The effect of plateletpheresis on the Fenwal CS-3000 on donor platelet counts

Effect of plateletpheresis on total platelet count and mean platelet volume: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Currently, there are discrepancies in the reports on the extent of the reduction in platelet count after platelet donation by apheresis, and its impact on mean platelet volume (MPV). This study was conducted to meta-analyze the effect of plateletpheresis on platelet count and on mean platelet volume, based on studies published between 1980 and 2018.

METHODS

Medline-Pubmed, Scielo, ScienceDirect, and Scopus databases were searched from inception to December 31 2019. The PRISMA guidelines, reproducibility, and evaluation of the methodological quality were guaranteed. Heterogeneity was evaluated with DerSimonian-Laird's, publication bias with a Begg's test. Sensitivity analysis and cumulative meta-analysis were also conducted, as well as a forest plot.

RESULTS

Twenty-five studies with 3769 donors were systematized to analyze platelet count, and seven studies with 1176 donors to observe MPV. Most studies were published in India and the United States. There was a postprocedure reduction in both variables. The reduction in platelet count was 14.3 × 10³ /μL (95% CI 11.4 to 17.1 × 10³ ⁄μL). The reduction in MPV was 1.43 fL (95% CI 0.3 to 2.5 fL). The analysis of subgroups showed that, in the case of platelet count, the reduction is not statistically significant two weeks after donation.

CONCLUSION

Platelet donation by apheresis reduces platelet count and MPV in donors, which is detrimental to the purposes of the procedure; although the decrease is not clinically significant for the donor or the recipient. This demonstrates the need for subsequent studies to evaluate variables, such as donation frequency and donation intervals, should be considered to evaluate if the reported decrease is easily compensated, without adverse consequences for donors, or if modifications in donor selection criteria are required.

Effect of plateletpheresis on postdonation serum thrombopoietin levels and its correlation with platelet counts in healthy voluntary donors

BACKGROUND:

Thrombopoietin (TPO) is regulated by a feedback mechanism between megakaryocytes and platelets. This is important in plateletpheresis donors to compensate for donation-associated platelet loss.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES:

The aim and objective of this study were to investigate changes in serum TPO levels in healthy plateletpheresis donors and its correlation with platelet recovery pattern.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Out of 50 plateletpheresis donors recruited in the study over 1 year, only 29 completed follow-up and were further analyzed. Plateletpheresis procedures were performed on two types of cell separators (TRIMA ACCEL^®, Terumo BCT Lakewood Colorado and AMICUS^®, Fresenius Kabi, Germany). Platelet parameters were estimated pre- and post-platelet donation, at 3^rd- and 5^th-day postdonation. Serum TPO levels were determined using quantitative sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay technique (Raybiotech, USA) as per the protocol of the manufacturer.

RESULTS:

The majority of donors (72%) in our study were first-time donors. The baseline platelet count was 226 ± 44 × 10³/μl with a significant decline (30%; P < 0.001) in postdonation phase and remained below baseline on the 3^rd and 5^th day. The serum TPO levels increased significantly (P < 0.001) from a baseline of 227.81 (interquartile range [IQR]: 176.06) pg/ml to 269.94 (IQR: 110.68) pg/ml postdonation and remained elevated from baseline levels on the 3^rd and 5^th day. An inverse relation was observed between change in serum TPO levels and platelet count during postdonation phase which was not statistically significant (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION:

Serum TPO levels increase significantly post plateletpheresis donation corresponding to decrease in platelet counts showing that TPO plays a vital role in compensatory mechanism after platelet loss.

Haemostatic parameters, platelet activation markers, and platelet indices among regular plateletpheresis donors

OBJECTIVE

Plateletpheresis is generally a safe procedure for platelet donation. Studies on the effects of haemostatic parameters and possible association between automated plateletpheresis and hypercoagulable state are limited. Hence, this study aimed to investigate the effects of plateletpheresis on regular donors using haemostatic parameters, i.e. natural anticoagulant proteins, platelet indices, and platelet activation markers.

METHODS

A total of 139 participants (plateletpheresis donors and normal controls) were recruited and divided into two groups: Group 1 participants who underwent tests for haemostatic and platelet indices and Group 2 participants who underwent tests for platelet activation markers using CD62P and PAC-1 monoclonal antibodies.

RESULTS

A significant mild shortening of prothrombin time and platelet activation were demonstrated (by increased CD62P and PAC-1 markers) among regular plateletpheresis donors as compared to healthy controls. The current pre-donation platelet count of plateletpheresis donors was significantly lower than their mean baseline platelet count obtained before their first plateletpheresis procedure. However, no significant differences were observed for the other platelet parameters (platelet count, mean platelet volume, platelet distribution width, activated partial thromboplastin time, protein C, protein S, antithrombin, and von Willebrand Factor antigen) between plateletpheresis donors and healthy controls.

CONCLUSION

This study concludes that regular plateletpheresis is a safe procedure. A possibility of mild platelet activation among regular donors requires further confirmation. However, pre-analytical platelet and FVII activations could occur in vitro contributing to these findings.

Comparison of plateletpheresis on the Fenwal Amicus, Fresenius COM.TEC, and Trima Accel Cell separators

Blood component donations by apheresis have become more common in modern blood transfusion practices. We compared three apheresis instruments (Fenwal Amicus, Fresenius COM.TEC, and Trima Accel) with regard to platelet (PLT) yield, collection efficiency (CE), and collection rate (CR). The single-needle or double-needle plateletpheresis procedures of the three instruments were compared in a retrospective, randomized study in 270 donors. The blood volume processed was higher in the COM.TEC compared with the Amicus and Trima. Also there was a significantly higher median volume of ACD used in collections on the COM.TEC compared with the Amicus and Trima. The PLT yield was significantly lower with the COM.TEC compared with the Amicus and Trima. Additionally, the CE was significantly lower with the COM.TEC compared with the Amicus and Trima. There was no significant difference in median separation time and CR between the three groups. When procedures were compared regarding CE by using Amicus device, it was significantly higher in single-needle than double-needle plateletpheresis. When double-needle Amicus system was compared with double-needle COM.TEC system, CE and PLT yield were significantly higher with Amicus system. When single-needle Amicus system was compared with single-needle Trima system, CE and PLT yield were significantly higher with Trima system. All instruments collected PLTs efficiently. However, the CE was lower with the COM.TEC compared with the Amicus and Trima. Also, we found Amicus single-needle system collected PLTs more efficiently compared with the double-needle system. CE and PLT yields were significantly higher with the single-needle Trima instrument compared with the single-needle Amicus device.

Feasibility of applying the 2day deferral for repeat plateletpheresis: Indian perspective

As the use of single donor apheresis platelets and plateletpheresis procedures done steadily increases in India, the plateletpheresis donors are at an increased risk of postpheresis anemia and thrombocytopenia. This study was planned in order to evaluate the effect of plateletpheresis on the hematological parameters in the local donor population and to evaluate the possibility of following the 2day deferral for repeat plateletpheresis. A total of 60 plateletpheresis procedures performed over a period of 1year with CS 3000 Plus Baxter Fenwal were evaluated. All the post-donation hematological parameters showed a significant decrease from the pre-donation values (p<0.001). Post-donation hemoglobin <12g, which is defined by WHO as anemia irrespective of the gender occurred in 25% (n=15) of the donors. The post-donation platelet count was less than 100×10(9)/L in 16.6% (n=10) of the procedure. The ability of these donors to serve as repeat plateletpheresis donor after 2days as recommended by AABB needs to be evaluated by further studies done post donation. Keeping in view the hematological profile of our donor population we recommend that donors who already have a low or borderline pre-donation platelet count and hemoglobin should be assessed and monitored post-donation for decrements in these parameters. While serving as repeat donors, their pre donation hemoglobin and platelet counts should be tested again.

Automated platelet collection using the latest apheresis devices in an Indian setting

In a developing nation like India where there is a scarcity of resources and voluntary donors, provision of safe and good quality blood and its components is a huge challenge. The demand for platelets is increasing constantly due to better management of various patient categories, specifically hemato-oncological cases, where there is an increased demand of platelet transfusion. The use of apheresis single donor platelets (SDPs) has been attributed to increased gap between demand and supply of whole blood derived random donor platelets (RDPs). Moreover, the other benefits of SDPs such as decreased donor exposure and simplification of inventory management cannot be overlooked. However, the increased costs and logistic problems, compounded by the lack of awareness, limit the donor recruitment and procedures for SDPs. In Indian scenario, there are no specific guidelines or standards available which can be followed, while simultaneously addressing the associated problems. In this review, we have tried to analyze the various problems of donor selection, donor safety and the quality issues regarding plateletpheresis. Based on this we have tried to give certain recommendations which might help the centers in resolving the problems related to plateletpheresis.

Comparison of plateletpheresis on three continuous flow cell separators

INTRODUCTION

Platelet concentrate (PC) remains one of the most important support measures in thrombocytopenic patients. An efficient cell separator is a prerequisite for an optimally functioning apheresis setup. Donor blood count may undergo a temporary reduction after the procedure.

AIM

The aim was to find the extent of reduction in donor blood count (hemoglobin, hematocrit, white blood cell, and platelet) after plateletpheresis and to evaluate the cell separator for collection efficiency, processing time, and leukoreduction.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Two hundred and thirty seven procedures performed on the Amicus (N = 121), Fenwal CS-3000 Plus (N = 50) and Cobe spectra (N = 66) in a one year period were evaluated. The procedures performed on the continuous flow centrifugation (CFC) cell separators and donor blood counts (pre and post donation) done were included in the study.

RESULTS

The percent reduction in hemoglobin (HB), hematocrit (HCT), white blood cell (WBC) and platelet count ((PLT ct) was 2.9, 3.1, 9, 30.7 (Mean, N = 237) respectively after the procedure. The post donation PLT ct reduced to < 100x109/L (range 80-100) in five donors (N = 5/237, Amicus). The pre donation PLT ct in them was 150-200x109/L. Collection efficiency (percent) of Amicus (79.3) was better as compared to the other two machines (CS: 62.5, Cobe: 57.5). PC collected on Cobe spectra had <1x106 WBC. The donor pre donation PLT levels had a positive correlation to the product PLT yield (r = 0.30, P = 0.000).

CONCLUSION

Monitoring donor blood counts helps to avoid pheresis induced adverse events. A cautious approach is necessary in donors whose pre donation PLT ct is 150-200x109/L. The main variable in PLT yield is donor PLT ct (pre donation). High collection efficiency is a direct measure of an optimally functioning cell separator.

Comparison of Plateletpheresis on the Fenwal Amicus and Fresenius Com.Tec Cell Separators

SUMMARY: BACKGROUND: A variety of apheresis devices are now available on the market for plateletapheresis. We compared two apheresis instruments (Fenwal Amicus and Fresenius COM.TEC) with regard to processing time, platelet (PLT) yield and efficiency, and white blood cell (WBC) content. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Donors undergoing plateletpheresis were randomly separated into two groups (either the Amicus or the COM.TEC cell separator). RESULTS: In the pre-apheresis setting, 32 plateletpheresis procedures performed with each instrument revealed no significant differences in donors' sex, age, weight, height and total blood volume between the two groups. However, the pre-apheresis PLT count was higher with the COM.TEC than with the Amicus (198 × 10(3)/μl vs. 223 × 10(3)/μl; p = 0.035). The blood volume processed to reach a target PLT yield of ≥3.3 × 10(11) was higher in the COM.TEC compared to the Amicus (3,481 vs. 2,850 ml; p < 0.001). The median separation time was also significantly longer in the COM.TEC than in the Amicus (61 vs. 44 min; p < 0.001). 91 and 88% of the PLT products collected with the Amicus and the COM.TEC, respectively, had a PLT count of >3.3 × 10(11) (p = 0.325). All products obtained with both instruments had WBC counts lower than 5 ↔ 10(6), as required. There was no statistical difference with regard to collection efficiency between the devices (55 ± 15 vs. 57 ± 15%; p = 0.477). However, the collection rate was significantly higher with the Amicus compared to the COM.TEC instrument (0.077 ± 0.012 × 10(11) vs. 0.057 ± 0.008 × 10(11) PLT/min; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Both instruments collected platelets efficiently. Additionally, consistent leukoreduction was obtained with both instruments; however, compared with the COM.TEC instrument, the Amicus reached the PLT target yield more quickly.

Effect of donor variables on yield in single donor plateletpheresis by continuous flow cell separator

The quality of single donor platelets (SDPs) in terms of yield influences platelet recovery in the recipient. Various donor factors such as pre-donation platelet count and hemoglobin (Hb) concentration affect the platelet yield. We studied the influence of pre-donation donor clinical and laboratory factors such as gender, age, weight of the donor, platelet count and Hb on the platelet yield. A total of 94 plateletpheresis procedures performed on continuous flow cell separator (CS3000, Baxter Healthcare, Round Lake, IL, USA) were evaluated for platelet yield. A relationship between pre-donation donor variables and yield of platelets was studied using the Pearson correlation. The mean platelet yield was 2.8+/-0.73x10(11). While a direct relationship was observed between pre-donation platelet count and yield (r=0.50, p<0.001), no such correlation was noticed with donor Hb concentration (r=-0.10, p>0.005). Similarly, no correlation was observed between gender (r=0.05), age (r=0.11) and weight (r=0.18) of the donor with yield. Optimization of platelet yield, which is influenced by pre-donation platelet count, is an emerging issue in blood transfusion services. Identification of such factors may help in selecting donors to obtain higher platelet yields and consequently better clinical outcome.

Frequently used plateletpheresis techniques result in variable target yields and platelet recruitment of donors

BACKGROUND

Standard plateletpheresis techniques and effects on platelet (PLT) donors were investigated to provide an informative basis for advancement of apheresis software.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Three paired groups with 33 male and 22 female blood donors were prospectively investigated by analyzing blood counts of donors and products. Four apheresis platforms, the COBE Spectra LRS and the Trima v4 (Gambro BCT) and the AS.TEC204 and the COM.TEC (Fresenius Hemocare), were compared. Deviations of the collected from programmed PLT targets and donor PLT recruitment were calculated for single-unit PLT concentrates (SU-PCs; 3 x 10(11) PLTs) and double-unit PLT concentrates (DU-PCs; 6 x 10(11) PLTs).

RESULTS

Regarding SU-PCs, the productivity of the COM.TEC machine was superior to the AS.TEC204 machine, because of shorter processing time (54 min vs. 67 min) and higher yields (2.90 x 10(11) PLTs vs. 2.75 x 10(11) PLTs). Compared to the Spectra machine, the Trima v4 machine showed higher collection efficiencies (CEs) and shorter processing time and complied better with the programmed target (SU-PCs, 3.24 x 10(11) PLTs vs. 3.70 x 10(11) PLTs; DU-PCs, 6.87 x 10(11) PLTs vs. 7.56 x 10(11) PLTs). Harvests of the Spectra machine (DU-PCs) exceeded the target by 40 percent, which resulted in high PLT loss for donors. A longer processing time resulted in some higher CEs (SU-PCs, 53%; DU-PCs, 58%), which could contribute to this result. PLT recruitment compensated PLT loss to some extent.

CONCLUSION

The major finding was that the newer devices (COM.TEC and Trima) gave more predictable yields than the older devices (AS.TEC204 and Spectra) and resulted in lower PLT deficit. PLT software should be improved to minimize relevant variations of collected yields regarding the programmed target.

Hemoglobin and platelet count effect on platelet yields in plateletpheresis

BACKGROUND

Platelet transfusion in thrombocytopenic patients, especially those with marrow failure, remains one of the most important support measures available. Treatment success depends on rational use of platelet transfusion. Platelet yield, reflected in transfused platelet dose, influences platelet recovery in the patient and allows prolonging intervals between transfusions. In this study, our main objective was to identify donor laboratory and clinical factors that showed some influence on platelet yield obtained by apheresis.

METHODS

Healthy donor laboratory and clinical data were analyzed prior to performing plateletpheresis. Platelet yield was quantified after plateletpheresis procedure was concluded in two different ways: a) prefixed volume of 5,000 mL processed, and b) volume determined according to manufacturer recommendations. Age, gender, hemoglobin concentration, platelet and leukocyte count, height, and weight were included as yield-predicting donor variables.

RESULTS

In group A, two variables were significant: donor platelet count and hemoglobin (Hb) concentrations with r = 0.554, and in group B, donor platelet count, Hb concentrations, and volume with r = 0.758.

CONCLUSIONS

Donor platelet count and hemoglobin concentrations influence platelet yield: higher platelet count corresponds to higher yield, while hemoglobin shows an inverse relationship, i.e., the lower the hemoglobin concentrations, the higher the platelet yield.

Sustained decreases in platelet count associated with multiple, regular plateletpheresis donations

BACKGROUND

Transient but significant decreases in platelet counts have been documented to occur in donors undergoing single and serial short-term plateletpheresis collections. The effect of long-term regular plateletpheresis on donor platelet counts has not been characterized.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A retrospective study was performed to evaluate the effects of long-term regular plateletpheresis donation on donor platelet counts. A computerized database containing records of 11,464 apheresis collections from 939 donors over a 4-year period was queried for serial preapheresis platelet counts. Donors were categorized by sex, age, and cumulative number of donations. The average difference in platelet counts (mDeltaPC) between each donor's first and last platelet count during this period was calculated for each category. A subgroup of frequent donors was selected for analysis of mDeltaPC, using the baseline platelet count obtained before the first plateletpheresis procedure.

RESULTS

A significant and sustained decrease in platelet count was identified for all donation frequency categories. The frequency of donation correlated directly with decrease in platelet count for all but the highest-frequency donation group, in which deferrals for low platelet count blunted the extent of the mDeltaPC. A mean decrease of 40,000 per microL from baseline occurred in the frequent-donor subgroup. A total of 84 donors (9%) were deferred for low platelet count. The majority returned to donate successfully after temporary deferral.

CONCLUSIONS

Regular plateletpheresis donors develop sustained decreases in platelet count. However, clinically significant thrombocytopenia is unusual when rigorous ongoing review and prudent deferral policies are established and followed.

Prospective comparison of plateletapheresis using four apheresis systems on the same donors

To address the demand for higher plateletapheresis efficiency while maintaining consistent leukoreduction, manufacturers of apheresis systems have introduced new equipment or modifications to existing equipment. Using the same 20 donors, we compared the Fresenius AS104 (AS104), Fenwal Amicus, and COBE Spectra Version 7 Leukoreduction System (Turbo) to the COBE Spectra Version 5 Leukoreduction System (V5-LRS) and each other in regard to platelet (plt) collection efficiencies, processing times, and leukoreduction consistency. Using current pre-procedure platelet counts, target endpoints were set at 6-6.5 x 10(11) plt or 3.3-4.0 x 10(11) plt in up to 100 minutes processing time. Median platelet yields for V5-LRS, AS104, Amicus, and Turbo were 3.98, 3.63, 5.03, and 4.99 x 10(11) plt respectively; median collection efficiencies were 53, 46, 73, and 56% respectively; median collection rates were.049,.039,.065, and. 060 x 10(11) plt/minute respectively; double product frequencies were 35, 10, 40, and 30% respectively; and median processing times were 87, 92, 77, and 79 minutes, respectively. Amicus had a significantly higher collection efficiency and higher incidence of double products than all other systems. While AS104 had a significantly lower collection efficiency and lowest double product frequency than all other systems, Amicus and Turbo had significantly lower processing times than V5-LRS and AS104. AS104 leukoreduction was inconsistent, but V5-LRS, Amicus, and Turbo were consistently leukoreduced ((99.8% had <5 x 10(6) WBC at 95% confidence interval). The best overall performance was for the Amicus with Turbo a close second.

Effect of long-term platelet donation on lymphocyte subsets and plasma protein concentrations

Previous studies of changes in immune function in platelet donors have investigated subjects who were undergoing plateletpheresis using older equipment that is no longer in general use. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the effect of long-term platelet donation on lymphocyte numbers and subsets and plasma protein concentrations in platelet donors using newer cell separators. Three groups included in the study were nondonor controls (n = 27), long-term whole blood donors (n = 29), and long-term platelet donors (n = 20). Using a cross-sectional analysis, lymphocyte numbers and subsets were determined and compared among the three groups. Plasma concentrations of total protein, globulin, albumin, and IgG were also compared. Among the three groups there were no significant differences in total white blood cell counts, percentage or absolute number of lymphocytes, or percentage or absolute number of lymphocyte subsets. Serum total protein, globulin, albumin, and IgG concentrations of platelet donors were within normal ranges. These data support the current Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and American Association of Blood Banks' standards for the frequency of platelet donation allowed and monitoring required for plateletpheresis donors. Furthermore, these data indicate that the FDA could eliminate the requirement for the warning in informed consents about lymphocyte depletion in platelet donors.

The collection of platelets by apheresis procedures

Collection of platelets by apheresis has been a major advance in transfusion medicine. It has allowed the supply of a therapeutically beneficial component to grow with medical needs. Donors find fulfillment in more frequent donations than are possible with whole blood and know that their donation fills a special need. New technology allows leukocyte reduction in the collection of the component with or without the use of filtration. Matching for refractory patients is possible. However, platelets collected by apheresis have not been shown to be hemostatically different from platelets separated from whole blood donations, and thus, do not represent an advance in therapeutic efficacy. The use of apheresis platelets does reduce donor exposure, but this has not been shown to be a safety advance, although it seems intuitively obvious that transfusion risk is statistically reduced in some patients requiring only a few platelet transfusions. Support of patients by apheresis platelets may or may not reduce the risk of alloimmunization. Apheresis platelets from some equipment have less white blood cell contamination even in the absence of filtration, which may be an advantage. Apheresis platelets could be a major step in the ultimate customization of blood collection, in which some donors would preferentially donate red blood cells, whereas others would donate platelets or plasma depending on their blood type and ability to donate frequently, and the current medical need of their donation. Perhaps this would be the most significant advance from the medical progress initiated by Cohn almost 50 years ago.

Platelet collection with the Autopheresis-C apheresis system

This report describes a new system for collection of platelet concentrate (PC) and cell-free plasma (PPP) from apheresis donors. The system uses two separation devices and requires only a single venipuncture. The Plateletcell device separates primary platelet concentrate (PPC) from anticoagulated whole blood and the Plasmacell-C device separates the PPC into PC and PPP. Results of functional studies performed indicate that the separation process does not alter viability of either the PPC, the PC, or the PPP. Platelet function after 5 days of storage is maintained. An average yield of 3.4 +/- 0.7 x 10(11) platelets in 201 g of PC and 422 g of PPP were harvested in 71 +/- 13 min of donor time from donors with preprocedure hematocrits averaging 42.5 +/- 2.0% and preprocedure platelet counts averaging 265 +/- 61 x 10(3)/microliters.