1
|
Saad AF, Pacheco LD, Saade GR. Immunosuppressant Medications in Pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2024; 143:e94-e106. [PMID: 38227938 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000005512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2024]
Abstract
Pregnant patients are often on immunosuppressant medications, most commonly to manage transplantation or autoimmune disorders. Most immunosuppressant agents, including tacrolimus, corticosteroids, azathioprine, and calcineurin inhibitors, are safe during pregnancy and lactation. However, mycophenolic acid is associated with higher risks of birth defects and should be avoided in pregnancy. Tacrolimus, the commonly used drug in transplantation medicine and autoimmune disorders, requires monitoring of serum levels for dose adjustment, particularly during pregnancy. Although no pregnancy-specific therapeutic range exists, the general target range is 5-15 ng/mL, and pregnant patients may require higher doses to achieve therapeutic levels. Adherence to prescribed immunosuppressive regimens is crucial to prevent graft rejection and autoimmune disorder flare-ups. This review aims to provide essential information about the use of immunosuppressant medications in pregnant individuals. With a rising number of pregnant patients undergoing organ transplantations or having autoimmune disorders, it is important to understand the implications of the use of these medications during pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio F Saad
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Inova Fairfax, Fairfax, Virginia; the Division of Surgical Critical Care, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, Texas; and the Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wiseman A, Alhamad T, Alloway RR, Concepcion BP, Cooper M, Formica R, Klein CL, Kumar V, Leca N, Shihab F, Taber DJ, Mulnick S, Bushnell DM, Hadi M, Bunnapradist S. Use of LCP-Tacrolimus (LCPT) in Kidney Transplantation: A Delphi Consensus Survey of Expert Clinicians. Ann Transplant 2024; 29:e943498. [PMID: 38526543 PMCID: PMC10944009 DOI: 10.12659/aot.943498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2024] [Indexed: 03/26/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND LCPT (Envarsus XR®) is a common once-daily, extended-release oral tacrolimus formulation used in kidney transplantation. However, there are minimal evidence-based recommendations regarding optimal dosing and treatment in the de novo and conversion settings. MATERIAL AND METHODS Using Delphi methodology, 12 kidney transplantation experts with LCPT experience reviewed available data to determine potential consensus topics. Key statements regarding LCPT use were generated and disseminated to the panel in an online Delphi survey. Statements were either accepted, revised, or rejected based on the level of consensus, perceived strength of evidence, and alignment with clinical practice. Consensus was defined a priori as ≥75% agreement. RESULTS Twenty-three statements were generated: 14 focused on de novo LCPT use and 9 on general administration or LCPT conversion use. After 2 rounds, consensus was achieved for 11/14 of the former and 7/9 of the latter statements. In a de novo setting, LCPT was recognized as a first-line option based on its safety and efficacy compared to immediate-release tacrolimus. In particular, African Americans and rapid metabolizer populations were identified as preferred for first-line LCPT therapy. In a conversion setting, full consensus was achieved for converting to LCPT to address neurological adverse effects related to immediate-release tacrolimus and for the time required (approximately 7 days) for steady-state LCPT trough levels to be reached. CONCLUSIONS When randomized clinical trials do not replicate current utilization patterns, the Delphi process can successfully generate consensus statements by expert clinicians to inform clinical decision-making for the use of LCPT in kidney transplant recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Wiseman
- AdventHealth Transplant Institute, Porter Adventist Hospital, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Tarek Alhamad
- Division of Nephrology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Saint Louis, MO, USA
| | - Rita R. Alloway
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | | | - Matthew Cooper
- Transplant Center – Center for Advanced Care – Froedtert Hospital, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Richard Formica
- Yale New Haven Transplantation Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Christina L. Klein
- Department of Transplant Nephrology, Piedmont Transplant Institute, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Vineeta Kumar
- Renal Transplant Program, University of Alabama at Birmingham Hospital, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Nicolae Leca
- Kidney Care and Transplantation Services, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Fuad Shihab
- Kidney and Liver Clinic, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - David J. Taber
- Transplant Immunobiology Laboratory, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Sarah Mulnick
- Patient-Centered Research, Evidera, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | - Monica Hadi
- Patient-Centered Research, Evidera, London, United Kingdom
| | - Suphamai Bunnapradist
- Division of Nephrology and Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dai A, Kim SJ. Systemic calcineurin inhibitors tacrolimus and voclosporin: A review of off-label dermatologic uses. J Am Acad Dermatol 2024; 90:358-367. [PMID: 37307993 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2023.05.074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Revised: 05/08/2023] [Accepted: 05/18/2023] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Systemic calcineurin inhibitors, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, and voclosporin, have been utilized in various dermatologic conditions. Although there have been numerous off-label dermatologic indications with published guidelines for cyclosporine, there is no established strong consensus for tacrolimus and voclosporin. OBJECTIVE To conduct a review of off-label use of systemic tacrolimus and voclosporin in various dermatoses to better inform treatment methods. METHODS A literature search was conducted using PubMed and Google Scholar. Relevant clinical trials, observational studies, case series, and reports regarding off-label dermatologic uses of systemic tacrolimus and voclosporin were included. RESULTS Tacrolimus shows promise for numerous dermatologic conditions, including psoriasis, atopic dermatitis/eczema, pyoderma gangrenosum, chronic urticaria, and Behcet's disease. Randomized controlled trial data are only available for voclosporin in psoriasis, which showed efficacy but did not meet noninferiority to cyclosporine. LIMITATIONS Data were limited and extracted from published papers. Studies differed in methodology, and nonstandardized outcomes limited the conclusions drawn. CONCLUSIONS In comparison to cyclosporine, tacrolimus can be considered for treatment-refractory disease or in patients with cardiovascular risk factors or inflammatory bowel disease. Voclosporin has only been utilized in psoriasis currently, and clinical trials in psoriasis show voclosporin's efficacy. Voclosporin can be considered for patients with lupus nephritis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annie Dai
- Department of Dermatology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Soo Jung Kim
- Department of Dermatology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Diamond A, Karhadkar S, Chavin K, Constantinescu S, Lau KN, Perez-Leal O, Mohrien K, Sifontis N, Di Carlo A. Dosing strategies for de novo once-daily extended release tacrolimus in kidney transplant recipients based on CYP3A5 genotype. World J Transplant 2023; 13:368-378. [PMID: 38174147 PMCID: PMC10758687 DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v13.i6.368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Revised: 10/16/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 12/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tacrolimus extended-release tablets have been Food and Drug Administration-approved for use in the de novo kidney transplant population. Dosing requi rements often vary for tacrolimus based on several factors including variation in metabolism based on CYP3A5 expression. Patients who express CYP3A5 often require higher dosing of immediate-release tacrolimus, but this has not been established for tacrolimus extended-release tablets in the de novo setting. AIM To obtain target trough concentrations of extended-release tacrolimus in de novo kidney transplant recipients according to CYP3A5 genotype. METHODS Single-arm, prospective, single-center, open-label, observational study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT037 13645). Life cycle pharma tacrolimus (LCPT) orally once daily at a starting dose of 0.13 mg/kg/day based on actual body weight. If weight is more than 120% of ideal body weight, an adjusted body weight was used. LCPT dose was adjusted to maintain tacrolimus trough concentrations of 8-10 ng/mL. Pharmacogenetic analysis of CYP3A5 genotype was performed at study conclusion. RESULTS Mean time to therapeutic tacrolimus trough concentration was longer in CYP3A5 intermediate and extensive metabolizers vs CYP3A5 non-expressers (6 d vs 13.5 d vs 4.5 d; P = 0.025). Mean tacrolimus doses and weight-based doses to achieve therapeutic concentration were higher in CYP3A5 intermediate and extensive metabolizers vs CYP3A5 non-expressers (16 mg vs 16 mg vs 12 mg; P = 0.010) (0.20 mg/kg vs 0.19 mg/kg vs 0.13 mg/kg; P = 0.018). CYP3A5 extensive metabolizers experienced lower mean tacrolimus trough concentrations throughout the study period compared to CYP3A5 intermediate metabolizers and non-expressers (7.98 ng/mL vs 9.18 ng/mL vs 10.78 ng/mL; P = 0 0.008). No differences were identified with regards to kidney graft function at 30-d post-transplant. Serious adverse events were reported for 13 (36%) patients. CONCLUSION Expression of CYP3A5 leads to higher starting doses and incremental dosage titration of extended-release tacro limus to achieve target trough concentrations. We suggest a higher starting dose of 0.2 mg/kg/d for CYP3A5 expressers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Diamond
- Department of Pharmacy, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19140, United States
| | - Sunil Karhadkar
- Department of Surgery, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19140, United States
| | - Kenneth Chavin
- Department of Surgery, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19140, United States
| | - Serban Constantinescu
- Department of Medicine, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19140, United States
| | - Kwan N. Lau
- Department of Surgery, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19140, United States
| | - Oscar Perez-Leal
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Jayne Haines Center for Pharmacogenomics and Drug Safety, Temple University School of Pharmacy, Philadelphia, PA 19140, United States
| | - Kerry Mohrien
- Department of Pharmacy, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19140, United States
| | - Nicole Sifontis
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Temple University School of Pharmacy, Philadelphia, PA 19140, United States
| | - Antonio Di Carlo
- Department of Surgery, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19140, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Anthony N, Khan I, Shah A, Tariq A, Khan M. Incidental Finding of Post-Transplant Erythrocytosis After Renal Transplantation in a Patient With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Case Report. Cureus 2023; 15:e51218. [PMID: 38283474 PMCID: PMC10821203 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.51218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/28/2023] [Indexed: 01/30/2024] Open
Abstract
Renal transplant aims to provide a healthy substitute for the chronically damaged kidney while also correcting the anemia of chronic disease by producing erythropoietin for effective erythropoiesis. However, in a small number of renal transplant patients, the hematocrit continues to rise even after correction of the anemia, ultimately leading to abnormally increased hemoglobin and hematocrit. This condition is termed "post-transplant erythrocytosis" (PTE). We present a case of a 50-year-old male who was diabetic, positive for hepatitis B surface antigen, and negative for polymerase chain reaction. He presented with symptoms of acute hepatitis. During the work-up, PTE was diagnosed. Our case sheds light on a common complication of renal transplant known as PTE, its possible complications in the patient, and the necessary interventions to prevent untoward outcomes. PTE, although a less common complication of renal transplant, can become serious and potentially fatal due to its sequelae of thromboembolism. The complications can range from simple thrombophlebitis and thrombosis of digital and brachial arteries to more severe events such as pulmonary embolism or stroke and cardiovascular events. Regular post-transplant follow-ups with frequent bloodwork will aid in the early diagnosis of PTE, allowing for timely intervention with appropriate treatment options such as venesection or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs)/angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nouman Anthony
- General Medicine, Rehman Medical Institute, Peshawar, PAK
| | - Imran Khan
- Urology, Royal London Hospital, London, GBR
- Cardiothoracic Surgery, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London, GBR
| | | | - Anum Tariq
- Nephrology, Rehman Medical Institute, Peshawar, PAK
| | - Mudassar Khan
- Emergency Medicine, Rehman Medical Institute, Peshawar, PAK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Jorgenson MR, Descourouez JL, Brady BL, Bowman L, Hammad S, Kaiser TE, Laub MR, Melaragno JI, Park JM, Chandran MM. Alternatives to immediate release tacrolimus in solid organ transplant recipients: When the gold standard is in short supply. Clin Transplant 2020; 34:e13903. [DOI: 10.1111/ctr.13903] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2020] [Revised: 04/25/2020] [Accepted: 05/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Bethany L. Brady
- Pharmacy Department Indiana University Health University Hospital Indianapolis IN USA
| | - Lyndsey Bowman
- Department of Pharmacy Tampa General Hospital Tampa FL USA
| | - Sara Hammad
- Department of Pharmacy University of Maryland Medical Center Baltimore MD USA
| | - Tiffany E. Kaiser
- Department of Pharmacy University of Cincinnati Medical Center Cincinnati OH USA
| | - Melissa R. Laub
- Department of Pharmacy Augusta University Medical Center Augusta GA USA
| | | | - Jeong M. Park
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy University of Michigan College of Pharmacy Ann Arbor MI USA
| | - Mary M. Chandran
- Department of Pharmacy Children's Hospital of Colorado Aurora CO USA
| |
Collapse
|