Therapeutic plasma exchange as treatment for propofol infusion syndrome

Propofol-Related Infusion Syndrome: A Bibliometric Analysis of the 100 Most-Cited Articles

Propofol-related infusion syndrome (PRIS) is a rare, yet life-threatening sequelae to prolonged administration of the anesthetic propofol in mechanically intubated patients. The condition is characterized by progressive multi-system organ failure and eventual mortality; of note, the predominant characteristics of PRIS involve but are not limited to cardiovascular impairment and collapse, metabolic and lactic acidosis, rhabdomyolysis, hyperkalemia, and acute renal failure. While potent or extended doses of propofol have been found to be the primary precipitating factor of this condition, others such as age, critical illness, steroid therapy, and hyperlipidemia have been discovered to play a role as well. This bibliometric analysis was done to reflect the current relevance and understanding of PRIS in recent literature. The SCOPUS database was utilized to conduct a search for articles with keywords "propofol infusion syndrome" and "propofol syndrome" from February 24, 2001, until April 16, 2023, with parameters for article title, citation number, citation per year, author, institution, publishing journal, and country of origin. PRIS was first defined in 1990, just a year after its approval by the Food and Drug Administration for use as a sedative-hypnotic. Since then, interest in PRIS slowly rose up to 13 publications per year in 2013. Seven papers on the topic were published in Critical Care Medicine, six in Neurocritical Care, and four in Anesthesia. The most common institutions were Mayo Clinic, Northeastern University, and Tufts Medical Center. To our knowledge, this is the first bibliometric analysis to evaluate the most influential publications about PRIS. A majority of the research is case-based, possibly owing to the rarity of the condition. Our research suggests that confounding factors outside the precipitating dosage of propofol may be implicated in the onset and progression of PRIS. This study could therefore bring renewed interest to the topic and lead to additional research focused on fully understanding the pathophysiology of PRIS in order to promote the development of novel diagnostics and treatment.

Propofol-Related Infusion Syndrome in a Child With Refractory Status Epilepticus: Successful Resuscitation With Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation, Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy, and Therapeutic Plasma Exchange

Propofol is used for sedation, anxiolysis, anesthesia induction, and as an anticonvulsant. In cases of refractory status epilepticus (RSE), propofol is more efficient than barbiturates. We present a case of a 3-year-old female with RSE who developed propofol-related infusion syndrome (PRIS) despite low dosage after failed attempts with multiple anti-epileptic drips and bolus therapies. Careful consideration must be made before initiating propofol administration for RSE. We discuss our PRIS treatment approach with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, therapeutic plasma exchange, and continuous renal replacement therapy leading to our patient recovering to baseline and being discharged home from the hospital.

Therapeutic Plasma Exchange in Severe Rhabdomyolysis: A Case-Control Study

INTRODUCTION

 Rhabdomyolysis is a serious condition that can cause acute kidney injury (AKI), compartment syndrome, severe metabolic and electrolyte derangement leading to arrhythmias, and even death. Total plasma exchange (TPE) has been used as a treatment modality to clear myoglobin, but the evidence is limited. In this study, we aim to investigate the use of TPE in critically ill rhabdomyolysis patients.

METHODS

 We retrospectively chart reviewed adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with a diagnosis of rhabdomyolysis between 2012 and 2021. We dichotomized patients into two groups based on whether TPE was used or not in addition to standard care. PRISMA machines with TPE2000 filters and either 5% albumin or fresh frozen plasma were used in the TPE group.

RESULTS

 The patients' age ranged from 23 years to 87 years (mean 49.4, SD 18.1), and 51% were male. Initial creatinine ranged from 0.6 to 16mg/dL (mean 3.4, SD 2.7), creatinine phosphokinase (CPK) from 403-93,232 U/L, and myoglobin from 934 to >20,000. The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA)scores on admission ranged from 6 to 17 (mean 7.23, SD 3.40). Overall, 28.78% (N=19) of the patients received therapeutic plasma exchange. The overall mortality in our study was 31.9%, with the length of ICU stay ranging from 1-25 days (mean 7.10, SD 5.91) among survivors. Older age and the presence of shock were predictive of mortality in univariate and multivariate analyses. There was no statistically significant association in mortality between the TPE and non-TPE groups (36.84% in TPE vs. 36.17% in the non-TPE group, OR 0.7209, p=0.959). Only two patients in the non-TPE group developed CKD/ESRD on long-term follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that TPE administration in critically ill patients with rhabdomyolysis did not improve mortality or length of ICU stay. Further studies are required to elucidate its indication and effect on long-term renal outcomes.

Propofol Infusion Syndrome: Efficacy of a Prospective Screening Protocol

Propofol infusion syndrome (PIS) is a potentially lethal complication of propofol marked by rhabdomyolysis, metabolic acidosis, and cardiac arrhythmias or collapse. The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of a prospective screening protocol to prevent PIS. All trauma patients admitted who received propofol as a continuous infusion were prospectively screened from November 1, 2013 to December 31, 2015. Variables studied included demographics, injury severity, laboratory values, infusion rates, and mortality. Serum creatine phosphokinase (CPK) and lactate were drawn daily. Propofol was stopped for a positive screen defined as an increase in CPK to greater than 5000 IU/L or lactate greater than 4 mmol/L. Positive and negative cohorts were compared. Two hundred and twenty-five patients met the inclusion criteria and 12 patients (5.3%) had propofol stopped because of elevated CPK. No differences were identified in demographics, transfusions, injury severity, hospital length of stay, or propofol dose. The positive screened group had longer intensive care unit length of stay (20 vs 13 days; P = 0.002) and increased vent days (14.5 vs 10 days; P = 0.008). Max serum osmolality (334 vs 305 mosm/kg; P = 0.049) and max serum CPK (6782 vs 1058 IU/L; P < 0.0001) were higher in the positive cohort. No cases of PIS occurred, and mortality (16.7 vs 15.5%; P = 0.999) was not different between the cohorts. The screening protocol was effective in eliminating PIS. Serial CPK evaluations provided an effective screening tool and serum lactate can be dropped from screening.

Propofol Infusion Syndrome in Refractory Status Epilepticus: A Case Report and Topical Review

Propofol infusion syndrome (PRIS) is a fatal complication when doses of propofol administration exceed 4 mg/kg/h for more than 48 hours. Propofol overdosage is not uncommon in patients with refractory status epilepticus (RSE). We describe a case of refractory status epilepticus complicated by propofol infusion syndrome and collect from 5 databases all reports of refractory status epilepticus cases that were treated by propofol and developed the syndrome and outline whether refractory status epilepticus treatment with propofol is standardized according to international recommendations, compare it with alternative medications, and discuss how this syndrome can be treated and prevented. A total of 21 patients who developed this syndrome reported arrhythmia in all cases (100%), rhabdomyolysis in 9 cases (42%), lactic acidosis in 13 cases (62%), renal failure in 8 cases (38%), lipemia in 7 cases (33%), and elevated hepatic enzymes in 6 cases (28%). 13 patients died (66%). Propofol is still given in a dosage higher than what is internationally recommended, and new treatment modalities such as renal replacement therapy, blood exchange, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation seem to be promising. In conclusion, propofol should be carefully titrated, the maximal infusion rate needs to be reassessed, and combination of different sedative agents may be considered.