Adenovirus E1A proteins direct subcellular redistribution of Nek9, a NimA-related kinase

ARGLU1 enhances promoter-proximal pausing of RNA polymerase II and stimulates DNA damage repair

Arginine and glutamate rich 1 (ARGLU1) is a poorly understood cellular protein with functions in RNA splicing and transcription. Computational prediction suggests that ARGLU1 contains intrinsically disordered regions and lacks any known structural or functional domains. We used adenovirus Early protein 1A (E1A) to probe for critical regulators of important cellular pathways and identified ARGLU1 as a significant player in transcription and the DNA damage response pathway. Transcriptional effects induced by ARGLU1 occur via enhancement of promoter-proximal RNA polymerase II pausing, likely by inhibiting the interaction between JMJD6 and BRD4. When overexpressed, ARGLU1 increases the growth rate of cancer cells, while its knockdown leads to growth arrest. Significantly, overexpression of ARGLU1 increased cancer cell resistance to genotoxic drugs and promoted DNA damage repair. These results identify new roles for ARGLU1 in cancer cell survival and the DNA damage repair pathway, with potential clinical implications for chemotherapy resistance.

In Mitosis You Are Not: The NIMA Family of Kinases in Aspergillus, Yeast, and Mammals

The Never in mitosis gene A (NIMA) family of serine/threonine kinases is a diverse group of protein kinases implicated in a wide variety of cellular processes, including cilia regulation, microtubule dynamics, mitotic processes, cell growth, and DNA damage response. The founding member of this family was initially identified in Aspergillus and was found to play important roles in mitosis and cell division. The yeast family has one member each, Fin1p in fission yeast and Kin3p in budding yeast, also with functions in mitotic processes, but, overall, these are poorly studied kinases. The mammalian family, the main focus of this review, consists of 11 members named Nek1 to Nek11. With the exception of a few members, the functions of the mammalian Neks are poorly understood but appear to be quite diverse. Like the prototypical NIMA, many members appear to play important roles in mitosis and meiosis, but their functions in the cell go well beyond these well-established activities. In this review, we explore the roles of fungal and mammalian NIMA kinases and highlight the most recent findings in the field.

Adenovirus 5 E1A Interacts with E4orf3 To Regulate Viral Chromatin Organization

Human adenovirus expresses several early proteins that control various aspects of the viral replication program, including an orchestrated expression of viral genes. Two of the earliest viral transcriptional units activated after viral genome entry into the host cell nucleus are the E1 and E4 units, which each express a variety of proteins. Chief among these are the E1A proteins that function to reprogram the host cell and activate transcription of all other viral genes. The E4 gene encodes multiple proteins, including E4orf3, which functions to disrupt cellular antiviral defenses, including the DNA damage response pathway and activation of antiviral genes. Here we report that E1A directly interacts with E4orf3 via the conserved N terminus of E1A to regulate the expression of viral genes. We show that E4orf3 indiscriminately drives high nucleosomal density of viral genomes, which is restrictive to viral gene expression and which E1A overcomes via a direct interaction with E4orf3. We also show that during infection E1A colocalizes with E4orf3 to nuclear tracks that are associated with heterochromatin formation. The inability of E1A to interact with E4orf3 has a significant negative impact on overall viral replication, the ability of the virus to reprogram the host cell, and the levels of viral gene expression. Together these results show that E1A and E4orf3 work together to fine-tune the viral replication program during the course of infection and highlight a novel mechanism that regulates viral gene expression.IMPORTANCE To successfully replicate, human adenovirus needs to carry out a rapid yet ordered transcriptional program that executes and drives viral replication. Early in infection, the viral E1A proteins are the key activators and regulators of viral transcription. Here we report, for the first time, that E1A works together with E4orf3 to perfect the viral transcriptional program and identify a novel mechanism by which the virus can adjust viral gene expression by modifying its genome's nucleosomal organization via cooperation between E1A and E4orf3.

Adenovirus 5 E1A-Mediated Suppression of p53 via FUBP1

Far-upstream element (FUSE) binding protein 1 (FUBP1) was originally identified as a regulator of the oncogene c-Myc via binding to the FUSE within the c-Myc promoter and activating the expression of the gene. Recent studies have identified FUBP1 as a regulator of transcription, translation, and splicing via its DNA and RNA binding activities. Here we report the identification of FUBP1 as a novel binding partner of E1A. FUBP1 binds directly to E1A via the N terminus (residues 1 to 82) and conserved region 3 (residues 139 to 204) of adenovirus 5 E1A. The depletion of FUBP1 via short interfering RNAs (siRNA) reduces virus growth and drives the upregulation of the cellular stress response by activating the expression of p53-regulated genes. During infection, FUBP1 is relocalized within the nucleus, and it is recruited to viral promoters together with E1A while at the same time being lost from the FUSE upstream of the c-Myc promoter. The depletion of FUBP1 affects viral and cellular gene expression. Importantly, in FUBP1-depleted cells, p53-responsive genes are upregulated, p53 occupancy on target promoters is enhanced, and histone H3 lysine 9 is hyperacetylated. This is likely due to the loss of the FUBP1-mediated suppression of p53 DNA binding. We also observed that E1A stabilizes the FUBP1-p53 complex, preventing p53 promoter binding. Together, our results identify, for the first time, FUBP1 as a novel E1A binding protein that participates in aspects of viral replication and is involved in the E1A-mediated suppression of p53 function.IMPORTANCE Viral infection triggers innate cellular defense mechanisms that have evolved to block virus replication. To overcome this, viruses have counterevolved mechanisms that ensure that cellular defenses are either disarmed or not activated to guarantee successful replication. One of the key regulators of cellular stress is the tumor suppressor p53 that responds to a variety of cellular stress stimuli and safeguards the integrity of the genome. During infection, many viruses target the p53 pathway in order to deactivate it. Here we report that human adenovirus 5 coopts the cellular protein FUBP1 to prevent the activation of the p53 stress response pathway that would block viral replication. This finding adds to our understanding of p53 deactivation by adenovirus and highlights its importance in infection and innate immunity.

Hacking the Cell: Network Intrusion and Exploitation by Adenovirus E1A

As obligate intracellular parasites, viruses are dependent on their infected hosts for survival. Consequently, viruses are under enormous selective pressure to utilize available cellular components and processes to their own advantage. As most, if not all, cellular activities are regulated at some level via protein interactions, host protein interaction networks are particularly vulnerable to viral exploitation. Indeed, viral proteins frequently target highly connected “hub” proteins to “hack” the cellular network, defining the molecular basis for viral control over the host. This widespread and successful strategy of network intrusion and exploitation has evolved convergently among numerous genetically distinct viruses as a result of the endless evolutionary arms race between pathogens and hosts. Here we examine the means by which a particularly well-connected viral hub protein, human adenovirus E1A, compromises and exploits the vulnerabilities of eukaryotic protein interaction networks. Importantly, these interactions identify critical regulatory hubs in the human proteome and help define the molecular basis of their function.

Suppression of Type I Interferon Signaling by E1A via RuvBL1/Pontin

Suppression of interferon signaling is of paramount importance to a virus. Interferon signaling significantly reduces or halts the ability of a virus to replicate; therefore, viruses have evolved sophisticated mechanisms that suppress activation of the interferon pathway or responsiveness of the infected cell to interferon. Adenovirus has multiple modes of inhibiting the cellular response to interferon. Here, we report that E1A, previously shown to regulate interferon signaling in multiple ways, inhibits interferon-stimulated gene expression by modulating RuvBL1 function. RuvBL1 was previously shown to affect type I interferon signaling. E1A binds to RuvBL1 and is recruited to RuvBL1-regulated promoters in an interferon-dependent manner, preventing their activation. Depletion of RuvBL1 impairs adenovirus growth but does not appear to significantly affect viral protein expression. Although RuvBL1 has been shown to play a role in cell growth, its depletion had no effect on the ability of the virus to replicate its genome or to drive cells into S phase. E1A was found to bind to RuvBL1 via the C terminus of E1A, and this interaction was important for suppression of interferon-stimulated gene transcriptional activation and recruitment of E1A to interferon-regulated promoters. Here, we report the identification of RuvBL1 as a new target for adenovirus in its quest to suppress the interferon response.IMPORTANCE For most viruses, suppression of the interferon signaling pathway is crucial to ensure a successful replicative cycle. Human adenovirus has evolved several different mechanisms that prevent activation of interferon or the ability of the cell to respond to interferon. The viral immediate-early gene E1A was previously shown to affect interferon signaling in several different ways. Here, we report a novel mechanism reliant on RuvBL1 that E1A uses to prevent activation of interferon-stimulated gene expression following infection or interferon treatment. This adds to the growing knowledge of how viruses are able to inhibit interferon and identifies a novel target used by adenovirus for modulation of the cellular interferon pathway.

The interaction of adenovirus E1A with the mammalian protein Ku70/XRCC6

Human adenovirus infects terminally differentiated cells and to replicate it must induce S-phase. The chief architects that drive adenovirus-infected cells into S-phase are the E1A proteins, with 5 different isoforms expressed during infection. E1A remodels the infected cell by associating with cellular factors and modulating their activity. The C-terminus of E1A is known to bind to only a handful of proteins. We have identified a novel E1A C-terminus binding protein, Ku70 (XRCC6), which was found to bind directly within the CR4 of E1A from human adenovirus type 5. Depletion of Ku70 reduced virus growth, possibly by activating the DNA damage response pathway. Ku70 was found to localize to viral replication centers and associate with the viral genome. Ku70 was also recruited to cellular cell cycle regulated promoters following viral infection. Our study has identified, for the first time, Ku70 as a novel E1A-binding protein which affects virus life cycle.

The Dual Nature of Nek9 in Adenovirus Replication

To successfully replicate in an infected host cell, a virus must overcome sophisticated host defense mechanisms. Viruses, therefore, have evolved a multitude of devices designed to circumvent cellular defenses that would lead to abortive infection. Previous studies have identified Nek9, a cellular kinase, as a binding partner of adenovirus E1A, but the biology behind this association remains a mystery. Here we show that Nek9 is a transcriptional repressor that functions together with E1A to silence the expression of p53-inducible GADD45A gene in the infected cell. Depletion of Nek9 in infected cells reduces virus growth but unexpectedly enhances viral gene expression from the E2 transcription unit, whereas the opposite occurs when Nek9 is overexpressed. Nek9 localizes with viral replication centers, and its depletion reduces viral genome replication, while overexpression enhances viral genome numbers in infected cells. Additionally, Nek9 was found to colocalize with the viral E4 orf3 protein, a repressor of cellular stress response. Significantly, Nek9 was also shown to associate with viral and cellular promoters and appears to function as a transcriptional repressor, representing the first instance of Nek9 playing a role in gene regulation. Overall, these results highlight the complexity of virus-host interactions and identify a new role for the cellular protein Nek9 during infection, suggesting a role for Nek9 in regulating p53 target gene expression.

IMPORTANCE

In the arms race that exists between a pathogen and its host, each has continually evolved mechanisms to either promote or prevent infection. In order to successfully replicate and spread, a virus must overcome every mechanism that a cell can assemble to block infection. On the other hand, to counter viral spread, cells must have multiple mechanisms to stifle viral replication. In the present study, we add to our understanding of how the human adenovirus is able to circumvent cellular roadblocks to replication. We show that the virus uses a cellular protein, Nek9, in order to block activation of p53-regulated gene GADD45A, which is an important player in stress response and p53-mediated cell cycle arrest. Importantly, our study also identifies Nek9 as a transcriptional repressor.

Adenovirus E1A targets the DREF nuclear factor to regulate virus gene expression, DNA replication, and growth

The adenovirus E1A gene is the first gene expressed upon viral infection. E1A remodels the cellular environment to maximize permissivity for viral replication. E1A is also the major transactivator of viral early gene expression and a coregulator of a large number of cellular genes. E1A carries out its functions predominantly by binding to cellular regulatory proteins and altering their activities. The unstructured nature of E1A enables it to bind to a large variety of cellular proteins and form new molecular complexes with novel functions. The C terminus of E1A is the least-characterized region of the protein, with few known binding partners. Here we report the identification of cellular factor DREF (ZBED1) as a novel and direct binding partner of E1A. Our studies identify a dual role for DREF in the viral life cycle. DREF contributes to activation of gene expression from all viral promoters early in infection. Unexpectedly, it also functions as a growth restriction factor for adenovirus as knockdown of DREF enhances virus growth and increases viral genome copy number late in the infection. We also identify DREF as a component of viral replication centers. E1A affects the subcellular distribution of DREF within PML bodies and enhances DREF SUMOylation. Our findings identify DREF as a novel E1A C terminus binding partner and provide evidence supporting a role for DREF in viral replication.

IMPORTANCE

This work identifies the putative transcription factor DREF as a new target of the E1A oncoproteins of human adenovirus. DREF was found to primarily localize with PML nuclear bodies in uninfected cells and to relocalize into virus replication centers during infection. DREF was also found to be SUMOylated, and this was enhanced in the presence of E1A. Knockdown of DREF reduced the levels of viral transcripts detected at 20 h, but not at 40 h, postinfection, increased overall virus yield, and enhanced viral DNA replication. DREF was also found to localize to viral promoters during infection together with E1A. These results suggest that DREF contributes to activation of viral gene expression. However, like several other PML-associated proteins, DREF also appears to function as a growth restriction factor for adenovirus infection.

Identification of herpesvirus proteins that contribute to G1/S arrest

Lytic infection by herpesviruses induces cell cycle arrest at the G1/S transition. This appears to be a function of multiple herpesvirus proteins, but only a minority of herpesvirus proteins have been examined for cell cycle effects. To gain a more comprehensive understanding of the viral proteins that contribute to G1/S arrest, we screened a library of over 200 proteins from herpes simplex virus type 1, human cytomegalovirus, and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) for effects on the G1/S interface, using HeLa fluorescent, ubiquitination-based cell cycle indicator (Fucci) cells in which G1/S can be detected colorimetrically. Proteins from each virus were identified that induce accumulation of G1/S cells, predominantly tegument, early, and capsid proteins. The identification of several capsid proteins in this screen suggests that incoming viral capsids may function to modulate cellular processes. The cell cycle effects of selected EBV proteins were further verified and examined for effects on p53 and p21 as regulators of the G1/S transition. Two EBV replication proteins (BORF2 and BMRF1) were found to induce p53 but not p21, while a previously uncharacterized tegument protein (BGLF2) was found to induce p21 protein levels in a p53-independent manner. Proteomic analyses of BGLF2-interacting proteins identified interactions with the NIMA-related protein kinase (NEK9) and GEM-interacting protein (GMIP). Silencing of either NEK9 or GMIP induced p21 without affecting p53 and abrogated the ability of BGLF2 to further induce p21. Collectively, these results suggest multiple viral proteins contribute to G1/S arrest, including BGLF2, which induces p21 levels likely by interfering with the functions of NEK9 and GMIP.

IMPORTANCE

Most people are infected with multiple herpesviruses, whose proteins alter the infected cells in several ways. During lytic infection, the viral proteins block cell proliferation just before the cellular DNA replicates. We used a novel screening method to identify proteins from three different herpesviruses that contribute to this block. Several of the proteins we identified had previously unknown functions or were structural components of the virion. Subsets of these proteins from Epstein-Barr virus were studied for their effects on the cell cycle regulatory proteins p53 and p21, thereby identifying two proteins that induce p53 and one that induces p21 (BGLF2). We identified interactions of BGLF2 with two human proteins, both of which regulate p21, suggesting that BGLF2 induces p21 by interfering with the functions of these two host proteins. Our study indicates that multiple herpesvirus proteins contribute to the cell proliferation block, including components of the incoming virions.

NEK9 depletion induces catastrophic mitosis by impairment of mitotic checkpoint control and spindle dynamics

NEK9 is known to play a role in spindle assembly and in the control of centrosome separation, but the consequences of NEK9 targeting in cancer cells remain to be elucidated. In this study, we used siRNA to investigate the consequences of targeting NEK9 in glioblastoma and kidney cancer cells as a first step in assessing its potential as an anti-cancer therapeutic target. Live cell imaging revealed that NEK9 depletion of U1242 glioblastoma and Caki2 kidney carcinoma cells resulted in failure of cytokinesis. Interestingly, NEK9-depleted Caki2 cells overrode mitosis under incorrect chromosome alignment and were converted to a micronucleated phenotype, leading to cell death. Whereas, the RPE1 normal epithelium cell line was refractory to abnormal mitosis upon NEK9 knockdown. Nocodazole-induced mitotic arrest was compromised after NEK9 depletion, indicating that NEK9 has an important role in mitotic checkpoint system. Taken together, we propose that NEK9 inhibition represents a novel anti-cancer strategy by induction of mitotic catastrophe via impairment of spindle dynamics, cytokinesis and mitotic checkpoint control.

Systematic differences in signal emitting and receiving revealed by PageRank analysis of a human protein interactome

Most protein PageRank studies do not use signal flow direction information in protein interactions because this information was not readily available in large protein databases until recently. Therefore, four questions have yet to be answered: A) What is the general difference between signal emitting and receiving in a protein interactome? B) Which proteins are among the top ranked in directional ranking? C) Are high ranked proteins more evolutionarily conserved than low ranked ones? D) Do proteins with similar ranking tend to have similar subcellular locations? In this study, we address these questions using the forward, reverse, and non-directional PageRank approaches to rank an information-directional network of human proteins and study their evolutionary conservation. The forward ranking gives credit to information receivers, reverse ranking to information emitters, and non-directional ranking mainly to the number of interactions. The protein lists generated by the forward and non-directional rankings are highly correlated, but those by the reverse and non-directional rankings are not. The results suggest that the signal emitting/receiving system is characterized by key-emittings and relatively even receivings in the human protein interactome. Signaling pathway proteins are frequent in top ranked ones. Eight proteins are both informational top emitters and top receivers. Top ranked proteins, except a few species-related novel-function ones, are evolutionarily well conserved. Protein-subunit ranking position reflects subunit function. These results demonstrate the usefulness of different PageRank approaches in characterizing protein networks and provide insights to protein interaction in the cell.

Recognition of host proteins by Helicobacter cysteine-rich protein C

Tetratricopeptide- and sel1-like repeat (SLR) proteins modulate various cellular activities, ranging from transcription regulation to cell-fate control. Helicobacter cysteine-rich proteins (Hcp) consist of several SLRs that are cross-linked by disulfide bridges and have been implicated in host/pathogen interactions. Using pull-down proteomics, several human proteins including Nek9, Hsp90, and Hsc71 have been identified as putative human interaction partners for HcpC. The interaction between the NimA-like protein kinase Nek9 and HcpC has been validated by ELISA and surface plasmon resonance. Recombinant Nek9 is recognized by HcpC with a dissociation constant in the lower micromolar range. This interaction is formed either directly between Nek9 and HcpC or via the formation of a complex with Hsc71. The HcpC homologue HcpA possesses no affinity for Nek9, suggesting that the reported interaction is rather specific for HcpC. These results are consistent with previous observations where Nek9 was targeted upon bacterial or viral invasion. However, further experiments will be required to show that the reported interactions also occur in vivo.

Mitotic regulation by NIMA-related kinases

The NIMA-related kinases represent a family of serine/threonine kinases implicated in cell cycle control. The founding member of this family, the NIMA kinase of Aspergillus nidulans, as well as the fission yeast homologue Fin1, contribute to multiple aspects of mitotic progression including the timing of mitotic entry, chromatin condensation, spindle organization and cytokinesis. Mammals contain a large family of eleven NIMA-related kinases, named Nek1 to Nek11. Of these, there is now substantial evidence that Nek2, Nek6, Nek7 and Nek9 also regulate mitotic events. At least three of these kinases, as well as NIMA and Fin1, have been localized to the microtubule organizing centre of their respective species, namely the centrosome or spindle pole body. Here, they have important functions in microtubule organization and mitotic spindle assembly. Other Nek kinases have been proposed to play microtubule-dependent roles in non-dividing cells, most notably in regulating the axonemal microtubules of cilia and flagella. In this review, we discuss the evidence that NIMA-related kinases make a significant contribution to the orchestration of mitotic progression and thereby protect cells from chromosome instability. Furthermore, we highlight their potential as novel chemotherapeutic targets.