1
|
Chaemsaithong P, Biswas M, Lertrut W, Warintaksa P, Wataganara T, Poon LC, Sukasem C. Pharmacogenomics of Preeclampsia therapies: Current evidence and future challenges for clinical implementation. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2024; 92:102437. [PMID: 38103508 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2023.102437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Revised: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
Preeclampsia is a pregnancy-specific disorder, and it is a leading cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. The application of pharmacogenetics to antihypertensive agents and dose selection in women with preeclampsia is still in its infancy. No current prescribing guidelines from the clinical pharmacogenetics implementation consortium (CPIC) exist for preeclampsia. Although more studies on pharmacogenomics are underway, there is some evidence for the pharmacogenomics of preeclampsia therapies, considering both the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) properties of drugs used in preeclampsia. It has been revealed that the CYP2D6*10 variant is significantly higher in women with preeclampsia who are non-responsive to labetalol compared to those who are in the responsive group. Various genetic variants of PD targets, i.e., NOS3, MMP9, MMP2, TIMP1, TIMP3, VEGF, and NAMPT, have been investigated to assess the responsiveness of antihypertensive therapies in preeclampsia management, and they indicated that certain genetic variants of MMP9, TIMP1, and NAMPT are more frequently observed in those who are non-responsive to anti-hypertensive therapies compared to those who are responsive. Further, gene-gene interactions have revealed that NAMPT, TIMP1, and MMP2 genotypes are associated with an increased risk of preeclampsia, and they are more frequently observed in the non-responsive subgroup of women with preeclampsia. The current evidence is not rigorous enough for clinical implementation; however, an institutional or regional-based retrospective analysis of audited data may help close the knowledge gap during the transitional period from a traditional approach (a "one-size-fits-all" strategy) to the pharmacogenomics of preeclampsia therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Piya Chaemsaithong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Mohitosh Biswas
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Rajshahi, Rajshahi, Bangladesh; Division of Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Medicine, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand; Laboratory for Pharmacogenomics, Somdech Phra Debaratana Medical Center (SDMC), Ramathibodi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Waranyu Lertrut
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Puntabut Warintaksa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Tuangsit Wataganara
- Division of Maternal-Fetal-Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Prannok Road, Bangkoknoi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand
| | - Liona Cy Poon
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China.
| | - Chonlaphat Sukasem
- Division of Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Medicine, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand; Laboratory for Pharmacogenomics, Somdech Phra Debaratana Medical Center (SDMC), Ramathibodi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand; Pharmacogenomics Clinic, Bumrungrad Genomic Medicine Institute, Bumrungrad International Hospital, Bangkok, 10110, Thailand; Research and Development Laboratory, Bumrungrad International Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand; Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Burapha University, Saensuk, Mueang, Chonburi 20131, Thailand; Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, Institute of Systems, Molecular, and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Deng NJ, Xian-Yu CY, Han RZ, Huang CY, Ma YT, Li HJ, Gao TY, Liu X, Zhang C. Pharmaceutical administration for severe hypertension during pregnancy: Network meta-analysis. Front Pharmacol 2023; 13:1092501. [PMID: 36699058 PMCID: PMC9869161 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1092501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 12/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Aims: To evaluate the efficacy of different pharmacologic treatment for severe hypertension during pregnancy. Methods: Two reviewers searched Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMbase, and the Cochrane Library for randomized clinical trials from the establishment of the database to 15 July 2021 that were eligible for inclusion and analyzed the pharmaceuticals used for severe hypertension in pregnancy. Results: 29 relevant trials with 2,521 participants were involved. Compared with diazoxide in rate of achieving target blood pressure, other pharmaceuticals, including epoprostenol (RR:1.58, 95%CI:1.01-2.47), hydralazine\dihydralazine (RR:1.57, 95%CI:1.07-2.31), ketanserin (RR:1.67, 95%CI:1.09-2.55), labetalol (RR:1.54, 95%CI:1.04-2.28), nifedipine (RR:1.54, 95%CI:1.04-2.29), and urapidil (RR:1.57, 95%CI:1.00-2.47), were statistically significant in the rate of achieving target blood pressure. According to the SUCRA, diazoxide showed the best therapeutic effect, followed by nicardipine, nifedipine, labetalol, and nitroglycerine. The three pharmaceuticals with the worst therapeutic effect were ketanserin, hydralazine, and urapidil. It is worth noting that the high ranking of the top two pharmaceuticals, including diazoxide and nicardipine, comes from extremely low sample sizes. Other outcomes were reported in the main text. Conclusion: This comprehensive network meta-analysis demonstrated that the nifedipine should be recommended as a strategy for blood pressure management in pregnant women with severe hypertension. Moreover, the conventional pharmaceuticals, including labetalol and hydralazine, showed limited efficacy. However, it was important to note that the instability of hydralazine reducing blood pressure and the high benefit of labetalol with high dosages intakes should also be of concern to clinicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nian-Jia Deng
- Center for Evidence-Based Medicine, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China
| | - Chen-Yang Xian-Yu
- Center for Evidence-Based Medicine, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China
| | - Rui-Zheng Han
- Department of Ultrasound, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
| | - Cheng-Yang Huang
- Center for Evidence-Based Medicine, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China
| | - Yu-Tong Ma
- Center for Evidence-Based Medicine, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China
| | - Hui-Jun Li
- Center for Evidence-Based Medicine, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China
| | - Teng-Yu Gao
- Center for Evidence-Based Medicine, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China
| | - Xin Liu
- Center for Evidence-Based Medicine, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China
| | - Chao Zhang
- Center for Evidence-Based Medicine, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China,*Correspondence: Chao Zhang,
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhang H, Wu M, Hu Y, Li C, Zheng W, Liu J, Li X, Zhu X, Ding Y. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of MT-1207, a novel multitarget blocker of α1 receptor, 5-HT2A receptor, and calcium channel, in healthy subjects. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2021; 30:271-278. [PMID: 33560891 DOI: 10.1080/13543784.2021.1887137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND MT-1207 is a novel multitarget blocker of α1 receptor, 5-HT2A receptor, and calcium channel that is currently under development for the treatment of hypertension. In this study, we evaluated the tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of MT-1207 in healthy Chinese subjects. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We examined the effects of a single-ascending dose (SAD) of MT-1207 (5-40 mg) and MT-1207 (40 mg) administered in combination with food in 56 healthy subjects. RESULTS No serious adverse events or discontinuations due to adverse events (related to MT-1207) occurred in either study. MT-1207 was rapidly absorbed (median Tmax: 0.5-1.25 h). The mean t1/2 of MT-1207 was approximately 4-7 hours. Systemic exposure (Cmax and AUC) to MT-1207 increased in proportion to dose. Food had little effect on the pharmacokinetics of MT-1207, such as t1/2 and AUC. For 4h-24 h after administration, the blood pressure reduction in the MT-1207 group was higher than that in the placebo group, showing the antihypertensive effect. Blood pressure reduction after MT-1207 administration showed some dose-dependent trend in the 5-20 mg groups. CONCLUSIONS MT-1207 was well tolerated in all subjects. PD measurements demonstrated the antihypertensive effects of MT-1207.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong Zhang
- Phase I Clinical Research Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin, China
| | - Min Wu
- Phase I Clinical Research Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin, China
| | - Yue Hu
- Phase I Clinical Research Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin, China
| | - Cuiyun Li
- Phase I Clinical Research Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin, China
| | - Wenbo Zheng
- Phase I Clinical Research Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin, China
| | - Jingrui Liu
- Phase I Clinical Research Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin, China
| | - Xiaojiao Li
- Phase I Clinical Research Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin, China
| | - Xiaoxue Zhu
- Phase I Clinical Research Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin, China
| | - Yanhua Ding
- Phase I Clinical Research Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin, China
| |
Collapse
|