Conversion From Sirolimus to Everolimus in Long-Term Liver Graft Recipients

Conversion from twice-daily everolimus to once-daily sirolimus in long-term stable liver transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

After organ transplantation, strategies for simplifying the therapeutic regimen may improve adherence and prevent acute organ rejection and/or late graft loss. The present study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of conversion from everolimus (EVR) twice daily to sirolimus (SIR) once daily in a large cohort of liver transplantation (LT) patients.

METHODS

We included 108 LT patients with at least 12 months of post-transplant follow-up and no rejection episodes in the last year. Conversion was based on a 1:1 ratio (but eventually adapted to available formulations of SIR).

RESULTS

The median age at the time of conversion was 68.9 years (range: 26.1-83.6); 75.0% were men. The main indications for mTOR inhibitor use were renal failure (38.9%) and/or a history of malignancy (37.0%). Median conversion time after LT was 14.8 years (range: 2.3-31.5). The median dose of EVR and SIR (initially) was 1.50 mg/day (range: 0.5-4.5). The mean follow-up after conversion was 15.8±4.4 months. Median serum EVR/SIR trough levels before/after conversion were 3.85 ng/mL vs. 6.32 ng/mL (p < 0.05), i.e. a 1:1.64 ratio. At the end of follow-up after conversion, the median dose of SIR was 1.25 mg/day (range: 0.5-3.5), and the mean serum SIR trough level was 5.23 ng/mL; 9 patients (8.3%) had returned to EVR, because of side effects (mainly digestive), that resolved thereafter. No biopsy-proven acute rejection episode was observed. Finally, 87.1% of patients considered the conversion beneficial and the cost was reduced by 50.3%.

CONCLUSION

The results of our study indicate that conversion from once-daily EVR to once-daily SIR in stable LT patients is safe, but needs dose adaptations and careful monitoring.

Conversion between sirolimus and everolimus in heart transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Sirolimus and everolimus are mechanistic target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTORi) that may be included in immunosuppression regimens for orthotopic heart transplant (OHT) recipients. mTORi play a role in slowing progression of cardiac allograft vasculopathy; however, they have poor tolerability, sometimes necessitating a change between agents or therapies. The literature surrounding a conversion between mTORi are incongruent, thus this study was designed to assess the concentration/dose ratio for each medication around the time of conversion to provide guidance for a conversion strategy between mTORi.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of adult OHT recipients who were maintained on both sirolimus- and everolimus-based immunosuppression regimens. The primary outcome was the concentration/dose (C/d) ratio of sirolimus to everolimus. Secondary outcomes included changes in hematologic and lipid labs and patient-reported intolerances.

RESULTS

The C/d ratio of sirolimus was 4.42, whereas the everolimus ratio was 2.23, resulting in a sirolimus: everolimus ratio of 1.98. Secondarily, after converting between mTORi, 93% of patients who reported intolerance(s) to one agent had a resolution of that intolerance. In our patient population, everolimus appeared better tolerated than sirolimus, with significantly more patients having no reported intolerances and significantly fewer patients experiencing edema. Other lab values were similar between patients receiving sirolimus and everolimus, except for an increased hemoglobin level in those receiving everolimus.

CONCLUSIONS

The conversion ratio of 1:2 observed in our population suggests OHT recipients may require an increased dose of EVL compared with SRL to maintain the same goal trough levels. A conversion between mTORi appeared to improve tolerability and did not lead to clinically significant worsening of any measured lab value.

Colonization with multidrug-resistant organisms is associated with in increased mortality in liver transplant candidates

Objectives

Rising prevalence of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) is a major health problem in patients with liver cirrhosis. The impact of MDRO colonization in liver transplantation (LT) candidates and recipients on mortality has not been determined in detail.

Methods

Patients consecutively evaluated and listed for LT in a tertiary German liver transplant center from 2008 to 2018 underwent screening for MDRO colonization including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria (MDRGN), and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE). MDRO colonization and infection status were obtained at LT evaluation, planned and unplanned hospitalization, three months upon graft allocation, or at last follow-up on the waiting list.

Results

In total, 351 patients were listed for LT, of whom 164 (47%) underwent LT after a median of 249 (range 0–1662) days. Incidence of MDRO colonization increased during waiting time for LT, and MRDO colonization was associated with increased mortality on the waiting list (HR = 2.57, p<0.0001. One patients was colonized with a carbapenem-resistant strain at listing, 9 patients acquired carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria (CRGN) on the waiting list, and 4 more after LT. In total, 10 of these 14 patients died.

Conclusions

Colonization with MDRO is associated with increased mortality on the waiting list, but not in short-term follow-up after LT. Moreover, colonization with CRGN seems associated with high mortality in liver transplant candidates and recipients.

AFP ratio predicts HCC recurrence after liver transplantation

Background/aims

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading indication for liver transplantation (LT) worldwide. Early identification of patients at risk for HCC recurrence is of paramount importance since early treatment of recurrent HCC after LT may be associated with increased survival. We evaluated incidence of and predictors for HCC recurrence, with a focus on the course of AFP levels.

Methods

We performed a retrospective, single-center study of 99 HCC patients who underwent LT between January 28^th, 1997 and May 11^th, 2016. A multi-stage proportional hazards model with three stages was used to evaluate potential predictive markers, both by univariate and multivariable analysis, for influences on 1) recurrence after transplantation, 2) mortality without HCC recurrence, and 3) mortality after recurrence.

Results

19/99 HCC patients showed recurrence after LT. Waiting time was not associated with overall HCC recurrence (HR = 1, p = 0.979). Similarly, waiting time did not affect mortality in LT recipients both with (HR = 0.97, p = 0.282) or without (HR = 0.99, p = 0.685) HCC recurrence. Log₁₀-transformed AFP values at the time of LT (HR 1.75, p = 0.023) as well as after LT (HR 2.07, p = 0.037) were significantly associated with recurrence. Median survival in patients with a ratio (AFP at recurrence divided by AFP 3 months before recurrence) of 0.5 was greater than 70 months, as compared to a median of only 8 months in patients with a ratio of 5.

Conclusion

A rise in AFP levels rather than an absolute threshold could help to identify patients at short-term risk for HCC recurrence post LT, which may allow intensification of the surveillance strategy on an individualized basis.

Programmed T cell differentiation: Implications for transplantation

While T cells play a critical role in protective immunity against infection, they are also responsible for graft rejection in the setting of transplantation. T cell differentiation is regulated by both intrinsic transcriptional pathways as well as extrinsic factors such as antigen encounter and the cytokine milieu. Herein, we review recent discoveries in the transcriptional regulation of T cell differentiation and their impact on the field of transplantation. Recent studies uncovering context-dependent differentiation programs that differ in the setting of infection or transplantation will also be discussed. Understanding the key transcriptional pathways that underlie T cell responses in transplantation has important clinical implications, including development of novel therapeutic agents to mitigate graft rejection.

Low Serum Levels of (Dihydro-)Ceramides Reflect Liver Graft Dysfunction in a Real-World Cohort of Patients Post Liver Transplantation

Patients after orthopic liver transplantation (OLT) are at risk of developing graft dysfunction. Sphingolipids (SL’s) have been identified to play a pivotal role in the regulation of hepatocellular apoptosis, inflammation and immunity. We aimed to investigate the serum SL profile in a prospective real-world cohort of post-OLT patients. From October 2015 until July 2016, 149 well-characterized post-OLT patients were analyzed. SL’s were assessed in serum probes via Liquid Chromatography/Tandem Mass Spectrometry. Twenty-nine (20%) patients had a biopsy proven graft rejection with decreased C20-ceramide (Cer) (p = 0.042), C18-dihydroceramide (DHC) (p = 0.022) and C24DHC (p = 0.060) levels. Furthermore, C18DHC (p = 0.044) and C24DHC (p = 0.011) were significantly down-regulated in patients with ischemic type biliary lesions (ITBL; n = 15; 10%). One-hundred and thirty-three patients (89%) have so far received tacrolimus as the main immunosuppressive agent with observed elevations of C14Cer (p = 0.052), C18Cer (p = 0.049) and C18:1Cer (p = 0.024). Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) pre-OLT was associated with increases in C24:1Cer (p = 0.024) and C24:1DHC (p = 0.024). In this large prospective cross-sectional study of patients, post-OLT serum levels of (very-)long chain (dihydro-)ceramides associate with graft rejection, ITBL, tacrolimus intake and HCC pre-OLT. Hence, serum SL’s may be indicative of graft complications. Further research is necessary to identify their diverse mechanistic role in regulating immunity and inflammation in patients post-OLT.