Pretreatment counseling experiences, stressors, and support differences between transgender and cisgender university students seeking mental healthcare

Protocol for a systematic review of substance use and misuse prevalence and associated factors among transgender and non-binary youth living in the USA

BACKGROUND

Transgender and gender non-binary (TNB) youth living in the USA report elevated levels of substance use compared with their cisgender counterparts, with previous literature pointing to minority stressors as some of the factors that could facilitate such elevated levels. Yet, substance use and misuse prevalence and associated modifiable factors among TNB youth are not fully known. The current paper details the protocol for a systematic review aimed at (1) identifying substance use and misuse prevalence among TNB youth (ages <25) and related demographic disparities (based on racial, ethnic and gender identity, and sexual orientation), (2) examining factors associated with substance use and misuse among TNB youth and (3) examining protective factors against substance use and misuse among TNB youth.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Systematic searches will be conducted across four databases: PubMed, LGBTQ+ Source, CINAHL and PsycInfo to identify quantitative, qualitative and mixed-methods peer-reviewed research publications. An exhaustive list of keywords and corresponding MeSH (Medical Subject Headings) terms representing the concepts of 'TNB' (the population of interest) and 'substance use and misuse' (outcome) will be employed. Identified records will be initially screened via a review of titles and abstracts. Full text of the remaining records will be reviewed corresponding to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Extracted data will be synthesised in table and narrative format. A meta-analysis will be considered contingent on the existence of sufficient data. Methodological quality and risk of bias of studies will be assessed.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This review does not require approval from the Institutional Review Board as it involves no interactions with human subjects. We will disseminate our findings via peer-reviewed manuscripts and academic conference presentations.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42023394985.

Transgender and gender diverse adults' self-reported mental health diagnoses, engagement in mental health services, and perceptions of therapists

OBJECTIVE

Transgender and gender diverse (TGD) people face various challenges when seeking therapy. Given this, we wanted to understand more about TGD people's perceptions of providers and how these compare to researcher ratings of providers on metrics of affirming practice.

METHOD

The sample included 158 TGD adults (M_age = 33.06); 57.6% were in therapy. Participants completed measures about mental health, resilience, and therapy. We systematically coded provider websites and intake forms.

RESULTS

Participants in therapy were older, had higher depression, and lower resilience than participants not in therapy. Non-binary/genderqueer participants rated providers as less knowledgeable compared to trans feminine participants. Overall, participants appeared satisfied (71.4% extremely satisfied) and viewed providers as at least moderately knowledgeable (89.1%). Provider coding revealed variation across the markers of affirmation; 66.04% identified a TGD-specialty and only 26.42% shared provider pronouns. Higher frequency of inclusivity (via coding) was related to higher ratings of provider knowledge and more of a focus on gender, however, there was not a significant association with satisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS

Providers who engaged in more affirming practices were more knowledgeable compared to those who engaged in fewer affirming practices. This may influence the content of therapy and whether clients feel comfortable discussing gender.

The Cisnormative Blindspot Explained: Healthcare Experiences of Trans Men and Non-Binary Persons and the accessibility to inclusive sexual & reproductive Healthcare, an integrative review

Trans men and non-binary persons assigned female at birth (AFAB) often encounter resistance and reluctance pertaining to their healthcare needs. As a result of patriarchal-based decision-making and cis-heteronormative ideologies, the trans and gender diverse (TGD) population is routinely left out of representation in research, education, and healthcare. The aim of this integrative literature review is to describe the experiences of trans men and non-binary persons AFAB in healthcare interactions and their sexual and reproductive healthcare needs. A total of 32 articles were analyzed, synthesized, and reconceptualized through joint inductive and deductive analysis with a transfeminist and intersectional lens. From these papers, two broader concepts emerged with five sub-concepts that portrayed underlying barriers to care (primed with fear, onus of self-advocacy, and call for competence) and internalized ideologies (pregnancy incompatibility and presumptive care). A multidisciplinary approach is essential to employ in implementation efforts involving improved standards of care and in achieving desired family planning. As this is not as linear as addressing a knowledge gap, but one of deeper set intrinsic ideologies, instruction on the necessary impact of continued education and peer learning within the context of in-group dynamics can help the efficiency of designated change agents within the healthcare systems themselves.

Mental Health Disparities at the Intersections of Gender Identity, Race, and Ethnicity

Purpose: Very little research has examined mental health among transgender people of color using population-based data. The objective of this study was to use large-scale data to examine mental health disparities at the intersections of gender identity, race, and ethnicity. Methods: Data for this study came from transgender (n = 4024) and cisgender (n = 935,793) adults aged 18 years and older in the 2014-2018 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. We estimated and compared frequent mental distress and lifetime depression diagnoses using multivariable logistic regression models. Regression results are presented as adjusted odds ratios (AORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: After controlling for sociodemographic characteristics and compared with cisgender White adults, transgender White adults (AOR = 1.81; 95% CI = 1.49-2.21), transgender American Indian or Alaska Native (AIAN) adults (AOR = 8.06; 95% CI = 2.03-32.00), and transgender adults of other/multiple races and ethnicities (AOR = 3.15; 95% CI = 1.78-5.59) had higher odds of exhibiting frequent mental distress. Transgender White adults (AOR = 2.07; 95% CI = 1.75-2.46), transgender AIAN adults (AOR = 3.61; 95% CI = 1.06-12.32), and transgender adults of other/multiple races and ethnicities (AOR = 2.37; 95% CI = 1.41-4.01) had higher odds of reporting a lifetime depression diagnosis compared with White cisgender adults. Conclusion: This study serves as a reminder that LGBT health should be analyzed through an intersectional lens as some individuals with multiple marginalized identities may have worse health as a result of double discrimination. Public health practitioners and health care providers should be mindful of the diversity within the transgender population in their work.