Introduction: Applying Clinical Psychological Science to Practice

"As long as they eat"? Therapist experiences, dilemmas and identity negotiations of Maudsley and family-based therapy for anorexia nervosa

BACKGROUND

Maudsley Family Therapy and its manualised version Family-Based Therapy for Anorexia Nervosa (FBT-AN) have accrued the most significant research evidence-base for the treatment of adolescent Anorexia Nervosa (AN). A tradition of seeking augmentations for this treatment has also been established to enhance efficacy. There exists, however, a gap in the uptake of this form of manualised treatment into the "real world" of clinicians who work with adolescent AN.

AIMS

This research study investigated the key experiences and identity negotiations of a group of nine Australian clinicians who were interested in contributing to research into ways that Maudsley and FBT-AN might be improved.

METHODS

Nine clinicians, who at the time of the interview practised or had previously practised, FBT-AN participated in a semi-structured interview. A critical discursive analysis of interview transcripts generated a thematic map of these therapists' experiences and identity negotiations in their practice of FBT-AN.

RESULTS

These therapists experienced the structure of FBT-AN as both a secure map for therapy, yet also constraining at times, in their work with adolescents and their families. Additionally, their professional identities were both invested and troubled by the identity position of themselves as evidence-based practitioners, particularly where evidence-based practice (EBP) meant strict fidelity to the manual and restrained them from tailoring a broader range of therapeutic interventions to an individual adolescent and their family. Within their narratives, these therapists refashioned alternative identity positions around what it meant to be an evidence-based practitioner through listening to and drawing on their clinical expertise of what works in therapeutic practice with an individual adolescent and their family.

CONCLUSIONS

These therapists narratives highlight the power of the dominant discourse of EBP that works to privilege the research evidence over other forms of evidence that include clinician expertise and client preferences. The dilemmas faced by these therapists questioned not only the strict application of FBT-AN for adolescent AN across diverse therapeutic contexts, but also the effects of supervisory practices that paralleled this strict fidelity to the model. Further research is needed into therapeutic interventions and supervisory practices that give greater scope for clinicians to draw on their expertise in the flexible tailoring of treatments to the unique needs and preferences of the individual adolescent and their family.

Beyond descriptions: selected aspects of science and practice in clinical psychology and personality psychopathology

EDITORIAL Beyond Descriptions: Selected Aspects of Science and Practice in Clinical Psychology EDITORIAL Beyond Descriptions: Selected Aspects of Science and Practice in Clinical Psychology EDITORIAL Beyond Descriptions: Selected Aspects of Science and Practice in Clinical Psychology EDITORIAL Beyond Descriptions: Selected Aspects of Science and Practice in Clinical Psychology EDITORIAL Beyond Descriptions: Selected Aspects of Science and Practice in Clinical Psychology EDITORIAL Beyond Descriptions: Selected Aspects of Science and Practice in Clinical Psychology EDITORIAL Beyond Descriptions: Selected Aspects of Science and Practice in Clinical Psychology EDITORIAL Beyond Descriptions: Selected Aspects of Science and Practice in Clinical Psychology EDITORIAL Beyond Descriptions: Selected Aspects of Science and Practice in Clinical Psychology EDITORIAL Beyond Descriptions: Selected Aspects of Science and Practice in Clinical Psychology