Long-term red blood cell exchange can be used to successfully treat sickle cell intrahepatic cholestasis: A case report

Interventions for treating intrahepatic cholestasis in people with sickle cell disease

BACKGROUND

Sickle cell disease is the most common hemoglobinopathy occurring worldwide and sickle cell intrahepatic cholestasis is a complication long recognized in this population. Cholestatic liver diseases are characterized by impaired formation or excretion (or both) of bile from the liver. There is a need to assess the clinical benefits and harms of the interventions used to treat intrahepatic cholestasis in people with sickle cell disease. This is an update of a previously published Cochrane Review.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of the interventions for treating intrahepatic cholestasis in people with sickle cell disease.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's Haemoglobinopathies Trials Register, which comprises references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches and handsearching of relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings. We also searched the LILACS database (1982 to 21 January 2020), the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov (21 January 2020). Date of last search of the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's Haemoglobinopathies Trials Register: 25 November 2019.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We searched for published or unpublished randomised controlled trials.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Each author intended to independently extract data, assess the risk of bias of the trials by standard Cochrane methodologies and assess the quality of the evidence using the GRADE criteria; however, no trials were included in the review.

MAIN RESULTS

We did not identify any randomised controlled trials.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This updated Cochrane Review did not identify any randomised controlled trials assessing interventions for treating intrahepatic cholestasis in people with sickle cell disease. Randomised controlled trials are needed to establish the optimum treatment for this condition.

Management of Sickle Cell Intrahepatic Cholestasis: An Argument in Favor of Automated Exchange Transfusion

Sickle cell disease patients are commonly treated at transfusion medicine services, and understanding of the hepatic manifestations of the disease is key for optimal management, specifically, in individuals presenting with sickle cell intrahepatic cholestasis (SCIC). SCIC represents a rare, severe hepatic crisis wherein sinusoidal red cell sickling leads to massive hepatocyte dysfunction and cholestatic laboratory findings. Acute SCIC is defined by abdominal pain with progressive hepatic injury associated with hyperbilirubinemia, renal failure, encephalopathy, and coagulopathy. Patients are generally managed with red blood cell exchange transfusion (RBCEx), when available, as this is a potentially fatal condition. Simple transfusion may be utilized in resource-poor environment or when patients refuse RBCEx. As less than 50 adult cases have been described in the literature, many of them with limited follow-up, randomized clinical trials comparing RBCEx with other treatments are currently unfeasible. Likewise, a chronic form exists, but is less well characterized, and is associated with persistent bilirubinemia and a variable course in terms of progressive hepatic disease. We undertake a brief review of the literature and discuss two cases of SCIC managed with RBCEx at our institution.

Interventions for treating intrahepatic cholestasis in people with sickle cell disease

BACKGROUND

Sickle cell disease is the most common hemoglobinopathy occurring worldwide and sickle cell intrahepatic cholestasis is a complication long recognized in this population. Cholestatic liver diseases are characterized by impaired formation or excretion (or both) of bile from the liver. There is a need to assess the clinical benefits and harms of the interventions used to treat intrahepatic cholestasis in people with sickle cell disease. This is an update of a previously published Cochrane Review.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of the interventions for treating intrahepatic cholestasis in people with sickle cell disease.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's Haemoglobinopathies Trials Register, which comprises references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches and handsearching of relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings. We also searched the LILACS database (1982 to 23 May 2017), the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform Search Portal (23 May 2017) and ClinicalTrials.gov.Date of last search of the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's Haemoglobinopathies Trials Register: 12 April 2017.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We searched for published or unpublished randomised controlled trials.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Each author intended to independently extract data and assess the risk of bias of the trials by standard Cochrane methodologies; however, no trials were included in the review.

MAIN RESULTS

There were no randomised controlled trials identified.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This updated Cochrane Review did not identify any randomised controlled trials assessing interventions for treating intrahepatic cholestasis in people with sickle cell disease. Randomised controlled trials are needed to establish the optimum treatment for this condition.

Interventions for treating intrahepatic cholestasis in people with sickle cell disease

BACKGROUND

Sickle cell disease is the most common hemoglobinopathy occurring worldwide and sickle cell intrahepatic cholestasis is a complication long recognized in this population. Cholestatic liver diseases are characterized by impaired formation or excretion (or both) of bile from the liver. There is a need to assess the clinical benefits and harms of the interventions used to treat intrahepatic cholestasis in people with sickle cell disease.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of the interventions for treating intrahepatic cholestasis in people with sickle cell disease.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's Haemoglobinopathies Trials Register, which comprises references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches and handsearching of relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings. We also searched the LILACS database (1982 to 7 July 2014) and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform Search Portal (7 July 2014).Date of last search of the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's Haemoglobinopathies Trials Register: 10 October 2014.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We searched for published or unpublished randomised controlled trials.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Each author intended to independently extract data and assess the risk of bias of the trials by standard Cochrane Collaboration methodologies; however, no trials were included in the review.

MAIN RESULTS

There were no randomised controlled trials identified.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This Cochrane Review did not identify any randomised controlled trials assessing interventions for treating intrahepatic cholestasis in people with sickle cell disease. Randomised controlled trials are needed to establish the optimum treatment for this condition.

Reversal of liver function without exchange transfusion in sickle cell intrahepatic cholestasis

Sickle cell intrahepatic cholestasis (SCIC) is a rare but fatal complication of sickle cell disease. It is found mainly in homozygous sickle cell disease. To date, there are no standard diagnostic criteria or well-established therapeutic approaches to this condition. Herein, we report this case of a 48-year-old man with sickle cell anemia and a total bilirubin of 78.5 mg/dL without evidence of extrahepatic biliary obstruction or viral hepatitis. The patient had a hemoglobin S level of 87.9%, acute renal failure, and mild coagulopathy. Despite the disease severity, he refused exchange transfusion (ET) with packed red blood cells. He was transfused with 2 units of blood and treated mainly with supportive measures. His total bilirubin levels trended down to normal days after discharge. Multiple studies have shown a significant decrease in the mortality rate in SCIC after ET. To date, only two reported adult cases have survived SCIC without aggressive treatment. Our case is the third case that demonstrates recovery of severe SCIC without ET.

Clinical effects of different types of red cell concentrates in patients with thalassemia and sickle cell disease

The treatment of thalassemia is still essentially based on continuous transfusion supporting using red cell concentrates (RCC) prepared in different ways. For patients with sickle-cell disorders, either urgent or chronic red blood cell transfusion therapy, is widely used in the management of sickle cell disease (SCD) because it reduces HbS level and generally prevents recurrent vaso-occlusive disease (VOD). Recently, the introduction of pre-storage filtration to remove leukocytes and the use of techniques for multicomponent donation have increased the types of blood components available for transfusion purposes. The clinical effects of different types of blood components in thalassaemic and sickle-cell patients have not been extensively studied so far. We evaluated the impact of the various different blood components currently available on transfusion needs, transfusion intervals and adverse reactions in order to determine which is the most advantageous for transfusion-dependent thalassaemic and sickle-cell patients followed in our centre. We believe that the optimal characteristics of the RCC are aged less than 10 days from time of collection; Hb content greater than 56 g per unit; Hct: 55-60%; volume (including additive) 300 mL+/-20%; leucodepleted to less than 200,000 leukocytes per unit; low cytokine content (achievable by pre-storage filtration carried out between two and 24 hours after the collection); lack of microaggregates (achievable by pre-storage filtration or filtration in the laboratory) and protein content less than 0.5 g per unit for patients allergic to plasma proteins (achievable with manual or automated washing). It is still recommended that the blood transfused should be as fresh as possible, compatible with the centre's product availability and the centre's organisation should be continuously adapted to this aim. We always transfuse blood within 10 days of its collection, respecting Rh and Kell system phenotypes. Pre-storage filtration is strongly recommended, both in order to prevent adverse reactions through the marked leucodepletion (less than 200,000 leukocytes per unit) and for a better standardisation of the final product, including the certainty that the product does not contain clots, an assurance that bed-side filtration cannot give. The RCC should be produced using a method causing as little as possible stress to the red cell membrane. The use of RCC with a high content of Hb (less than 56 g per unit) is strongly recommended, because our study clearly shows that this reduces the number of exposures to donors and the number of accesses to hospital, thus improving the patient's quality of life.

Cytapheresis in the treatment of cell-affected blood disorders and abnormalities

This report presents our experience with cytaphereses performed in treatment of 476 patients. Leukapheresis was used in management of 68 patients with hyperleukocytosis leukostasis (WBC > or = 150 x 10(9)L(-1)). Average decrease in cell count after treatment was 73.3%. Plateletapheresis for 32 patients (platelets > or = 1500 x 10(9)L(-1)) was applied in order to prevent the thrombotic-hemorrhagic syndrome and resulted in a moderate platelet count reduction (84.3%). Erythrocytaphereses performed in treatment of 376 patients by manual or automated technique resulted in a rapid blood viscosity drop (42.4+/-7.1%). Patients with red blood cell exchanges (severe malaria and autoimmune hemolytic crisis) were in life-threatening situations and resulted in a prompt reduction of parasitized or antibody-coated RBCs and anemia correction. This study indicates that "conventional" TCs resulted in considerable cytoreduction only in patients with especially high cell count. This effect was not associated with bone marrow remission. The best clinical effect and long-term benefits were obtained using RBCX and antimalarial drugs in malaria patients who have had high-level parasitized-RBCs with multiorgan dysfunction.

Apheresis in donor and therapeutic settings: Recruitments vs. possibilities—a multicenter study

In our country, the first apheresis was performed in the late 1960s (by manual technique), and the first cell separator was used in 1979. The number of blood component collections performed from 1994 to 2004 was: 11,170 (total), i.e., 8540 (NBTI), 1180 (IT-MMA), 1050 (BTI of Novi Sad) and 400 (BTI Nis). The number of PBSC harvests during 1996-2004 was 386 for treatment of 272 patients. For treatment of myocardial infarction, "cell-therapy" by autologous stem cells was introduced in 2004 at the MMA. The results of PE treatments performed (7632 sessions) by our group for various immune-mediated and other disorders were generally beneficial, but the effect is not associated with bone marrow remission. TC procedures (total number=1279) resulted in a significant fall in the blood cell counts and hemorheological improvement, as well as the removal and replacement of abnormal red blood cells. Greater standardization of different apheresis protocols is required.

Chronic red blood cell exchange to prevent clinical complications in sickle cell disease

We tracked the results of 394 manual or automatic red blood cell exchanges done with a cell separator in 20 sickle cell patients at high risk for recurrent complications. Over an average of 6 years, none of the patients developed complications related to the procedure or to the increased blood use. It was safe and effective in preventing complications of sickle cell disease, and if done automatically, reduced iron overload. Ferritin levels also decreased in patients treated with automatic red blood cell exchange. Furthermore, using Single Donor Red Blood Cell units (SDRC) we reduced the potential exposure to transfusion transmitted infectious diseases (TTI).