DosePredict: A Shiny Application for Generalized Pharmacokinetics‐Based Dose Predictions

Model-Informed Precision Dosing Software Tools for Dosage Regimen Individualization: A Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

Pharmacokinetic nomograms, equations, and software are considered the main tools available for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM). Model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) is an advanced discipline of TDM that allows dose individualization, and requires a software for knowledge integration and statistical calculations. Due to its precision and extensive applicability, the use of these software is widespread in clinical practice. However, the currently available evidence on these tools remains scarce.

OBJECTIVES

To review and summarize the available evidence on MIPD software tools to facilitate its identification, evaluation, and selection by users.

METHODS

An electronic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, OpenAIRE, and BASE before July 2022. The PRISMA-ScR was applied. The main inclusion criteria were studies focused on developing software for use in clinical practice, research, or modelling.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight software were classified as MIPD software. Ten are currently unavailable. The remaining 18 software were described in depth. It is noteworthy that all MIPD software used Bayesian statistical methods to estimate drug exposure and all provided a population model by default, except NONMEN.

CONCLUSIONS

Pharmacokinetic software have become relevant tools for TDM. MIPD software have been compared, facilitating its selection for use in clinical practice. However, it would be interesting to standardize the quality and validate the software tools.

Easy and reliable maximum a posteriori Bayesian estimation of pharmacokinetic parameters with the open-source R package mapbayr

Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameter estimation is a critical and complex step in the model‐informed precision dosing (MIPD) approach. The mapbayr package was developed to perform maximum a posteriori Bayesian estimation (MAP‐BE) in R from any population PK model coded in mrgsolve. The performances of mapbayr were assessed using two approaches. First, “test” models with different features were coded, for example, first‐order and zero‐order absorption, lag time, time‐varying covariates, Michaelis–Menten elimination, combined and exponential residual error, parent drug and metabolite, and small or large inter‐individual variability (IIV). A total of 4000 PK profiles (combining single/multiple dosing and rich/sparse sampling) were simulated from each test model, and MAP‐BE of parameters was performed in both mapbayr and NONMEM. Second, a similar procedure was conducted with seven “real” previously published models to compare mapbayr and NONMEM on a PK outcome used in MIPD. For the test models, 98% of mapbayr estimations were identical to those given by NONMEM. Some discordances could be observed when dose‐related parameters were estimated or when models with large IIV were used. The exploration of objective function values suggested that mapbayr might outdo NONMEM in specific cases. For the real models, a concordance close to 100% on PK outcomes was observed. The mapbayr package provides a reliable solution to perform MAP‐BE of PK parameters in R. It also includes functions dedicated to data formatting and reporting and enables the creation of standalone Shiny web applications dedicated to MIPD, whatever the model or the clinical protocol and without additional software other than R.