA. We aimed to investigate the relationship between leisure-time physical activity (LTPA) from adolescence to middle age and vertebral dimensions in adulthood. We utilized the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966, of which 1188 subjects had records of LTPA at 14, 31 and 46 years, and had undergone lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at the mean age of 47 years. Using MRI data, we measured eight dimensions of the L4 vertebra. Socioeconomic status, smoking habits, height and weight were also recorded at 14, 31 and 46 years. We obtained lifetime LTPA (14-46 years of age) trajectories using latent class analysis, which resulted in three categories (active, moderately active, inactive) in both genders. Linear regression analysis was used to analyze the association between LTPA and vertebral CSA with adjustments for vertebral height, BMI, socioeconomic status and smoking. High lifetime LTPA was associated with larger vertebral CSA in women but not men. Further research is needed to investigate the factors behind the observed gender-related differences.

Age-related trends in vertebral dimensions

Several studies have demonstrated age-related changes in vertebral dimensions. Vertebral size has been reported to increase among elderly adults, with periosteal apposition resulting in increased cross-sectional area (CSA) of the vertebral corpus combined with reduction in bone mineral density. These changes in CSA are observed to be sex-specific, as the pronounced increase of vertebral CSA is found only in elderly males. However, the reduction in bone mineral density in old age is apparent within both sexes. It is thus hypothesized that higher fracture risk in elderly women is a result of their incapacity to increase vertebral size and thus adapt to bone mineral reduction. In this study, our aim was to explore whether the onset of these changes could be ascribed to specific age intervals and whether the proposed differences between the sexes are as great as previously suggested. To conduct this study we utilized two large early 20th century skeletal collections known as Terry and Bass (n = 181). We also utilized data from two lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging samples as a modern-day reference (n = 497). Age, sex and ethnicity of all individuals were known. Vertebral CSA was determined by measuring three width and length dimensions from the corpus of the fourth lumbar vertebra (L4). Our results indicate only a moderate association between age and vertebral CSA. This association was observed to be relatively similar in both sexes, and we thus conclude that there is no clear sex-specific compensatory mechanism for age-related bone loss in vertebral size.

Failure strength of human vertebrae: prediction using bone mineral density measured by DXA and bone volume by micro-CT

Significant relationships exist between areal bone mineral density (BMD) derived from dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and bone strength. However, the predictive validity of BMD for osteoporotic vertebral fractures remains suboptimal. The diagnostic sensitivity of DXA in the lumbar spine may be improved by assessing BMD from lateral-projection scans, as these might better approximate the objective of measuring the trabecular-rich bone in the vertebral body, compared to the commonly-used posterior-anterior (PA) projections. Nowadays, X-ray micro-computed tomography (μCT) allows non-destructive three-dimensional structural characterization of entire bone segments at high resolution. In this study, human lumbar cadaver spines were examined ex situ by DXA in lateral and PA projections, as well as by μCT, with the aims (1) to investigate the ability of bone quantity measurements obtained by DXA in the lateral projection and in the PA projection, to predict variations in bone quantity measurements obtained by μCT, and (2) to assess their respective capabilities to predict whole vertebral body strength, determined experimentally. Human cadaver spines were scanned by DXA in PA projections and lateral projections. Bone mineral content (BMC) and BMD for L2 and L3 vertebrae were determined. The L2 and L3 vertebrae were then dissected and entirely scanned by μCT. Total bone volume (BV(tot)=cortical+trabecular), trabecular bone volume (BV), and trabecular bone volume fraction (BV/TV) were calculated over the entire vertebrae. The vertebral bodies were then mechanically tested to failure in compression, to determine ultimate load. The variables BV(tot), BV, and BV/TV measured by μCT were better predicted by BMC and BMD measured by lateral-projection DXA, with higher R(2) values and smaller standard errors of the estimate (R(2)=0.65-0.90, SEE=11%-18%), compared to PA-projection DXA (R(2)=0.33-0.53, SEE=22%-34%). The best predictors of ultimate load were BV(tot) and BV assessed by μCT (R(2)=0.88 and R(2)=0.81, respectively), and BMC and BMD from lateral-projection DXA (R(2)=0.82 and R(2)=0.70, respectively). Conversely, BMC and BMD from PA-projection DXA were lower predictors of ultimate load (R(2)=0.49 and R(2)=0.37, respectively). This ex vivo study highlights greater capabilities of lateral-projection DXA to predict variations in vertebral body bone quantity as measured by μCT, and to predict vertebral strength as assessed experimentally, compared to PA-projection DXA. This provides basis for further exploring the clinical application of lateral-projection DXA analysis.

Variations in vertebral body dimensions in women measured by 3D-XA: a longitudinal in vivo study

Bone size and shape play an important role in bone strength, as shown by biomechanical testing and clinical studies. Vertebral body dimensions determine vertebral body strength even after adjustment for bone mineral density. We have recently proposed an in vivo method for 3D reconstruction of vertebral bodies using the whole spine imaging on a standard DXA device (3D-XA). The aim of our study was to measure in vivo vertebral body dimension changes by 3D-XA in women over a 6 year period. A total of 174 women were included in this study. They were divided into 3 groups: premenopausal (20-40 years; N=53), postmenopausal women (55-60 years; N=65) and elderly women (70-80 years; N=56). Thoracic and lumbar spine (T4-L4) were reconstructed using the 3D-XA method at baseline and 6 years later. Biochemical markers of bone remodeling were measured at baseline. In premenopausal women, there was an increase in minimal cross-sectional area (minCSA), vertebral body volume as well as end plate width of the lumbar vertebrae, without statistically significant change of these parameters at the thoracic spine; there was no change in anterior heights. In postmenopausal women, there was a decrease in vertebral body anterior height and depth, driven by results in the elderly group at both the thoracic and lumbar spine. Vertebral body width decreased at the thoracic spine but increased at the lumbar spine. MinCSA and volume decreased at the thoracic spine, in contrast with an increase of these 2 parameters at the lumbar spine in early postmenopausal women (55-60 years). In elderly women (70-80 years), the change in minCSA and volume of the lumbar spine was not statistically significant over 6 years. In postmenopausal women, there was no correlation between changes in vertebral dimensions and baseline biochemical markers of bone remodeling except for NTX/Cr and anterior height decrease. Our study confirms that an increase in geometric dimensions of lumbar vertebrae occurs through adult life. This could be related to a compensation for bone loss, aiming to maintain bone strength through increase in size. However, this phenomenon is not observed at all levels in the spine; since we do not confirm this increase at the thoracic spine. This might be one of the determinants of the higher risk of fractures in this part of the spine.

Temporal trends in vertebral size and shape from medieval to modern-day

Human lumbar vertebrae support the weight of the upper body. Loads lifted and carried by the upper extremities cause significant loading stress to the vertebral bodies. It is well established that trauma-induced vertebral fractures are common especially among elderly people. The aim of this study was to investigate the morphological factors that could have affected the prevalence of trauma-related vertebral fractures from medieval times to the present day. To determine if morphological differences existed in the size and shape of the vertebral body between medieval times and the present day, the vertebral body size and shape was measured from the 4th lumbar vertebra using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and standard osteometric calipers. The modern samples consisted of modern Finns and the medieval samples were from archaeological collections in Sweden and Britain. The results show that the shape and size of the 4th lumbar vertebra has changed significantly from medieval times in a way that markedly affects the biomechanical characteristics of the lumbar vertebral column. These changes may have influenced the incidence of trauma- induced spinal fractures in modern populations.

Lumbar spine peak bone mass and bone turnover in men and women: a longitudinal study

Peak bone mass is an important determinant of bone mass in later life, but the age of peak bone mass is still unclear. We found that bone size and density increase and bone turnover decreases until age 25. It may be possible to influence bone accrual into the third decade.

INTRODUCTION

Peak bone mass is a major determinant of bone mass in later life. Bone growth and maturation is site-specific, and the age of peak bone mass is still unclear. It is important to know the age to which bone accrual continues so strategies to maximise bone mass can be targeted appropriately. This study aims to ascertain the age of lumbar spine peak bone mass.

METHODS

We measured lumbar spine BMC, estimated volume and BMAD by DXA and biochemical markers of bone turnover in 116 healthy males and females ages 11 to 40, followed up at an interval of five to nine years.

RESULTS

The majority of peak bone mass was attained by the mid-twenties. Increases in BMC in adolescents and young adults were mostly due to increases in bone size. Bone turnover markers decreased through adolescence and the third decade and the decreasing rate of change in bone turnover corresponded with the decreasing rate of change in lumbar spine measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

Skeletal maturation and bone mineral accrual at the lumbar spine continues into the third decade.

Generation of a 3D proximal femur shape from a single projection 2D radiographic image

Generalized Procrustes analysis and thin plate splines were employed to create an average 3D shape template of the proximal femur that was warped to the size and shape of a single 2D radiographic image of a subject. Mean absolute depth errors are comparable with previous approaches utilising multiple 2D input projections.

INTRODUCTION

Several approaches have been adopted to derive volumetric density (g cm(-3)) from a conventional 2D representation of areal bone mineral density (BMD, g cm(-2)). Such approaches have generally aimed at deriving an average depth across the areal projection rather than creating a formal 3D shape of the bone.

METHODS

Generalized Procrustes analysis and thin plate splines were employed to create an average 3D shape template of the proximal femur that was subsequently warped to suit the size and shape of a single 2D radiographic image of a subject. CT scans of excised human femora, 18 and 24 scanned at pixel resolutions of 1.08 mm and 0.674 mm, respectively, were equally split into training (created 3D shape template) and test cohorts.

RESULTS

The mean absolute depth errors of 3.4 mm and 1.73 mm, respectively, for the two CT pixel sizes are comparable with previous approaches based upon multiple 2D input projections.

CONCLUSIONS

This technique has the potential to derive volumetric density from BMD and to facilitate 3D finite element analysis for prediction of the mechanical integrity of the proximal femur. It may further be applied to other anatomical bone sites such as the distal radius and lumbar spine.

Effects of the sample size of reference population on determining BMD reference curve and peak BMD and diagnosing osteoporosis

Establishing reference databases generally requires a large sample size to achieve reliable results. Our study revealed that the varying sample size from hundreds to thousands of individuals has no decisive effect on the bone mineral density (BMD) reference curve, peak BMD, and diagnosing osteoporosis. It provides a reference point for determining the sample size while establishing local BMD reference databases.

INTRODUCTION

This study attempts to determine a suitable sample size for establishing bone mineral density (BMD) reference databases in a local laboratory.

METHODS

The total reference population consisted of 3,662 Chinese females aged 6-85 years. BMDs were measured with a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry densitometer. The subjects were randomly divided into four different sample groups, that is, total number (Tn) = 3,662, 1/2n = 1,831, 1/4n = 916, and 1/8n = 458. We used the best regression model to determine BMD reference curve and peak BMD.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the full curves between the four sample groups at each skeletal site, although some discrepancy at the end of the curves was observed at the spine. Peak BMDs were very similar in the four sample groups. According to the Chinese diagnostic criteria (BMD >25% below the peak BMD as osteoporosis), no difference was observed in the osteoporosis detection rate using the reference values determined by the four different sample groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Varying the sample size from hundreds to thousands has no decisive effect on establishing BMD reference curve and determining peak BMD. It should be practical for determining the reference population while establishing local BMD databases.

Assessment of bone acquisition in childhood and adolescence

Availability, ease of use, relative low cost, and minimal radiation exposure have made dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry the most widely used technique worldwide to obtain bone measurements for both research and clinical purposes in pediatric populations. However, errors related to growth and maturity significantly diminish the accuracy of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry bone measurements. Several investigators have found that dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in children frequently leads to a misdiagnosis of osteoporosis and an underestimation of the amount of bone. In this regard, a recent official position paper by the International Society for Clinical Densitometry states that subjects <20 years of age should not be given a diagnosis of osteoporosis on the basis of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry criteria. Nevertheless, the increased awareness that osteoporosis has its antecedents in childhood and the demand for examinations of bone acquisition and response to therapy stress the urgent need to improve the value of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry measurements for children.

Assessing bone mass in children and adolescents

Growing awareness that osteoporosis may have its antecedents in childhood has led to increasing interest in assessing bone mass in children and adolescents. Several noninvasive imaging techniques are currently available to measure properties of the growing skeleton, including bone mass, density, cross-sectional area, and microarchitecture. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the most widely used technique, but it has several major limitations associated with its dependence on two-dimensional projections. Quantitative CT and peripheral quantitative CT allow three-dimensional imaging but are more costly and have higher radiation exposure. Quantitative ultrasound is simple and inexpensive but can measure bone "quality" only at a single peripheral site. MRI techniques for measuring bone are still under development and not yet ready for clinical use. For all of these techniques, clinical interpretation of the bone measures obtained remains a significant challenge. Further research is needed to relate these measures to osteoporosis in the elderly and to short-term and long-term fracture risk.

Osteoporosis in children and adolescents: etiology and management

Bone mass increases progressively during childhood, but mainly during adolescence when approximately 40% of total bone mass is accumulated. Peak bone mass is reached in late adolescence, and is a well recognised risk factor for osteoporosis later in life. Thus, increasing peak bone mass can prevent osteoporosis. The critical interpretation of bone mass measurements is a crucial factor for the diagnosis of osteopenia/osteoporosis in children and adolescents. To date, there are insufficient data to formally define osteopenia/osteoporosis in this patient group, and the guidelines used for adult patients are not applicable. In males and females aged <20 years the terminology 'low bone density for chronologic age' may be used if the Z-score is less than -2. For children and adolescents, this terminology is more appropriate than osteopenia/osteoporosis. Moreover, the T-score should not be used in children and adolescents. Many disorders, by various mechanisms, may affect the acquisition of bone mass during childhood and adolescence. Indeed, the number of disorders that have been identified as affecting bone mass in this age group is increasing as a consequence of the wide use of bone mass measurements. The increased survival of children and adolescents with chronic diseases or malignancies, as well as the use of some treatment regimens has resulted in an increase in the incidence of reduced bone mass in this age group. Experience in treating the various disorders associated with osteoporosis in childhood is limited at present. The first approach to osteoporosis management in children and adolescents should be aimed at treating the underlying disease. The use of bisphosphonates in children and adolescents with osteoporosis is increasing and their positive effect in improving bone mineral density is encouraging. Osteoporosis prevention is a key factor and it should begin in childhood. Pediatricians should have a fundamental role in the prevention of osteoporosis, suggesting strategies to achieve an optimal peak bone mass.

Adaptation of the Carter method to adjust lumbar spine bone mineral content for age and body size: application to children who were born preterm

In adults, the Carter method allows the separation of the lumbar spine bone mineral content (BMC) into its constituents; bone volume (BV) and volumetric density (bone mineral apparent density [BMAD]). However, this method is not widely used in pediatric studies and does not account for the effects of body habitus on bone mass. The aims of this study were to modify the Carter method for use in children by developing an approach that adjusts separately for age and body height, and to test whether lumbar spine bone mass is normal in children born who were born preterm. Twenty-five preterm-born children were matched to a term-born child. Lumbar spine bone mass was measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. The BV and BMAD were calculated. Z-scores based on age and height were calculated. The preterm group had reduced absolute height, weight, BMC, BV, and BMAD, and reduced height, weight, and BMC for their age. The BMC was appropriate for height. The BV was appropriate for age. The BMAD was reduced for age but appropriate for height. In preterm children, the major abnormality at the lumbar spine is a decrease in volumetric density; however, this decrease is proportional with their reduced stature, and we speculate that there is no reduction in the strength of the lumbar spine.

The fracture risk index and bone mineral density as predictors of vertebral structural failure

Structural failure becomes increasingly likely as the load on bone approximates or exceeds the bone's ability to withstand it. The vertebral fracture risk index (FRI) expresses the risk for structural failure as a ratio of compressive stress (load per unit area) to estimated failure stress, and so should be a more sensitive and specific predictor of vertebral fracture than spine areal BMD (aBMD) or volumetric BMD (vBMD), surrogates of bone strength alone. To address this issue, we analyzed the results of a case-control study of 89 postmenopausal women with vertebral fractures and 306 controls in Melbourne, Australia, and a 10-year community-based prospective study in which 30 postmenopausal women who had incident vertebral fractures were compared with 150 controls in Lyon, France. The FRI and vBMD of the third lumbar vertebral body and spine aBMD were derived using dual X-ray absorptiometry. In the cross-sectional analysis, each SD increase in FRI was associated with 2.1-fold (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.55-2.73) increased vertebral fracture risk, while each SD decrease in aBMD or vBMD was associated with 4.0-fold (95% CI, 2.69-6.18 and 2.65-6.94, respectively) increase in risk. Using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the FRI was less sensitive and specific than aBMD in discriminating cases and controls (area under ROC, 0.76 vs 0.84, p<0.01). The area under ROC curve did not differ between FRI and vBMD (0.76 vs 0.79, NS). In the prospective data set, the FRI was not predictive [hazard ratio, HR, 1.20 (95% CI, 0.9-1.7)] and was in contrast to aBMD [HR, 2.4 (95% CI, 1.5-3.8)] and vBMD [HR, 2.1 (95% CI, 1.39-3.17)]. There was also lower sensitivity using a cutoff value of FRI>or=1 compared with aBMD T-score of -2.5 SD in both studies. There was poor agreement (kappa=0.13-0.18) between FRI and aBMD T -scores in detecting fractures; each method only identified around 50% of fractured cases. Within the constraints of the sample size, we concluded that applying a biomechanical index such as FRI at the spine is no better in discriminating fracture cases and controls than conventional aBMD or vBMD. The FRI may not predict incident vertebral fractures.

Three-dimensional X-ray absorptiometry (3D-XA): a method for reconstruction of human bones using a dual X-ray absorptiometry device

Three-dimensional accurate evaluation of the geometry of the proximal femur may be helpful for hip fracture risk evaluation. The purpose of this study was to apply and validate a stereo-radiographic 3D reconstruction method of the proximal femur, using contours identification from biplanar DXA images. Twenty-five excised human proximal femurs were investigated using a standard DXA unit. Three-dimensional personalized models were reconstructed using a dedicated non-stereo corresponding contours (NSCC) algorithm. Three-dimensional CT-scan reconstructions obtained on a clinical CT-scan unit were defined as geometric references for the comparison protocol, in order to assess accuracy and reproducibility of the 3D stereo-radiographic reconstructions. The precision of a set of 3D geometric parameters (femoral-neck axis length, mid-neck cross-section area, neck-shaft angle), obtained from stereo-radiographic models was also evaluated. This study shows that the NSCC method may be applied to obtain 3D reconstruction from biplanar DXA acquisitions. Applied to the proximal femur, this method showed good accuracy as compared with high-resolution personalized CT-scan models (mean error = 0.8 mm). Moreover, precision study for the set of 3D parameters yielded coefficients of variation lower than 5%. This is the first study providing 3D geometric parameters from standard 2D DXA images using the NSCC method. It has good accuracy and reproducibility in the present study on cadaveric femurs. In vivo prospective studies are needed to evaluate its discriminating potential on hip fracture risk prediction.

Relationship of body surface area with bone density and its risk of osteoporosis at various skeletal regions in women of mainland China

The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between body surface area (BS) and bone mineral density (BMD) and the associated osteoporosis risk at various skeletal regions in women from mainland China. BMD was measured at the posteroanterior (PA) spine (L1-L4), supine lateral spine (L2-L4) including volumetric BMD (vBMD), hip including femoral neck, trochanter and total hip, and forearm, including radius + ulna ultradistal (R + UUD), 1/3 site (R + U1/3) and total region (R + UT) using a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) fan-beam bone densitometer (Hologic QDR 4500A) in 3418 females aged from 18 to 75 years. Data analysis revealed a positive correlation between BS and BMD at the various skeletal regions (r = 0.114-0.373, all P = 0.000), but no correlation with vBMD (r = 0.000, P = 0.934). Using the stepwise regression model, BMDs at various skeletal regions were dependent variables while height, weight, body mass index (BMI), BS and projective bone area (BA) were independent variables; BS was determined to be the most important variable that affected the PA spine, hip and forearm BMDs. Subjects were divided into three groups according to size: large BS group (LBSG), intermediate BS group (IBSG) and small BS group (SBSG). The BMD at different skeletal regions of subjects between groups exhibited a significant gradient difference, with LBSG > IBSG > SBSG, but this was not seen for vBMD. On the fitting curves where BMD varied with age at the PA spine, femoral neck, total hip and R + UUD, BMDs of LBSG were 6.93-9.29% higher than those of IBSG and 12.1-16.9 % higher than those of SBSG, whereas those of SBSG were 6.12-9.59% lower than those of IBSG at various skeletal regions, respectively. The prevalence rates and risks of osteoporosis of LBSG were significantly lower than those of SBSG and IBSG, whereas those of IBSG were obviously lower than those of SBSG at various skeletal regions, respectively, presenting a gradient difference among the three study groups, LBSG < IBSG < SBSG. Our study shows that the relationship between BS and BMD exceeds that between BMD and height or weight in women in mainland China. When areal BMD is employed, those with a larger BS have higher areal BMD and lower risks of osteoporosis while, conversely, those with a smaller BS have lower areal BMD, and therefore higher risk for osteoporosis. However, when vBMD is used, these differences diminish or even disappear.

Apparent bone mineral density estimated from DXA in healthy men and women

The aim of this study was to measure bone mineral density (BMD) in healthy people and examine the influence of age, anthropometry, and postmenopause on calculated bone mineral apparent density (BMAD). The study included 541 healthy subjects (249 men and 292 women), aged 20 to 79 years. Anthropometric measurements included height, weight, and body mass index (BMI). Bone mineral content (BMC) and areal BMD were measured at the lumbar spine and proximal femur, using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The calculation of volumetric density relied on the formula BMAD=BMD/ square root BA (where BA = bone area). Association between densitometric parameters and age, height, weight, and postmenopause was analyzed with multiple regression. BMC and BMD decreased with age, especially in postmenopausal women. The average annual bone loss in spine was 0.2% in both sexes, whereas femur loss was 0.5% in men and 0.3% in women. Bone area slightly increased with age in both sexes, and BMD loss after the age of 50 could be attributed to bone area increase. To minimize the effect of bone size on bone density, volumetric density and areal density were regressed to age, anthropometry, and postmenopause. Age and postmenopause were significantly associated with BMD and BMAD in the spine and femur. Furthermore, BMD showed a stronger association with height and weight than BMAD, in both regions. Weaker association of body height and weight with BMAD than with BMD suggests that BMD depends on the bone size and body size and that the different BMDs could be the consequence of the difference in those parameters.

Effects of projective bone area size of the spine on bone density and the diagnosis of osteoporosis in healthy pre-menopausal women in China

The aim of this study was to understand the effects of projective bone area (BA) size of the spine on bone density and the diagnosis of osteoporosis. Measurements of BA, bone mineral content (BMC), areal bone density (aBMD) and volumetric bone density (vBMD) at the posteroanterior (PA) lumbar spine (vertebrae L2-L4) followed by a paired PA/lateral spine (L2-L4) were made using a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) fan-beam bone densitometer (Hologic QDR 4500A) in 1436 healthy pre-menopausal women aged from 20 to 56-years-old. At the PA and lateral lumbar spine, there was a significant positive correlation between BA and BMC (r=0.762 and 0.762, p=0.000) and aBMD (r=0.370 and 0.352, p=0.000), but not vBMD (r=0.000 and 0.102, p=0.813 and 0.063). When BA at the PA spine changed by one standard deviation (SD), BMC and aBMD correspondingly changed by 12.6% and 4.3% on the basis of their respective means while vBMD indicated no change. When a variation of 1 SD was observed in BA at the lateral spine, BMC, aBMD and vBMD correspondingly changed by 13.8%, 4.4% and 1.73% on the basis of their respective means. Through an intercomparison among large, intermediate and small BA groups, significant differences were found in the means of subject's height, weight, BMC and aBMD at the PA and lateral spine as well as the detection rate of osteoporosis by aBMD (p=0.000). Detection rates of osteoporosis by aBMD at the PA, lateral spine and vBMD in healthy pre-menopausal women aged from 40 years to 56 years were 4.5%, 16.4% and 9.7%, respectively, in the small BA group; 1.3%, 6.4% and 7.3%, respectively, in the intermediate BA group; and 0, 0 and 5.5%, respectively, in the large BA group. No significant differences were found in the detection rates of osteoporosis by vBMD among the groups. The results of multiple linear regression revealed that the major factors influencing BA of the lumbar spine was height. In healthy pre-menopausal women of the same race and age, the BA size of the lumbar spine would have significant influence upon aBMD and the diagnosis of osteoporosis, i.e. the larger the BA, the greater the aBMD and the lower the osteoporosis detection rate while conversely, the smaller the BA, the smaller the aBMD and the higher the osteoporosis detection rate. Though vBMD does not change with BA sizes of the lumbar spine, it is a sensitive marker for diagnosing osteoporosis.

Establishment of peak bone mass

Among the main areas of progress in osteoporosis research during the last decade or so are the general recognition that this condition, which is the cause of so much pain in the elderly population, has its antecedents in childhood and the identification of the structural basis accounting for much of the differences in bone strength among humans. Nevertheless, current understanding of the bone mineral accrual process is far from complete. The search for genes that regulate bone mass acquisition is ongoing, and current results are not sufficient to identify subjects at risk. However, there is solid evidence that BMD measurements can be helpful for the selection of subjects that presumably would benefit from preventive interventions. The questions regarding the type of preventive interventions, their magnitude, and duration remain unanswered. Carefully designed controlled trials are needed. Nevertheless, previous experience indicates that weight-bearing activity and possibly calcium supplements are beneficial if they are begun during childhood and preferably before the onset of puberty. Modification of unhealthy lifestyles and increments in exercise or calcium assumption are logical interventions that should be implemented to improve bone mass gains in all children and adolescents who are at risk of failing to achieve an optimal peak bone mass.

Comparison of DXA and MRI methods for interpreting femoral neck bone mineral density

The aim of the study was to improve the practical implementation of the dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) by converting the areal bone mineral density BMD (BMD(areal)) to volumetric BMD using magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (MRI) because a failure to control for the femoral neck size can lead to erroneous interpretation of BMD values. We also evaluated the feasibility of MR T2* relaxation time in assessing bone mineral status of the femoral neck. Twenty-eight randomly selected 47- to 64-yr-old healthy men were studied. The men had neither unilateral nor bilateral hip osteoarthritis according to radiographs. Bone width, mineral content (BMC), BMD(areal), and apparent volumetric BMD (BMD(vol)) of the right femoral neck were measured with DXA. The BMD(vol) was calculated by approximating the femoral neck to be cylindrical with a circular cross-section (Vol(dxa)). Volumetric measurements from MR (Vol(mri)) images of the femoral neck were also used to create a BMD measure that was corrected for the femoral neck volume (BMD(mri)). T2* measurements were performed with a 1.5-T scanner (Siemens Magnetom 63SP, Erlangen, Germany). A single 10-mm-thick coronal slice was generated on the femur with a repetition time of 60 ms, and nine echo times (4-20 ms) were used to derive T2* values. Vol(mri) correlated positively (r = 0.828, p < 0.001) with Vol(dxa). However, the Vol(mri) of the femoral neck was 18% lower than the Vol(dxa). Similarly, the BMD(mri) was related to the BMD(vol) (r = 0.737, p < 0.001). Because of the difference in the volumetric measures, the BMD(mri) of the femoral neck was 21% higher than the BMD(vol) (p < 0.001). T2* relaxation time showed a significant negative correlation with BMC, BMD(areal), BMD(vol), and BMD(mri) (r = -0.423 to -0.757, p < 0.05-0.001). In conclusion, these results are evidence that DXA-derived volume approximations by the cylinder with circular cross-section geometry may lead to lower DXA-derived BMD(vol) values, as compared to true MRI-derived volumetric bone mineral density. Thus, the BMD(vol) may not be an accurate method to calculate the true volumetric BMD in the femoral neck. Our results also suggest that the MRI-derived T2* method may be used to approximate the BMD in the proximal femur.

Assessment of forearm volumetric bone mineral density from standard areal densitometry data

The common bone density measurement procedures produce areal bone mineral density data (BMD) alone. Volumetric bone density is thought to offer a different diagnostic perspective and is usually measured by peripheral quantitative computed tomography. We developed a calculation procedure for radial and ulnar volumetric densities based on single X-ray absorptiometry. The study consisted of 418 healthy Bulgarian females (ages 20 83 yr). Forearm bone density was measured on a DTX-100 densitometer at the 8-mm distal site, and the total volumetric bone densities of radius and ulna were calculated. The accuracy error determined on cadaveric bones was 10 14%. The in vivo precision error was 1.0 1.1%. Age-matched reference curves for volumetric BMD (vBMD) were built. Peak values were registered in the age 30 34 group: 0.403 (radius) and 0.469 g/cm(3) (ulna). Ulnar volumetric density exceeded the radial one, representing an interesting finding to be further investigated. For the age 70 74 group, vBMD was reduced by approx 30% compared with the age 30 34 group. Our data confirmed the fact that volumetric density was much less affected by age and menopause. Correlations between forearm vBMD and axial BMD were moderate. The proposed calculation procedure could become an extra option in forearm bone densitometry to be applied in pediatric populations or adults of extremely large or small body size.

Sexual dimorphism in vertebral fragility is more the result of gender differences in age-related bone gain than bone loss

Spine fractures usually occur less commonly in men than in women. To identify the structural basis for this gender difference in vertebral fragility, we studied 1013 healthy subjects (327 men and 686 women) and 76 patients with spine fractures (26 men and 50 women). Bone mineral content (BMC), cross-sectional area (CSA), and volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) of the third lumbar vertebral body (L3) were measured by posteroanterior (PA) and lateral scanning using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). In this cross-sectional study, the diminution in peak vertebral body BMC from young adulthood to old age was less in men than in women (6% vs. 27%). This diminution was the net result of two opposing changes occurring concurrently throughout adult life: the removal of bone adjacent to marrow on the inner (endosteal) surface by bone resorption and the deposition of bone on the outer (periosteal) surface by bone formation. For L3, we estimated that men resorbed 3.7 g and deposited 3.1 g, producing a net loss of 0.6 g from young adulthood to old age and women resorbed 3.1 g and deposited only 1.2 g, producing a net loss of 1.9 g. Thus, based on our indirect estimates of periosteal gain and endosteal loss across life, the observed net diminution in BMC during aging was less in men than women because absolute periosteal bone formation was greater in men than women (3.1 g vs. 1.2 g) not because absolute bone resorption was less in men. On the contrary, the absolute amount of bone resorbed was greater in men than women (3.7 g vs. 3.1 g). Periosteal bone formation also increased vertebral body CSA 3-fold more in men than in women, distributing loads onto a larger CSA, so that the load imposed per unit CSA decreased twice as much in men than in women (13% vs. 5%). In men and women with spine fractures, CSA and vBMD were reduced relative to age-matched controls. However, vBMD was no different to the adjusted vBMD in age-matched controls derived assuming controls had no periosteal bone formation during aging. Thus, large amounts of bone are resorbed in men as well as in women, accounting for the age-related increase in spine fractures in both genders. Periosteal bone formation increases CSA and offsets bone loss in both genders but more greatly in men, accounting for the lower incidence of spine fractures in men than in women. We speculate that reduced periosteal bone formation, during growth or aging, may be in part responsible for both reduced vertebral size and reduced vBMD in men and women with spine fractures. Sexual dimorphism in vertebral fragility is more the result of gender differences in age-related bone gain than age-related bone loss.

The biomechanical basis of vertebral body fragility in men and women

The aim of this study was to quantify the biomechanical basis for vertebral fracture risk in elderly men and women. A bone is likely to fracture when the loads imposed are similar to or greater than its strength. To quantify this risk, we developed a fracture risk index (FRI) based on the ratio of the vertebral body compressive load and strength. Loads were determined by upper body weight, height, and the muscle moment arm, and strength was estimated from cross-sectional area (CSA) and volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD). With loads less than the strength of the bone, the FRI remains < 1. For any given load, once bone strength diminishes due to a falling vBMD, the FRI will increase. Should FRI approach or exceed unity, structural failure of the vertebra is likely. We measured vertebral body CSA vBMD of the middle zone of third lumbar vertebra by lateral and posteroanterior (PA) scanning using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and calculated vertebral compressive stress (load per unit area) in 327 healthy men and 686 healthy women and 26 men and 55 postmenopausal women with vertebral fractures. Activities that require forward bending of the upper body caused approximately 10-fold more compressive stress on the vertebra compared with standing upright. Men and women had similar peak vBMD in young adulthood. Because men have greater stature than women, the loads imposed on the vertebral body are higher (3,754 +/- 65 N vs. 3,051 +/- 31 N; p < 0.001). However, because CSA also was higher in men than women, peak load per unit CSA (stress) did not differ by gender (317.4 +/- 4.7 N/cm2 vs. 321.9 +/- 3.3 N/cm2, NS). The FRI was similar in young men and women and well below unity (0.42 +/- 0.02 vs. 0.43 +/- 0.01; NS). Gender differences emerged during aging; CSA increased in both men and women but more so in men, so load per unit area (stress) diminished but more so in men than in women. vBMD decreased in both genders but less so in men. These changes were captured in the FRI, which increased by only 21% in men and by 102% in women so that only 9% of elderly men but 26% of elderly women had an FRI > or = 1. Men and women with vertebral fractures had an FRI that was greater than or equal to unity (1.03 +/- 0.13 vs. 1.35 +/- 0.13; p < 0.05) and was 2.04 SD and 2.26 SD higher than age-matched men and women, respectively. In summary and conclusion, young men and women have a similar vBMD, vertebral stress, and FRI. During aging, CSA increases more, and vBMD decreases less in men than in women. Thus, fewer men than women are at risk for fracture because fewer men than women have these structural determinants of bone strength below a level at which the loads exceed the bone's ability to tolerate them. Men and women with vertebral fractures have FRIs that are equal to or exceed unity. The results show that a fracture threshold for vertebrae can be defined using established biomechanical principles; whether this approach has greater sensitivity and specificity than the current BMD T score of -2.5 SD is unknown.

Future methods in the assessment of bone mass and structure

There have been major advances in the diagnosis of osteoporosis over the last few decades not only in the definitions that are now used but also in the technology that is available. The future will see further development of the techniques currently in common clinical use, such us dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and quantitative ultrasound. In addition new techniques for assessing bone structure, including MRI and fractal analysis of X-rays, may add significantly to our understanding of the pathophysiology of osteoporosis and to the prediction of fracture risk.

Reproducibility of volume-adjusted bone mineral density of spine and hip from dual X-ray absorptiometry

Skeletal size has a confounding effect on areal bone mineral density (aBMD) related to differences in skeletal volume. Several methods have been proposed for calculating volumetric BMD (vBMD), but in vivo precision data are limited for the spine and have not been published for the hip. We prospectively performed duplicate dual X-ray absorptiometry measurements of the anteroposterior spine and hip (n = 121) in a diverse female population referred for initial clinical BMD testing. Each scan pair was performed and analyzed by two different technologists (mean interval of 4 d) to obtain standard aBMD. Scan data were reprocessed at a later date to calculate vBMD for the lumbar spine (L2-L4), femoral neck, and total hip in the 87 spines and 82 hips for which we had complete analyzable scan data. We found much worse precision in femoral neck volume (5.2% coefficient of variation [CV]) than in spine volume (2.6% CV; p < 0.003). This contributed to greater error in femoral neck vBMD (3.9% CV) than aBMD (2.3= CV; p < 10(-6)). Total hip aBMD had better precision than vBMD (1.0 and 1.3-2.5% CV; p < 10(-5)). The reverse pattern was seen in the spine with slightly better precision for vBMD than aBMD (1.1 and 1.5% CV; p < 0.002). Volumetric measures of lumbar spine density can be obtained with high precision. Because of poor reproducibility in the femoral neck, the total hip region may be preferable for measuring volumetric bone density in the proximal femur.

A physical model for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry--derived bone mineral density

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-derived areal bone mineral density (BMD) is an established predictor of osteoporotic fractures and reflects bone strength as well. The goal of this study was to develop and validate a physical model for appropriate interpretation of BMD.

METHODS

DXA and peripheral quantitative computed tomography investigations of the distal tibia (n = 45), proximal tibia (n = 12), distal femur (n = 26), and distal radius (n = 34) were carried out. The DXA-derived BMD was analytically modeled as a nonlinear function of volumetric bone mineral apparent density and the cross-sectional area (eCSA) of given bone; ie, BMD(mod) = apparent BMD x square root of eCSA.

RESULTS

At every measured skeletal site, the relationship between BMD and BMD(mod) was systematically stronger than that observed separately between BMD and apparent BMD or cross-sectional area. The models (r2) explained 85%, 94%, 87%, and 74% of the variability in BMD at the distal tibia, proximal tibia, distal femur, and distal radius, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The mutual contributions of bone density and size to BMD can vary to some extent in a site-dependent fashion. This dual nature of BMD on one hand provides a reasonable mechanical explanation for why BMD is a good surrogate of bone strength and a predictor of osteoporotic fractures but on the other hand, complicates its detailed interpretation.

Vertebral bone mass, size, and volumetric density in women with spinal fractures

Bone densitometry provides a measure of bone mass expressed as bone mineral content (BMC) or areal bone mineral density (aBMD). BMC is unadjusted for bone size while aBMD is adjusted for the projected area of the region scanned but not its depth. Because patients with fractures often have reduced bone size, the deficit in BMC or aBMD relative to controls may be partly the result of the comparison of a smaller bone in patients with fractures with a bigger bone in controls without fractures. We asked, what proportion of the deficit in BMC and aBMD found in women with spine fractures relative to controls is attributable to smaller vertebral size? We measured BMC (g), volume (cm3, derived from projected area3/2), aBMD (g/cm2), and volumetric BMD (vBMD, g/cm3) of the third lumbar vertebra by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in 270 premenopausal women aged 18-43 years, 163 postmenopausal women with spine fractures aged 54-83 years, and 209 women without fractures aged 54-87 years. The regression of BMC and aBMD on volume in the premenopausal women was used to calculate volume adjusted BMC and aBMD in postmenopausal women with and without fractures (adjusted BMC = observed BMC + [50 - observed volume] x 0.29; adjusted aBMD = observed aBMD + [50 - observed volume] x 0.0044). The data were expressed in the original units and as standard deviation scores (SD) above or below the young normal mean (T scores) or the age predicted mean (Z scores). All results were expressed as mean +/- SEM. Women with spine fractures had reduced BMC (T = -2.35 +/- 0.07 SD, Z = -1.18 +/- 0.06 SD), volume (T = -1.08 +/- 0.08 SD, Z = -0.82 +/- 0.08 SD), aBMD (T = -3. 06 +/- 0.09 SD, Z = -1.14 +/- 0.06 SD) and vBMD (T = -2.67 +/- 0.10 SD, Z = - 0.94 +/- 0.07 SD) (all p < 0.001). About 48% of the difference in BMC between postmenopausal women with and without spine fractures, and about 16% of the difference in aBMD was explained by the difference in vertebral volume between them. When women with and without spine fractures were intentionally matched by aBMD (and age, height, and weight), vertebral volume was reduced (Z = -0.66 +/- 0.13 SD, p < 0.001). When women with and without fractures were intentionally matched by vertebral volume (and age, height, and weight), vBMD was reduced (Z = -1.07 +/- 0.10 SD, p < 0. 001). Women with spine fractures have smaller vertebrae with less bone in the smaller bone. About half the deficit in BMC relative to controls is due to their smaller bone size. The remainder may be due to reduced bone accrual, increased bone loss, or both. Thus, the pathogenesis of bone fragility is heterogeneous. Factors responsible for a deficit in bone mass (due to reduced accrual or excess bone loss) are unlikely to be identified when reduced bone size exaggerates the deficit, and increased bone size obscures it. Understanding the pathogenesis of bone fragility requires acknowledgment of this heterogeneity and the description of its varied morphological basis. This can be achieved by the study of the periosteal and endosteal surfaces of bone because the absolute and relative changes in these surfaces during growth and aging determine skeletal size, its mass, and architecture.

Longitudinal evaluation of bone mass in asthmatic children treated with inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate or cromolyn sodium

Inhaled corticosteroids are recommended as first-line therapy in patients with moderate to severe asthma. The use of these agents in the milder form of asthma is controversial because of their potential adverse effects, especially in growing children. We investigated 49 asthmatic children (38 treated with beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) at a daily dose of 276+/-125 microg/day and 11 treated with cromolyn sodium (CS) at a daily dose of 30+/-10 mg/day) for 7.4 months, with bone-mass measurements at baseline and after the treatment period. Evaluation of changes in cortical and trabecular bone mass (bone mineral density [BMD]; m/cm2) was performed by absorptiometry at the proximal forearm and at the lumbar spine, respectively. Furthermore, to correct for bone size changes due to growth, we calculated volumetric BMD (VOL-BMD; mg/cm3). At the end of the treatment period, the children who had received regular inhaled BDP had grown as well as children treated with CS, from 120+/-1.4 to 123+/-1.3 cm and from 118+/-3.2 to 120.3+/-2.8 cm, respectively. No children showed deviation from their percentile level of growth. Trabecular and cortical BMD increased after 7 months of follow-up in both groups to the same extent. When BMD was adjusted for body size (VOL-BMD; mg/cm3), bone mass was found not to have changed after BDP or CS treatment course within and between the two groups.

Instrumental diagnosis of osteoporosis

Considerable progress in the development of methods for assessing the skeleton now makes it possible to detect osteoporosis non-invasively and early. There is a variety of techniques available at present: single-photon (SPA) and single X-ray absorptiometry (SXA), dual-photon (DPA) and dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), quantitative computed tomography (QCT), radiographic absorptiometry (RA), and quantitative ultrasound (QUS), and their development has certainly been driven by the need to overcome the inherent shortcomings of plain radiography for this purpose. Both SPA and SXA methods make a quantitative assessment of the bone mineral content (BMC) or density (BMD) at peripheral sites of the skeleton possible. Single energy measurements are not possible at sites with variable soft tissue thickness and composition, i.e., the axial skeleton. For these purposes, DPA and DXA techniques were introduced. The main advantages of an X-ray system over a radionuclide system are shortened examination time, greater accuracy and precision limited to higher resolution, and removal of errors due to source decay correction. Low radiation dose, availability, capacity to evaluate multiple sites, and ease of use have made DXA the most widely used technique for measuring bone mineral density. QCT can determine the true volumetric density of trabecular or cortical bone in three dimensions at any skeletal site. Recently developed new computer-assisted methods have improved RA precision, thus providing a simple and inexpensive technique for screening of bone mineral status of large populations. QUS was reported to provide information regarding the structural characteristics of bone, which may be relevant to the appearance of osteoporotic fractures; indeed, some studies suggest a relationship between QUS and bone strength beyond that which can be explained by BMD. Recent experimental studies suggested that magnetic resonance might also constitute a promising tool for assessing osteoporosis.

Applications of bone densitometry for osteoporosis

Over the past decade, growing awareness of the impact of osteoporosis on the elderly population and the availability of new treatments to prevent fractures have stimulated the rapid development of new radiologic techniques to assist in diagnosis. With the ability to perform high precision measurements of bone mineral density (BMD) in the spine and hip, dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is well suited to meet this latter need. However, there is continuing interest in smaller, cheaper systems for assessing the peripheral skeleton that include DXA scanning of the distal forearm and a variety of devices for performing quantitative ultrasound (QUS) measurements on bone. Alongside the new equipment, new guidelines have been developed to assist in the interpretation of bone densitometry studies and, following a report by a World Health Organization working group, osteoporosis is increasingly diagnosed on the basis of the patient's T-score value (difference of BMD from young adult mean normalized to the population SD). For the future, wider provision of bone densitometry services is required to properly target the new treatments now becoming available. Since it is unlikely that conventional DXA can meet these needs, QUS is an attractive alternative, especially because this technique is now proven in its ability to predict fracture risk in the elderly and FDA approval is imminent.

The effect of water fluoridation on the bone mineral density of young women

INTRODUCTION

Osteogenic effects of therapeutic fluoride have been reported; however, the impact of exposure to low level water fluoridation on bone density is not clear. We investigated the effect of long-term exposure to fluoridated water from growth to young adulthood on bone mineral density (BMD).

METHODS

BMD was measured in 24 healthy women from Regina (fluoride 0.1 mg/L) and 33 from Saskatoon (fluoride 1.0 mg/L), with no differences between groups for height, weight, lifestyle or dietary factors.

RESULTS

Saskatoon women had significantly higher mean BMD at total anterior-posterior lumbar spine (APS) and estimated volumetric 1.3 (VLS), with no difference at total body (TB) or proximal femur (PF).

CONCLUSION

Exposure to water fluoridation during the growing years may have a positive impact on axial spine bone density in young women.

Effect of bone area on spine density in Chinese men and women in Taiwan

Areal bone mineral density (BMD), the quotient of bone mineral content (BMC) divided by the projectional bone area (BA), measured with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers (DXA), is the most common parameter used today to evaluate spinal osteoporosis. To evaluate whether gender, age, weight, and height can determine spinal BA, and to compare BA and analyze its effects on spinal density in the two genders, we measured BA and BMC, and calculated areal BMD, and the bone mineral apparent density (BMAD = BMD/the square root of BA) of the L-2 to L-4 vertebrae of 604 female and 223 male Chinese volunteers from 20 to 70 years of age using a Norland XR-26 DXA. Standardized for height and weight, BA showed a relatively large variation and a significant increase with increasing age in both genders. On the other hand, BMC stayed unchanged in men > 50 years of age and decreased with aging in postmenopausal women. Younger men (< 51 years) had a much larger mean BA (by 15.5%) and larger mean BMC (only 10%) than that of age-matched women. As a result, younger men had a slightly and significantly lower areal BMD (by 7.1%) and a much lower BMAD (by 16%) (p < 0.0001 for both) than premenopausal women of similar age. Men had higher areal BMD and BMAD values than age-matched women only after age 50 years. Although taller body height, heavier weight, and increasing age were associated with a larger BA, these factors could not explain most of the interindividual variations in BA in both genders. Thus anteroposterior BA of lumbar vertebrae measured with DXA seems to affect the areal BMD and BMAD readings in the two genders. The larger BA caused a low BMAD and probably underestimated the true volumetric spine density in men.

Bone densitometry: current status and future prospects

Over the past decade, growing awareness of the impact of osteoporosis on the elderly population and the consequent costs of healthcare have stimulated development of new treatments to prevent fractures, together with new imaging technologies to assist in diagnosis. With its ability to perform high-precision measurements of bone mineral density (BMD) in the spine and hip, dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is well suited to meet this latter need. However, there is continuing interest in smaller, less expensive, systems for assessing the peripheral skeleton. These include peripheral DXA scanning of the distal forearm and a variety of devices for performing quantitative ultrasound (QUS) measurements of broad-band ultrasonic attenuation (BUA) and speed of sound (SOS) in bone. Pivotal to all these developments is the demonstration in prospective studies that new technologies can reliably identify patients at risk of osteoporotic fractures. Whether DXA technology can meet the anticipated need for wider provision of diagnostic services is uncertain at present. The likely alternative is bone ultrasound. Although QUS technology is substantially cheaper than DXA and has proved its ability to predict fracture risk in the elderly, it is less precise, there is a lack of appropriate phantoms for quality control and there are doubts about how to interpret results in younger women.

Technical principles of dual energy x-ray absorptiometry

Since its introduction nearly ten years ago, dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) has become the single most widely used technique for performing bone densitometry studies. One reason for its popularity is the ability of DXA systems to measure bone mineral density (BMD) in the spine and proximal femur, the two most common sites for osteoporotic fractures. Other advantages of DXA include the exceptionally low radiation dose to patients, short scan times, high resolution images, good precision and inherent stability of calibration. For these reasons DXA scans are widely used to diagnose osteoporosis, assist making decisions in treatment, and as a follow-up response to therapy. Another important application has been the use of DXA in many clinical trials of new treatments for osteoporosis. Since the first generation pencil beam DXA systems became available, the most significant technical innovation has been the introduction of fan beam systems with shorter scan times, increased patient throughput, and improved image quality. New clinical applications include the measurement of lateral spine and total body BMD, body composition, and vertebral morphometry. Despite these advances, posteroanterior (PA) spine and proximal femur scans remain the most widely used application because of their utility in treatment decisions and monitoring response to therapy.

Evaluation of vertebral volumetric vs. areal bone mineral density during growth

Bone mineral "density" (BMD) measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) does not represent the volumetric density (grams per cubic centimeter), but rather the areal density (grams per square centimeter). This distinction is important during growth. The purpose of this study was to measure vertebral dimensions in cadavers of young pigtail macaques (Macaca nemestrina), and to derive equations to predict the volumetric bone density from noninvasive measurements. We measured the areal bone density by DEXA, vertebral volume by underwater weighing, mineral content by ashing, dimensions of lumbar vertebrae by calipers, and dimensions of vertebrae by radiography. Somatometric measurements of the female lumbar vertebral bodies showed that the shape changed during growth. The bone mineral content from the densitometer correlated significantly with the ash weight (r = 0.99, error 8.7%). The correlation coefficient between the volumetric bone mineral density and areal BMD measurement was significant (r = 0.68, p < 0.0001) with a 9.5% error; this improved significantly to 0.82 (7.2% error) when the BMD was divided by the vertebral depth from the radiograph. A real BMD showed a strong correlation with age (r = 0.82, p < 0.0001), with an average increase of 7.4%/year. In contrast, volumetric mineral density showed a weak relationship with age (r = 0.43, p < 0.01), for an average increase of 1.5%/year. When studying bone mineral density during growth, the differences between volumetric and areal bone mineral density should be taken into consideration.

Bone mass, areal, and volumetric bone density are equally accurate, sensitive, and specific surrogates of the breaking strength of the vertebral body: an in vitro study

The validity of the bone mineral density (BMD) measurement depends on its accuracy as a predictor of the breaking strength of bone. As the breaking strength is proportional to the square of the apparent density, a small error in the calculation of BMD may result in a larger error in the predicted bone strength. The aims of this study were (i) to determine whether inaccuracies in the measurement of the dimensions, projected area, and volume of the vertebral body (used to derive the areal and volumetric BMD) result in errors in the predicted breaking strength and (ii) to compare the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of bone mineral content (BMC), areal BMD, volumetric BMD, and volumetric bone mineral apparent density (BMAD) as surrogates of bone strength. We measured the BMC (by densitometry), dimensions and volume (using calipers, densitometry, the Carter et al. and Peel and Eastell methods), and breaking strength (using the Instron 1114 apparatus, Newtons, N) of 22 vertebral body specimens. All methods resulted in errors in height, width, and depth between -11.3 +/- 1.0 and 30.4 +/- 1.8% relative to the "gold" standard caliper method. The vertebral body volume (of 38.0 +/- 1.2 cm3) measured by submersion was used as the gold standard to derive the volumetric BMD gold standard (of 0.162 +/- 0.01 g/cm3). All methods, except the Peel and Eastell method, resulted in errors ranging between -10.7 +/- 1.5 and 56.9 +/- 3.4% in vertebral body volume and -35.6 +/- 1.5 to 12.6 +/- 1.8% in volumetric BMD (all p < 0.0005). The same absolute value for volumetric BMD predicted a breaking strength that differed according to the method used to derive BMD. For example, a volumetric BMD of 0.162 g/cm3 predicted a breaking strength of 6208 N (submersion method), 5473 N (caliper method), 6095 N (Peel and Eastell method), 7697 N (DXA method), and 9470 N (Carter et al. method). The mean volumetric BMD derived by each method differed (0.181, 0.165, 0.133, and 0.104 g/cm3, respectively). However, all were accurate; each predicted a similar breaking strength (6177, 6217, 6209, and 6221 N respectively). Likewise, breaking strengths predicted by the mean BMC, areal BMD by calipers, and areal BMD by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) were 6267, 6214, and 6244 N, respectively. The methods were equally sensitive; a 1 standard deviation (SD) decrease in volumetric BMD resulted in a similar decrease in the breaking strength of 1818 (caliper), 2080 (Peel and Eastell), 2001 (DXA), and 1625 N (BMAD by Carter et al). A 1 SD decrease in BMC, areal BMD (using calipers) and areal BMD (using DXA) predicted a decrease in the breaking strength of 2019, 1738, and 1825 N, respectively. All methods were equally specific; the variance in bone strength explained by bone mass did not differ for volumetric BMD (38-61% depending on the method), BMC (58%), or areal BMD (48%). In conclusion, despite errors in the measurement of the dimensions of the vertebral body, bone mass, areal, and volumetric bone density are equally accurate, sensitive, and specific surrogates of the breaking strength of bone in vitro.