Inhibition of activated factor X; a new pathway in ameliorating carbon tetrachloride-induced liver fibrosis in rats

Microvascular Thrombosis and Liver Fibrosis Progression: Mechanisms and Clinical Applications

Fibrosis is an unavoidable consequence of chronic inflammation. Extracellular matrix deposition by fibroblasts, stimulated by multiple pathways, is the first step in the onset of chronic liver disease, and its propagation promotes liver dysfunction. At the same time, chronic liver disease is characterized by alterations in primary and secondary hemostasis but unlike previously thought, these changes are not associated with an increased risk of bleeding complications. In recent years, the role of coagulation imbalance has been postulated as one of the main mechanisms promoting hepatic fibrogenesis. In this review, we aim to investigate the function of microvascular thrombosis in the progression of liver disease and highlight the molecular and cellular networks linking hemostasis to fibrosis in this context. We analyze the predictive and prognostic role of coagulation products as biomarkers of liver decompensation (ascites, variceal hemorrhage, and hepatic encephalopathy) and liver-related mortality. Finally, we evaluate the current evidence on the application of antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapies for prophylaxis of hepatic decompensation or prevention of the progression of liver fibrosis.

Sulodexide attenuates liver fibrosis in mice by restoration of differentiated liver sinusoidal endothelial cell

Sulodexide is a heparinoid compound with wide-ranging pharmacological activities. However, the effect of sulodexide on liver fibrogenesis has not been reported. In this study, we aim to evaluate the therapeutic potential of sulodexide in mouse model of liver fibrosis and explore the underlying antifibrotic mechanisms. We found that sulodexide treatment significantly attenuated thioacetamide (TAA) and 3,5-diethoxycarbonyl-1,4-dihydrocollidine (DDC)-induced liver fibrosis in mice. Transcriptome analysis revealed that sulodexide treatment downregulated fibrosis-related genes and liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (LSECs) capillarization-associated genes in fibrotic livers. Immunohistochemistry confirmed that the increased expression of LSEC capillarization-related genes (CD34, CD31 and Laminin) in liver fibrotic tissues was reduced by sulodexide treatment. Scanning electron microscopy showed that LSECs fenestrations were preserved upon sulodexide treatment. Quantitative real-time PCR and immunofluorescence demonstrated that the expression of mesenchymal markers was downregulated by sulodexide administration, suggesting sulodexide inhibited endothelial-mesenchymal transition of LSECs during liver fibrosis. Furthermore, sulodexide administration protected primary LSECs from endothelial dysfunction in vitro. In conclusion, sulodexide attenuated liver fibrosis in mice by restoration of differentiated LSECs, indicating that sulodexide treatment may present as a potential therapy for patients with liver fibrosis.

The Therapeutic Potential of Anticoagulation in Organ Fibrosis

Fibrosis, also known as organ scarring, describes a pathological stiffening of organs or tissues caused by increased synthesis of extracellular matrix (ECM) components. In the past decades, mounting evidence has accumulated showing that the coagulation cascade is directly associated with fibrotic development. Recent findings suggest that, under inflammatory conditions, various cell types (e.g., immune cells) participate in the coagulation process causing pathological outcomes, including fibrosis. These findings highlighted the potential of anticoagulation therapy as a strategy in organ fibrosis. Indeed, preclinical and clinical studies demonstrated that the inhibition of blood coagulation is a potential intervention for the treatment of fibrosis across all major organs (e.g., lung, liver, heart, and kidney). In this review, we aim to summarize our current knowledge on the impact of components of coagulation cascade on fibrosis of various organs and provide an update on the current development of anticoagulation therapy for fibrosis.

Effects of Anticoagulants on Experimental Models of Established Chronic Liver Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

The role of anticoagulants in chronic liver diseases is inconclusive. A meta-analysis was thus undertaken to evaluate treatment-related survival and antifibrotic effects in animal models of chronic liver diseases.

METHODS

A systematic search of the literature took place (up to November 2020), screening for preclinical studies that evaluated anticoagulant effects in animal models of chronic liver diseases. We assessed the quality of methods and the certainty of evidence. Data on outcomes were extracted and pooled into random-effects models.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies proved eligible, each assessing anticoagulant use in animals with chronic liver diseases. Generally, the pooled evidence demonstrated that the administration of anticoagulants is preventive against fibrogenesis, as indicated by METAVIR fibrosis scores (risk ratio = 0.66, 95% confidence interval: 0.47 to 0.94), portal pressure determinations (mean difference = -1.39, 95% confidence interval: -2.33 to -0.44), inflammatory activity (mean difference = -169.69, 95% confidence interval: -257.64 to -81.74), and indices of hepatic injury, specifically alanine aminotransferase (mean difference = -82.7, 95% confidence interval: -107.36 to -58.04), aspartate aminotransferase (mean difference = -186.12, 95% confidence interval: -254.90 to -117.33), albumin (mean difference = 0.59, 95% confidence interval: 0.16 to 1.01), and total bilirubin (mean difference = -0.96, 95% confidence interval: -1.46 to -0.46), and it had no impact on animal survival (risk ratio = 1.03, 95% confidence interval: 0.94 to 1.13).

CONCLUSIONS

Our assessments indicate that in animal models of chronic liver diseases, anticoagulants may alleviate the degree of fibrosis evaluated by the METAVIR score system, portal pressure, inflammatory activity, and serum indices of hepatocellular injury, without impacting survival. High-quality experimental studies are still required.