Cytokine induction of proliferation and expression of CDC2 and cyclin A in FDC-P1 myeloid hematopoietic progenitor cells: regulation of ubiquitous and cell cycle-dependent histone gene transcription factors

The abbreviated pluripotent cell cycle

Human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) and induced pluripotent stem cells proliferate rapidly and divide symmetrically producing equivalent progeny cells. In contrast, lineage committed cells acquire an extended symmetrical cell cycle. Self-renewal of tissue-specific stem cells is sustained by asymmetric cell division where one progeny cell remains a progenitor while the partner progeny cell exits the cell cycle and differentiates. There are three principal contexts for considering the operation and regulation of the pluripotent cell cycle: temporal, regulatory, and structural. The primary temporal context that the pluripotent self-renewal cell cycle of hESCs is a short G1 period without reducing periods of time allocated to S phase, G2, and mitosis. The rules that govern proliferation in hESCs remain to be comprehensively established. However, several lines of evidence suggest a key role for the naïve transcriptome of hESCs, which is competent to stringently regulate the embryonic stem cell (ESC) cell cycle. This supports the requirements of pluripotent cells to self-propagate while suppressing expression of genes that confer lineage commitment and/or tissue specificity. However, for the first time, we consider unique dimensions to the architectural organization and assembly of regulatory machinery for gene expression in nuclear microenviornments that define parameters of pluripotency. From both fundamental biological and clinical perspectives, understanding control of the abbreviated ESC cycle can provide options to coordinate control of proliferation versus differentiation. Wound healing, tissue engineering, and cell-based therapy to mitigate developmental aberrations illustrate applications that benefit from knowledge of the biology of the pluripotent cell cycle.

The architectural organization of human stem cell cycle regulatory machinery

Two striking features of human embryonic stem cells that support biological activity are an abbreviated cell cycle and reduced complexity to nuclear organization. The potential implications for rapid proliferation of human embryonic stem cells within the context of sustaining pluripotency, suppressing phenotypic gene expression and linkage to simplicity in the architectural compartmentalization of regulatory machinery in nuclear microenvironments is explored. Characterization of the molecular and architectural commitment steps that license human embryonic stem cells to initiate histone gene expression is providing understanding of the principal regulatory mechanisms that control the G1/S phase transition in primitive pluripotent cells. From both fundamental regulatory and clinical perspectives, further understanding of the pluripotent cell cycle in relation to compartmentalization of regulatory machinery in nuclear microenvironments is relevant to applications of stem cells for regenerative medicine and new dimensions to therapy where traditional drug discovery strategies have been minimally effective.

Transcriptional activation of the histone nuclear factor P (HiNF-P) gene by HiNF-P and its cyclin E/CDK2 responsive co-factor p220NPAT defines a novel autoregulatory loop at the G1/S phase transition

Histone nuclear factor P (HiNF-P) activates histone H4 gene transcription at the G1/S phase transition upon association with its cyclin E/CDK2 responsive co-factor p220NPAT. Here we characterize the gene regulatory pathways that control the proliferation-related expression of HiNF-P. The HiNF-P locus contains a single TATA-less 0.6 kbp promoter with multiple phylogenetically conserved transcription factor recognition motifs. Transient reporter gene assays with HiNF-P promoter deletions show that there are at least three distinct activating regions (-387/-201, -201/-100 and -100/-1) that support maximal transcription. HiNF-P gene transcription is activated by SP1 through the -100/-1 domain and repressed by E2F1 through the -201/-100 domain. The multifunctional co-regulators CBP and p300 also stimulate HiNF-P gene transcription through the -201/-1 core promoter. Importantly, the HiNF-P promoter is activated by both HiNF-P and p220NPAT. This autoregulatory activation is further enhanced by cyclin E and CDK2, while blocked by CDK inhibition (i.e., p57KIP2 p27KIP1, p21CIP). Thus, the HiNF-P gene is a key non-histone target of p220NPAT and HiNF-P. The dependence of HiNF-P gene transcription on cyclin E/CDK2/p220NPAT signaling defines a novel feed-forward loop that may sustain HiNF-P expression in proliferating cells to support the cell cycle regulated synthesis of histone H4 proteins.

An architectural perspective of cell-cycle control at the G1/S phase cell-cycle transition

A prominent role for the execution of cell cycle and growth regulatory mechanisms within the three-dimensional context of nuclear architecture is becoming increasingly evident. Signaling pathways and regulatory networks that govern activation and suppression of genes controlling proliferation are functionally integrated for the organization and assembly of transcriptional machinery in nuclear microenvironments. The transcriptional activation of histone genes at the G1/S phase transition (S-point) is temporarily, functionally, and spatially distinct from transcriptional mechanisms at the restriction point (R-point). The spatial distinction in R-point versus S-point control is the localization of clustered histone gene loci at cajal bodies, which is modulated during the cell cycle. Histone nuclear factor P (HiNF-P), the principal factor mediating H4 histone gene transcription, is the final link in the signaling cascade that is initiated with growth factor dependent induction of cyclin E/CDK2 kinase activity at the R-point and culminates in the NPAT-mediated activation of histone H4 genes through HiNF-P at the G1/S phase cell-cycle transition.

Identification of HiNF-P, a key activator of cell cycle-controlled histone H4 genes at the onset of S phase

At the G(1)/S phase cell cycle transition, multiple histone genes are expressed to ensure that newly synthesized DNA is immediately packaged as chromatin. Here we have purified and functionally characterized the critical transcription factor HiNF-P, which is required for E2F-independent activation of the histone H4 multigene family. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis and ligation-mediated PCR-assisted genomic sequencing, we show that HiNF-P interacts with conserved H4 cell cycle regulatory sequences in vivo. Antisense inhibition of HiNF-P reduces endogenous histone H4 gene expression. Furthermore, we find that HiNF-P utilizes NPAT/p220, a substrate of the cyclin E/cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (CDK2) kinase complex, as a key coactivator to enhance histone H4 gene transcription. The biological role of HiNF-P is reflected by impeded cell cycle progression into S phase upon antisense-mediated reduction of HiNF-P levels. Our results establish that HiNF-P is the ultimate link in a linear signaling pathway that is initiated with the growth factor-dependent induction of cyclin E/CDK2 kinase activity at the restriction point and culminates in the activation of histone H4 genes through HiNF-P at the G(1)/S phase transition.

Tumor suppressor pRB functions as a co-repressor of the CCAAT displacement protein (CDP/cut) to regulate cell cycle controlled histone H4 transcription

The CCAAT displacement protein (CDP-cut/CUTL1/cux) performs a key proliferation-related function as the DNA binding subunit of the cell cycle controlled HiNF-D complex. HiNF-D interacts with all five classes (H1, H2A, H2B, H3, and H4) of the cell-cycle dependent histone genes, which are transcriptionally and coordinately activated at the G(1)/S phase transition independent of E2F. The tumor suppressor pRB/p105 is an intrinsic component of the HiNF-D complex. However, the molecular interactions that enable CDP and pRB to form a complex and thus convey cell growth regulatory information onto histone gene promoters must be further defined. Using transient transfections, we show that CDP represses the H4 gene promoter and that pRB functions with CDP as a co-repressor. Direct physical interaction between CDP and pRB was observed in glutathione-S-transferase (GST) pull-down assays. Furthermore, interactions between these proteins were established by yeast and mammalian two-hybrid experiments and co-immunoprecipitation assays. Confocal microscopy shows that subsets of each protein are co-localized in situ. Using a series of pRB mutants, we find that the CDP/pRB interaction, similar to the E2F/pRB interaction, utilizes the A/B large pocket (LP) of pRB. Thus, several converging lines of evidence indicate that complexes between CDP and pRB repress cell cycle regulated histone gene promoters.

Cell cycle regulation in human hematopoietic stem cells: from isolation to activation

Hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) reside mostly in the bone marrow and are defined by their ability to self-renew and to give rise by proliferation and differentiation to all blood lineages. Despite this strict definition HSCs cannot be unequivocally identified in the hematopoietic cell pool. Despite innumerable studies over the years, which focused on the search of the ideal phenotypic marker to selectively isolate stem cells, most of the known markers still define heterogeneous populations in different stages of commitment. Functional features attributed to stem cells have also been investigated, and among these the use of fluorescent markers which allow tracking of the cell division record of each cell. A second issue, after the initial isolation process, is the expansion ex vivo in order to obtain production of large numbers of homogeneous cell populations for both biological studies and clinical applications. Expansion ex vivo is difficult to modulate and normally occurs only along with commitment and consequent loss of multipotentiality. Moreover expansion obtained ex vivo is significantly reduced to that achievable in vivo. One of the key features of HSCs is a very slow proliferation rate, but when the appropriate stimuli are delivered, the proliferation rate can drastically increase. In normal physiological conditions a strict balance is maintained between the number of cells that maintain the original pool and those that proliferate and differentiate. Numerous data in recent years are providing some clue to elucidate the key steps in this tightly controlled process, but the dynamics that regulate which and how many cells self-renew to maintain the pool, and which proliferate and become committed to give rise to the mature blood elements, are still unclear.

Purification and functional analysis of a novel leucine-zipper/nucleotide-fold protein, BZAP45, stimulating cell cycle regulated histone H4 gene transcription

Regulation of histone gene transcription at the G1/S phase transition via the Site II cell cycle control element is distinct from E2F-dependent mechanisms operative at the growth factor-related restriction point. E2F-independent activation of histone H4 gene expression combines contributions of several promoter factors, including HiNF-M/IRF2 and the HiNF-D/CDP-cut complex which contains pRB, CDK1, and cyclin A as non-DNA binding subunits. Mutational analyses suggest additional rate-limiting factors for Site II function. Using sequence-specific Site II DNA affinity chromatography, we identified a 45 kDa protein (KIAA0005 or BZAP45) that is embryonically expressed and phylogenetically conserved. Based on amino acid sequence analysis, BZAP45 contains a unique decapeptide that is part of a putative leucine-zipper protein with a nucleotide (ATP or GTP) binding fold. Bacterial expression of a full-length cDNA produces a 45 kDa protein. Binding studies reveal that highly purified BZAP45 does not interact with Site II, suggesting that BZAP45 function may require partner proteins. Forced expression of BZAP45 strongly stimulates H4 promoter (nt -215 to -1)/CAT reporter gene activity. Deletion analyses and point mutations indicate that BZAP45 enhances H4 gene transcription through Site II. Thus, BZAP45 is a novel regulatory factor that contributes to transcriptional control at the G1/S phase transition.

High cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors in Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL-expressing CD34+-proliferating haematopoietic progenitors

We have previously described the isolation of primitive, slow-proliferating progenitors from normal, circulating CD34+ cells by using the fluorescent dye 5-6-carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester (CFDA-SE). CFDA-SE(bright) (primitive) and CFDA-SE(dim) (differentiating) cells were isolated following cytokine stimulation on the basis of their different proliferation rates. In the present work we analysed the expression levels of a number of proteins involved with differentiation, proliferation and survival/apoptosis in CFDA-SE(bright)/CD34+/slow-proliferating cells that were previously defined as progenitors capable of differentiating into different lineages. The aim of this work was to gain a better understanding of our model system in order to define some of the important parameters that regulate differentiation in haematopoietic progenitors. GATA-1 and PU.1 RNA levels were similar in freshly isolated (d 0) CD34+ and in CFDA-SE(bright) (bright) cells, whereas they increased in CFDA-SE(dim) (dim) cells. Accordingly, Nm23 was expressed at higher levels in bright cells. Moreover, bright cells had higher p21WAF1/CIP1, p27KIP1 and p16Ink4 protein levels than dim cells. Consistently, Cdc2 and Cdk2 kinase activity was much higher in the dim than in the slower proliferating bright cells. C-myc and p53 levels were higher in bright cells than in d 0 CD34+ and dim cells, and so was Bcl-xL, which followed the trend we have previously described for Bcl-2. Thus, bright cells, despite having a higher proliferation rate than the starting d 0 CD34+ population, have strikingly elevated levels of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors, which are likely to also act as inhibitors of differentiation.

Selective expression of specific histone H4 genes reflects distinctions in transcription factor interactions with divergent H4 promoter elements

Expression of many histone H4 genes is stringently controlled during the cell cycle to maintain a functional coupling of histone biosynthesis with DNA replication. The histone H4 multigene family provides a paradigm for understanding cell cycle control of gene transcription. All functional histone H4 gene copies are highly conserved in the mRNA coding region. However, the putative promoter regions of these H4 genes are divergent. We analyzed three representative mouse H4 genes to assess whether variation in H4 promoter sequences has functional consequences for the relative level and temporal control of expression of distinct H4 genes. Using S1 nuclease protection assays with gene-specific probes and RNA from synchronized cells, we show that the mRNA level of each H4 gene is temporally coupled to DNA synthesis. However, there are differences in the relative mRNA levels of these three H4 gene copies in several cell types. Based on gel shift assays, nucleotide variations in the promoters of these H4 genes preclude or reduce binding of several histone gene transcription factors, including IRF2, HiNF-D, SP-1 and/or YY1. Therefore, differential regulation of H4 genes is directly attributable to evolutionary divergence in H4 promoter organization which dictates the potential for regulatory interactions with cognate H4 transcription factors. This regulatory flexibility in H4 promoter organization may maximize options for transcriptional control of histone H4 gene expression in response to the onset of DNA synthesis and cell cycle progression in a broad spectrum of cell types and developmental stages.

Delineation of cell cycle state and correlation to adhesion molecule expression of human CD34+ cells from steady-state bone marrow and peripheral blood mobilized following G-CSF-supported chemotherapy

Treatment with a combination of chemotherapy and G-CSF leads to the release of hematopoietic stem cells from the bone marrow (BM) to the peripheral blood (PB), where they can be harvested for transplantation. Premobilization BM CD34+ cells were reported to proliferate actively, while virtually none of the mobilized PB CD34+ cells were in the S/G2M phase. We were interested in elucidating the cell cycle state further and in investigating the role of adhesion molecule expression on marrow-adherent and circulating CD34+ cells during different phases of the cell cycle. Consecutive premobilization BM and leukapheresis product (LP) samples were obtained from 14 patients following G-CSF-supported chemotherapy. Steady-state BM and LP CD34+ selected cells were triple-stained for CD34, for DNA using the intercalating dye 7-aminoactinomycin D, and for Ki-67, cyclins, or adhesion antigens. Ki-67 is expressed in all phases of the cell cycle except G0 and was found in 69.14%+/-3.46% (mean +/- standard error [SE]) of BM CD34+ cells and 62.78%+/-3.37% of LP CD34+ cells, while in BM significantly more CD34+/Ki-67+ cells were in the S/G2M phase of the cell cycle than in LP (8.6%+/-0.9% versus 1.8%+/-0.3%, respectively, p = 0.0001). Therefore, most circulating mobilized CD34+ cells are in the G1 phase, similar to their steady-state BM counterparts. Cyclin A became detectable in the 2n DNA peak. As expected, a higher proportion of CD34+/cyclin A+/S/G2M cells was found in BM than in LP (p < 0.05). Antigen density of the cyclins D3 and D2 tended to be higher on LP than on BM CD34+ cells, while D1 was found at low levels in similar density. The adhesion antigens CD18, CD49b, CD49d, CD49e, CD58, and CD62L were expressed in a significantly higher proportion of S/G2M-phase than in G0/G1-phase CD34+ cells. The strongest association to the proliferative status was observed for CD49d, which was coexpressed by 85.9% +/-2.6% (BM) or 90.8%+/-2.5% (LP) of CD34+/S/G2M cells, whereas a distinct CD34+/CD49d-/S/G2M population could not be detected. The average coexpression of the other antigens was 57% (CD49e, CD18) or lower. Our results demonstrate that the majority of PB CD34+ cells mobilized following G-CSF-supported chemotherapy and steady-state BM CD34+ cells are in the late G1 phase of the cell cycle and show a correlation between the expression of adhesion receptors and cell cycle status of CD34+ cells in both BM and LP.

The integrated activities of IRF-2 (HiNF-M), CDP/cut (HiNF-D) and H4TF-2 (HiNF-P) regulate transcription of a cell cycle controlled human histone H4 gene: mechanistic differences between distinct H4 genes

Maximal transcription of a prototypical cell cycle controlled histone H4 gene requires a proliferation-specific in vivo genomic protein/DNA interaction element, Site II. Three sequence-specific transcription factors interact with overlapping recognition motifs within Site II: interferon regulatory factor IRF-2 (HiNF-M), the putative H4 subtype-specific protein H4TF-2 (HiNF-P), and HiNF-D which represents a complex of the homeodomain protein CDP/cut, CDC2, cyclin A and pRB. However, natural sequence variation in the Site II sequences of different human H4 genes abolishes binding of specific trans-acting factors; the functional consequences of these variations have not been investigated. To address the precise contribution of H4 promoter factors to the level of H4 gene transcription, we performed a systematic mutational analysis of Site II transcriptional motifs. These mutants were tested for ability to bind each of the Site II cognate proteins, and subsequently evaluated for ability to confer H4 transcriptional activity using chimeric H4 promoter/CAT fusion constructs in different cell types. We also analyzed the effect of over-expressing IRF-2 on CAT reporter gene expression driven by mutant H4 promoters and assessed H4 transcriptional control in cells nullizygous for IRF-1 and IRF-2. Our results show that the recognition sequence for IRF-2 (HiNF-M) is the dominant component of Site II and modulates H4 gene transcription levels by 3 fold. However, the overlapping recognition sequences for IRF-2 (HiNF-M), H4TF-2 (HiNF-P) and CDP/cut (HiNF-D) together modulate H4 gene transcription levels by at least an order of magnitude. Thus, maximal activation of H4 gene transcription during the cell cycle in vivo requires the integrated activities of multiple transcription factors at Site II. We postulate that the composite organization of Site II supports responsiveness to multiple signalling pathways modulating the activities of H4 gene transcription factors during the cell cycle. Variations in Site II sequences among different H4 genes may accommodate differential regulation of H4 gene expression in cells and tissues with unique phenotypic properties.

ATF1 and CREB trans-activate a cell cycle regulated histone H4 gene at a distal nuclear matrix associated promoter element

Proteins of the ATF/CREB class of transcription factors stimulate gene expression of several cell growth-related genes through protein kinase A-related cAMP response elements. The promoter activity of cell cycle regulated histone H4 genes is regulated by at least four principal cis-acting elements which mediate G1/S phase control and/or enhancement of transcription during the cell cycle. Using protein-DNA interaction assays we show that the H4 promoter contains two ATF/CREB recognition motifs which interact with CREB, ATF1, and ATF2 but not with ATF4/CREB2. One ATF/CRE motif is located in the distal promoter at the nuclear matrix-associated Site IV, and the second motif is present in the proximal promoter at Site I. Both ATF/CRE motifs overlap binding sequences for the multifunctional YY1 transcription factor, which has previously been shown to be nuclear matrix associated. Subnuclear fractionation reveals that there are two ATF1 isoforms which appear to differ with respect to DNA binding activity and partition selectively between nuclear matrix and nonmatrix compartments, consistent with the role of the nuclear matrix in regulating gene expression. Site-directed mutational studies demonstrate that Site I and Site IV together support ATF1- and CREB-induced trans-activation of the H4 promoter. Thus, our data establish that ATF/CREB factors functionally modulate histone H4 gene transcription at distal and proximal promoter elements.

Cell cycle-dependent modifications in activities of pRb-related tumor suppressors and proliferation-specific CDP/cut homeodomain factors in murine hematopoietic progenitor cells

The histone H4 gene promoter provides a paradigm for defining transcriptional control operative at the G1/S phase transition point in the cell cycle. Transcription of the cell cycle-dependent histone H4 gene is upregulated at the onset of S phase, and the cell cycle control element that mediates this activation has been functionally mapped to a proximal promoter domain designated Site II. Activity of Site II is regulated by an E2F-independent mechanism involving binding of the oncoprotein IRF2 and the multisubunit protein HiNF-D, which contains the homeodomain CDP/cut, CDC2, cyclin A, and the tumor suppressor pRb. To address mechanisms that define interactions of Site II regulatory factors with this cell cycle control element, we have investigated these determinants of transcriptional regulation at the G1/S phase transition in FDC-P1 hematopoietic progenitor cells. The representation and activities of histone gene regulatory factors were examined as a function of FDC-P1 growth stimulation. We find striking differences in expression of the pRb-related growth regulatory proteins (pRb/p105, pRb2/p130, and p107) following the onset of proliferation. pRb2/p130 is present at elevated levels in quiescent cells and declines following growth stimulation. By contrast, pRb and p107 are minimally represented in quiescent FDC-P1 cells but are upregulated at the G1/S phase transition point. We also observe a dramatic upregulation of the cellular levels of pRb2/p130-associated protein kinase activity when S phase is initiated. Selective interactions of pRb and p107 with CDP/cut are observed during the FDC-P1 cell cycle and suggest functional linkage to competency for DNA binding and/or transcriptional activity. These results are particularly significant in the context of hematopoietic differentiation where stringent control of the cell cycle program is requisite for expanding the stem cell population during development and tissue renewal.

Expression of the Id Family Helix-Loop-Helix Regulators During Growth and Development in the Hematopoietic System

To better understand the molecular mechanism(s) by which growth and differentiation of the primitive hematopoietic stem cell is initiated, as well as the means by which the maturing cell can commit to development along a specific cell lineage, we elected to study the Id family of helix-loop-helix (HLH) transcriptional regulators. Some members of the HLH family are expressed in a stage-specific manner during hematopoietic development and can regulate the ability of immature hematopoietic cells to terminally differentiate. None of the four Id family genes were detected in the most primitive progenitors. Id-1 was widely expressed in proliferating bi- and unipotential progenitors, but its expression was downregulated in cells of increasing maturity; conversely, Id-2 and, to a limited extent, Id-3 gene expression increased as cells matured and lost proliferative capacity. Id-2 expression ran counter to that of Id-1 not only during maturation, but during periods of cell growth and arrest as well. This is quite distinct from the nonhematopoietic tissues, in which these two factors are coordinately expressed and suggests that Id-1 and Id-2 might be regulating very different events during hematopoiesis than they regulate in other cell types.

CDP/cut is the DNA-binding subunit of histone gene transcription factor HiNF-D: a mechanism for gene regulation at the G1/S phase cell cycle transition point independent of transcription factor E2F

Transcription of the genes for the human histone proteins H4, H3, H2A, H2B, and H1 is activated at the G1/S phase transition of the cell cycle. We have previously shown that the promoter complex HiNF-D, which interacts with cell cycle control elements in multiple histone genes, contains the key cell cycle factors cyclin A, CDC2, and a retinoblastoma (pRB) protein-related protein. However, an intrinsic DNA-binding subunit for HiNF-D was not identified. Many genes that are up-regulated at the G1/S phase boundary are controlled by E2F, a transcription factor that associates with cyclin-, cyclin-dependent kinase-, and pRB-related proteins. Using gel-shift immunoassays, DNase I protection, and oligonucleotide competition analyses, we show that the homeodomain protein CDP/cut, not E2F, is the DNA-binding subunit of the HiNF-D complex. The HiNF-D (CDP/cut) complex with the H4 promoter is immunoreactive with antibodies against CDP/cut and pRB but not p107, whereas the CDP/cut complex with a nonhistone promoter (gp91-phox) reacts only with CDP and p107 antibodies. Thus, CDP/cut complexes at different gene promoters can associate with distinct pRB-related proteins. Transient coexpression assays show that CDP/cut modulates H4 promoter activity via the HiNF-D-binding site. Hence, DNA replication-dependent histone H4 genes are regulated by an E2F-independent mechanism involving a complex of CDP/cut with cyclin A/CDC2/ RB-related proteins.