The activation of M2 muscarinic receptor inhibits cell growth and survival in human epithelial ovarian carcinoma

M2 muscarinic receptors negatively modulate cell migration in human glioblastoma cells

Glioblastoma (GB) is a very aggressive human brain tumor. The high growth potential and invasiveness make this tumor surgically and pharmacologically untreatable. Our previous work demonstrated that the activation of the M2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (M2 mAChRs) inhibited cell proliferation and survival in GB cell lines and in the cancer stem cells derived from human biopsies. The aim of the present study was to investigate the ability of M2 mAChR to modulate cell migration in two different GB cell lines: U87 and U251. By wound healing assay and single cell migration analysis performed by time-lapse microscopy, we demonstrated the ability of M2 mAChRs to negatively modulate cell migration in U251 but not in the U87 cell line. In order to explain the different effects observed in the two cell lines we have evaluated the possible involvement of the intermediate conductance calcium-activated potassium (IKCa) channel. IKCa channel is present in the GB cells, and it has been demonstrated to modulate cell migration. Using the perforated patch-clamp technique we have found that selective activation of M2 mAChR significantly reduced functional density of the IKCa current in U251 but not in U87 cells. To understand whether the M2 mAChR mediated reduction of ion channel density in the U251 cell line was relevant for the cell migration impairment, we tested the effects of TRAM-34, a selective inhibitor of the IKCa channel, in wound healing assay. We found that it was able to markedly reduce U251 cell migration and significantly decrease the number of invadopodia-like structure formations. These results suggest that only in U251 cells the reduced cell migration M2 mAChR-mediated might involve, at least in part, the IKCa channel.

M2 Muscarinic Receptor Stimulation Induces Autophagy in Human Glioblastoma Cancer Stem Cells via mTOR Complex-1 Inhibition

BACKGROUND

Although autophagy is a pro-survival process of tumor cells, it can stimulate cell death in particular conditions and when differently regulated by specific signals. We previously demonstrated that the selective stimulation of the M2 muscarinic receptor subtype (mAChR) negatively controls cell proliferation and survival and causes oxidative stress and cytotoxic and genotoxic effects in both GBM cell lines and GBM stem cells (GSCs). In this work, we have evaluated whether autophagy was induced as a downstream mechanism of the observed cytotoxic processes induced by M2 mAChR activation by the orthosteric agonist APE or the dualsteric agonist N8-Iper (N8).

METHODS

To assess the activation of autophagy, we analyzed the expression of LC3B using Western blot analysis and in LC3B-EGFP transfected cell lines. Apoptosis was assessed by measuring the protein expression of Caspases 3 and 9.

RESULTS

Our data indicate that activation of M2 mAChR by N8 promotes autophagy in both U251 and GB7 cell lines as suggested by the LC3B-II expression level and analysis of the transfected cells by fluorescence microscopy. Autophagy induction by M2 mAChRs is regulated by the decreased activity of the PI3K/AKT/mTORC1 pathway and upregulated by pAMPK expression. Downstream of autophagy activation, an increase in apoptosis was also observed in both cell lines after treatment with the two M2 agonists.

CONCLUSIONS

N8 treatment causes autophagy via pAMPK upregulation, followed by apoptosis in both investigated cell lines. In contrast, the absence of autophagy in APE-treated GSC cells seems to indicate that cell death could be triggered by mechanisms alternative to those observed for N8.

Multitargeting nature of muscarinic orthosteric agonists and antagonists

Muscarinic receptors (mAChRs) are typical members of the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family and exist in five subtypes from M₁ to M₅. Muscarinic receptor subtypes do not sufficiently differ in affinity to orthosteric antagonists or agonists; therefore, the analysis of receptor subtypes is complicated, and misinterpretations can occur. Usually, when researchers mainly specialized in CNS and peripheral functions aim to study mAChR involvement in behavior, learning, spinal locomotor networks, biological rhythms, cardiovascular physiology, bronchoconstriction, gastrointestinal tract functions, schizophrenia, and Parkinson’s disease, they use orthosteric ligands and they do not use allosteric ligands. Moreover, they usually rely on manufacturers’ claims that could be misleading. This review aimed to call the attention of researchers not deeply focused on mAChR pharmacology to this fact. Importantly, limited selective binding is not only a property of mAChRs but is a general attribute of most neurotransmitter receptors. In this review, we want to give an overview of the most common off-targets for established mAChR ligands. In this context, an important point is a mention the tremendous knowledge gap on off-targets for novel compounds compared to very well-established ligands. Therefore, we will summarize reported affinities and give an outline of strategies to investigate the subtype’s function, thereby avoiding ambiguous results. Despite that, the multitargeting nature of drugs acting also on mAChR could be an advantage when treating such diseases as schizophrenia. Antipsychotics are a perfect example of a multitargeting advantage in treatment. A promising strategy is the use of allosteric ligands, although some of these ligands have also been shown to exhibit limited selectivity. Another new direction in the development of muscarinic selective ligands is functionally selective and biased agonists. The possible selective ligands, usually allosteric, will also be listed. To overcome the limited selectivity of orthosteric ligands, the recommended process is to carefully examine the presence of respective subtypes in specific tissues via knockout studies, carefully apply “specific” agonists/antagonists at appropriate concentrations and then calculate the probability of a specific subtype involvement in specific functions. This could help interested researchers aiming to study the central nervous system functions mediated by the muscarinic receptor.