Transfusion-induced platelet antibodies and regulatory T cells in multiply transfused patients

T-TAS® 01 as a new tool for the evaluation of hemostasis in thrombocytopenic patients after platelet transfusion

BACKGROUND

Current laboratory tests fail to evaluate the hemostatic function of platelets in patients with thrombocytopenia. We investigated the use of the Total Thrombus-Formation Analysis System (T-TAS® 01 [Fujimori Kogyo Co, Tokyo, Japan]) to evaluate hemostasis under conditions of experimental thrombocytopenia, and in patients before and after platelet transfusion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Specific T-TAS 01 chips, for thrombocytopenic conditions, were used. The area under the curve (AUC) and occlusion time (OT, min) were measured in: (i) experimentally induced thrombocytopenia (183±15 to 6.3±1.2×103 platelets/μL) in blood samples from healthy donors (No.=13), and (ii) blood from oncohematological thrombocytopenic patients (No.=48), before and after platelet transfusion. The influences of hematocrit and number of transfusions were analyzed in these patients.

RESULTS

Progressive reductions of AUC and prolongations of OT related significantly to decreasing platelet counts (p<0.05 for all) in experimental thrombocytopenia. In samples from thrombocytopenic patients, platelet counts, AUC and OT were, respectively, 10.8±0.6×103/μL, 175.2±59, and 27.2±1 min before transfusion; and 22±1.5×103/μL, 400.8±83 and 22.9±1.5 min after platelet transfusion (p<0.01 for all). A hematocrit below 25% or exposure to ten or more previous platelet transfusions had a negative impact on the T-TAS 01 performance in patients. In vitro correction of the hematocrit improved the hemostatic response in thrombocytopenic patients.

DISCUSSION

T-TAS 01 measurements were sensitive to low platelet counts in the experimental setting. The technology was sensitive to evaluate the hemostatic capacity of platelet transfusions. Exposure to multiple medications, repeated platelet transfusions and lower hematocrits may interfere with the hemostatic performance in oncohematological patients with thrombocytopenia.

A meta-analysis of risk factors associated with platelet transfusion refractoriness

BACKGROUND

Platelet transfusion refractoriness (PTR) remains an intractable issue in clinical practice, and is common in hematological patients. At present, it is believed that both immune and non-immune factors play a role. We conducted a meta-analysis of various risk factors which may contribute to PTR.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, and Web of Science were selected as research database platforms. Citations included were further assessed for quality and bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. All analyses were performed using Review Manager Version 5.4 and STATA 16.0.

RESULTS

The preliminary search revealed 1069 publications, and 17 (5929 patients in total) were ultimately included in the quantitative analysis. The following variables were associated with the occurrence of PTR: fever (OR = 2.26, 95%CI 2.00-2.55, p < 0.00001), bleeding (OR = 2.10, 95%CI 1.36-3.24, p = 0.0008), female sex (OR = 2.06, 95%CI 1.13-3.75, p = 0.02), antibiotic use (OR = 2.94, 95%CI 1.54-5.59, p = 0.001), and infection (OR = 2.19, 95%CI 1.20-4.03, p = 0.01). Antibodies involved in immune activation were a higher risk factor (OR = 4.17, 95%CI 2.36-7.36, p < 0.00001), and splenomegaly was nearly significant (OR = 1.73, 95%CI 0.97-3.07, p = 0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

We identified some important risk factors for PTR, but further research is needed to identify the many other possible elements that may contribute to or mediate PTR.

Current Status of and Global Trends in Platelet Transfusion Refractoriness From 2004 to 2021: A Bibliometric Analysis

Platelet transfusion refractoriness (PTR) is common in patients with hematology and oncology and is becoming an important barrier in the treatment of thrombocytopenia and hemorrhage. Bibliometrics is an effective method for identifying existing research achievements, important breakthroughs, current research hotspots, and future development trends in any given field. In recent years, research on PTR has received increasing attention, but a bibliometric analysis of this field has not yet been reported. In this study, we applied bibliometrics to analyze the existing literature on PTR research over the past 17 years. On November 1, 2021, we began a publications analysis of PTR research using the Science Citation Index Expanded of the Web of Science Core Collection with collection dates from 2004 to 2021. This research aimed to summarize the state of PTR research using Bibliometrix to identify connections between different elements (i.e., authors, institutions, countries, journals, references, and keywords) using VOS viewer analyses to visualize key topics and trends in PTR research using Cite Space and gCLUTO. The results of all 310 studies showed that the annual number of publications focused on PTR is steadily increasing, with the United States of America and Japan making significant contributions. We noted that the research group led by Dr. Sherrill J. Slichter was prominent in this field, while Estcourt Lise may become the most influential newcomer. Transfusion was the most popular journal, and Blood was the most cited journal. Using various analyses, including co-cited analysis, historiography analysis, citation burst analysis, and factorial analysis, we pointed out and discussed contributing publications. According to occurrence analysis, co-word biclustering analysis, landform map, thematic evolution, and thematic map, we believe that “activation,” “p-selection,” “CD36 deficiency,” “gene-frequencies,” “CD109,” “HPA-1,” and “beta (3) integrin” may become new trends in PTR research. The outcome of our bibliometric analyses has, for the first time, revealed profound insights into the current state and trends in PTR research. The systematic analysis provided by our study clearly demonstrates the field's significant advancements to all researchers who are interested in a quick and comprehensive introduction to the field.

Transfusion-induced platelet antibodies and regulatory T cells in multiply transfused patients

Background

Platelet transfusion refractoriness (PTR) remains a difficult problem in patients requiring long‐term platelet supportive care. However, there are little data on the frequency of platelet antibodies in multiply transfused Chinese patients. Moreover, the relationship between peripheral regulatory T cells (Tregs) and PTR remains unclear.

Methods

We retrospectively studied the frequency of alloimmunization against platelet antigens in patients receiving multiple transfusions between 2013 and 2017. Monoclonal antibody solid‐phase platelet antibody test (MASPAT) kits were used to screen for platelet antibodies before each platelet transfusion. Peripheral Tregs and CD4⁺CD25⁺CD127⁻ T cells were detected by flow cytometry, while transforming growth factor‐beta (TGF‐β) and interleukin (IL)‐17 cytokines were detected by enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay.

Results

A total of 399 patients who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled for the analysis of platelet antibodies and refractoriness. Among these patients, 10 (2.5%) were positive for platelet antibodies before transfusion and 47 (11.8%) became antibody‐positive during the study period. The number of alloimmunized patients was significantly higher in patients with hematological disease as compared with other disease groups (p < 0.05). Refractoriness and alloimmunization occurred in 77 (19.3%) and 22 (28.6%) patients, respectively. There were no significant differences in CD4⁺, CD8⁺, and CD4⁺CD25⁺CD127⁻ T cell numbers and plasma levels of TGF‐β1 and IL‐17 between patients with PTR and the control group.

Conclusions

Refractoriness was common in patients undergoing multiple platelet transfusions (19.3%), with alloimmunization observed in 28.6% of patients. However, Tregs in peripheral blood may not play a key role in PTR.