Evaluation and Development of Vancomycin Dosing Schemes to Meet New AUC/MIC Targets in Intermittent Hemodialysis Using Monte Carlo Simulation Techniques

Vancomycin Dosing in Patients on Intermittent Hemodialysis-A Retrospective Study

PURPOSE

To determine the incidence of therapeutic target attainment using a three-times per week protocol for vancomycin therapy given during the last hour of intermittent hemodialysis (HD).

METHODS

A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted of patient medical records in a remote dialysis center from January 2017 to July 2023. Adult patients with chronic kidney disease stage 5 on ≥3 months of intermittent HD who had received a course of vancomycin therapy with ≥1 serum vancomycin concentration recorded were included. Demographic and dosing data were collected. Clinician adherence with the dosing protocol and attainment of the therapeutic target (trough concentration within 15-20 mg/L) following the loading and maintenance doses were assessed. Factors associated with target nonattainment following the loading dose were analyzed, and the 48- and 72-h maintenance dosing intervals were analyzed for target nonattainment.

FINDINGS

A total of 98 vancomycin courses (67 patients) were available for analysis. Only 38% of the loading doses were prescribed as per protocol. Following the loading dose, 25% of trough concentrations achieved the therapeutic target concentration (15-20 mg/L), 25% returned a supra-therapeutic concentration (>20 mg/L) and 50% were sub-therapeutic (<15 mg/L). When compared with those achieving target, sub-therapeutic concentrations were associated with a lower loading dose (median 16.6 vs 20.0 mg/kg, P < 0.002), and supra-therapeutic concentrations had a shorter dosing interval between the loading dose and first maintenance dose (median 31.5 vs 39.0 h, P = 0.06). Of the 201 maintenance trough concentrations collected, 65% were therapeutic, 21% were sub-therapeutic and 14% were supra-therapeutic, with an overall median trough concentration of 17.3 mg/L. As the treatment duration increased, an increase was seen in the number of dose adjustments required to achieve the target trough concentration. The 48-h dosing interval was associated with more supra-therapeutic concentrations and the 72-h interval was associated with more sub-therapeutic concentrations (df = 2, P = 0.022).

IMPLICATIONS

We have identified a high rate of target nonattainment for HD patients on a three times a week vancomycin dosing regimen. We recommend a loading dose of 20 to 25 mg/kg irrespective of the indication and a better-defined dosing interval after the loading dose. A higher maintenance dose should be prescribed when the time to next dialysis session is 72 h. Further pharmacokinetic studies are needed to assess factors influencing target concentration attainment following the maintenance doses and to determine an optimal dosing regimen.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Vancomycin in Hemodialysis Patients in a Hospital in North-East Romania

Background/Objectives: Vancomycin is a reserve antibiotic that is frequently prescribed for central venous catheter (CVC)-associated infections in hemodialysis patients. Hemodialysis patients are very fragile patients and the presence of CVCs increases the risk of sepsis. We conducted a prospective study, evaluating the needs of changes in vancomycin dosing for treatment based on the use of the new 2020 vancomycin dosing guidelines, to increase drug safety (preventing subtherapeutic or supratherapeutic doses and offering therapeutic concentrations of the drug) in a particular group of patients with sepsis caused by catheter infections and being on intermittent hemodialysis. Methods: This prospective study included patients with sepsis caused by catheter infections and being on intermittent hemodialysis, treated with vancomycin, admitted in the nephrology department and intensive care unit (ICU). Vancomycin levels were adjusted according to the 2020 vancomycin guidelines. Results: In our study, nine (45%) patients had a vancomycin AUC between 400 and 600 mcg × h/mL, five (25%) patients had a subtherapeutic AUC, and six (30%) patients had a supratherapeutic AUC. It is important to mention that in 10 (50%) of the patients included in the study, the loading and maintenance doses mentioned in the protocol were respected, but 50% of them had a supratherapeutic AUC. We observed that a supratherapeutic AUC occurred when the loading dose was 1500 mg or 2000 mg, and in one case at 1000 mg with a low BMI. Conclusions: a therapeutic level of vancomycin can often be difficult to achieve because of different reasons, mainly in hemodialysis patients.

Development and Assessment of Vancomycin Dosing Utilizing AUC/MIC Protocol in Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) on Intermittent Hemodialysis (IHD)

Purpose: Vancomycin is commonly prescribed for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections, including patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD) receiving intermittent hemodialysis (IHD). Infection is the second-leading cause of mortality in this patient population; therefore, optimizing vancomycin dosing is essential. New guidelines recommend using the ratio of area under the curve (AUC)/minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) dosing with a target of 400-600 to maximize efficacy and minimize vancomycin nephrotoxicity. Summary: A retrospective chart review was performed to assess the current protocol for vancomycin dosing in ESRD patients on IHD at a community hospital in North Mississippi. A protocol was developed for dosing vancomycin utilizing AUC/MIC targets in this patient population. The study included all inpatient adults with ESRD receiving IHD at least 3 times weekly and receiving vancomycin. Data collection occurred in two phases. The first phase of data collection occurred before implementation of the new protocol and assessed the current vancomycin protocol effectiveness. In phase II of data collection, an assessment of the newly developed protocol utilizing similar data collected in phase I was conducted. Conclusions: It is thought that the difference in treatment outcomes and AUC/MIC targets is due to decreased immune function in this population. For this reason, we set our goal pre-dialysis level at 20-25 mg/dL, rather than 17-25 mg/dL, which correlates with an AUC/MIC of 480-600. It is important to quickly achieve therapeutic levels for the patients that do have MRSA to improve outcomes, to sustain these levels, and to reduce adverse events and costs.

Impact of Vancomycin trough levels monitoring on uncomplicated methilcillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia in chronic kidney disease on hemodialysis, retrospective cohort

BACKGROUND

CKD patients on hemodialysis (HD) with Staphylococcus aureus (SA) bacteremia present high morbidity, mortality and increased risk of MRSA. Vancomycin is the antibiotic of choice in these cases, it has a narrow therapeutic margin and inadequate dosage generates a risk of toxicity, therefore, the recommendation is to dosage it through serum levels.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study in 3 hospitals of third level of complexity in the city of Medellin in which there were differences in the measurement and implementation of vancomycin25 dosage based on trough levels (VL) in patients with chronic kidney disease on hemodialysis (CKD- HD) with uncomplicated bacteremia based infection by methilcillin-resistant Staphyloccocus aureus (MRSA). The primary outcome was the composite of hospital mortality, clinical response (fever, hemodynamic instability and altered consciousness), complications associated with bacteremia, or bacteriological response failure (positive cultures at first week follow-up) at 7 days. The composite variables were analyzed individually as secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

The main unadjusted outcome (OR 1.3, CI 0.6 - 2.7) and adjusted for age, Charlson index, loading dose, initial dose, dosing frequency and MIC to vancomycin (OR 1.2, CI 0.5 - 2.7). Regarding adjusted secondary outcomes: clinical response (OR 1.4 CI 0.3 - 5.8), death (OR 1.3 CI 0.3 - 4.6) and complications (OR 0.9, CI 0.37 - 2.2).

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that the measurement of trough levels in patients with HD-CKD does not modify the composite outcome. The main limitation is the sample size and type of study, randomized control trials may be required to confirm the results presented.

Optimizing the dosing of vancomycin in patients receiving intermittent haemodialysis with low-flux filters, and the potential impact of dosing software

AIM

Iterative approaches to vancomycin dosing (e.g., dosing when trough concentrations <15-20 mg/L) can be inadequate. Computer-guided dosing may be superior but has not been evaluated in patients with kidney failure receiving replacement therapy. We evaluated vancomycin concentrations using a hospital protocol and a pharmacokinetic software. We measured vancomycin clearance by the FX8 low-flux filter because data are absent.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed records of adults with kidney failure requiring replacement therapy receiving vancomycin and dialysed with the FX8 low-flux filter, and calculated the proportion of pre-dialysis concentrations that were within, above or below a specified range. One and two-compartment models in the pharmacokinetic software were assessed by computing mean prediction error (MPE) and root mean square error (RMSE) of observed versus predicted concentrations. Vancomycin extracorporeal clearance was prospectively determined using the extraction method.

RESULTS

In 24 patients (34 courses; 139 paired observed and predicted concentrations), 62/139 (45%) pre-dialysis concentrations were 15-25 mg/L, 29/139 (21%) were above, and 48/139 (35%) were below. MPE for the one-compartment model was -0.2 mg/L, RMSE 5.3 mg/L. MPE for the two-compartment model was 2.0 mg/L, RMSE 5.6 mg/L. Excluding the first paired concentrations, the subsequent MPE (n = 105) using one-compartment model was -0.5 mg/L, RMSE 5.6 mg/L. The MPE for the two-compartment model was 2.1 mg/L, RMSE 5.8 mg/L. The median extracorporeal clearance was 70.7 mL/min (range: 10.3-130.3; n = 22).

CONCLUSIONS

Vancomycin dosing was suboptimal and the pharmacokinetic software was not sufficiently predictive. These may improve with a loading dose. The substantial removal of vancomycin by low-flux filters is not accounted for by the models tested.

Vancomycin and daptomycin dosing recommendations in patients receiving home hemodialysis using Monte Carlo simulation

BACKGROUND

Few drug dosing recommendations for patients receiving home hemodialysis (HHD) have been published which has hindered the adoption of HHD. HHD regimens vary widely and differ considerably from conventional, thrice weekly, in-center hemodialysis in terms of treatment frequency, duration and blood and dialysate flow rates. Consequently, vancomycin and daptomycin clearances in HHD are also likely to be different, consequently HHD dosing regimens must be developed to ensure efficacy and minimize toxicity when these antibiotics are used. Many HHD regimens are used clinically, this study modeled ten common HHD regimens and determined optimal vancomycin and daptomycin dosing for each HHD regimen.

METHODS

Monte Carlo simulations using pharmacokinetic data derived from the literature and demographic data from a large HHD program treating patients with end stage kidney disease were incorporated into a one-compartment pharmacokinetic model. Virtual vancomycin and daptomycin doses were administered post-HHD and drug exposures were determined in 5,000 virtual patients receiving ten different HHD regimens. Serum concentration monitoring with subsequent dose changes was incorporated into the vancomycin models. Pharmacodynamic target attainment rates were determined for each studied dose. The lowest possible doses that met predefined targets in virtual patients were chosen as optimal doses.

RESULTS

HHD frequency, total dialysate volumes and HHD durations influenced drug exposure and led to different dosing regimens to meet targets. Antibiotic dosing regimens were identified that could meet targets for 3- and 7-h HHD regimens occurring every other day or 4-5 days/week. HHD regimens with 3-day interdialytic periods required higher doses prior to the 3-day period. The addition of vancomycin serum concentration monitoring allowed for calculation of necessary dosing changes which increased the number of virtual subjects meeting pharmacodynamic targets.

CONCLUSIONS

Doses of vancomycin and daptomycin that will meet desired pharmacodynamic targets in HHD are dependent on patient and HHD-specific factors. Doses used in conventional thrice weekly hemodialysis are unlikely to meet treatment goals. The antibiotic regimens paired with the HHD parameters studied in this analysis are likely to meet goals but require clinical validation.

Practices, Knowledge, and Attitudes of Nephrologists Towards Prescribing and Monitoring Vancomycin at Dialysis Centers

BACKGROUND

Vancomycin dosing protocols are varied in the literature for hemodialysis patients. This study sought to determine nephrologists' practices, knowledge, attitudes, and barriers toward prescribing and monitoring vancomycin at dialysis centers.

METHODS

A cross-sectional and multi-center study was conducted in Kuwait using a validated self-administered questionnaire among 168 nephrologists. Descriptive and comparative analyses were performed using SPSS (version 28).

RESULTS

The response rate was 75% (n = 126). Over half of nephrologists frequently prescribed a vancomycin loading dose of 1000 mg (53.2%) and a maintenance dose of 500 mg (51.6%) to all patients. Their overall median (IQR) percentage knowledge about the therapeutic monitoring of vancomycin was 66.7% (33.3) and was found to be higher in nephrologists aged ≤ 40 years and in registrars/senior registrars (p < 0.05). Their overall median (IQR) attitude score was 4.0 (1.0) [positive attitude]. Nephrologists with > 15 years of practice experience expressed higher attitudes (p < 0.05). The top two perceived barriers were a lack of clear local hospital/national guidelines (60.3%) for vancomycin dosing in dialysis and inconsistencies among different dosing references and guidelines (51.6%).

CONCLUSION

Findings showed that nephrologists have varying practices, moderate knowledge, and positive attitudes toward prescribing and monitoring vancomycin and highlight the need for interventions to overcome the perceived barriers.

An updated vancomycin dosing protocol for initiating therapy in patients undergoing intermittent high-flux hemodialysis

DISCLAIMER

In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time.

PURPOSE

To design an updated vancomycin dosing protocol for initiating therapy in patients undergoing chronic intermittent high-flux hemodialysis (iHFHD) that is congruent with the revised 2020 consensus guidelines for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM).

METHODS

Monte Carlo simulation methods were used to study vancomycin dosing for patients on iHFHD. Vancomycin regimens were constructed as intravenous infusions (for intradialytic administration) of a loading dose and maintenance doses 3 times weekly during subsequent dialysis sessions. Vancomycin plasma concentrations were simulated, and the probability of target attainment (PTA) for a 24-hour area under the time-concentration curve (AUC24) of 400 to 700 mg • h/L was determined. Standardized weight-based (ie, dose-banding) regimens were investigated, and an optimized protocol was selected based on TDM target attainment and practical considerations for use in the dialysis setting.

RESULTS

The proposed vancomycin dosing protocol (for intradialytic administration) specifies 3 regimens: (1) a 1,500-mg loading dose and 750-mg maintenance doses for patients weighing 50 kg to 69 kg; (2) a 2,000-mg loading dose and 1,000-mg maintenance doses for patients weighing 70 kg to 89 kg; and (3) a 2,500-mg loading dose and 1,250-mg maintenance doses for patients weighing 90 kg to 110 kg. In a simulated hemodialysis population (n = 1,000), the proposed protocol delivered median (interquartile range [IQR]) loading and maintenance doses of 25.0 (23.4-26.6) mg/kg and 12.5 (11.8-13.3) mg/kg, respectively. The PTA for an AUC24 of 400 to 700 mg • h/L was 74.7% on day 1 and 70.8% on day 8, with less than 10% of values exceeding the target range.

CONCLUSION

Our proposed dosing protocol for patients undergoing iHFHD offers an updated and practical approach for initiating vancomycin therapy that can be optimized with early TDM.

Dynamic of Glucose Homeostasis in Virtual Patients: A Comparison between Different Behaviors

This work presents a mathematical model of homeostasis dynamics in healthy individuals, focusing on the generation of conductive data on glucose homeostasis throughout the day under dietary and physical activity factors. Two case studies on glucose dynamics for populations under conditions of physical activity and sedentary lifestyle were developed. For this purpose, two types of virtual populations were generated, the first population was developed according to the data of a total of 89 physical persons between 20 and 75 years old and the second was developed using the Monte Carlo approach, obtaining a total of 200 virtual patients. In both populations, each participant was classified as an active or sedentary person depending on the physical activity performed. The results obtained demonstrate the capacity of virtual populations in the generation of in-silico approximations similar to those obtained from in-vivo studies. Obtaining information that is only achievable through specific in-vivo experiments. Being a tool that generates information for the approach of alternatives in the prevention of the development of type 2 Diabetes.