A New Method of Using Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) Precipitation of Macroprolactin to Detect Genuine Hyperprolactinemia

Practical approaches to the detection of macrotroponin

INTRODUCTION

Macrotroponin is increasingly recognised as a cause of confusion in interpreting high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTnI) results. In this study, we sought to evaluate two practical approaches to detecting macrotroponin. These two approaches are PEG precipitation and SVM (support vector machine) analysis to classify discrepancies between hs-cTn assays.

METHOD

Residual serum and heparin plasma specimens (n = 483) with initially elevated hs-cTnI from hospital and community laboratories were retested on multiple hs-cTn platforms before and after PEG precipitation and Protein A immunoglobulin depletion. SVM analysis was conducted to identify a linear equation that best discriminated specimens with macrotroponin using a combination of results from two different hs-cTn assays.

FINDINGS

The diagnostic performance of PEG precipitation was carried out using Protein A immunoglobulin depletion as the reference comparator. When a cutoff residual activity after PEG precipitation of ≤ 20% was used, this threshold carried a high specificity of 92% (confidence interval 83-98%; n = 189) using the Siemens hs-cTnI Vista assay and 95% specificity (86%-98%; n = 242) using the Abbott hs-cTnI Architect assay. SVM analysis generated a linear equation identifying macrotroponin specimens from results obtained on two hs-cTn assays. This approach can be highly specific, comparable to PEG precipitation when certain assay combinations and concentrations are used.

CONCLUSION

We describe and identify practical alternatives to detecting macrotroponin. These approaches can be optimised for high specificity, reducing the need for more complex laboratory methods.

Current Insights in Prolactin Signaling and Ovulatory Function

Prolactin (PRL) is a pleiotropic hormone released from lactotrophic cells of the anterior pituitary gland that also originates from extrapituitary sources and plays an important role in regulating lactation in mammals, as well as other actions. Acting in an endocrine and paracrine/autocrine manner, PRL regulates the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis, thus influencing the maturation of ovarian follicles and ovulation. This review provides a detailed discussion of the current knowledge on the role of PRL in the context of ovulation and ovulatory disorders, particularly with regard to hyperprolactinemia, which is one of the most common causes of infertility in women. Much attention has been given to the PRL structure and the PRL receptor (PRLR), as well as the diverse functions of PRLR signaling under normal and pathological conditions. The hormonal regulation of the menstrual cycle in connection with folliculogenesis and ovulation, as well as the current classifications of ovulation disorders, are also described. Finally, the state of knowledge regarding the importance of TIDA (tuberoinfundibular dopamine), KNDγ (kisspeptin/neurokinin B/dynorphin), and GnRH (gonadotropin-releasing hormone) neurons in PRL- and kisspeptin (KP)-dependent regulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis in women is reviewed. Based on this review, a rationale for influencing PRL signaling pathways in therapeutic activities accompanying ovulation disorders is presented.

Comparison of PEG precipitation and ultrafiltration treatment for serum macroprolactin in Chinese patients with hyperprolactinemia

BACKGROUND

Macroprolactinemia is a common cause of hyperprolactinemia (HPRL), with an average worldwide incidence of 18.9 %. This study aimed to explore the feasibility of ultrafiltration (UF) and polyethylene glycol (PEG) precipitation for macroprolactin screening, as well as the incidence and clinical characteristics of Chinese patients with macroprolactinemia.

METHODS

In this study, 94 patients with HPRL and 206 healthy individuals were included. Gel filtration chromatography (GFC), PEG precipitation, and UF were used to screen for macroprolactin, and chemiluminescence was used to determine the prolactin levels.

RESULTS

The detected incidence of macroprolactinemia in the patients with HPRL was 7.45% (7/94, GFC) and 5.32% (5/94, PEG precipitation). Patients with macroprolactinemia usually present with atypical clinical symptoms, moderately increased prolactin levels, and negative or microadenoma-positive pituitary images. In addition, the recovery of monomeric prolactin by PEG precipitation and UF was significantly correlated to that of GFC (r _PEG=0.493, P<0.001; r _UF=0.226, P=0.014), with a higher correlation coefficient between PEG precipitation and GFC. Furthermore, PEG precipitation had a smaller variation (95% confidence interval [CI]: -35.77% to 18.34%) than UF in monomeric prolactin recovery and substantial diagnostic consistency with GFC (Cohen's kappa coefficient=0.647). The proportion of monomeric prolactin in patients with HPRL did not change significantly between the two visits within one year (P >0.05).

CONCLUSION

The incidence of macroprolactinemia in Chinese patients with HPRL is low in the present study. Based on our analysis, we recommend that only patients who are clinically suspected of having macroprolactinemia should be screened using PEG precipitation.

Optimization of a Screening Method for Macroprolactinemia

OBJECTIVE

To optimize a screening method for macroprolactinemia and improve the accuracy of free prolactin (freePRL) detection.

METHOD

Overall efficiency, calculated as the product of the immunoglobulin G (IgG) precipitation rate and the freePRL recovery rate were employed to determine the concentration of the precipitant polyethylene glycol (PEG). Then, an optimized screening method for macroprolactinemia was established. The concentrations of freePRL, obtained by gel filtration chromatography (GFC), from 66 cases were used as the gold standard, and the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and precision of the optimized and traditional methods for detecting macroprolactinemia were compared.

RESULTS

(1) The IgG precipitation rate increased with increasing PEG6000 concentration, and the freePRL recovery rate decreased with increasing PEG6000 concentration; the overall efficiency first increased and then decreased. When the IgG concentrations in the mixture were 10 g/L, 25 g/L and 40 g/L, the concentrations of PEG6000 with the highest overall efficiency were 24%, 20% and 18%, respectively. (2) The effect of high and low IgG on the overall efficiency was 4.7% when using 20% PEG6000, which was lower than the effects when using 18% or 24% PEG6000 (9.2% and 13.2%). (3) In the optimized method established using 20% PEG6000, the macroprolactin (macroPRL) chromatographic peak disappeared, but the freePRL chromatographic peak was retained. The sensitivity of this macroprolactinemia screening method was 96.7%, and the specificity was 100%. (4) The freePRL concentrations obtained by the optimized method for samples from 30 macroprolactinemia cases and 36 true hyperprolactinemia cases were 15.8 (10.2-21.4) ng/mL and 60.2 (51.8-79.9) ng/mL; the concentrations were similar to those obtained using the GFC method (16.3 (11.9-27.2) ng/mL and 68.1 (49.5-92.9) ng/mL, respectively (p > 0.05)) and higher than those obtained using the traditional method (9.1 (6.1-17.6) ng/mL and 51.4 (43.7-71.9) ng/mL), respectively, p < 0.05)). (5) The relative deviation between the optimized and GFC methods was -7.0%, which was significantly lower than the relative deviation between the traditional and GFC methods (-21.4%, p < 0.01). (6) The in-batch coefficients of variation (CVs) for the dual-level quality control materials measured by the optimized method were 1.88% and 1.87%, and the within-laboratory CVs were 2.55% and 2.29%, which were slightly lower than the in-batch CVs (1.93% and 2.81%) and within-laboratory CVs (2.75% and 2.81%) measured by the traditional method.

CONCLUSION

The established optimized method for screening macroprolactinemia using 20% PEG6000 as a precipitant can completely precipitate macroPRL components and effectively retain freePRL components. Compared with traditional methods, the optimized method is simpler, more accurate and more stable for the quantitative detection of freePRL.

A proteomics-based method for identifying antigens within immune complexes

A novel approach to recover and identify immune complexes (ICs) was developed using size exclusion chromatography (SEC) and affinity chromatography on immunoglobulin binding columns (HiTrap Protein G). The purification process was monitored by 1D SDS-PAGE, protein staining, Western blotting and, finally, liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC MS/MS) was used to identify the recovered antigens. This approach was applied to serum with artificially created immune complexes (ICs) comprising vaccine antigen (influenza) and antibody, which led to recovery and identification of influenza peptides within the recovered ICs. This approach was compared with the established method for IC detection and recovery, polyethylene glycol (PEG) precipitation, followed by LC MS/MS. Both approaches successfully enabled capture, recovery and characterization of immunoglobulins and influenza antigen(s) in complex with the immunoglobulins. However, PEG precipitation has the advantage of simplicity and is more suited for large scale studies.

Hyperprolactinaemia in the context of psychiatry

Advocating for good physical healthcare for their patients is of the utmost importance to psychiatrists. This narrative review focuses on one part of this large goal, the topic of hyperprolactinaemia from the perspective of mental healthcare. For psychiatrists this often includes managing raised prolactin levels in the context of medication. However, they must consider the wider differentials of a raised prolactin level and the possible impact of treatments. For that reason, in this review we start with an overview of prolactin physiology before considering hyperprolactinaemia both in the context of antipsychotic therapy and its wider differentials, including prolactinoma. Investigation and management are considered and key practice points developed.

Laboratory and clinical significance of macroprolactinemia in women with hyperprolactinemia

The role of macroprolactinemia in women with hyperprolactinemia is currently controversial and can lead to clinical dilemmas, depending upon the origin of macroprolactin, the presence of hyperprolactinemic symptoms and monomeric prolactin (PRL) levels. Macroprolactinemia is mostly considered an extrapituitary phenomenon of mild and asymptomatic hyperprolactinemia associated with normal concentrations of monomeric PRL and a predominance of macroprolactin confined to the vascular system, which is biologically inactive. Patients can therefore be reassured that macroprolactinemia should be considered a benign clinical condition, resistant to antiprolactinemic drugs, and that no diagnostic investigations or prolonged follow-up should be necessary. However, a significant proportion of macroprolactinemic patients appears to suffer from hyperprolactinemia-related symptoms and radiological pituitary findings commonly associated with true hyperprolactinemia. The symptoms of hyperprolactinemia are correlated to the levels of monomeric PRL excess, which may be explained as coincidental, by dissociation of macroprolactin, or by physiological, pharmacological and pathological causes. The excess of monomeric PRL levels in such cases is of primarily importance and the diagnosis of macroprolactinemia is misleading or inadequate. However, macroprolactinemia of pituitary origin associated with radiological findings of pituitary adenomas may rarely occur with similar hyperprolactinemic manifestations, exclusively due to bioactivity of macroprolactin. Therefore, in such cases with hyperprolactinemic signs and pituitary findings, macroprolactinemia should be considered a pathological biochemical condition of hyperprolactinemia. Accordingly, individualized diagnostic investigations with the introduction of dopamine agonists, or other treatment with prolonged follow-up, should be mandatory. The review analyses the laboratory and clinical significance of macroprolactinemia in hyperprolactinemic women suggesting clinically useful diagnostic and treatment strategies.