1
|
Chandrasekhar SS, Tsai Do BS, Schwartz SR, Bontempo LJ, Faucett EA, Finestone SA, Hollingsworth DB, Kelley DM, Kmucha ST, Moonis G, Poling GL, Roberts JK, Stachler RJ, Zeitler DM, Corrigan MD, Nnacheta LC, Satterfield L. Clinical Practice Guideline: Sudden Hearing Loss (Update). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2020; 161:S1-S45. [PMID: 31369359 DOI: 10.1177/0194599819859885] [Citation(s) in RCA: 345] [Impact Index Per Article: 86.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Sudden hearing loss is a frightening symptom that often prompts an urgent or emergent visit to a health care provider. It is frequently but not universally accompanied by tinnitus and/or vertigo. Sudden sensorineural hearing loss affects 5 to 27 per 100,000 people annually, with about 66,000 new cases per year in the United States. This guideline update provides evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis, management, and follow-up of patients who present with sudden hearing loss. It focuses on sudden sensorineural hearing loss in adult patients aged ≥18 years and primarily on those with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss. Prompt recognition and management of sudden sensorineural hearing loss may improve hearing recovery and patient quality of life. The guideline update is intended for all clinicians who diagnose or manage adult patients who present with sudden hearing loss. PURPOSE The purpose of this guideline update is to provide clinicians with evidence-based recommendations in evaluating patients with sudden hearing loss and sudden sensorineural hearing loss, with particular emphasis on managing idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss. The guideline update group recognized that patients enter the health care system with sudden hearing loss as a nonspecific primary complaint. Therefore, the initial recommendations of this guideline update address distinguishing sensorineural hearing loss from conductive hearing loss at the time of presentation with hearing loss. They also clarify the need to identify rare, nonidiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss to help separate those patients from those with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss, who are the target population for the therapeutic interventions that make up the bulk of the guideline update. By focusing on opportunities for quality improvement, this guideline should improve diagnostic accuracy, facilitate prompt intervention, decrease variations in management, reduce unnecessary tests and imaging procedures, and improve hearing and rehabilitative outcomes for affected patients. METHODS Consistent with the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation's "Clinical Practice Guideline Development Manual, Third Edition" (Rosenfeld et al. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;148[1]:S1-S55), the guideline update group was convened with representation from the disciplines of otolaryngology-head and neck surgery, otology, neurotology, family medicine, audiology, emergency medicine, neurology, radiology, advanced practice nursing, and consumer advocacy. A systematic review of the literature was performed, and the prior clinical practice guideline on sudden hearing loss was reviewed in detail. Key Action Statements (KASs) were updated with new literature, and evidence profiles were brought up to the current standard. Research needs identified in the original clinical practice guideline and data addressing them were reviewed. Current research needs were identified and delineated. RESULTS The guideline update group made strong recommendations for the following: (KAS 1) Clinicians should distinguish sensorineural hearing loss from conductive hearing loss when a patient first presents with sudden hearing loss. (KAS 7) Clinicians should educate patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss about the natural history of the condition, the benefits and risks of medical interventions, and the limitations of existing evidence regarding efficacy. (KAS 13) Clinicians should counsel patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss who have residual hearing loss and/or tinnitus about the possible benefits of audiologic rehabilitation and other supportive measures. These strong recommendations were modified from the initial clinical practice guideline for clarity and timing of intervention. The guideline update group made strong recommendations against the following: (KAS 3) Clinicians should not order routine computed tomography of the head in the initial evaluation of a patient with presumptive sudden sensorineural hearing loss. (KAS 5) Clinicians should not obtain routine laboratory tests in patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss. (KAS 11) Clinicians should not routinely prescribe antivirals, thrombolytics, vasodilators, or vasoactive substances to patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss. The guideline update group made recommendations for the following: (KAS 2) Clinicians should assess patients with presumptive sudden sensorineural hearing loss through history and physical examination for bilateral sudden hearing loss, recurrent episodes of sudden hearing loss, and/or focal neurologic findings. (KAS 4) In patients with sudden hearing loss, clinicians should obtain, or refer to a clinician who can obtain, audiometry as soon as possible (within 14 days of symptom onset) to confirm the diagnosis of sudden sensorineural hearing loss. (KAS 6) Clinicians should evaluate patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss for retrocochlear pathology by obtaining magnetic resonance imaging or auditory brainstem response. (KAS 10) Clinicians should offer, or refer to a clinician who can offer, intratympanic steroid therapy when patients have incomplete recovery from sudden sensorineural hearing loss 2 to 6 weeks after onset of symptoms. (KAS 12) Clinicians should obtain follow-up audiometric evaluation for patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss at the conclusion of treatment and within 6 months of completion of treatment. These recommendations were clarified in terms of timing of intervention and audiometry and method of retrocochlear workup. The guideline update group offered the following KASs as options: (KAS 8) Clinicians may offer corticosteroids as initial therapy to patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss within 2 weeks of symptom onset. (KAS 9a) Clinicians may offer, or refer to a clinician who can offer, hyperbaric oxygen therapy combined with steroid therapy within 2 weeks of onset of sudden sensorineural hearing loss. (KAS 9b) Clinicians may offer, or refer to a clinician who can offer, hyperbaric oxygen therapy combined with steroid therapy as salvage therapy within 1 month of onset of sudden sensorineural hearing loss. DIFFERENCES FROM PRIOR GUIDELINE Incorporation of new evidence profiles to include quality improvement opportunities, confidence in the evidence, and differences of opinion Included 10 clinical practice guidelines, 29 new systematic reviews, and 36 new randomized controlled trials Highlights the urgency of evaluation and initiation of treatment, if treatment is offered, by emphasizing the time from symptom occurrence Clarification of terminology by changing potentially unclear statements; use of the term sudden sensorineural hearing loss to mean idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss to emphasize that >90% of sudden sensorineural hearing loss is idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss and to avoid confusion in nomenclature for the reader Changes to the KASs from the original guideline: KAS 1-When a patient first presents with sudden hearing loss, conductive hearing loss should be distinguished from sensorineural. KAS 2-The utility of history and physical examination when assessing for modifying factors is emphasized. KAS 3-The word "routine" is added to clarify that this statement addresses nontargeted head computerized tomography scan that is often ordered in the emergency room setting for patients presenting with sudden hearing loss. It does not refer to targeted scans, such as temporal bone computerized tomography scan, to assess for temporal bone pathology. KAS 4-The importance of audiometric confirmation of hearing status as soon as possible and within 14 days of symptom onset is emphasized. KAS 5-New studies were added to confirm the lack of benefit of nontargeted laboratory testing in sudden sensorineural hearing loss. KAS 6-Audiometric follow-up is excluded as a reasonable workup for retrocochlear pathology. Magnetic resonance imaging, computerized tomography scan if magnetic resonance imaging cannot be done, and, secondarily, auditory brainstem response evaluation are the modalities recommended. A time frame for such testing is not specified, nor is it specified which clinician should be ordering this workup; however, it is implied that it would be the general or subspecialty otolaryngologist. KAS 7-The importance of shared decision making is highlighted, and salient points are emphasized. KAS 8-The option for corticosteroid intervention within 2 weeks of symptom onset is emphasized. KAS 9-Changed to KAS 9A and 9B. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy remains an option but only when combined with steroid therapy for either initial treatment (9A) or salvage therapy (9B). The timing of initial therapy is within 2 weeks of onset, and that of salvage therapy is within 1 month of onset of sudden sensorineural hearing loss. KAS 10-Intratympanic steroid therapy for salvage is recommended within 2 to 6 weeks following onset of sudden sensorineural hearing loss. The time to treatment is defined and emphasized. KAS 11-Antioxidants were removed from the list of interventions that the clinical practice guideline recommends against using. KAS 12-Follow-up audiometry at conclusion of treatment and also within 6 months posttreatment is added. KAS 13-This statement on audiologic rehabilitation includes patients who have residual hearing loss and/or tinnitus who may benefit from treatment. Addition of an algorithm outlining KASs Enhanced emphasis on patient education and shared decision making with tools provided to assist in same.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sujana S Chandrasekhar
- 1 ENT & Allergy Associates, LLP, New York, New York, USA.,2 Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra-Northwell, Hempstead, New York, USA.,3 Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | | | | | - Laura J Bontempo
- 6 University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Sandra A Finestone
- 8 Consumers United for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | - David M Kelley
- 10 University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Steven T Kmucha
- 11 Gould Medical Group-Otolaryngology, Stockton, California, USA
| | - Gul Moonis
- 12 Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - J Kirk Roberts
- 12 Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | | | | | - Maureen D Corrigan
- 15 American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation, Alexandria, Virginia, USA
| | - Lorraine C Nnacheta
- 15 American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation, Alexandria, Virginia, USA
| | - Lisa Satterfield
- 15 American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation, Alexandria, Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Serum Fibrinogen as a Prognostic Factor in Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Meta-analysis. Otol Neurotol 2019; 39:e929-e935. [PMID: 30303943 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000002019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE High blood viscosity has been proposed as a mechanism for sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL); however, the relationship between blood markers of fibrinolysis or coagulation and severity or prognosis of SSNHL is still unclear. The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between serum fibrinogen and SSNHL. DATA SOURCES PubMed and Scopus were searched for English language articles using the following keywords: SSNHL, sudden hearing loss, sudden deafness, idiopathic hearing loss or idiopathic sensorineural hearing loss, and fibrinogen. STUDY SELECTION The articles in the study related to SSNHL and provided data about the serum fibrinogen level. DATA EXTRACTION The data included patient profiles, fibrinogen level, recovery, and treatment modality. DATA SYNTHESIS Nineteen articles were selected. The aggregated data were analyzed using the random effect model. Two articles that included the fibrinogen level with recovery rates were analyzed for the relationship between the fibrinogen level and recovery. CONCLUSIONS The average fibrinogen level was 318 ± 8.5 mg/dl (mean ± standard error, within normal range). There was no difference in the fibrinogen level between SSNHL patients and the control group. The fibrinogen level of the recovery group was lower than that of the no recovery group. This showed that a high fibrinogen level was associated with poor prognosis, and it could be related to the severity of the pathological change rather than being the cause of the SSNHL. SSNHL includes various pathologies; therefore, the appropriate therapy should be selected based on each condition.
Collapse
|
3
|
Ashtiani MK, Firouzi F, Bastaninejad S, Dabiri S, Nasirmohtaram S, Saeedi N, Ghazavi H, Sahebi L. Efficacy of systemic and intratympanic corticosteroid combination therapy versus intratympanic or systemic therapy in patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss: a randomized controlled trial. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2017; 275:89-97. [PMID: 29149379 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-017-4808-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2016] [Accepted: 11/08/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The present study was conducted to compare the rates of recovery from idiopathic sudden deafness after the treatment with oral and intratympanic corticosteroids in both mono and combination therapies. STUDY DESIGN Triple-blind randomized clinical trial. SETTINGS Tertiary referral hospital. SUBJECTS AND METHODS A total of 112 patients who were admitted to the ENT emergency department randomly divided into three groups: an oral corticosteroid plus intratympanic placebo (systemic corticosteroid monotherapy group); an intratympanic corticosteroid plus oral placebo group (IT monotherapy group); and a combination therapy group (IT plus systemic combination group). All patients were treated additionally with antiviral and proton pomp inhibitor. An audiometry was performed once before beginning the therapies and again at the end of the therapy. RESULTS Of the total of 112 patients, 32 received intratympanic (IT) corticosteroids, 45 were receiving systemic corticosteroids, and 35 were receiving a combination of the two. A total of 74 patients (66.1%) responded positively [response to treatment was calculated as gain of at least 10 dB in 10 dB in average threshold or with the minimum improvement of 15% in speech discrimination scores (SDS)] to corticosteroid therapy. No significant differences were observed between the three groups (IT, systemic group, and combination therapy group) in their overall response to treatment (p = 0.5). Patients who suffered from concomitant tinnitus and dizziness responded less positively to the treatment (p < 0.002). Positive family history of SSNHL seems to be negative prognostic factors in the response to treatment (p < 0.001). The response to treatment was not related to the pattern (p = 0.04) and initial severity of hearing loss (p = 0.9). CONCLUSION This study did not find any difference in the rate of hearing improvement between systemic, intratympanic, and combined corticosteroid therapy for sudden hearing loss. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 1b.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammadtaghi Khorsandi Ashtiani
- Otorhinolaryngology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.,Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.,Amir'Alam Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Farzad Firouzi
- Otorhinolaryngology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.,Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.,Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Shahin Bastaninejad
- Otorhinolaryngology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. .,Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. .,Amir'Alam Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. .,ENT Department, Amir'Alam Hospital, North Sadee Avenue, Tehran, Iran.
| | - Sasan Dabiri
- Otorhinolaryngology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.,Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.,Amir'Alam Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Sevil Nasirmohtaram
- Otorhinolaryngology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.,Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.,Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Niloufar Saeedi
- Otorhinolaryngology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.,Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.,Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Hossein Ghazavi
- Otorhinolaryngology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.,Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.,Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Leyla Sahebi
- Otorhinolaryngology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Weiss D, Böcker AJ, Koopmann M, Savvas E, Borowski M, Rudack C. Predictors of hearing recovery in patients with severe sudden sensorineural hearing loss. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017; 46:27. [PMID: 28376930 PMCID: PMC5379569 DOI: 10.1186/s40463-017-0207-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2016] [Accepted: 03/27/2017] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSHL) is a disease, which severely affects the patient’s social and relational life. The underlying pathomechanisms have not been finally clarified yet and outcome is not predictable. Methods We conducted a retrospective study in order to identify parameters that influence hearing recovery. The data base contains results of basic otoneurological tests and clinical parameters of 198 patients with idiopathic SSHL of at least 60 dB in at least four frequencies, diagnosed and treated at the University Hospital of Münster, Germany, between 1999 and 2015. Hearing recovery was measured by pure tone audiometry. Results Multivariate linear and logistic regression analyses indicate that the chance as well as the magnitude of hearing recovery is higher for patients with normal caloric testing than for patients with pathological caloric testing. However, for the subgroup of patients who attained a hearing recovery, the caloric testing result was not found to influence the magnitude. Instead, the magnitude was noticeably lower for patients within this subgroup who had a previous hearing loss. Furthermore, we found indications that the magnitude is higher for men than for women and that receiving a high-dose steroid therapy is associated with a higher chance and magnitude of a hearing recovery. Conclusions We conclude that SSHL associated with disorders of the vestibular system or previous hearing loss represent special sub-entities of SSHL that may be caused by unique pathophysiological mechanisms and are associated with worse outcome. Furthermore, our data support the importance of elevated dosage of steroids in SSHL therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Weiss
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Münster, Kardinal-von-Galen-Ring 10, Münster, 48149, Germany.
| | - Armin Julius Böcker
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Münster, Kardinal-von-Galen-Ring 10, Münster, 48149, Germany
| | - Mario Koopmann
- Practice for Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Meckenemstrasse 26, Bocholt, 46395, Germany
| | - Eleftherios Savvas
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Münster, Kardinal-von-Galen-Ring 10, Münster, 48149, Germany
| | - Matthias Borowski
- Institute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University of Münster, Schmeddingstrasse 56, Münster, 48149, Germany
| | - Claudia Rudack
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Münster, Kardinal-von-Galen-Ring 10, Münster, 48149, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Schwartz J, Padmanabhan A, Aqui N, Balogun RA, Connelly-Smith L, Delaney M, Dunbar NM, Witt V, Wu Y, Shaz BH. Guidelines on the Use of Therapeutic Apheresis in Clinical Practice-Evidence-Based Approach from the Writing Committee of the American Society for Apheresis: The Seventh Special Issue. J Clin Apher 2017; 31:149-62. [PMID: 27322218 DOI: 10.1002/jca.21470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 276] [Impact Index Per Article: 39.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) Journal of Clinical Apheresis (JCA) Special Issue Writing Committee is charged with reviewing, updating, and categorizing indications for the evidence-based use of therapeutic apheresis in human disease. Since the 2007 JCA Special Issue (Fourth Edition), the Committee has incorporated systematic review and evidence-based approaches in the grading and categorization of apheresis indications. This Seventh Edition of the JCA Special Issue continues to maintain this methodology and rigor to make recommendations on the use of apheresis in a wide variety of diseases/conditions. The JCA Seventh Edition, like its predecessor, has consistently applied the category and grading system definitions in the fact sheets. The general layout and concept of a fact sheet that was used since the fourth edition has largely been maintained in this edition. Each fact sheet succinctly summarizes the evidence for the use of therapeutic apheresis in a specific disease entity. The Seventh Edition discusses 87 fact sheets (14 new fact sheets since the Sixth Edition) for therapeutic apheresis diseases and medical conditions, with 179 indications, which are separately graded and categorized within the listed fact sheets. Several diseases that are Category IV which have been described in detail in previous editions and do not have significant new evidence since the last publication are summarized in a separate table. The Seventh Edition of the JCA Special Issue serves as a key resource that guides the utilization of therapeutic apheresis in the treatment of human disease. J. Clin. Apheresis 31:149-162, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Schwartz
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Anand Padmanabhan
- Blood Center of Wisconsin, Department of Pathology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Nicole Aqui
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Rasheed A Balogun
- Division of Nephrology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Laura Connelly-Smith
- Department of Medicine, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance and University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Meghan Delaney
- Bloodworks Northwest, Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Nancy M Dunbar
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Volker Witt
- Department for Pediatrics, St. Anna Kinderspital, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Yanyun Wu
- Bloodworks Northwest, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Beth H Shaz
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.,New York Blood Center, Department of Pathology.,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fasano T, Pertinhez TA, Tribi L, Lasagni D, Pilia A, Vecchia L, Baricchi R, Bianchin G. Laboratory assessment of sudden sensorineural hearing loss: A case-control study. Laryngoscope 2017; 127:2375-2381. [DOI: 10.1002/lary.26514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2016] [Revised: 11/17/2016] [Accepted: 12/02/2016] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Tommaso Fasano
- Clinical Chemistry and Endocrinology Laboratory; Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova-Scientific Institute for Research, Hospitalization and Health Care; Reggio Emilia Italy
| | - Thelma A. Pertinhez
- Transfusion Medicine Unit; Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova- Scientific Institute for Research, Hospitalization and Health Care; Reggio Emilia Italy
- Department of Biomedical, Biotechnological, and Translational Sciences; University of Parma; Parma Italy
| | - Lorenzo Tribi
- Department of Otolaryngology and Audiology; Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova-Scientific Institute for Research, Hospitalization and Health Care; Reggio Emilia Italy
| | - Daniela Lasagni
- Transfusion Medicine Unit; Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova- Scientific Institute for Research, Hospitalization and Health Care; Reggio Emilia Italy
| | - Annalisa Pilia
- Clinical Chemistry and Endocrinology Laboratory; Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova-Scientific Institute for Research, Hospitalization and Health Care; Reggio Emilia Italy
| | - Luigi Vecchia
- Clinical Chemistry and Endocrinology Laboratory; Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova-Scientific Institute for Research, Hospitalization and Health Care; Reggio Emilia Italy
| | - Roberto Baricchi
- Transfusion Medicine Unit; Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova- Scientific Institute for Research, Hospitalization and Health Care; Reggio Emilia Italy
| | - Giovanni Bianchin
- Department of Otolaryngology and Audiology; Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova-Scientific Institute for Research, Hospitalization and Health Care; Reggio Emilia Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis. J Clin Apher 2016; 31:163-202. [PMID: 27322219 DOI: 10.1002/jca.21474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
8
|
Mirvakili A, Dadgarnia MH, Baradaranfar MH, Atighechi S, Zand V, Ansari A. Role of Platelet Parameters on Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Case-Control Study in Iran. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0148149. [PMID: 26829393 PMCID: PMC4734775 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2015] [Accepted: 01/13/2016] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) is a common otological disorder characterized by a hearing loss greater than 30 dB over three consecutive frequencies, in less than 72 hours. It has been established that platelet parameters, such as mean platelet volume, are associated with ischemic heart events, whose clinical manifestations are similar to those of SSNHL. Hence, we aimed to determine if the platelet count, mean platelet volume and platelet distribution width are related to the occurrence and severity of sudden sensorineural hearing loss. A case-control prospective study was conducted in a teaching hospital in Iran. One hundred-eight patients with SSNHL and an equal number of healthy, age- and sex-matched controls were enrolled in the study. Peripheral venous blood samples were collected from the subjects, and the platelet count, mean platelet volume and platelet distribution width were measured with an automated blood cell counter. Analysis of the audiometry and hematological test results using SPSS22 software showed no statistical correlation between the platelet parameters and the occurrence of SSNHL, but correlation coefficients showed a significant correlation between PDW and hearing loss severity in patients group. However, further investigation is required to unequivocally establish the absence of correlation between the platelet parameters and occurrence of SSNHL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abbas Mirvakili
- Otorhinolaryngology Research Center, Department of Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Shahid Sadoughi University Of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
| | - Mohammad Hossein Dadgarnia
- Otorhinolaryngology Research Center, Department of Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Shahid Sadoughi University Of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
| | - Mohammad Hossein Baradaranfar
- Otorhinolaryngology Research Center, Department of Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Shahid Sadoughi University Of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
| | - Saeid Atighechi
- Otorhinolaryngology Research Center, Department of Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Shahid Sadoughi University Of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
| | - Vahid Zand
- Otorhinolaryngology Research Center, Department of Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Shahid Sadoughi University Of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
| | - Abdollah Ansari
- Otorhinolaryngology Research Center, Department of Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Shahid Sadoughi University Of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Stachler RJ, Chandrasekhar SS, Archer SM, Rosenfeld RM, Schwartz SR, Barrs DM, Brown SR, Fife TD, Ford P, Ganiats TG, Hollingsworth DB, Lewandowski CA, Montano JJ, Saunders JE, Tucci DL, Valente M, Warren BE, Yaremchuk KL, Robertson PJ. Clinical Practice Guideline. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012; 146:S1-35. [DOI: 10.1177/0194599812436449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 659] [Impact Index Per Article: 54.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Objective. Sudden hearing loss (SHL) is a frightening symptom that often prompts an urgent or emergent visit to a physician. This guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis, management, and follow-up of patients who present with SHL. The guideline primarily focuses on sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) in adult patients (aged 18 and older). Prompt recognition and management of SSNHL may improve hearing recovery and patient quality of life (QOL). Sudden sensorineural hearing loss affects 5 to 20 per 100,000 population, with about 4000 new cases per year in the United States. This guideline is intended for all clinicians who diagnose or manage adult patients who present with SHL. Purpose. The purpose of this guideline is to provide clinicians with evidence-based recommendations in evaluating patients with SHL, with particular emphasis on managing SSNHL. The panel recognized that patients enter the health care system with SHL as a nonspecific, primary complaint. Therefore, the initial recommendations of the guideline deal with efficiently distinguishing SSNHL from other causes of SHL at the time of presentation. By focusing on opportunities for quality improvement, the guideline should improve diagnostic accuracy, facilitate prompt intervention, decrease variations in management, reduce unnecessary tests and imaging procedures, and improve hearing and rehabilitative outcomes for affected patients. Results. The panel made strong recommendations that clinicians should (1) distinguish sensorineural hearing loss from conductive hearing loss in a patient presenting with SHL; (2) educate patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL) about the natural history of the condition, the benefits and risks of medical interventions, and the limitations of existing evidence regarding efficacy; and (3) counsel patients with incomplete recovery of hearing about the possible benefits of amplification and hearing-assistive technology and other supportive measures. The panel made recommendations that clinicians should (1) assess patients with presumptive SSNHL for bilateral SHL, recurrent episodes of SHL, or focal neurologic findings; (2) diagnose presumptive ISSNHL if audiometry confirms a 30-dB hearing loss at 3 consecutive frequencies and an underlying condition cannot be identified by history and physical examination; (3) evaluate patients with ISSNHL for retrocochlear pathology by obtaining magnetic resonance imaging, auditory brainstem response, or audiometric follow-up; (4) offer intratympanic steroid perfusion when patients have incomplete recovery from ISSNHL after failure of initial management; and (5) obtain follow-up audiometric evaluation within 6 months of diagnosis for patients with ISSNHL. The panel offered as options that clinicians may offer (1) corticosteroids as initial therapy to patients with ISSNHL and (2) hyperbaric oxygen therapy within 3 months of diagnosis of ISSNHL. The panel made a recommendation against clinicians routinely prescribing antivirals, thrombolytics, vasodilators, vasoactive substances, or antioxidants to patients with ISSNHL. The panel made strong recommendations against clinicians (1) ordering computerized tomography of the head/brain in the initial evaluation of a patient with presumptive SSNHL and (2) obtaining routine laboratory tests in patients with ISSNHL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert J. Stachler
- Department of Otolaryngology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | | | - Sanford M. Archer
- Division of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Richard M. Rosenfeld
- Department of Otolaryngology, SUNY Downstate Medical Center and Long Island College Hospital, Brooklyn, New York, USA
| | - Seth R. Schwartz
- Department of Otolaryngology, Virginia Mason Hospital and Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - David M. Barrs
- Department of Otolaryngology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Steven R. Brown
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Arizona School of Medicine, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Terry D. Fife
- Department of Neurology, University of Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | | | - Theodore G. Ganiats
- Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Debara L. Tucci
- Division of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Michael Valente
- Department of Otolaryngology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Barbara E. Warren
- Center for LGBT Social Science & Public Policy, Hunter College, City University of New York, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Peter J. Robertson
- American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation, Alexandria, Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Takeda S, Hata R, Cao F, Yoshida T, Hakuba N, Hato N, Gyo K. Ischemic tolerance in the cochlea. Neurosci Lett 2009; 462:263-6. [PMID: 19596048 DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.07.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2009] [Revised: 07/06/2009] [Accepted: 07/07/2009] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Ischemic tolerance in the cochlea was investigated in a gerbil model of cochlear ischemia. Transient cochlear ischemia was produced by extracranial occlusion of the bilateral vertebral arteries. The gerbils were divided into two groups; single ischemia group and double ischemia group. In the single ischemia group, animals were subjected to lethal cochlear ischemia for 15 min. In the double ischemia group, animals were subjected to sublethal cochlear ischemia for 2 min at 2 days before lethal ischemia for 15 min. Consequently, sublethal ischemia prevented lethal ischemia-induced hair cell degeneration and ameliorated hearing impairment, suggesting ischemic tolerance in the cochlea.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shoichiro Takeda
- Department of Otolaryngology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Shitsukawa, Ehime, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
Sudden sensorineural hearing loss is a medical emergency in search of an appropriate treatment. Almost all aspects of this disease process are disputed in the literature. The natural course of the disease process has not been well defined, although spontaneous recovery in a percentage of patients appears well accepted. Little scientific data exist to develop an evidence-based treatment protocol. The more common elements of treatment in the United States include oral steroid therapy, transtympanic steroid therapy, and potentially oral antiviral therapy. Other therapies are used with great frequency, and their potential should not be discounted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew R O'Malley
- The Otology Group Vanderbilt, 300 20th Ave N., Suite 502, Nashville, TN 37203-2115, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Onofrillo D, Accorsi P. What’s going on in LDL apheresis. Transfus Apher Sci 2007; 37:213-21. [DOI: 10.1016/j.transci.2007.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2007] [Accepted: 08/29/2007] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
|