Super-Obesity is Associated with an Increased Risk of Complications Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Obesity, defined as a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30, is an ever-growing epidemic, with > 35% of adults in the United States currently classified as obese. Super-obese individuals, defined as those who have a BMI ≥ 50, are the fastest-growing portion of this group. This study sought to quantify the infection risk as well as the incidence of surgical, medical, and thromboembolic complications among super-obese patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

An all-payer claims database was used to identify patients who underwent elective, primary TKA between 2016 and 2021. Patients who had a BMI ≥ 50 were compared to those who had a normal BMI of 18 to 25. Demographics and the incidence of 90-day postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. Univariate analysis and multivariable regression were used to assess differences between groups.

RESULTS

In total, 3,376 super-obese TKA patients were identified and compared to 17,659 patients who had a normal BMI. Multivariable analysis indicated that the super-obese cohort was at an increased postoperative risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.7, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.1 to 6.4, P < 0.001), pulmonary embolism (aOR 2.2, 95%-CI: 1.0 to 5.0, P = 0.047), acute respiratory failure (aOR 4.1, 95%-CI: 2.7 to 6.1, P < 0.001), myocardial infarction (aOR 2.5, 95%-CI: 1.1 to 5.8, P = 0.026), wound dehiscence (aOR 2.3, 95%-CI: 1.4 to 3.8, P = 0.001), and acute renal failure (aOR 3.2, 95%-CI: 2.4 to 4.2, P < 0.001) relative to patients who have normal BMI.

CONCLUSION

Super-obese TKA patients are at an elevated risk of postoperative infectious, surgical, medical, and thromboembolic complications. As such, risk stratification, as well as appropriate medical management and optimization, is of utmost importance for this high-risk group.

Morphomics-informed population pharmacokinetic and physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling to optimize cefazolin surgical prophylaxis

INTRODUCTION

Cefazolin is the leading antibiotic used to prevent surgical site infections worldwide. Consensus guidelines recommend adjustment of the cefazolin dose above and below 120 kg without regard to body composition. Algorithms exist to repurpose radiologic data into body composition (morphomics) and inform dosing decisions in obesity.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the current standard of body weight to morphomic measurements as covariates of cefazolin pharmacokinetics and aid dose stratification of cefazolin in patients with obesity undergoing colorectal surgery.

METHODS

This prospective study measured cefazolin plasma, fat, and colon tissue concentrations in colorectal surgery patients in order to develop a morphomics-informed population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model to guide dose adjustments. A physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was also constructed to inform tissue partitioning in morbidly obese patients (n = 21, body mass index ≥35 kg/m2 with one or more co-morbid conditions).

RESULTS

Morphomics and pharmacokinetic data were available in 58 patients with a median [min, max] weight and age of 95.9 [68.5, 148.8] kg and 55 [25, 79] years, respectively. The plasma-to-subcutaneous fat partition coefficient was predicted to be 0.072 and 0.060 by the PopPK and PBPK models, respectively. The estimated creatinine clearance (eCLcr ) and body depth at the third lumbar vertebra (body depth_L3) were identified as covariates of cefazolin exposure. The probability of maintaining subcutaneous fat concentrations above 2 μg/mL for 100% of a 4-h surgical period was below 90% when eCLcr ≥105 mL/min and body depth_L3 ≥ 300 mm and less sensitive to the rate of infusion between 5 and 60 min.

CONCLUSIONS

Kidney function and morphomics were more informative than body weight as covariates of cefazolin target site exposure. Data from more diverse populations, consensus on target cefazolin exposure, and comparative studies are needed before a change in practice can be implemented.

Peripartum care of persons with obesity: a scoping review of recommendations and practical tools for implementation

OBJECTIVE

Despite the growing prevalence of obesity among reproductive aged persons in the USA, evidence-based guidelines for peripartum care are lacking. The objective of this scoping review is to identify obesity-related recommendations for peripartum care, evaluate grades of evidence for each recommendation, and identify practical tools (eg, checklists, toolkits, care pathways and bundles) to support their implementation in clinical practice.

DATA SOURCES

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to December 2020 for eligible studies addressing peripartum care in persons with obesity.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Inclusion criteria were published evidence-rated recommendations and practical tools for peripartum care of persons with obesity.

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS

Pairs of independent reviewers extracted data (source, publication year, content and number of recommendations, level and grade of evidence, description of tool) and identified similarities and differences among the articles.

RESULTS

Of 18 315 screened articles, 18 were included including 7 articles with evidence-rated recommendations and 11 practical tools (3 checklists, 3 guidelines, 1 care bundle, 1 flowchart, 1 care pathway, 1 care map and 1 protocol). Thirteen of 39 evidence-rated recommendations were based on expert opinion. Recommendations related to surgical antibiotic prophylaxis and subcutaneous tissue closure at caesarean delivery received the highest grade of evidence. Some of the practical tools included a checklist from the USA regarding anticoagulation after caesarean delivery (evidence-supported recommendation), a bundle for surgical site infections after caesarean delivery in Australia (evidence did not support recommendation) and a checklist with content for several aspects of peripartum care from Canada (evidence supported seven of nine definitive recommendations).

CONCLUSION

The recommendations for peripartum care for persons with obesity are based on limited evidence and few practical tools for implementation exist. Future work should focus on developing practical tools based on high-quality studies.

Population pharmacokinetics of cefazolin in maternal and umbilical cord plasma, and simulated exposure in term neonates

BACKGROUND

Intra-partum cefazolin is used to prevent group B Streptococcus (GBS) vertical transmission in mothers allergic to penicillin without a history of anaphylaxis.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the maternal cefazolin dose-exposure relationship and subsequent maternal and neonatal target attainment at delivery.

METHODS

Data were obtained from 24 healthy, GBS-colonized pregnant women (20-41 years), undergoing vaginal delivery (gestational age ≥37 weeks). During labour, all women received a 2 g cefazolin IV infusion. Eight hours later, eight women received another 1 g in the event of delayed (>8 h) delivery. Next to maternal plasma concentrations (up to 10 per dosing interval, until delivery), venous and arterial umbilical cord concentrations were determined at delivery. Target attainment in maternal/neonatal plasma was set at 1 mg/L for 60% of the dosing interval (unbound cefazolin, worst-case clinical breakpoint). A population pharmacokinetic (popPK) model was built (NONMEM 7.4). ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01295606.

RESULTS

At delivery, maternal blood and arterial umbilical cord unbound cefazolin concentrations were >1 mg/L in 23/24 (95.8%) and 11/12 (91.7%), respectively. The popPK of cefazolin in pregnant women was described by a two-compartment model with first-order elimination. Two additional compartments described the venous and arterial umbilical cord concentration data. Cefazolin target attainment was adequate in the studied cohort, where delivery occurred no later than 6.5 h after either the first or the second dose. PopPK simulations showed adequate maternal and umbilical cord exposure for 12 h following the first dose.

CONCLUSIONS

PopPK simulations showed that standard pre-delivery maternal cefazolin dosing provided adequate target attainment up to the time of delivery.

Cefazolin prophylaxis in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery - are dosage and timing appropriate? Prospective study using resampling simulation

OBJECTIVE

Cefazolin is a widely used antimicrobial prophylactic agent, however the appropriate dosage, timing, pharmacology and microbial coverage have not been well-established for gynecologic procedures. We aimed to describe serum concentrations and pharmacokinetics of Intravenous cefazolin given to women prior to scheduled minimally invasive gynecologic surgeries, and to determine whether appropriate antimicrobial coverage had been achieved in short time from prophylactic administration to surgical start time.

METHODS

A prospective cohort analysis study, using a resampled dataset, of women undergoing scheduled gynecological surgeries in a university affiliated tertiary medical center. IV cefazolin (1 or 2 gr) was administered prior to incision to women weighing <80 kg (Group A) and ≥80 kg (Group B), respectively. Cefazolin serum levels were obtained at the time of skin incision (Time 0) and 30 min later (Time 30), measured by high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC). Appropriate antimicrobial coverage was defined when cefazolin serum levels were above minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) for Enterobacteriaceae.

RESULTS

Overall, 21 women were included. The mean time interval between drug administration and incision did not differ between the two groups (18 ± 10 min vs. 11 ± 10 min, respectively, p = .0.25). A hierarchical mixed linear regression model, using a simulation of multiple random bootstrap resampling (n = 1,000), revealed that cefazolin serum levels exceeded MIC, regardless of the timing of administration in the sampling intervals. Mean cefazolin serum levels in time 0 and time 30 min were not affected by BMI in patients receiving 1 gr.

CONCLUSION

A single dose of IV cefazolin given shortly prior to skin incision provides serum concentrations above minimal inhibitory concentrations for susceptible pathogens in most women undergoing scheduled minimally invasive gynecologic surgery.

Medications for Pregnant Women With Obesity: Special Considerations

Pregnant women with obesity are at increased risk of a multitude of complications of pregnancy and adverse perinatal outcomes. The risk of some of these complications, such as neural tube defects or preeclampsia, may be mitigated by some medications. Other complications, such as diabetes, venous thromboembolism, and infections, require treatment with medications. Given the changes in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics during pregnancy, which is further enhanced by obesity, the optimal medication and its dose is often researched. This chapter further explores the different complications and common medications that women with obesity are likely to require.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Wound Complications after a Caesarean Section in Obese Women

(1) Background: Caesarean sections in obese patients are associated with an increased risk of surgical wound complications, including hematomas, seromas, abscesses, dehiscence, and surgical site infections. The aim of the present study is to perform a meta-analysis and systematic review of the current literature focusing on the strategies available to decrease wound complications in this population. (2) Methods: We reviewed the data available from the PubMed and the Science Direct databases concerning wound complications after caesarean sections in obese women. The following key words were used: “caesarean section”, “cesarean section”, “wound complication”, “wound morbidity”, and “wound infection”. A total of 540 papers were retrieved, 40 of which were selected for the final systematic review and whereas 21 articles provided data for meta-analysis. (3) Results: The conducted meta-analyses revealed that the use of prophylactic drainage does not increase the risk of wound complications in obese women after a caesarean sections (pooled OR = 1.32; 95% CI 0.64–2.70, p = 0.45) and that vertical skin incisions increase wound complications (pooled OR = 2.48; 95% CI 1.85–3.32, p < 0.01) in obese women, including extremely obese women. (4) Conclusions: Subcutaneous drainage does not reduce the risk of a wound complications, wound infections, and fever in obese women after caesarean sections. Negative prophylactic pressure wound therapy (NPWT) may reduce the risk of surgical site infections. The evidence of using a prophylactic dose of an antibiotic before the caesarean section is still lacking.

Calculating the appropriate prophylactic dose of cefazolin in women undergoing cesarean delivery

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Surgical site infection and other postoperative complications are relatively common in obstetrical procedures, and they are associated with morbidity, prolonged hospital stay, and readmissions. Appropriate levels of antimicrobial agents given directly before skin incision can prevent the establishment of surgical-related infection caused by endogenous microorganisms present on the woman's skin. We aimed to determine serum concentrations of cefazolin given to pregnant women prior to scheduled cesarean delivery and to compare their drug concentrations and pharmacokinetics in 2 weight groups.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a prospective cohort analysis of the pharmacokinetics of cefazolin in women undergoing cesarean delivery (August 2017 to September 2018). One or two grams of intravenous cefazolin was administered within 30 min prior to skin incision to women weighing <80 kg and ≥80 kg, respectively. Maternal serum samples were obtained at skin incision and 30 min later. The serum concentration of cefazolin was measured by high-pressure liquid chromatography. Antimicrobial coverage was defined as being appropriate when the cefazolin levels were above the minimal inhibitory concentration. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using a one-compartment model.

RESULTS

A total of 61 women were enrolled, of whom 47 underwent cesarean delivery (study group). The mean time that had elapsed between drug administration to incision was 13 ± 6.9 min (95% confidence interval 10.6-16.2 min). The drug levels after 30 min in women who weighed >80 kg and in women who received 2 g cefazolin, after 30 min from incision differed significantly (87.0 ± 26.0 vs 55.4 ± 16.6 μg/ml, p = .0001).

CONCLUSION

A single 1- or 2-g dose of cefazolin provides serum concentrations above minimal inhibitory concentrations for susceptible pathogens in most women undergoing scheduled cesarean delivery.

Maternal Obesity and Risk of Early-onset Neonatal Bacterial Sepsis: Nationwide Cohort and Sibling-controlled Studies

BACKGROUND

Maternal overweight and obesity are related to risks of pregnancy and delivery complications that, in turn, are associated with newborn infections. We examined the associations between early pregnancy body mass index (BMI; kg/m2) and risk of early-onset neonatal bacterial sepsis (EOS).

METHODS

We conducted a nationwide population-based retrospective cohort study of 1 971 346 live singleton infants born in Sweden between 1997 and 2016. Outcome was a culture-confirmed EOS diagnosis. We estimated hazard ratios (HR) of EOS according to BMI using proportional hazard models, and identified potential mediators. Among term infants, we conducted sibling-controlled analyses.

RESULTS

EOS risk per 1000 live births was 1.48; 0.76 in term and 15.52 in preterm infants. Compared with infants of normal-weight mothers (BMI, 18.5-24.9), the adjusted HR (95% confidence interval [CI]) of EOS for BMI categories <18.5, 25.0-29.9, 30.0-34.9, 35.0-39.9, and ≥40.0 were, respectively, 1.07 (.83-1.40), 1.19 (1.08-1.32), 1.70 (1.49-1.94), 2.11 (1.73-2.58), and 2.50 (1.86-3.38). Maternal overweight and obesity increased the risk of EOS by group B Streptococcus, Staphylococcus aureus, and Escherichia coli. Half of the association was mediated through preeclampsia, cesarean section delivery, and preterm delivery. A dose-response association was consistently apparent in term infants only. In sibling-controlled analyses, every kilogram per meter squared interpregnancy BMI change was associated with a mean 8.3% increase in EOS risk (95% CI, 1.7%-15.3%; P = .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Risk of EOS increases with maternal overweight and obesity severity, particularly in term infants.

Pregnancy-related pharmacokinetics and antimicrobial prophylaxis during fetal surgery, cefazolin and clindamycin as examples

Antimicrobial prophylaxis during surgery aims to prevent post-operative site infections. For fetal surgery, this includes the fetal and amniotic compartments. Both are deep compartments as drug equilibrium with maternal blood is achieved relatively late. Despite prophylaxis, chorio-amnionitis or endometritis following ex utero intrapartum treatment or fetoscopy occur in 4.13% and 1.45% respectively of the interventions. This review summarizes the observations on two commonly administered antimicrobials (cefazolin, clindamycin) for surgical prophylaxis during pregnancy, with emphasis on the deep compartments. For both compounds, antimicrobial exposure is on target when we consider the maternal and fetal plasma compartment. In contrast, amniotic fluid concentrations-time profiles display a delayed and much more blunted pattern, behaving as deep compartment. For cefazolin, there are data that document further dilution in the setting of polyhydramnios. Along this deep compartment concept, there is some accumulation during repeated administration, modeled for cefazolin and observed for clindamycin. The relative underexposure to antimicrobials in amniotic fluid may be reflected in the pattern of maternal-fetal complications after fetal surgery, and suggest that antimicrobial prophylaxis practices for fetal surgery should be reconsidered. Further studies should be designed by a multidisciplinary team (fetal surgeons, clinical pharmacologists and microbiologists) to facilitate efficient evaluation of antimicrobial prophylaxis.

Reducing post-caesarean delivery surgical site infections: a narrative review

Surgical site infection complicates 1-10% of caesarean deliveries. With the rate of caesarean delivery increasing, it is important to identify effective measures of preventing surgical site infection and to consider their impact on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Compelling evidence supports the use of prophylactic antibiotics, prior to skin incision, to reduce surgical site infection. However, there remain international variations in terms of the recommended agent, dose and body weight-adjusted dosing. Advances in wound dressings are an evolving area of interest and surgical technique can influence outcomes. This narrative review explores pharmacological and non-pharmacological methods of preventing surgical site infection following caesarean delivery.

Obese patients have higher rates of polymicrobial and Gram-negative early periprosthetic joint infections of the hip than non-obese patients

Background

Obese patients are more likely to develop periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after primary total joint arthroplasty. This study compared the clinical and microbiological characteristics of non-obese, obese and severely obese patients with early PJI, in order to ultimately optimize antibiotic prophylaxis and other prevention measures for this specific patient category.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated patients with early PJI of the hip and knee treated with debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) between 2006 and 2016 in three Dutch hospitals. Only patients with primary arthroplasties indicated for osteoarthritis were included. Early PJI was defined as an infection that developed within 90 days after index surgery. Obesity was defined as a BMI ≥30kg/m² and severe obesity as a BMI ≥35kg/m².

Results

A total of 237 patients were analyzed, including 64 obese patients (27.0%) and 62 severely obese patients (26.2%). Compared with non-obese patients, obese patients had higher rates of polymicrobial infections (60.3% vs 33.3%, p<0.001) with more often involvement of Enterococcus species (27.0% vs 11.7%, p = 0.003). Moreover, severely obese patients had more Gram-negative infections, especially with Proteus species (12.9% vs 2.3%, p = 0.001). These results were only found in periprosthetic hip infections, comprising Gram-negative PJIs in 34.2% of severely obese patients compared with 24.7% in obese patients and 12.7% in non-obese patients (p = 0.018).

Conclusions

Our results demonstrate that obese patients with early periprosthetic hip infections have higher rates of polymicrobial infections with enterococci and Gram-negative rods, which stresses the importance of improving preventive strategies in this specific patient category, by adjusting antibiotic prophylaxis regimens, improving disinfection strategies and optimizing postoperative wound care.

Fast and sensitive HPLC/UV method for cefazolin quantification in plasma and subcutaneous tissue microdialysate of humans and rodents applied to pharmacokinetic studies in obese individuals

Antimicrobial prophylactic dosing of morbidly obese patients may differ from normal weighted individuals owing to alterations in drug tissue distribution. Drug subcutaneous tissue distribution can be investigated by microdialysis patients and animals. The need for cefazolin prophylactic dose adjustment in obese patients remains under discussion. The paper describes the validation of an HPLC-UV method for cefazolin quantification in plasma and microdialysate samples from clinical and pre-clinical studies. A C₁₈ column with an isocratic mobile phase was used for drug separation, with detection at 272 nm. Total and unbound cefazolin lower limit of quantitation was 5 μg/mL in human plasma, 2 μg/mL in rat plasma, and 0.5 and 0.025 μg/mL in human and rat microdialysate samples, respectively. The maximum intra- and inter-day imprecisions were 10.7 and 8.1%, respectively. The inaccuracy was <9.7%. The limit of quantitation imprecision and inaccuracy were < 15%. Cefazolin stability in the experimental conditions was confirmed. Cefazolin plasma concentrations and subcutaneous tissue penetration were determined by microdialysis in morbidly obese patients (2 g i.v. bolus) and diet-induced obese rats (30 mg/kg i.v. bolus) using the method. This method has the main advantages of easy plasma clean-up and practicability and has proven to be useful in cefazolin clinical and pre-clinical pharmacokinetic investigations.

Prophylactic cefazolin concentrations in morbidly obese patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy: do we achieve targets?

Morbid obesity is known to increase the risk of surgical site infections. Optimal concentrations of prophylactic antibacterial drugs are required. Using Monte Carlo simulations, the aim of this work was to build a population pharmacokinetics model for a morbidly obese population to assess a 4000-mg dose of cefazolin recommended by the guidelines and to propose new administration schemes. One hundred and seventeen morbidly obese patients (mean body mass index, 46.95 kg/m²) received 4000 mg of cefazolin intravenously before sleeve gastrectomy. Using population pharmacokinetics modelling and Monte Carlo simulations, probabilities of target attainment (PTAs) (subcutaneous tissue concentration of cefazolin above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) throughout the surgical procedure was targeted) were determined. For Staphylococcus spp. and Streptococcus spp., which are the most frequent species isolated from post-surgical infections in bariatric surgery (MIC usually ≤2 mg/L), PTA remains greater than 0.9 until 2 h after administration of 4000 mg of cefazolin. For MIC up to 4 mg/L, efficient prophylaxis was checked until 1 h after the initial administration. A 3000-mg regimen followed by a continuous infusion (1000 mg/h) achieves these two targets until 4 h after the loading dose. A 2000-mg and a 3000-mg regimen do not achieve sufficient concentrations. According to the duration of surgery and MIC values, an initial administration of 4000 mg should be sufficient, but for extended surgeries continuous infusion can be considered.

Comparison of tenofovir plasma and tissue exposure using a population pharmacokinetic model and bootstrap: a simulation study from observed data

Sparse tissue sampling with intensive plasma sampling creates a unique data analysis problem in determining drug exposure in clinically relevant tissues. Tissue exposure may govern drug efficacy, as many drugs exert their actions in tissues. We compared tissue area-under-the-curve (AUC) generated from bootstrapped noncompartmental analysis (NCA) methods and compartmental nonlinear mixed effect (NLME) modeling. A model of observed data after single-dose tenofovir disoproxil fumarate was used to simulate plasma and tissue concentrations for two destructive tissue sampling schemes. Two groups of 100 data sets with densely-sampled plasma and one tissue sample per individual were created. The bootstrapped NCA (SAS 9.3) used a trapezoidal method to calculate geometric mean tissue AUC per dataset. For NLME, individual post hoc estimates of tissue AUC were determined, and the geometric mean from each dataset calculated. Median normalized prediction error (NPE) and absolute normalized prediction error (ANPE) were calculated for each method from the true values of the modeled concentrations. Both methods produced similar tissue AUC estimates close to true values. Although the NLME-generated AUC estimates had larger NPEs, it had smaller ANPEs. Overall, NLME NPEs showed AUC under-prediction but improved precision and fewer outliers. The bootstrapped NCA method produced more accurate estimates but with some NPEs > 100%. In general, NLME is preferred, as it accommodates less intensive tissue sampling with reasonable results, and provides simulation capabilities for optimizing tissue distribution. However, if the main goal is an accurate AUC for the studied scenario, and relatively intense tissue sampling is feasible, the NCA bootstrap method is a reasonable, and potentially less time-intensive solution.