A semiempirical approach to ligand-binding affinities: Dependence on the Hamiltonian and corrections

Computational methods for calculation of protein-ligand binding affinities in structure-based drug design

Drug design is an expensive and time-consuming process. Any method that allows reducing the time the costs of the drug development project can have great practical value for the pharmaceutical industry. In structure-based drug design, affinity prediction methods are of great importance. The majority of methods used to predict binding free energy in protein-ligand complexes use molecular mechanics methods. However, many limitations of these methods in describing interactions exist. An attempt to go beyond these limits is the application of quantum-mechanical description for all or only part of the analyzed system. However, the extensive use of quantum mechanical (QM) approaches in drug discovery is still a demanding challenge. This chapter briefly reviews selected methods used to calculate protein-ligand binding affinity applied in virtual screening (VS), rescoring of docked poses, and lead optimization stage, including QM methods based on molecular simulations.

On the Use of Interaction Entropy and Related Methods to Estimate Binding Entropies

Molecular mechanics combined with Poisson-Boltzmann or generalized Born and solvent-accessible area solvation energies (MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA) are popular methods to estimate the free energy for the binding of small molecules to biomacromolecules. However, the estimation of the entropy has been problematic and time-consuming. Traditionally, normal-mode analysis has been used to estimate the entropy, but more recently, alternative approaches have been suggested. In particular, it has been suggested that exponential averaging of the electrostatic and Lennard-Jones interaction energies may provide much faster and more accurate entropies, the interaction entropy (IE) approach. In this study, we show that this exponential averaging is extremely poorly conditioned. Using stochastic simulations, assuming that the interaction energies follow a Gaussian distribution, we show that if the standard deviation of the interaction energies (σIE) is larger than 15 kJ/mol, it becomes practically impossible to converge the interaction entropies (more than 10 million energies are needed, and the number increases exponentially). A cumulant approximation to the second order of the exponential average shows a better convergence, but for σIE > 25 kJ/mol, it gives entropies that are unrealistically large. Moreover, in practical applications, both methods show a steady increase in the entropy with the number of energies considered.

Improving the Performance of MM/PBSA in Protein-Protein Interactions via the Screening Electrostatic Energy

Accurate calculation of protein-protein binding free energy is of great importance in biological and medical science, yet it remains a hugely challenging problem. In this work, we develop a new strategy in which a screened electrostatic energy (i.e., adding an exponential damping factor to the Coulombic interaction energy) is used within the framework of the molecular mechanics/Poisson-Boltzmann surface area (MM/PBSA) method. Our results show that the Pearson correlation coefficient in the modified MM/PBSA is over 0.70, which is much better than that in the standard MM/PBSA, especially in the Amber14SB force field. In particular, the performance of the standard MM/PBSA is very poor in a system where the proteins carry like charges. Moreover, we also calculated the mean absolute error (MAE) between the calculated and experimental ΔG values and found that the MAE in the modified MM/PBSA was indeed much smaller than that in the standard MM/PBSA. Furthermore, the effect of the dielectric constant of the proteins and the salt conditions on the results was also investigated. The present study highlights the potential power of the modified MM/PBSA for accurately predicting the binding energy in highly charged biosystems.

Thermochemical and Quantum Descriptor Calculations for Gaining Insight into Ricin Toxin A (RTA) Inhibitors

In this work, we performed a study to assess the interactions between the ricin toxin A (RTA) subunit of ricin and some of its inhibitors using modern semiempirical quantum chemistry and ONIOM quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics (QM/MM) methods. Two approaches were followed (calculation of binding enthalpies, ΔH _bind, and reactivity quantum chemical descriptors) and compared with the respective half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC₅₀) experimental data, to gain insight into RTA inhibitors and verify which quantum chemical method would better describe RTA-ligand interactions. The geometries for all RTA-ligand complexes were obtained after running classical molecular dynamics simulations in aqueous media. We found that single-point energy calculations of ΔH _bind with the PM6-DH+, PM6-D3H4, and PM7 semiempirical methods and ONIOM QM/MM presented a good correlation with the IC₅₀ data. We also observed, however, that the correlation decreased significantly when we calculated ΔH _bind after full-atom geometry optimization with all semiempirical methods. Based on the results from reactivity descriptors calculations for the cases studied, we noted that both types of interactions, molecular overlap and electrostatic interactions, play significant roles in the overall affinity of these ligands for the RTA binding pocket.

SQM/COSMO Scoring Function: Reliable Quantum-Mechanical Tool for Sampling and Ranking in Structure-Based Drug Design

Quantum mechanical (QM) methods have been gaining importance in structure-based drug design where a reliable description of protein-ligand interactions is of utmost significance. However, strategies i. e. QM/MM, fragmentation or semiempirical (SQM) methods had to be pursued to overcome the unfavorable scaling of QM methods. Various SQM-based approaches have significantly contributed to the accuracy of docking and improvement of lead compounds. Parametrizations of SQM and implicit solvent methods in our laboratory have been instrumental to obtain a reliable SQM-based scoring function. The experience gained in its application for activity ranking of ligands binding to tens of protein targets resulted in setting up a faster SQM/COSMO scoring approach, which outperforms standard scoring methods in native pose identification for two dozen protein targets with ten thousand poses. Recently, SQM/COSMO was effectively applied in a proof-of-concept study of enrichment in virtual screening. Due to its superior performance, feasibility and chemical generality, we propose the SQM/COSMO approach as an efficient tool in structure-based drug design.

Converging ligand-binding free energies obtained with free-energy perturbations at the quantum mechanical level

In this article, the convergence of quantum mechanical (QM) free-energy simulations based on molecular dynamics simulations at the molecular mechanics (MM) level has been investigated. We have estimated relative free energies for the binding of nine cyclic carboxylate ligands to the octa-acid deep-cavity host, including the host, the ligand, and all water molecules within 4.5 Å of the ligand in the QM calculations (158-224 atoms). We use single-step exponential averaging (ssEA) and the non-Boltzmann Bennett acceptance ratio (NBB) methods to estimate QM/MM free energy with the semi-empirical PM6-DH2X method, both based on interaction energies. We show that ssEA with cumulant expansion gives a better convergence and uses half as many QM calculations as NBB, although the two methods give consistent results. With 720,000 QM calculations per transformation, QM/MM free-energy estimates with a precision of 1 kJ/mol can be obtained for all eight relative energies with ssEA, showing that this approach can be used to calculate converged QM/MM binding free energies for realistic systems and large QM partitions. © 2016 The Authors. Journal of Computational Chemistry Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Semiempirical Quantum Mechanical Methods for Noncovalent Interactions for Chemical and Biochemical Applications

Semiempirical (SE) methods can be derived from either Hartree-Fock or density functional theory by applying systematic approximations, leading to efficient computational schemes that are several orders of magnitude faster than ab initio calculations. Such numerical efficiency, in combination with modern computational facilities and linear scaling algorithms, allows application of SE methods to very large molecular systems with extensive conformational sampling. To reliably model the structure, dynamics, and reactivity of biological and other soft matter systems, however, good accuracy for the description of noncovalent interactions is required. In this review, we analyze popular SE approaches in terms of their ability to model noncovalent interactions, especially in the context of describing biomolecules, water solution, and organic materials. We discuss the most significant errors and proposed correction schemes, and we review their performance using standard test sets of molecular systems for quantum chemical methods and several recent applications. The general goal is to highlight both the value and limitations of SE methods and stimulate further developments that allow them to effectively complement ab initio methods in the analysis of complex molecular systems.

The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities

INTRODUCTION

The molecular mechanics energies combined with the Poisson-Boltzmann or generalized Born and surface area continuum solvation (MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA) methods are popular approaches to estimate the free energy of the binding of small ligands to biological macromolecules. They are typically based on molecular dynamics simulations of the receptor-ligand complex and are therefore intermediate in both accuracy and computational effort between empirical scoring and strict alchemical perturbation methods. They have been applied to a large number of systems with varying success.

AREAS COVERED

The authors review the use of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to calculate ligand-binding affinities, with an emphasis on calibration, testing and validation, as well as attempts to improve the methods, rather than on specific applications.

EXPERT OPINION

MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA are attractive approaches owing to their modular nature and that they do not require calculations on a training set. They have been used successfully to reproduce and rationalize experimental findings and to improve the results of virtual screening and docking. However, they contain several crude and questionable approximations, for example, the lack of conformational entropy and information about the number and free energy of water molecules in the binding site. Moreover, there are many variants of the method and their performance varies strongly with the tested system. Likewise, most attempts to ameliorate the methods with more accurate approaches, for example, quantum-mechanical calculations, polarizable force fields or improved solvation have deteriorated the results.

Enhanced semiempirical QM methods for biomolecular interactions

Recent successes and failures of the application of 'enhanced' semiempirical QM (SQM) methods are reviewed in the light of the benefits and backdraws of adding dispersion (D) and hydrogen-bond (H) correction terms. We find that the accuracy of SQM-DH methods for non-covalent interactions is very often reported to be comparable to dispersion-corrected density functional theory (DFT-D), while computation times are about three orders of magnitude lower. SQM-DH methods thus open up a possibility to simulate realistically large model systems for problems both in life and materials science with comparably high accuracy.