Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Vemurafenib in BRAF-Mutated Melanoma Patients

Development and validation of a liquid chromatographic-tandem mass spectrometric assay for the quantification of cabotegravir and rilpivirine from dried blood spots

BACKGROUND

Dried blood spots (DBS) have been utilized as a blood plasma alternative for therapeutic drug monitoring and pharmacologic analysis. There are analytical and physiochemical considerations in bridging drug concentrations from plasma to DBS. Recently, the long-acting antiretroviral cabotegravir (CAB) has been approved for HIV prevention, and a co-packaged regimen of long-acting CAB and rilpivirine (RPV) has been approved for HIV treatment. Measurement of these drugs in blood collected as DBS may offer increased capacity and flexibility in translational applications.

METHODS

Whole blood was spiked with CAB and RPV and spotted on DBS cards. Following extraction and addition of isotopically labeled internal standards, samples were subjected to liquid chromatographic-tandem mass spectrometric (LC-MS/MS) analysis. The method was validated according to regulatory recommendations, and the assay was evaluated in remnant samples from an HIV prevention trial in which paired DBS and plasma samples were collected.

RESULTS

DBS CAB and RPV concentrations were linear from 25 to 20,000 ng/mL and 2-2500 ng/mL, respectively. Precision, accuracy, and matrix effect results were acceptable. DBS RPV demonstrated stability under all tested conditions; DBS CAB showed mean biases of - 23.5% when stored at room temperature for 36 days, and - 18.0% at 40 °C and 100% humidity for two days. DBS measurements for CAB and RPV were an average 54.0% and 14.1% lower, respectively, as compared to paired plasma samples. Derived conversion factors of 1.79 and 1.16 were applied to DBS CAB and RPV measurements, respectively, to estimate plasma concentrations. Estimated plasma CAB and RPV concentrations showed mean biases of 2.2% and 0.6%, respectively. In a CAB clinical trial, application of the conversion factor resulted in agreement between estimated plasma CAB concentrations from DBS and plasma CAB concentrations (y = 1.08x - 79.2, r = 0.932; mean bias of -3.2%; 95% CI: -48.2% to 41.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

We developed and validated a novel LC-MS/MS assay for the quantification of CAB and RPV from DBS, and identified conversion factors to estimate plasma concentrations from spotted blood.

Therapeutic drug monitoring-based precision dosing of oral targeted therapies in oncology: a prospective multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Oral targeted therapies show a high pharmacokinetic (PK) interpatient variability. Even though exposure has been positively correlated with efficacy for many of these drugs, these are still dosed using a one-size-fits-all approach. Consequently, individuals have a high probability to be either underexposed or overexposed, potentially leading to suboptimal outcomes. Therapeutic drug monitoring, which is personalized dosing based on measured systemic drug concentrations, could address these problems.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were enrolled in this prospective multicenter study (www.trialregister.nl; NL6695) if they started treatment with one of the 24 participating oral targeted therapies. Primary outcome was to halve the proportion of underexposed patients, compared with historical data. PK sampling was carried out after 4, 8 and 12 weeks, and every 12 weeks thereafter. In case of Cmin below the predefined target and manageable toxicity, a pharmacokinetically guided intervention was proposed (i.e. checking compliance and drug-drug interactions, concomitant intake with food, splitting intake moments or dose increments).

RESULTS

In total, 600 patients were included of whom 426 patients are assessable for the primary outcome and 552 patients had ≥1 PK sample(s) available and were therefore assessable for the overall analyses. Pharmacokinetically guided dosing reduced the proportion of underexposed patients at the third PK measurement by 39.0% (95% confidence interval 28.0% to 49.0%) compared with historical data. At the third PK measurement, 110 out of 426 patients (25.8%) had a low exposure. In total, 294 patients (53.3%) had ≥1 PK sample(s) below the preset target at a certain time point during treatment. In 166 of these patients (56.5%), pharmacokinetically guided interventions were carried out, which were successful in 113 out of 152 assessable patients (74.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Pharmacokinetically guided dose optimization of oral targeted therapies was feasible in clinical practice and reduced the proportion of underexposed patients considerably.

Discrimination of hand-foot skin reaction caused by tyrosine kinase inhibitors based on direct keratinocyte toxicity and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 inhibition

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are molecular-targeted anticancer drugs. Their benefits are limited by dermal toxicities, including hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR), which is commonly found in skin areas subjected to friction. The present study aimed to explain the incidence of HFSR in patients treated with TKIs by focusing on keratinocyte toxicity and inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR), which plays an essential role in angiogenesis. Mice with gene knockout for the immunosuppressive cytokine interleukin-10 exhibited HFSR-like phenotypes, such as cytotoxicity in keratinocytes and increased number and size of blood vessels after repeated doses of regorafenib, sorafenib, and pazopanib, all of which cause high incidence of HFSR, in combination with tape-stripping mimicking skin damage at the friction site. Comprehensive examination of the direct cytotoxic effects of 21 TKIs on primary cultured human keratinocytes revealed that 18 of them reduced the cell viability dose-dependently. Importantly, the ratio of the trough concentration in patients (C_trough) to the LC₅₀ values of cell viability reduction was higher than unity for four HFSR-inducing TKIs, suggesting that these TKIs cause keratinocyte toxicity at clinically relevant concentrations. In addition, eight HFSR-inducing TKIs caused inhibition of VEGFR-2 kinase activity, which was validated by their ratios of C_trough to the obtained IC_50,VEGFR-2 of more than unity. All 12 TKIs with no reported incidence of HFSR exhibited less than unity values for both C_trough/LC_{50,keratinocytes} and C_trough/IC_50,VEGFR-2. These results suggested that a combination of keratinocyte toxicity and VEGFR-2 inhibition may explain the incidence of HFSR upon TKI usage in humans.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of oral targeted antineoplastic drugs

PURPOSE

This review provides an overview of the current challenges in oral targeted antineoplastic drug (OAD) dosing and outlines the unexploited value of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Factors influencing the pharmacokinetic exposure in OAD therapy are depicted together with an overview of different TDM approaches. Finally, current evidence for TDM for all approved OADs is reviewed.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search (covering literature published until April 2020), including primary and secondary scientific literature on pharmacokinetics and dose individualisation strategies for OADs, together with US FDA Clinical Pharmacology and Biopharmaceutics Reviews and the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use European Public Assessment Reports was conducted.

RESULTS

OADs are highly potent drugs, which have substantially changed treatment options for cancer patients. Nevertheless, high pharmacokinetic variability and low treatment adherence are risk factors for treatment failure. TDM is a powerful tool to individualise drug dosing, ensure drug concentrations within the therapeutic window and increase treatment success rates. After reviewing the literature for 71 approved OADs, we show that exposure-response and/or exposure-toxicity relationships have been established for the majority. Moreover, TDM has been proven to be feasible for individualised dosing of abiraterone, everolimus, imatinib, pazopanib, sunitinib and tamoxifen in prospective studies. There is a lack of experience in how to best implement TDM as part of clinical routine in OAD cancer therapy.

CONCLUSION

Sub-therapeutic concentrations and severe adverse events are current challenges in OAD treatment, which can both be addressed by the application of TDM-guided dosing, ensuring concentrations within the therapeutic window.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Vemurafenib in Children With Recurrent/Refractory BRAF Gene V600E-Mutant Astrocytomas

Vemurafenib (Zelboraf) is an orally available BRAF^V600E inhibitor approved for the treatment of unresectable or metastatic BRAF^V600E -mutant melanoma. The primary objective of this work was to characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) of vemurafenib in pediatric patients with recurrent/refractory astrocytomas harboring the BRAF^V600E mutation. The study was also designed to evaluate the feasibility of replacing whole vemurafenib tablets with crushed tablets in young children unable to swallow tablets. Twenty-five pediatric patients (median age, 8.8 years; range, 3.3-19.2) with recurrent/refractory BRAF^V600E -mutant astrocytomas received whole (n = 19) or crushed (n = 6) vemurafenib tablets twice daily. Plasma samples were collected on days 1, 15, and 22 in cycle 1 of vemurafenib treatment. Descriptive PK analyses demonstrated significant variability (approximately 6-fold) in drug exposure. A 1-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination was developed by adjusting the vemurafenib PK model previously validated in adults with mutant BRAF^V600E melanoma. After inclusion of allometric scaling on total body weight, the model adequately described the PK of vemurafenib in children between a wide age range of 3 to 19 years old. In the crushed-tablet cohort, relative bioavailability was approximately 96% (95% confidence interval, 49%-142%) compared to that seen in pediatric patients receiving whole tablets based on the preliminary comparison analysis results. Moderate intrapatient variability (48%) of vemurafenib clearance was observed. There was significant correlation (R² = 0.83) between area under the plasma concentration-time curve and trough concentration at steady state. These results will help increase the number of pediatric patients for whom vemurafenib is accessible and facilitate improved dosing in pediatric patients with recurrent/refractory BRAF^V600E astrocytomas.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Oral Anticancer Drugs: The Dutch Pharmacology Oncology Group-Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Protocol for a Prospective Study

BACKGROUND

Oral anticancer drugs show a high interpatient variability in pharmacokinetics (PK), leading to large differences in drug exposure. For many of these drugs, exposure has been linked to efficacy and toxicity. Despite this knowledge, these drugs are still administered in a one-size-fits-all approach. Consequently, individual patients have a high probability to be either underdosed, which can lead to decreased antitumor efficacy, or overdosed, which could potentially result in increased toxicity. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), personalized dosing based on measured drug levels, could be used to circumvent underdosing and overdosing and thereby optimize treatment outcomes.

METHODS

In this prospective clinical study (www.trialregister.nl; NL6695), the feasibility, tolerability, and efficacy of TDM of oral anticancer drugs will be evaluated. In total, at least 600 patients will be included for (at least) 23 different compounds. Patients starting regular treatment with one of these compounds at the approved standard dose can be included. PK sampling will be performed at 4, 8, and 12 weeks after the start of treatment and every 12 weeks thereafter. Drug concentrations will be measured, and trough concentrations (Cmin) will be calculated. In cases where Cmin falls below the predefined target and acceptable toxicity, a PK-guided intervention will be recommended. This could include emphasizing compliance, adapting concomitant medication (due to drug-drug interactions), instructing to take the drug concomitant with food, splitting intake moments, or recommending a dose increase.

DISCUSSION

Despite a strong rationale for the use of TDM for oral anticancer drugs, this is currently not yet widely adopted in routine patient care. This prospective study will be a valuable contribution to demonstrate the additional value of dose optimization on treatment outcome for these drugs.

Effects of pharmacogenetic variants on vemurafenib-related toxicities in patients with melanoma

Aim: The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of vemurafenib are characterized by a wide interpatient variability. Since multiple polymorphic enzymes and drug transporters are involved in vemurafenib pharmacokinetics, we studied associations of polymorphisms on vemurafenib-associated toxicities. Patients & methods: Prospectively collected samples of 97 melanoma patients treated with vemurafenib alone (n = 62) or in combination with cobimetinib (n = 35) were genotyped for ABCB1 (3435C>T), ABCG2 (421C>A, 34G>A) and CYP3A4 (*22, 15389C>T) polymorphisms. Associations between these variants and the incidence of toxicities were studied. Results: CYP3A4*22 was significantly associated with increased risk for grade ≥3 nausea, grade 1-4 hyperbilirubinemia, and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. ABCB1 3435C>T was a predictor for grade ≥3 toxicity. Conclusion: Genetic variants in CYP3A4 and ABCB1 are associated with vemurafenib-associated toxicities.

Targeting the "undruggable" RAS - new strategies - new hope?

K-RAS is the most frequently mutated oncogene in solid tumors, such as pancreatic, colon or lung cancer. The GTPase K-RAS can either be in an active (GTP-loaded) or inactive (GDP-loaded) form. In its active form K-RAS forwards signals from growth factors, cytokines or hormones to the nucleus, regulating essential pathways, such as cell proliferation and differentiation. In turn, activating somatic mutations of this proto-oncogene deregulate the complex interplay between GAP (GTPase-activating) - and GEF (Guanine nucleotide exchange factor) - proteins, driving neoplastic transformation. Due to a rather shallow surface, K-RAS lacks proper binding pockets for small molecules, hindering drug development over the past thirty years. This review summarizes recent progress in the development of low molecular antagonists and further shows insights of a newly described interaction between mutant K-RAS signaling and PD-L1 induced immunosuppression, giving new hope for future treatments of K-RAS mutated cancer.

The Impact of Dose and Simultaneous Use of Acid-Reducing Agents on the Effectiveness of Vemurafenib in Metastatic BRAF V600 Mutated Melanoma: a Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The impact of dose and simultaneous use of acid-reducing agents (ARAs) on the effectiveness of vemurafenib is unknown.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the association between progression of metastatic BRAF V600 mutated melanoma and (1) dose reductions of vemurafenib and (2) simultaneous use of vemurafenib and ARAs.

PATIENT AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of 112 first-line vemurafenib users for melanoma was conducted (March 2012-March 2016), using electronic patient records and pharmacy dispensing records of a Dutch academic hospital. Cox regression analysis was used to estimate the risk of progression with full-dose (n = 64) versus reduced-dose vemurafenib (n = 48) and with simultaneous use of vemurafenib and ARAs (n = 35) versus vemurafenib alone (n = 77). Analyses were adjusted for age and sex.

RESULTS

In total, disease progression occurred in 55% of treated patients on vemurafenib, with a median progression-free survival of 6.0 (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.0-6.9) months. Compared to patients on vemurafenib alone, there was no increased risk of progression among patients requiring vemurafenib at a reduced dose or among patients receiving simultaneous therapy with vemurafenib and ARAs. In addition, there was no increased risk of progression among patients who used reduced-dose vemurafenib and ARAs versus those receiving full-dose vemurafenib as sole therapy. However, a tendency for progression was observed among patients who used full-dose vemurafenib and ARAs versus full-dose vemurafenib alone (adjusted hazard ratio [HRa] 2.37; 95% CI 0.97-5.76), which became statistically significant in a sensitivity analysis (HRa 4.56; 95% CI 1.51-13.75).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no association between the use of vemurafenib in a reduced dose or the simultaneous use of vemurafenib and ARAs and the risk of progression. In addition, there was no association between the simultaneous use of vemurafenib in a reduced dose and ARAs and the risk of progression. However, patients tolerating  full-dose vemurafenib simultaneously with ARAs might have an increased risk of progression. This finding requires prospective validation.

Individualized dosing of oral targeted therapies in oncology is crucial in the era of precision medicine

PURPOSE

While in the era of precision medicine, the right drug for each patient is selected based on molecular tumor characteristics, most novel oral targeted anticancer agents are still being administered using a one-size-fits-all fixed dosing approach. In this review, we discuss the scientific evidence for dose individualization of oral targeted therapies in oncology, based on therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM).

METHODS

Based on literature search and our own experiences, seven criteria for drugs to be suitable candidates for TDM will be addressed: (1) absence of an easily measurable biomarker for drug effect; (2) long-term therapy; (3) availability of a validated sensitive bioanalytical method; (4) significant variability in pharmacokinetic exposure; (5) narrow therapeutic range; (6) defined and consistent exposure-response relationships; (7) feasible dose-adaptation strategies.

RESULTS

All of these requirements are met for most oral targeted therapies in oncology. Also, prospective studies have already shown TDM to be feasible for imatinib, pazopanib, sunitinib, everolimus, and endoxifen.

CONCLUSIONS

In order to realize the full potential of personalized medicine in oncology, patients should not only be treated with the right drug, but also at the right dose. TDM could be a suitable tool to achieve this.

Fusion genes: A promising tool combating against cancer

The driving roles of fusion genes during tumorigenesis have been recognized for decades, with efficacies demonstrated in clinical diagnosis and targeted therapy. With advances in sequencing technologies and computational biology, a surge in the identification of fusion genes has been witnessed during the past decade. The discovery and presence of splicing based fusions in normal tissues have challenged our canonical conceptions on fusion genes and offered us novel medical opportunities. The specificity of fusion genes to neoplastic tissues and their diverse functionalities during carcinogenesis foster them as promising tools in the battle against cancer. It is time to re-visit and comb through our cutting-edge knowledge on fusion genes to accelerate clinical translation of these internal markers. Urged as such, we are encouraged to categorize fusion events according to mechanisms leading to their generation, oncological consequences and clinical implications, offer insights on fusion occurrence across tumors from the system level, highlight feasible practices in fusion-related pharmaceutical development, and identify understudied yet important niches that may lead future research trend in this field.

Practical Recommendations for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Kinase Inhibitors in Oncology

Despite the fact that pharmacokinetic exposure of kinase inhibitors (KIs) is highly variable and clear relationships exist between exposure and treatment outcomes, fixed dosing is still standard practice. This review aims to summarize the available clinical pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data into practical guidelines for individualized dosing of KIs through therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Additionally, we provide an overview of prospective TDM trials and discuss the future steps needed for further implementation of TDM of KIs.