Design Features of Drug-Drug Interaction Trials Between Antivirals and Oral Contraceptives

Drug-Drug Interactions With the Hepatitis B Virus Capsid Assembly Modulator JNJ-56136379 (Bersacapavir)

The capsid assembly modulator JNJ-56136379 (bersacapavir) disrupts hepatitis B virus replication. It is metabolized via cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A, but little is known about the drug-drug interactions of JNJ-56136379 when combined with drugs that inhibit or are metabolized by CYP3A. In a phase 1, open-label trial (NCT03945539), healthy adults received 1 dose of JNJ-56136379 with and without 21 days of prior exposure to itraconazole 200 mg (CYP3A inhibitor). In a second phase 1, open-label trial (NCT03111511), healthy women received 1 dose of drospirenone/ethinyl estradiol and midazolam before and after 15 days of JNJ-56136379. Itraconazole increased the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of JNJ-56136379 by 38%. JNJ-56136379 reduced the maximum observed concentration and AUC of midazolam (CYP3A substrate) by 42%-54%, increased AUC of ethinyl estradiol by 1.6-fold, but had no effect on drospirenone pharmacokinetics. Overall, these results demonstrated that a strong CYP3A inhibitor (itraconazole) modestly increased JNJ-56136379 exposure. Furthermore, JNJ-56136379 was a weak inducer of CYP3A (midazolam) and increased ethinyl estradiol exposure; coadministration of high-dose estrogen-based contraceptives and JNJ-56136379 is not recommended.

Drug-Drug Interaction Studies With Oral Contraceptives: Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic and Study Design Considerations

Oral contraceptives (OCs) are the most widely used form of birth control among women of childbearing potential. Knowledge of potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) with OCs becomes imperative to provide information on the medication to women of childbearing potential and enable their inclusion in clinical trials, especially if the new molecular entity is a teratogen. Although a number of DDI guidance documents are available, they do not provide recommendations for the design and conduct of OC DDI studies. The evaluation of DDI potential of a new molecular entity and OCs is particularly challenging because of the availability of a wide variety of combinations of hormonal contraceptives, different doses of the ethinyl estradiol, and different metabolic profiles of the progestin component. The aim of this review is to comprehensively discuss factors to be considered such as pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), choice of OC, and study population for the conduct of in vivo OC DDI studies. In this context, metabolic pathways of OCs, the effect of enzyme inhibitors and inducers, the role of sex hormone-binding globulin in the PK of progestins, current evidence on OC DDIs, and the interpretation of PD end points are reviewed. With the emergence of new tools like physiologically based PK modeling, the decision to conduct an in vivo study can be made with much more confidence. This review provides a comprehensive overview of various factors that need to be considered in designing OC DDI studies and recommends PK-based DDI studies with PK end points as adequate measures to establish clinical drug interaction and measurement of PD end points when there is basis for PD interaction.

Confirmation of the drug-drug interaction potential between cobicistat-boosted antiretroviral regimens and hormonal contraceptives

BACKGROUND

Cobicistat (COBI), a CYP3A inhibitor, is a pharmacokinetic enhancer that increases exposures of the HIV protease inhibitors (PIs) atazanavir (ATV) and darunavir (DRV). The potential drug interaction between COBI-boosted PIs and hormonal contraceptives, which are substrates of intestinal efflux transporters and extensively metabolized by CYP enzymes, glucuronidation and sulfation, was evaluated.

METHODS

This was a Phase I, open-label, two cohort (n=18/cohort), fixed-sequence study in healthy females that evaluated the drug-drug interaction (DDI) between multiple-dose ATV+COBI or DRV+COBI and single-dose drospirenone/ethinyl estradiol (EE). DDIs were evaluated using 90% confidence intervals of the geometric least-squares mean ratios of the test (drospirenone/EE+boosted PI) versus reference (drospirenone/EE) using lack of DDI boundaries of 70-143%. Safety was assessed throughout the study.

RESULTS

29/36 participants completed the study. Relative to drospirenone/EE alone, drospirenone area under the plasma concentration versus time curve extrapolated to infinity (AUC_inf) was 1.6-fold and 2.3-fold higher, and maximum observed plasma concentration (C_max) was unaltered, upon coadministration with DRV+COBI and ATV+COBI, respectively. EE AUC_inf decreased 30% with drospirenone/EE + DRV+COBI and was unchanged with ATV+COBI + drospirenone/EE, relative to drospirenone/EE alone. Study treatments were generally well tolerated. The majority of adverse events were mild and consistent with known safety profiles of the compounds.

CONCLUSIONS

Consistent with COBI-mediated CYP3A inhibition, drospirenone exposure increased following coadministration with COBI-containing regimens, with a greater increase with ATV+COBI. Thus, clinical monitoring for drospirenone-associated hyperkalaemia is recommended with DRV+COBI and ATV+COBI should not be used with drospirenone. Lower EE exposure with DRV+COBI may be attributed to inductive effects of DRV on CYP enzymes and/or intestinal efflux transporters (that is, P-gp) involved in EE disposition.