Combination treatment of rituximab and donor platelets infusion to reduce donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies for stem cells engraftment in haploidentical transplantation

ASTCT Consensus Recommendations on Testing and Treatment of Patients with Donor-specific Anti-HLA Antibodies

Donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) are an important cause of engraftment failure and may negatively impact survival outcomes of patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) using an HLA-mismatched allograft. The incidence of DSA varies across studies, depending on individual factors, detection or identification methods and thresholds considered clinically relevant. Although DSA testing by multiplex bead arrays remains semiquantitative, it has been widely adopted as a standard test in most transplant centers. Additional testing to determine risk of allograft rejection may include assays with HLA antigens in natural conformation, such as flow cytometric crossmatch, and/or antibody binding assays, such as C1q testing. Patients with low level of DSA (<2,000 mean fluorescence intensity; MFI) may not require treatment, while others with very high level of DSA (>20,000 MFI) may be at very high-risk for engraftment failure despite current therapies. By contrast, in patients with moderate or high level of DSA, desensitization therapy can successfully mitigate DSA levels and improve donor cell engraftment rate, with comparable outcomes to patients without DSA. Treatment is largely empirical and multimodal, involving the removal, neutralization, and blocking of antibodies, as well as inhibition of antibody production to prevent activation of the complement cascade. Desensitization protocols are based on accumulated multicenter experience, while prospective multicenter studies remain lacking. Most patients require a full intensity protocol that includes plasma exchange, while protocols relying only on rituximab and intravenous immunoglobulin may be sufficient for patients with lower DSA levels and negative C1q and/or flow cytometric crossmatch. Monitoring DSA levels before and after HSCT could guide preemptive treatment when high levels persist after stem cell infusion. This paper aims to standardize current evidence-based practice and formulate future directions to improve upon current knowledge and advance treatment for this relatively rare, but potentially serious complication in allogeneic HSCT recipients.

The Role of Pre-existing Anti-HLA Antibodies in Severe Aplastic Anemia Patients Undergoing Allogenic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

The objective is to underscore the significance of pre-existing anti-HLA Abs in the context of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) for SAA. A retrospective analysis was conducted using data from 244 SAA patients who underwent allo-HSCT between January 2016 and October 2022. The patient cohort was divided into 2 groups based on the presence of pre-existing anti-HLA Abs. Out of 244 SAA patients, 82 were tested positive for anti-HLA Abs. Seventeen patients were tested with DSA in haplo-HSCT. We found that the presence of pre-existing anti-HLA Abs did not influence neutrophil engraftment (P = .600); however, it resulted in delayed platelet recovery (P = .006). Comparatively, patients with anti-HLA Abs demonstrated lower overall survival (OS) compared to their counter parts without anti-HLA Abs (P = .001), with a correspondingly elevated transplant-related mortality (TRM) in the former group (P = .002). Multivariate analysis established pre-existing anti-HLA Abs as an independent risk factor for impaired platelet recovery (HR 1.67, 95% CI 1.16 to 2.44, P = .006) and OS (HR 2.19, 95% CI 1.03 to 4.67, P = .043). However, there were no differences between DSA and non-DSA patients after desensitization in haplo-HSCT. In summary, the presence of pre-existing anti-HLA Abs in SAA patients undergoing allo-HSCT appears to detrimentally affect platelet recovery and overall prognosis.

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions | Current Status and Future Directions of Donor Selection

The landscape of HLA matching in hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is continuously advancing, introducing more nuanced criteria beyond traditional 10/10 HLA-A, -B, -C, and -DRB1 allele matching. For 10/10 matched donors, prioritizing a donor with a "core" permissive HLA-DPB1 mismatch is recommended over "noncore" permissive mismatches, with nonpermissive mismatches being the least prefered. In the one-antigen mismatched setting (7/8 HLA-matched), HLA-C matching, particularly avoiding high-expression mismatches at residues 116 or 77/80, is preferred over HLA-A or HLA-B mismatches. HLA B-leader matching is beneficial in both one-antigen mismatched and haploidentical HCT. Additionally, specific HLA mismatches in haploidentical HCT, such as DRB1 mismatches with DQB1 matches and DPB1 nonpermissive mismatches are linked to better outcomes. Among non-HLA factors, evidence consistently underscores the pivotal impact of donor age on overall survival. For HLA-mismatched transplants, including haploidentical HCT, avoidance of donors against whom the recipient has preformed donor-specific antibodies is paramount. Selecting a cytomegalovirus (CMV) seronegative donor is important particularly for CMV-negative recipients; however, more research is needed in the letermovir prophylaxis era. The impact of ABO-matching on transplant outcomes is debatable. Other unanswered questions include defining "younger" donors and establishing hierarchy in donor selection based on factors like CMV status, ABO compatibility, or sex-mismatch, to name a few. Future research addressing these issues will refine donor selection algorithms and improve transplant success. In conclusion, selecting a donor for HCT requires multifaceted considerations, integrating evolving HLA-matching criteria and non-HLA factors, to optimize HCT outcomes in this rapidly advancing field.

The impact of donor-specific anti-HLA antibody levels on primary poor graft function and graft rejection in rituximab desensitized haploidentical stem cell transplantation

This study investigates the influence of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) levels on primary poor graft function (PGF) and graft rejection (GR) after haploidentical stem cell transplantation (haplo-SCT) with rituximab desensitization. A total of 155 DSA-positive haplo-SCT candidates with mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) between 2000 and 10,000 were enrolled in this prospective clinical trial. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves determined the optimal DSA MFI cutoff for identifying high-risk patients. Patients were categorized into two groups: DSA low-level group (2000 ≤ DSA MFI < 5000, Group A) and high-level group (5000 ≤ DSA MFI ≤ 10,000, Group B). The incidence of primary PGF was 6.5% (2.6%-10.3%), while GR incidence was 0.6% (0.0%-1.9%). Group A had significantly lower primary PGF rates than Group B (2.3% [0.0%-5.7%] vs. 12.9% [4.8%-21.0%], p = 0.017). Only one patient in Group B experienced GR. High DSA levels (5000 ≤ MFI ≤ 10,000) were identified as the sole independent risk factor for primary PGF and GR after haplo-SCT with rituximab desensitization (HR = 7.282, 95% CI 1.517-34.953, p = 0.013). The 4-year cumulative incidence of relapse, non-relapse mortality, disease-free survival, and overall survival were 14.7% (11.6%-17.8%), 16.3% (13.1%-19.4%), 69.0% (65.9%-76.2%), and 70.6% (66.4%-74.8%), respectively. DSA levels have an impact on efficiency of rituximab desensitization, and a DSA MFI threshold is provided for predicting primary PGF and GR.

Double filtration plasmapheresis combined with rituximab for donor-specific antibody desensitization in haploidentical haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) are a major cause of engraftment failure in patients receiving haploidentical haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Haplo-HSCT). Double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) avoids the unnecessary loss of plasma proteins and increases the efficiency of purification. To investigate the effectiveness of the desensitization protocol including DFPP and rituximab, we conducted a nested case-control study. Thirty-three patients who had positive DSA were desensitized by the protocol and 99 patients with negative DSA were randomly matched as control. The median DSA mean fluorescence intensity values before and after DFPP treatment were 7505.88 ± 4424.38 versus 2013.29 ± 4067.22 (p < 0.001). All patients in DSA group achieved haematopoietic reconstitution and the median neutrophils and platelets engraftment times were 13 (10-21) and 13 (10-29) days respectively. Although the cumulative incidence of II-IV aGVHD (41.4% vs. 28.1%) and 3-year moderate to severe cGVHD (16.8% vs. 7.2%) were higher in DSA cohort than in the control, no statistical significance was observed. The 3-year non-relapse mortality and the overall survival were 6.39% and 72.0%, respectively, in the DSA cohort, which were comparable to the negative control. In conclusion, DFPP and rituximab could be effectively used for desensitization and overcome the negative effects of DSA in Haplo-HSCT.

[Impact of immunosuppression intensified conditioning regimen for patients with strong positive pre-transplantation donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSAs) undergoing haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation]

Objective: To explore the efficacy of immunosuppression intensified conditioning regimen in patients who have strongly positive donor-specific Anti-HLA antibodies (DSAs) and received a haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) . Methods: Clinical data of 10 patients with strongly positive pretransplant DSAs (defined as MFI ≥10000) were retrospectively analyzed in this study. All of them received a haplo-HSCT in the Hematology Department of Shanghai Zhaxin Traditional Chinese & Western Medicine Hospital. Results: ① Of all ten patients, three were males, and seven were females, with a median age of 53.5 (36-64) years. Of the 10 patients, three were diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia, two were myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), two were chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), two were in an accelerated phase of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-AP), and one was primary myelofibrosis (PMF). ② Conditioning regimen consisted of fludarabine (Flu) /busulfan (Bu) combined with whole-body irradiation (TBI) /cyclophosphamide (Cy). ③ On the seventh day after transplantation, the median pretransplant DSA level was MFI 15 999 (10 210-23 417) and 10 787 (0-22 720). ④ Eight patients acquired hematopoietic reconstitution; the median time of neutrophil engraftment was 14 (10-16) days; and 18 (14-20) days for platelet engraftment. After a median follow-up of 12.5 (1.5-27) months, primary graft failure was found in one patient and another with poor graft function. Seven patients remained in a disease remission state, and all were DSA-negative. Conclusions: An intensified immunosuppression conditioning regimen can efficiently decrease the level of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSAs), leading to good short-term efficacy.

High-Dose immunoglobulin Intervention as an effective and simple strategy for donor specific Anti-HLA antibody desensitization in haploidentical transplant

Donor-specific anti-HLA antibody (DSA) is a significant obstacle to successful haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) and is associated with poor engraftment rates. DSA strongly positive patients with a mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) over 5000 have a primary poor graft function (PGF) rate of over 60%. Currently, there is no consensus on the desensitization of DSA, and existing strategies are complex and have limited effectiveness. To address this issue, we conducted a retrospective study on 19 patients with strongly positive DSA (MFI over 5000) who underwent haplo-HSCT and were treated with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg)-based therapy. We also included 38 baseline-matched patients with DSA-negative as controls. Our findings revealed that the cumulative incidence of engraftment, PGF, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), virus infection, overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), relapse, and non-relapse mortality (NRM) in the DSA strongly positive group after desensitization were comparable to those in the DSA negative group (P > 0.05). Our multivariable analysis showed that disease remission was a protective factor against PGF (P = 0.005, OR = 0.019, 95% CI 0.001-0.312). Subgroup analysis revealed that the desensitization efficacy was equal regardless of DSA type against HLA-I or II, and MFI value over 5000 or not. In conclusion, we propose a simple and effective DSA desensitization strategy based on immunoglobulin to ensure successful engraftment and improve patient prognosis.

Treatment with the combination of rituximab and intravenous γ globulin is effective in promoting engraftment in donor specific antibody positive patients receiving myeloablative conditioning haploidentical stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

Donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSAs) are a major cause of engraftment failure in patients receiving haploidentical stem cell transplantation (HaploSCT). Effective procedures are needed for those who demand urgent transplantation and have no other donor options.

OBJECTIVE

We here retrospectively analyzed 13 patients with DSAs successfully treated with desensitization of rituximab and intravenous γ globulin prior to HaploSCT from March 2017 to July 2022.

STUDY DESIGN

All 13 patients were with DSA MFI >4000 of at least one loci before desensitization. Of the 13 patients, 10 patients were with the initial diagnosis of malignant hematological diseases, and 3 were diagnosed with aplastic anemia. Patients were treated with one (n=3) or two(n=10) doses of rituximab (375mg/m² for one dose). All patients receive the same total dose of 0.4g/kg of intravenous γ globulin (IVIg) within 72 hours before haploidentical stem cell administration to neutralize the remaining DSA.

RESULTS

All patients achieved neutrophil engraftment and 12 patients achieved primary platelet engraftment. The patient with primary platelet engraftment failure received purified CD34 positive stem cell infusion nearly 1 year after transplantation and achieved platelet engraftment thereafter. The estimated 3-year overall survival (OS) is 73.4%.

CONCLUSION

Although further studies on larger numbers of patients are needed, it is clear that the combination of IVIg and rituximab is an effective way to clear DSA and has a strong effect on promoting engraftment and survival for patients with DSA. It is a practical and adaptable combination of treatment options.

Effects of donor-specific antibodies on engraftment and long-term survival after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation-A systematic review and meta-analysis

The presence of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) have been reported to be associated with an increased risk of primary graft failure following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), but its effects on the time to engraftment and long-term outcomes remain unclear. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies investigating the impact of DSAs on engraftment and long-term survival of patients undergoing allo-HSCT. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and CBM. Data were analyzed using RevMan5.4. Pooled hazard ratio (HR), standard mean difference (SMD) or odds ratio (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) are calculated for time-to-event data, continuous data, discontinuous data respectively. 17 eligible studies were included, involving 2169 patients main receiving haploidentical SCT (haplo-SCT) or umbilical cord blood transplantation (UCBT). Meta-analysis showed that DSAs-positive patients are associated with significantly higher risk of GF(OR = 12.87, 95%CI, 6.45-25.70; P < 0.00001; OR = 4.76, 95%CI, 2.88-7.87), poorer neutrophil engraftment (HR = 2.20, 95%CI, 1.02-4.73; P = 0.04; HR = 1.83, 95%CI, 1.46-2.30; P < 0.00001), worse OS (HR = 3.19, 95%CI, 1.85-5.50; P < 0.0001; HR = 1.68, 95%CI, 1.04-2.71; P = 0.03), and inferior PFS (HR = 4.25, 95%CI, 1.59-11.40; P = 0.004; HR = 4.83, 95%CI, 1.65-14.12; P = 0.004) in haplo-SCT and UCBT, respectively.

The impact of Rituximab administered before transplantation in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A real-world study

Rituximab is used to eliminate B cells as a chimeric monoclonal antibody directed against CD20, a B-cell antigen expressed on B cells. To explore the impact of rituximab administered before transplantation, we implemented a retrospective, monocentric study and utilized real-world data collected at our center between January 2018 and December 2020, and then followed until December 2021. Based on whether a dose of 375mg/m2 rituximab was used at least once within two weeks before transplantation, patients undergoing allo-HSCT were classified into two groups: rituximab (N=176) and non-rituximab (N=344) group. Amongst all the patients, the application of rituximab decreased EBV reactivation (P&lt;0.01) and rituximab was an independent factor in the prevention of EBV reactivation by both univariate and multivariate analyses (HR 0.56, 95%CI 0.33-0.97, P=0.04). In AML patients, there were significant differences in the cumulative incidence of aGVHD between the two groups (P=0.04). Our data showed that rituximab was association with a decreased incidence of aGVHD in AML patients according to both univariate and multivariate analyses. There was no difference between the two groups in other sets of populations. Thus, our study indicated that rituximab administered before transplantation may help prevent EBV reactivation in all allo-HSCT patients, as well as prevent aGVHD in AML patients after allo-HSCT.

Successful desensitization of high level donor-specific anti-HLA antibody in patients with hematological diseases receiving haploidentical allografts

Donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibody (DSA) is associated with a higher incidence of graft failure and mortality in HLA-mismatched allograft settings. However, the optimal protocol of desensitization for patients with positive DSA remains uncertain. We investigated the effectiveness of a desensitization protocol, including rituximab, high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), and a single session of plasma exchange (PE), for haploidentical allograft recipients with a high mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) level of DSA (≥ 5,000). Eleven patients with hematological disease who had positive DSA (median, 11,676, range 5387-20,435) were desensitized by the protocol. All of the patients achieved hematopoietic recovery. The median times for neutrophil and platelet engraftment were 13 (range, 11-26) days and 19 (range, 11-90) days, respectively. Grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was seen in one patient and was controlled completely. Chronic cutaneous GVHD was seen in eight patients. Nine patients are alive with good performance so far. One patient suffered extramedullary relapse, and one patient died of transplantation-associated thrombotic microangiopathy. The 1-year probability of overall survival was 81.8%. These results suggest that successful desensitization could be obtained by a combination of rituximab, high-dose IVIG, and PE for haploidentical allograft recipients with high MFI levels of DSA.

Comparison of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Outcomes Using Matched Sibling Donors, Haploidentical Donors, and Immunosuppressive Therapy for Patients With Acquired Aplastic Anemia

We retrospectively compared the outcomes of 387 consecutive patients with acquired aplastic anemia (AA) who underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) with a fludarabine-based conditioning regimen from matched sibling donors (MSD) (n = 108) or haploidentical donors (HID) (n = 91) and immunosuppressive therapy (IST) (n = 188) from 2014 to 2020 at our hospital. Compared with HID-HSCT, MSD-HSCT had a lower incidence of graft failure (1% vs. 7%, p = 0.062), grade II–IV acute graft versus host disease (aGvHD) (16% vs. 35%, p = 0.001), and mild to severe chronic GvHD (cGvHD) (8% vs. 23%, p = 0.007), but an equivalent incidence of grade III–IV aGvHD (8% vs. 12%, p = 0.237) and moderate to severe cGvHD (3% vs. 9%, p = 0.076). HSCT had superior blood count recovery at 3, 6, and 12 months compared with IST (p < 0.001). The estimated 5-year overall survival (OS) of the MSD, HID, and IST groups were 86%, 72%, and 79% (p = 0.02), respectively; accordingly, the failure-free survival (FFS) rates were 85%, 68%, and 56%, respectively (p < 0.001). For patients aged ≤40 years, the OS rate was still significantly superior for MSD-HSCT receipients compared to HID-HSCT receipients (89% vs. 76%, p = 0.024) while the HID-HSCT recipients showed similar OS (76% vs. 78%, p = 0.166) but superior FFS (p = 0.047) when follow-up was longer than 14.5 months in contrast to IST. In a multivariate analysis, HID-HSCT and a conditioning regimen that included busulfan were adversely related to OS among patients who received allografts. In conclusion, MSD-HSCT was the frontline choice for patients with severe AA aged ≤40 years, while HID-HSCT was as effective as IST for patients without an MSD.

The impact of HLA donor-specific antibodies on engraftment and the evolving desensitization strategies

The majority of contemporary allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) procedures utilize partially HLA-mismatched stem cell grafts. Donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) are associated with primary graft failure independent of the graft source, conditioning intensity and other patient and donor factors. Here we provide an update on testing and monitoring of DSA, review the impact of DSA on stem cell engraftment, and present promising desensitization modalities. Ultimately, we attempt to provide practical recommendations for DSA screening and mitigation strategies.

Treatment of allosensitized patients receiving allogeneic transplantation

Treatment with PE, rituximab, IVIg, and donor buffy coat is effective in promoting engraftment in patients with DSA <20 000 MFI.

Patients with persistent positive C1q at transplant have a higher risk of engraftment failure and poor survival.

Donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSAs) are a major cause of engraftment failure in patients receiving haploidentical stem cell transplantation (HaploSCT). Effective treatments are needed for these patients, who often have no other donor options and/or are in need to proceed urgently to transplantation. We studied a multimodality treatment with alternate-day plasma exchange (PE), rituximab, intravenous γ globulin (IVIg) and an irradiated donor buffy coat for patients with DSAs at 2 institutions. Thirty-seven patients with a median age of 51 years were treated with this desensitization protocol. Treatment outcomes were compared with a control group of HaploSCT patients without DSAs (n = 345). The majority of patients in the DSA group were female (83.8% vs 37.1% in controls, P < .001) and received stem cells from a child as the donor (67.6% vs 44.1%, P = .002). Mean DSA level before and after desensitization was 10 198 and 5937 mean fluorescence intensity (MFI), respectively, with mean differences of 4030 MFI. Fourteen of 30 tested patients (46.7%) had C1q positivity, while 8 of 29 tested patients (27.6%) remained positive after desensitization. In multivariable analysis, patients with initial DSA > 20 000 MFI and persistent positive C1q after desensitization had a significantly lower engraftment rate, which resulted in significantly higher non-relapse mortality and worse overall survival (OS) than controls, whereas graft outcome and survival of patients with initial DSA < 20 000 MFI and those with negative C1q after treatment were comparable with controls. In conclusion, treatment with PE, rituximab, IVIg, and donor buffy coat is effective in promoting engraftment in patients with DSAs ≤20 000 MFI.

Advances in the understanding of poor graft function following allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation

Poor graft function (PGF) following allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is a life-threatening complication and is characterized by bilineage or trilineage blood cell deficiency and hypoplastic marrow with full chimerism. With the rapid development of allo-HSCT, especially haploidentical-HSCT, PGF has become a growing concern. The most common risk factors illustrated by recent studies include low dose of infused CD34+ cells, donor-specific antibody, cytomegalovirus infection, graft versus host disease (GVHD), iron overload and splenomegaly, among others. Because of the poor prognosis of PGF, it is crucial to uncover the underlying mechanism, which remains elusive. Recent studies have suggested that the bone marrow microenvironment may play an important role in the pathogenesis of PGF. Deficiency and dysfunction of endothelial cells and mesenchymal stem cells, elevated reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels, and immune abnormalities are believed to contribute to PGF. In this review, we also discuss recent clinical trials that evaluate the safety and efficacy of new strategies in patients with PGF. CD34+-selected stem-cell boost (SCB) is effective with an acceptable incidence of GVHD, despite the need for a second donation. Alternative strategies including the applications of mesenchymal stem cells, N-acetyl-l-cysteine (NAC), and eltrombopag have shown favorable outcomes, but further large-scale studies are needed due to the small sample sizes of the recent clinical trials.

Combination treatment of rituximab and donor platelets infusion to reduce donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies for stem cells engraftment in haploidentical transplantation

BACKGROUND

Donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies (DSAs) in recipients is a risk factor for donor stem cell graft failure in haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT), and the treatment to reduce the levels of DSAs is not unanimous. This study was to analysis the role of DSAs for stem cell engraftment and to discuss the effective treatment to reduce DSAs in haplo-HSCT.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the levels of DSAs and the effect of the combination treatment of rituximab and donor platelets (PLTs) for donor stem cell engraftment in haplo-HSCT patients from June 2016 to March 2018 at our center.

RESULTS

Nine patients (11.5%) out of the total 78 patients were DSAs-positive and multivariate analysis revealed DSAs was the only factor that affected engraftment. Seven out of the 9 DSAs (+) patients received therapy: Four had antibodies against donor HLA class I (HLA-I) antigens and were administered two therapeutic amounts of donor apheresis platelets (platelet count approximately 3-5 × 10¹¹ ) before donor stem cell infusion and the other three patients received a combination therapy of donor apheresis platelets and rituximab due to the antibodies against both donor HLA-I antigens and HLA class II (HLA-II) antigens. All the seven patients achieved donor stem cell engraftment successfully, and the DSAs levels decreased rapidly after transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

DSAs is an important factor affecting engraftment in haplo-HSCT. Donor platelet transfusion is one simple and effective treatment for HLA-I DSAs, and a combination therapy should be administered if patients have both HLA-I and HLA-II antibodies.