Evaluation and Development of Vancomycin Dosing Schemes to Meet New AUC/MIC Targets in Intermittent Hemodialysis Using Monte Carlo Simulation Techniques

Optimizing the dosing of vancomycin in patients receiving intermittent haemodialysis with low-flux filters, and the potential impact of dosing software

AIM

Iterative approaches to vancomycin dosing (e.g., dosing when trough concentrations <15-20 mg/L) can be inadequate. Computer-guided dosing may be superior but has not been evaluated in patients with kidney failure receiving replacement therapy. We evaluated vancomycin concentrations using a hospital protocol and a pharmacokinetic software. We measured vancomycin clearance by the FX8 low-flux filter because data are absent.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed records of adults with kidney failure requiring replacement therapy receiving vancomycin and dialysed with the FX8 low-flux filter, and calculated the proportion of pre-dialysis concentrations that were within, above or below a specified range. One and two-compartment models in the pharmacokinetic software were assessed by computing mean prediction error (MPE) and root mean square error (RMSE) of observed versus predicted concentrations. Vancomycin extracorporeal clearance was prospectively determined using the extraction method.

RESULTS

In 24 patients (34 courses; 139 paired observed and predicted concentrations), 62/139 (45%) pre-dialysis concentrations were 15-25 mg/L, 29/139 (21%) were above, and 48/139 (35%) were below. MPE for the one-compartment model was -0.2 mg/L, RMSE 5.3 mg/L. MPE for the two-compartment model was 2.0 mg/L, RMSE 5.6 mg/L. Excluding the first paired concentrations, the subsequent MPE (n = 105) using one-compartment model was -0.5 mg/L, RMSE 5.6 mg/L. The MPE for the two-compartment model was 2.1 mg/L, RMSE 5.8 mg/L. The median extracorporeal clearance was 70.7 mL/min (range: 10.3-130.3; n = 22).

CONCLUSIONS

Vancomycin dosing was suboptimal and the pharmacokinetic software was not sufficiently predictive. These may improve with a loading dose. The substantial removal of vancomycin by low-flux filters is not accounted for by the models tested.

Development and Assessment of Vancomycin Dosing Utilizing AUC/MIC Protocol in Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) on Intermittent Hemodialysis (IHD)

Purpose: Vancomycin is commonly prescribed for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections, including patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD) receiving intermittent hemodialysis (IHD). Infection is the second-leading cause of mortality in this patient population; therefore, optimizing vancomycin dosing is essential. New guidelines recommend using the ratio of area under the curve (AUC)/minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) dosing with a target of 400-600 to maximize efficacy and minimize vancomycin nephrotoxicity. Summary: A retrospective chart review was performed to assess the current protocol for vancomycin dosing in ESRD patients on IHD at a community hospital in North Mississippi. A protocol was developed for dosing vancomycin utilizing AUC/MIC targets in this patient population. The study included all inpatient adults with ESRD receiving IHD at least 3 times weekly and receiving vancomycin. Data collection occurred in two phases. The first phase of data collection occurred before implementation of the new protocol and assessed the current vancomycin protocol effectiveness. In phase II of data collection, an assessment of the newly developed protocol utilizing similar data collected in phase I was conducted. Conclusions: It is thought that the difference in treatment outcomes and AUC/MIC targets is due to decreased immune function in this population. For this reason, we set our goal pre-dialysis level at 20-25 mg/dL, rather than 17-25 mg/dL, which correlates with an AUC/MIC of 480-600. It is important to quickly achieve therapeutic levels for the patients that do have MRSA to improve outcomes, to sustain these levels, and to reduce adverse events and costs.

Vancomycin and daptomycin dosing recommendations in patients receiving home hemodialysis using Monte Carlo simulation

BACKGROUND

Few drug dosing recommendations for patients receiving home hemodialysis (HHD) have been published which has hindered the adoption of HHD. HHD regimens vary widely and differ considerably from conventional, thrice weekly, in-center hemodialysis in terms of treatment frequency, duration and blood and dialysate flow rates. Consequently, vancomycin and daptomycin clearances in HHD are also likely to be different, consequently HHD dosing regimens must be developed to ensure efficacy and minimize toxicity when these antibiotics are used. Many HHD regimens are used clinically, this study modeled ten common HHD regimens and determined optimal vancomycin and daptomycin dosing for each HHD regimen.

METHODS

Monte Carlo simulations using pharmacokinetic data derived from the literature and demographic data from a large HHD program treating patients with end stage kidney disease were incorporated into a one-compartment pharmacokinetic model. Virtual vancomycin and daptomycin doses were administered post-HHD and drug exposures were determined in 5,000 virtual patients receiving ten different HHD regimens. Serum concentration monitoring with subsequent dose changes was incorporated into the vancomycin models. Pharmacodynamic target attainment rates were determined for each studied dose. The lowest possible doses that met predefined targets in virtual patients were chosen as optimal doses.

RESULTS

HHD frequency, total dialysate volumes and HHD durations influenced drug exposure and led to different dosing regimens to meet targets. Antibiotic dosing regimens were identified that could meet targets for 3- and 7-h HHD regimens occurring every other day or 4-5 days/week. HHD regimens with 3-day interdialytic periods required higher doses prior to the 3-day period. The addition of vancomycin serum concentration monitoring allowed for calculation of necessary dosing changes which increased the number of virtual subjects meeting pharmacodynamic targets.

CONCLUSIONS

Doses of vancomycin and daptomycin that will meet desired pharmacodynamic targets in HHD are dependent on patient and HHD-specific factors. Doses used in conventional thrice weekly hemodialysis are unlikely to meet treatment goals. The antibiotic regimens paired with the HHD parameters studied in this analysis are likely to meet goals but require clinical validation.

Practices, Knowledge, and Attitudes of Nephrologists Towards Prescribing and Monitoring Vancomycin at Dialysis Centers

BACKGROUND

Vancomycin dosing protocols are varied in the literature for hemodialysis patients. This study sought to determine nephrologists' practices, knowledge, attitudes, and barriers toward prescribing and monitoring vancomycin at dialysis centers.

METHODS

A cross-sectional and multi-center study was conducted in Kuwait using a validated self-administered questionnaire among 168 nephrologists. Descriptive and comparative analyses were performed using SPSS (version 28).

RESULTS

The response rate was 75% (n = 126). Over half of nephrologists frequently prescribed a vancomycin loading dose of 1000 mg (53.2%) and a maintenance dose of 500 mg (51.6%) to all patients. Their overall median (IQR) percentage knowledge about the therapeutic monitoring of vancomycin was 66.7% (33.3) and was found to be higher in nephrologists aged ≤ 40 years and in registrars/senior registrars (p < 0.05). Their overall median (IQR) attitude score was 4.0 (1.0) [positive attitude]. Nephrologists with > 15 years of practice experience expressed higher attitudes (p < 0.05). The top two perceived barriers were a lack of clear local hospital/national guidelines (60.3%) for vancomycin dosing in dialysis and inconsistencies among different dosing references and guidelines (51.6%).

CONCLUSION

Findings showed that nephrologists have varying practices, moderate knowledge, and positive attitudes toward prescribing and monitoring vancomycin and highlight the need for interventions to overcome the perceived barriers.

An updated vancomycin dosing protocol for initiating therapy in patients undergoing intermittent high-flux hemodialysis

DISCLAIMER

In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time.

PURPOSE

To design an updated vancomycin dosing protocol for initiating therapy in patients undergoing chronic intermittent high-flux hemodialysis (iHFHD) that is congruent with the revised 2020 consensus guidelines for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM).

METHODS

Monte Carlo simulation methods were used to study vancomycin dosing for patients on iHFHD. Vancomycin regimens were constructed as intravenous infusions (for intradialytic administration) of a loading dose and maintenance doses 3 times weekly during subsequent dialysis sessions. Vancomycin plasma concentrations were simulated, and the probability of target attainment (PTA) for a 24-hour area under the time-concentration curve (AUC24) of 400 to 700 mg • h/L was determined. Standardized weight-based (ie, dose-banding) regimens were investigated, and an optimized protocol was selected based on TDM target attainment and practical considerations for use in the dialysis setting.

RESULTS

The proposed vancomycin dosing protocol (for intradialytic administration) specifies 3 regimens: (1) a 1,500-mg loading dose and 750-mg maintenance doses for patients weighing 50 kg to 69 kg; (2) a 2,000-mg loading dose and 1,000-mg maintenance doses for patients weighing 70 kg to 89 kg; and (3) a 2,500-mg loading dose and 1,250-mg maintenance doses for patients weighing 90 kg to 110 kg. In a simulated hemodialysis population (n = 1,000), the proposed protocol delivered median (interquartile range [IQR]) loading and maintenance doses of 25.0 (23.4-26.6) mg/kg and 12.5 (11.8-13.3) mg/kg, respectively. The PTA for an AUC24 of 400 to 700 mg • h/L was 74.7% on day 1 and 70.8% on day 8, with less than 10% of values exceeding the target range.

CONCLUSION

Our proposed dosing protocol for patients undergoing iHFHD offers an updated and practical approach for initiating vancomycin therapy that can be optimized with early TDM.

Dynamic of Glucose Homeostasis in Virtual Patients: A Comparison between Different Behaviors

This work presents a mathematical model of homeostasis dynamics in healthy individuals, focusing on the generation of conductive data on glucose homeostasis throughout the day under dietary and physical activity factors. Two case studies on glucose dynamics for populations under conditions of physical activity and sedentary lifestyle were developed. For this purpose, two types of virtual populations were generated, the first population was developed according to the data of a total of 89 physical persons between 20 and 75 years old and the second was developed using the Monte Carlo approach, obtaining a total of 200 virtual patients. In both populations, each participant was classified as an active or sedentary person depending on the physical activity performed. The results obtained demonstrate the capacity of virtual populations in the generation of in-silico approximations similar to those obtained from in-vivo studies. Obtaining information that is only achievable through specific in-vivo experiments. Being a tool that generates information for the approach of alternatives in the prevention of the development of type 2 Diabetes.