Reference interval and the role of soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (sST2) in subclinical cardiac dysfunction at health checkups

Role of biomarkers in the heart failure clinic

Heart failure (HF) is a common cardiovascular disease that has a complex pathophysiology. Because it is the final stage of many cardiovascular diseases, proper diagnosis and treatment are crucial for prolonging patients’ survival and improving their well-being. Several biomarkers have been identified in HF, and their roles in diagnosis and prognostication have been widely investigated. Among them, natriuretic peptides are key for diagnosing HF, predicting its prognosis, and monitoring the effectiveness of HF treatment. Moreover, natriuretic peptides can also be used to treat HF. In addition to natriuretic peptides, several other biomarkers were included in the most recent HF management guidelines. Thus, we reviewed the role of the biomarkers included in these guidelines and discussed future perspectives.

Prognostic value of soluble suppression of tumorigenesis-2 (sST2) for cardiovascular events in coronary artery disease patients with and without diabetes mellitus

Background

Soluble suppression of tumorigenesis-2 (sST2) is implicated in myocardial overload and has long been recognized as an inflammatory marker related to heart failure and acute coronary syndrome, but data on the prognostic value of sST2 in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) remain limited. This study sought to investigate the prognostic value of sST2 in patients with established CAD and its predictive value in CAD patients with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

Methods

A total of 3641 consecutive patients were included in this prospective cohort study. The primary end point was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). The secondary end point was all-cause death. The association between sST2 and outcomes was investigated using multivariable Cox regression.

Results

During a median follow-up of 6.4 years, MACEs occurred in 775 patients, and 275 patients died. Multiple Cox regression models showed that a higher level of sST2 was an independent predictor of MACEs development (HR = 1.36, 95% CI 1.17–1.56, p < 0.001) and all-cause death (HR = 2.01, 95% CI 1.56–2.59, p < 0.001). The addition of sST2 to established risk factors significantly improved risk prediction of the composite outcome of MACEs and all-cause death (C-index, net reclassification index, and integrated discrimination improvement, all p < 0.05). In subgroup analysis depending on diabetes status, the diabetes group had a significantly higher level of sST2, which remained a significant predictor of MACEs and all-cause death in patients with and without T2DM in multivariable models. The area under the curve (AUC) of CAD patients with diabetes mellitus was significantly higher than that of those without T2DM. For MACEs, the AUC was 0.737 (patients with T2DM) vs 0.620 (patients without T2DM). For all-cause death, the AUC was 0.923 (patients with T2DM) vs 0.789 (patients without T2DM).

Conclusions

A higher level of sST2 is significantly associated with long-term MACEs and all-cause death in CAD patients with and without T2DM. sST2 has strong predictive value for cardiovascular adverse events in CAD patients with T2DM, and these results provide new evidence for the role of sST2.

Reference interval and the role of soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (sST2) in subclinical cardiac dysfunction at health checkups

Background

Soluble ST2 (sST2) is known to predict adverse outcomes and death in individuals with established heart failure. However, the role of sST2 testing in the general population has not been established. The aims of this study were to determine the reference interval (RI) and the clinical utility of sST2 in subclinical cardiac dysfunction in general population.

Methods

This cross‐sectional study consecutively selected 41,806 general subjects at health checkups who underwent echocardiography and sST2 testing at 16 health promotion centers in 13 Korean cities. The reference subjects were obtained among those with normal findings in echocardiography. Sex‐specific RIs were established according to the CLSI C28‐A3 guidelines. sST2 was measured using immunoassay with the Presage ST2 assay (Critical Diagnostics).

Results

In the general subjects, age, sex, BMI, systolic blood pressure, blood glucose, creatinine, liver function, and triglycerides were associated with the sST2 levels. The RI for sST2 was higher in males (≤49.6 ng/mL, 95% CI = 48.5‐51.5) than in females (≤44.5 ng/mL, 95% CI = 43.5‐45.6) and higher in subjects aged < 40 years than ≥ 40 years in both sexes. The sST2 levels were 29.1 ± 10.7 (mean ± SD) and 29.1 ± 14.4 ng/mL in the groups with normal cardiac function and subclinical cardiac dysfunction, respectively. The sST2 level was not associated with subclinical cardiac dysfunction (odd ratio = 1.002, P = .13).

Conclusions

RIs obtained from a large and echocardiography‐proven healthy community‐based sample are presented. Subclinical cardiac dysfunction was associated with older age, male sex, and metabolic factors but not with the sST2 level.