Clopidogrel: A multifaceted affair

Variants in clopidogrel-relevant genes and early neurological deterioration in ischemic stroke patients receiving clopidogrel

BACKGROUND

Early neurological deterioration (END) is common in acute ischemic stroke (IS). However, the underlying mechanisms for END are unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the associations of 16 variants in clopidogrel-relevant genes and interactions among these variants with END in acute IS patients receiving clopidogrel treatment.

METHODS

We consecutively enrolled 375 acute IS patients between June 2014 and January 2015. Platelet aggregation was measured on admission and after the 7-10 days of clopidogrel treatment. The 16 variants in clopidogrel-relevant genes were examined using mass spectrometry. The primary outcome was END within the 10 days of admission. Gene-gene interactions were analyzed by generalized multifactor dimensionality reduction (GMDR) methods.

RESULTS

Among the 375 patients, 95 (25.3%) patients developed END within the first 10 days of admission. Among the 16 variants, only CYP2C19*2 (rs4244285) AA/AG was associated with END using single-locus analytical approach. GMDR analysis revealed that there was a synergistic effect of gene-gene interactions among CYP2C19*2 rs4244285, P2Y12 rs16863323, and GPIIIa rs2317676 on the risk for END. The high-risk interactions among the three variants were associated with the higher platelet aggregation and independent predictor for END after adjusting for the covariates (hazard ratio: 2.82; 95% confidence interval: 1.36-7.76; P = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

END is very common in patients with acute IS. The mechanisms leading to END are most likely multifactorial. Interactions among CYP2C19*2 rs4244285, P2Y12 rs16863323, and GPIIIa rs2317676 may confer a higher risk for END. It was very important to modify clopidogrel therapy for the patients carrying the high-risk interactive genotypes.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION

The study described here is registered at http://www.chictr.org/ (unique Identifier: ChiCTR-OCH-14004724). The date of trial registration was May 30, 2014.

The correlation between recurrent risk and CYP2C19 gene polymorphisms in patients with ischemic stroke treated with clopidogrel for prevention

BACKGROUND

To explore the correlation between recurrent risk and CYP2C19 gene polymorphisms in patients with ischemic stroke (IS) treated with clopidogrel for prevention.

METHODS

A total of 289 patients with IS treated with clopidogrel regularly were enrolled in this study, and stroke recurrence of all patients were recorded by follow-up. The correlation between CYP2C19 gene polymorphism and stroke recurrence in patients taking clopidogrel regularly was analyzed.

RESULTS

After a mean follow-up period of 6 months, there were 289 patients who took clopidogrel regularly, and 41 of which occurred recurrent stroke. Patients of poor metabolizer and intermediate metabolizer had higher risk of recurrent stroke comparing with patients of extensive metabolize, and the odds ratios were 2.88 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.31-6.33, P = .068) and 3.00 (95% CI 1.09-8.22, P = .027), respectively. The recurrence risk of *2 (G681A)A allele carriers was 3.30 times that of G allele carriers (P = .0065). The recurrence rate of stroke in patients carrying heterozygous and homozygous *2 allele mutant was 1.96 times (P = .071) and 3.30 times (P = .012) that of patients with wild-type genes. Multifactor logistic regression analysis result indicated carrying loss of function (LOF) allele was an independent risk factor of stroke recurrence.

CONCLUSION

For patients with IS treated with clopidogrel regularly for secondary prevention, poor metabolizer, and intermediate metabolizer patients had higher risk of recurrent stroke comparing with extensive metabolize ones. Carrying CYP2C19 LOF allele is an independent risk factor of stroke recurrence in patients with IS.

CYP2C19 or CYP3A5 Genotyping Does Not Predict Clinical Response to Clopidogrel

Along with aspirin, clopidogrel has been a widely used antiplatelet therapeutic regimen. Although generally well tolerated, its efficacy varies among individuals, with the main hypothesis that its bioavailability relies on its bioconversion to the active compound, which, in turn, depends on the genetic background and/or interactions with other drugs. To determine which factors influenced response in our patients, 368 patients receiving combined antiaggregation therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel were followed for 1 year to record 30 novel cardiovascular acute events. This clinical relapse was considered a surrogate end point to measure therapeutic response under the influence of the CYP2C19*2, *3, and *17 and CYP3A5*3 alleles, as well as the effects of concomitant medication and the presence of known cardiovascular risk factors and comorbidity. We show that either single CYP2C19 or CYP3A5 genotyping or combined were not useful to predict clinical efficacy in this cohort. Rather than genetic testing, we have found that clinical observations such as suffering type 2 diabetes mellitus requiring insulin, having several vessels affected, and concurrent medication with calcium channel blockers, regardless of CYP3A5 genotype or drug class were, in that order, the strongest independent predictors of disease relapse.

Interaction of CYP2C19, P2Y12, and GPIIIa Variants Associates With Efficacy of Clopidogrel and Adverse Events on Patients With Ischemic Stroke

Objective:

Clopidogrel is a clinically important oral antiplatelet agent for the treatment or prevention of cerebrovascular disease. However, different individuals have different sensitivities to clopidogrel. This study assessed variants of different genes for association with response to clopidogrel, clinical outcome, and side effects in patients with ischemic stroke (IS).

Methods:

We consecutively enrolled 375 patients with IS after they received clopidogrel therapy, and venous blood samples were subjected to genotyping allelic variants of genes modulating clopidogrel absorption (ATP binding cassette subfamily B1, ABCB1), metabolic activation (cytochrome P450[CYP] 3A and CYP2C19), and biologic activity (platelet membrane receptor [ P2Y12, P2Y1)], and glycoprotein IIIa [ GPIIIa]) and statistically analyzing their interactions with clopidogrel sensitivity (CS) and adverse events, risk of IS recurrence, myocardial infarction, and death during 6 months of follow-up.

Results:

Adverse events occurred in 37 patients (31 had IS recurrence, 4 died, and 2 had myocardial infarction) during the first 6 months of follow-up. Single locus analysis showed that only the CYP2C19*2(rs4244285) variant was independently associated with CS and risk of adverse events after adjusting covariates. However, there was significant gene–gene interaction among CYP2C19*2(rs4244285), P2Y12(rs16863323), and GPIIIa (rs2317676) analyzed by generalized multifactor dimensionality reduction methods. The rate of adverse events among patients with the 3-loci interaction was 2.82 times the rate among those with no interaction (95% confidence interval: 2.04-8.63).

Conclusion:

Sensitivity of patients with IS to clopidogrel and clopidogrel-induced adverse clinical events may be multifactorial but is not determined by single gene polymorphisms.

A Critical Evaluation of Pharmacogenetic Information in Package Inserts for Selected Drugs Marketed in India and Its Comparison With US FDA-Approved Package Inserts

Our objective was to compare the pharmacogenetic information provided in the package inserts (PIs) of 7 drugs marketed in the United States and India, namely, abacavir, capecitabine, carbamazepine, clopidogrel, irinotecan, valproic acid, and warfarin. We evaluated the pharmacogenetic information provided in Indian PIs for the highest level where it was included, robustness and completeness, clinical validity, and clinical utility and compared it with corresponding data of US PIs. Pharmacogenetic studies carried out in India were identified using PubMed. Pharmacogenetic information was provided in Indian PIs of all the drugs except irinotecan. It appeared in the same section as in US PIs for abacavir, capecitabine, carbamazepine (HLA-*3101), valproic acid (urea cycle disorders), and warfarin (protein C and protein S), whereas it appeared at lower levels for other drug-gene combinations. The robustness of pharmacogenetic testing was graded convincing for abacavir, adequate for carbamazepine and clopidogrel, and incomplete for the remaining drugs, and only abacavir and clopidogrel PIs provided full details of supporting studies. These details, when provided in the Indian PIs were identical to those in the US PIs. The Indian PIs did not provide data on Indian patients, although published studies are available. Both US and Indian PIs lacked critical information on the clinical validity and utility of pharmacogenetic testing. The pharmacogenetic information should provide country/ethnicity-specific data so that they are useful to clinicians. Where data are not available, the prevalence of genetic variation in the population of a country needs to be determined and should then be translated to the PIs.