The excessive numbers of total nucleated cells does not affect the performance of the CliniMACS

Optimization of the immunomagnetic selection in microcythemic donors enrolled for haploidentical transplantation

BACKGROUND

Immunomagnetic cell selection (ICS) cells is increasingly used in allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation in order to reduce the T cells quantity. The aim of this study was to evaluate an protocol based on Ficoll method before ICS.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

The automated procedure was compared with the standard method. In the group 1 the cell processing involves the extraction of the buffy-coat by Ficoll before incubation with antibodies. This procedure was performed with the Sepax S-100 device. The efficacy of this automated procedure was compared with the group 2. In this group, the cell washing and the incubation were performed through the standard method. The CD34+ cells collected by apheresis (HPC-A) were selected with ICS.

RESULTS

The results obtained after Ficoll procedure, showed a total nucleated cells (TNCs) and CD34+ cells recovery of 85.73% (75.90-90.63; SD 4.25) and 79.31% (51.77-112.31; SD 18.40), respectively. The TNC and CD34+ cells recovery after the pre-incubation washing performed through the standard method, was 75.54% (38.36-97.76; SD 22.5) and 61.51% (30.87-81.79; SD 19.3), respectively. The CD34+ cells recovery after ICS was 79% (51.77-100; SD 18.40) and 44% (15.57-88.24; SD 25.91) in the group 1 and the group 2, respectively. This difference was statistically significant (p=0.001).

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of the ICS which resulted to be higher in the group 1 compared to the group 2. Overall, our data suggest that the Ficoll procedure before incubation is suitable for the clinical routine in the ICS for haploidentical transplantation in patients affected by thalassemia.

Positive immunomagnetic CD34(+) cell selection in haplo-identical transplants in beta-thalassemia patients: removal of platelets using an automated system

BACKGROUND AIMS

Immunomagnetic CD34(+) cell selection (ICS) is utilized in autologous and allogeneic transplants. In the first case it is used to reduce the neoplastic contamination of concentrates, while in the second case it is needed to carry out a T-depletion of cell concentrates in order to reduce the incidence of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) in patients who have undergone haplo-identical transplants.

METHODS

The efficacy of CliniMACS technology, after reduction of platelet contamination, incubation of monoclonal antibodies (MAb) and successive washings of concentrates, performed in 16 ICS using the standard method without reducing platelet content, was compared with the use of the automated system CytoMate, which was carried out in 46 ICS.

RESULTS

In the group of ICS carried out after automatic manipulation, a significant statistical difference in purity was noted (91.39% versus 83.57, P = 0.017) compared with the group of ICS carried out with the standard procedure. The same significant difference was noted in relation to the remaining percentages of CD3(+) and CD19(+) cells (2.31% versus 5.68%, P = 0.012, and 1.58% versus 2.71%, P = 0.014, respectively). Recovery of CD34+ cells overlapped in the two groups (70.49% versus 68.39%, P = 0.774).

CONCLUSIONS

Immunomagnetic selection carried out using the automated procedure was more efficient, producing a purer sample, more efficient T-depletion and optimal reduction of B cells, without influencing cell recovery. Furthermore, conforming to good manufacturing practice (GMP) guidelines, the entire procedure with CytoMate took place in a contamination-controlled environment.

Evaluation of 'out-of-specification' CliniMACS CD34-selection procedures of hematopoietic progenitor cell-apheresis products

BACKGROUND

Immunomagnetic selection of CD34(+) hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPC) using CliniMACS CD34 selection technology is widely used to provide high-purity HPC grafts. However, the number of nucleated cells and CD34+ cells recommended by the manufacturer for processing in a single procedure or with 1 vial of CD34 reagent is limited.

METHODS

In this retrospective evaluation of 643 CliniMACS CD34-selection procedures, we validated the capacity of CliniMACS tubing sets and CD34 reagent. Endpoints of this study were the recovery and purity of CD34+ cells, T-cell depletion efficiency and recovery of colony-forming units-granulocyte-macrophage (CFU-GM).

RESULTS

Overloading normal or large-scale tubing sets with excess numbers of total nucleated cells, without exceeding the maximum number of CD34+ cells, had no significant effect on the recovery and purity of CD34+ cells. In contrast, overloading normal or large-scale tubing sets with excess numbers of CD34+ cells resulted in a significantly lower recovery of CD34+ cells. Furthermore, the separation capacity of 1 vial of CD34 reagent could be increased safely from 600 x 10(6) CD34+ cells to 1000 x 10(6) CD34+ cells with similar recovery of CD34(+) cells. Finally, T-cell depletion efficiency and the fraction of CD34+ cells that formed CFU-GM colonies were not affected by out-of-specification procedures.

DISCUSSION

Our validated increase of the capacity of CliniMACS tubing sets and CD34 reagent will reduce the number of selection procedures and thereby processing time for large HPC products. In addition, it results in a significant cost reduction for these procedures.

G-CSF-mobilized haploidentical peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in children with poor prognostic nonmalignant disorders

Haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is currently one of the alternative curative treatment options for some nonmalignant but also for malignant diseases. However, concerns regarding its safety cause delays in time and a successful outcome. Between 2000 and 2005, twenty-one children with poor prognostic nonmalignant disorders, 13 boys and 8 girls, with a median age of 12 months, underwent 28 haploidentical peripheral HSCT. Immunomagnetic bead depletion device (CliniMACS) was used for indirect T-cell depletion. Indications for transplant were severe combined immunodeficiency (n=16), osteopetrosis (n=2), MDS (n=1), amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia (n=1), and aplastic anemia (n=1). Five patients (24%) had lung infection at the time of transplantation. The patients received a median of 25.67 x 10(6) G-CSF-mobilized peripheral CD34(+) progenitor cells and a median of 4.19 x 10(4) T-lymphocytes per kilogram of body weight with a T-cell depletion rate of median 4.59 logs. The rate of total engraftment was 66.6%. Median times for leukocyte and platelet engraftment were 14 and 16 days, respectively. The 6-year projected survival was 32% for all patients and 29.76% for patients with severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID). The rates of transplant-related mortality, graft failure, and severe GvHD were 14.2, 33.4%, and 8.3%, respectively. Infection was the main cause of death. The poor outcome may be explained with the poor prognostic factors of our patients such as the type of SCID in most cases (T-B- SCID), the median age over 6 months and the presence of lung infection in some children at the time of transplantation.