Comparison of three modalities of plasmapheresis on coagulation: Centrifugal, single-membrane filtration, and double-filtration plasmapheresis

Nomenclature of Extracorporeal Blood Purification Therapies for Acute Indications: The Nomenclature Standardization Conference

The development of new extracorporeal blood purification (EBP) techniques has led to increased application in clinical practice but also inconsistencies in nomenclature and misunderstanding. In November 2022, an international consensus conference was held to establish consensus on the terminology of EBP therapies. It was agreed to define EBP therapies as techniques that use an extracorporeal circuit to remove and/or modulate circulating substances to achieve physiological homeostasis, including support of the function of specific organs and/or detoxification. Specific acute EBP techniques include renal replacement therapy, isolated ultrafiltration, hemoadsorption, and plasma therapies, all of which can be applied in isolation and combination. This paper summarizes the proposed nomenclature of EBP therapies and serves as a framework for clinical practice and future research.

Plasma exchange as an adjunctive therapy in anti-neutrophil cytoplasm antibody-associated vasculitis

INTRODUCTION

We summarize evidence for the role of therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) in the treatment of anti-neutrophil cytoplasm antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV). TPE rapidly removes ANCA IgG, complement and coagulation factors important in the pathogenesis of AAV. TPE has been used in patients with rapidly deteriorating renal function to achieve early disease control, allowing time for immunosuppressive agents to prevent resynthesis of ANCA. The PEXIVAS trial challenged the utility of TPE in AAV, as it did not show benefit of adjunctive TPE on a combined end point of end stage kidney disease (ESKD) and death.

AREAS COVERED

We analyze data from PEXIVAS and other trials of TPE in AAV, an up-to-date meta-analysis, and recently published large cohort studies.

EXPERT OPINION

There remains a role for the use of TPE in AAV in certain groups of patients, in particular those with severe renal involvement (Cr >500 μmol/L or dialysis-dependent). It should be considered in patients with Cr >300 μmol/L and rapidly deteriorating function, or with life-threatening pulmonary hemorrhage. A separate indication is patients double positive for anti-GBM antibodies and ANCA. TPE may have the greatest benefit as part of steroid-sparing immunosuppressive treatment strategies.

Desensitization in Crossmatch-positive Kidney Transplant Candidates

Access to kidney transplantation is limited by HLA-specific sensitization. Desensitization strategies enable crossmatch-positive kidney transplantation. In this review, we describe clinical experience gained over the last 20 y using desensitization strategies before kidney transplantation and describe the different tools used (both drugs and apheresis options), including IVIg, rituximab, apheresis techniques, interleukin-6 interference, proteasome inhibition, enzymatic degradation of HLA antibodies, complement inhibition, and B cytokine interference. Although access to transplantation for highly sensitized kidney transplantation candidates has been vastly improved by desensitization strategies, it remains, however, limited by the recurrence of HLA antibodies after transplantation and the occurrence of antibody-mediated rejection.

How to improve clotting factors depletion in double-filtration plasmapheresis

BACKGROUND

Double-filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP), a selective therapeutic apheresis, can deplete pathogenic antibodies/substances, but also important coagulation factors.

AIM

To determine if the use of a separator filter with different characteristics (CascadefloEC-50 W) as compared to the reference filter (PlasmafloOP-08 W) is as efficient in terms of immunoglobulin loss, but can reduce coagulation factor losses and have similar tolerability.

PATIENTS/METHODS

This is a single-center prospective study including 14 patients divided into two groups (7 each): that is, group1 = CascadefloEC-50 W and group2 = PlasmafloOP-08 W. We measured immunoglobulins, lipid profiles, blood-cell counts, hemostasis (prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time), coagulation factors, and natural anticoagulants at before and after the first DFPP-session.

RESULTS

In group 1, the loss of coagulation factors was significantly reduced as compared to group 2 for proteins with a molecular weight of >150 kDa: there was, respectively, an average decrease of 70% vs 31% for fibrinogen (P = 0.004), 66% vs 21% for factor V (P = 2.16e-07), 60% vs 32% for factor XI (P = 6.96e-06), 75% vs 17% for XIII-antigen (P = 0.0002), and 47% vs 0% for VWF-antigen(P = 0.02). The decrease in post-session IgG was, on average, 45% in group 1 and 50% in group 2 (P = 0.13). Those results remained significant even when adjusted to the treated-plasma volume and the pre-DFPP factor values.

CONCLUSION

DFPP, using a CascadefloEC-50W as a first-filter, reduces efficiently IgGs similarly to PlasmafloOP-08W but spares clotting factors.