The use of fluid boluses to safely perform extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) in low-weight children: a novel procedure

Role of extracorporeal photopheresis in the management of children with graft-vs-host disease

INTRODUCTION

Graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) is a frequent cause of morbidity and mortality in allogeneic stem cell transplants. Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is one of the most accepted second-line treatments, but technical issues of ECP in children might be prohibitive.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients under 18 y of age with corticodependant or corticorefractory GVHD receiving ECP at our hospital were included in this retrospective study. ECP was performed with an in-line system (CellExTherakos) in 2013-2014 and with an off-line system (Spectra Optia) from 2015 onwards. Cumulative incidence curves were obtained to compare ECP efficacy among patients grouped by different baseline, apheresis, and disease characteristics. Significant variables on univariate analysis (Gray's test) were pooled into a multivariate analysis (Fine-Gray proportional hazard regression for competing events).

RESULTS

A total of 701 ECP sessions were performed on 33 patients between October 2013 and December 2021. In total, 97% of the sessions could be executed. In 8% of the sessions an incident was detected, most of them mild and related to catheter dysfunction. With a median follow-up for alive patients of 33.6 mo (range, 8-95), the composite partial and complete response cumulative incidence was 70% (95% confidence interval, 51%-82%) and the median time to maximal response was 2.8 mo (range, 0.25-9.8). Significantly lower response ratios were found in patients with hepatic, gastrointestinal, acute, or severe GVHD. The only variable that influenced response on multivariate analysis was GVHD severity.

DISCUSSION

ECP is feasible, safe, and effective for pediatric patients with corticorefractory or corticodependant GVHD, offering a less toxic and nonimmunosuppressive treatment option.

[UV phototherapy : UV phototherapy and photodiagnostics-a practical overview]

UV phototherapy is an essential and efficient therapeutic option in the treatment of dermatological diseases. It is an integral part of multiple guidelines and maintains its high clinical significance despite the development of new therapeutic options for systemic treatment. Due to the difficult revenue situation, the market for ready-to-use products of psoralen and UV therapy devices is constantly changing.

European dermatology forum - updated guidelines on the use of extracorporeal photopheresis 2020 - part 1

Background

Following the first investigational study on the use of extracorporeal photopheresis for the treatment of cutaneous T‐cell lymphoma published in 1983, this technology has received continued use and further recognition for additional earlier as well as refractory forms. After the publication of the first guidelines for this technology in the JEADV in 2014, this technology has maintained additional promise in the treatment of other severe and refractory conditions in a multi‐disciplinary setting. It has confirmed recognition in well‐known documented conditions such as graft‐versus‐host disease after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation, systemic sclerosis, solid organ transplant rejection including lung, heart and liver and to a lesser extent inflammatory bowel disease.

Materials and methods

In order to further provide recognized expert practical guidelines for the use of this technology for all indications, the European Dermatology Forum (EDF) again proceeded to address these questions in the hands of the recognized experts within and outside the field of dermatology. This was done using the recognized and approved guidelines of EDF for this task. All authors had the opportunity to review each contribution as it was added.

Results and conclusion

These updated 2020 guidelines provide at present the most comprehensive available expert recommendations for the use of extracorporeal photopheresis based on the available published literature and expert consensus opinion. The guidelines are divided in two parts: PART I covers cutaneous T‐cell lymphoma, chronic graft‐versus‐host disease and acute graft‐versus‐host disease while PART II will cover scleroderma, solid organ transplantation, Crohn's disease, use of ECP in paediatrics practice, atopic dermatitis, type 1 diabetes, pemphigus, epidermolysis bullosa acquisita and erosive oral lichen planus.

Treatment of Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease in Childhood with Extracorporeal Photochemotherapy/Photopheresis: The Padova Experience

Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) is the major cause of morbidity and mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Systemic steroid treatment represents the first-line therapy for aGVHD and is associated with a response rate of 30% to 60%. Steroid-resistant patients have a poor prognosis with high transplantation-related mortality (TRM). Several second-line therapies have been proposed for the management of unresponsive aGVHD, without proven beneficial effects on patients' outcome or overall long-term survival. For these reasons, extracorporeal photochemotherapy/photopheresis (ECP), a cell-based approach to control GVHD that spares generalized immunosuppression, seems to be promising. In this study, we report the outcome of 72 consecutive pediatric patients treated with ECP between 1997 and 2013 for aGVHD. Among them, 21 patients had steroid-resistant aGVHD, 42 had steroid-dependent aGVHD, and 9 did not receive steroid as first-line therapy because of clinical contraindications. A complete response was obtained in 72% of patients, a partial response was observed in 11%, and there was no response in 17% of patients. At day +180, TRM was 4% in the whole cohort; TRM was 3% and 20% among responders and nonresponders to ECP, respectively (P < .0001). The 5-year overall survival was 71%, showing a difference between responders and nonresponders of 78% and 30%, respectively (P = .0004). The 5-year time to progression of primary disease was 81%, without any significant difference between the 2 groups. Moreover, the 5-year progression-free survival of primary disease was 72%, with a significant difference (P = .0007) between responders (79%) and nonresponders (30%) to ECP. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that ECP is highly effective in aGVHD without a negative impact on primary disease.

•

We conducted a retrospective study of 72 consecutive pediatric patients treated with extracorporeal photochemotherapy/photopheresis for acute graft-versus-host disease.

•

Twenty-one steroid-refractory, 21 steroid-dependent, and 30 patients with infectious complications were included.

•

The infectious complications group included 9 with no steroids before extracorporeal photochemotherapy/photopheresis and 21 with steroids.

•

Outcomes at the end of extracorporeal photochemotherapy/photopheresis were complete remission, 72%; transplantation-related mortality day +180, 4%; 5-year overall survival, 71%; time to progression, 81%; and progression-free survival, 72%.

•

Extracorporeal photochemotherapy/photopheresis was highly effective in acute graft-versus-host disease without negative impact on primary disease.

Guidelines on the use of extracorporeal photopheresis

BACKGROUND

After the first investigational study on the use of extracorporeal photopheresis for the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma was published in 1983 with its subsequent recognition by the FDA for its refractory forms, the technology has shown significant promise in the treatment of other severe and refractory conditions in a multi-disciplinary setting. Among the major studied conditions are graft versus host disease after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation, systemic sclerosis, solid organ transplant rejection and inflammatory bowel disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In order to provide recognized expert practical guidelines for the use of this technology for all indications the European Dermatology Forum (EDF) proceeded to address these questions in the hands of the recognized experts within and outside the field of dermatology. This was done using the recognized and approved guidelines of EDF for this task.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

These guidelines provide at present the most comprehensive available expert recommendations for the use of extracorporeal photopheresis based on the available published literature and expert consensus opinion.