Addressing Antiretroviral Therapy-Associated Drug-Drug Interactions in Patients Requiring Treatment for Opportunistic Infections in Low-Income and Resource-Limited Settings

Clinical Relevance of Drug Interactions in People Living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus on Antiretroviral Therapy-Update 2022: Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

The clinical outcomes of antiretroviral drugs may be modified through drug interactions; thus, it is important to update the drug interactions in people living with HIV (PLHIV).

AIM

To update clinically relevant drug interactions in PLHIV on antiretroviral therapy with novel drug interactions published from 2017 to 2022.

METHODS

A systematic review in Medline/PubMed database from July 2017 to December 2022 using the Mesh terms antiretroviral agents and drug interactions or herb-drug interactions or food-drug interactions. Publications with drug interactions in humans, in English or Spanish, and with full-text access were retrieved. The clinical relevance of drug interactions was grouped into five levels according to the gravity and probability of occurrence.

RESULTS

A total of 366 articles were identified, with 219 (including 87 citation lists) were included, which allowed for the identification of 471 drug interaction pairs; among them, 291 were systematically reported for the first time. In total 42 (14.4%) and 137 (47.1%) were level one and two, respectively, and 233 (80.1%) pairs were explained with the pharmacokinetic mechanism. Among these 291 pairs, protease inhibitors (PIs) and ritonavir/cobicistat-boosted PIs, as well as integrase strand transfer inhibitors (InSTIs), with 70 (24.1%) and 65 (22.3%) drug interaction pairs of levels one and two, respectively, were more frequent.

CONCLUSIONS

In PLHIV on antiretroviral therapy, we identify 291 drug interaction pairs systematically reported for the first time, with 179 (61.5%) being assessed as clinically relevant (levels one and two). The pharmacokinetic mechanism was the most frequently identified. PIs, ritonavir/cobicistat-boosted PIs, and InSTIs were the antiretroviral groups with the highest number of clinically relevant drug interaction pairs (levels one and two).

Early Antiretroviral Therapy in AIDS Patients Presenting With Toxoplasma gondii Encephalitis Is Associated With More Sequelae but Not Increased Mortality

Background

Evidence on the optimal time to initiate antiretroviral therapy (ART) in the presence of toxoplasmic encephalitis (TE) is scarce. We compared the impact of early vs. delayed ART initiation on mortality and neurologic complications at discharge in a Brazilian population co-infected with HIV and TE.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated data from 9 years of hospitalizations at a referral center in Manaus, Amazonas. All ART-naïve hospitalized patients were divided into early initiation treatment (EIT) (0-4 weeks) and delayed initiation treatment (DIT) (>4 weeks). The groups were compared using chi-square test and mortality at 16 weeks.

Results

Four hundred sixty nine patients were included, of whom 357 (76.1%) belonged to the EIT group. The median CD4⁺ lymphocyte count and CD4⁺/CD8⁺ ratio were 53 cells/mm³ and 0.09, respectively. Mortality rate and presence of sequelae were 4.9% (n = 23) and 41.6% (n = 195), respectively. Mortality was similar between groups (p = 0.18), although the EIT group had the highest prevalence of sequelae at discharge (p = 0.04). The hazard ratio for death at 16 weeks with DIT was 2.3 (p = 0.18). The necessity for intensive care unit admission, mechanical ventilation, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation were similar between groups.

Conclusion

In patients with AIDS and TE, early ART initiation might have a detrimental influence on the occurrence of sequelae.

Potential drug-drug interactions of antiretrovirals and antimicrobials detected by three databases

Standard treatment for HIV infection involves a combination of antiretrovirals. Additionally, opportunistic infections in HIV infected patients require further antimicrobial medications that might cause drug-drug interactions (DDIs). The objective of this study was to to compare the recognition of DDIs between antiretrovirals and antimicrobials by three proprietary databases and evaluate their concordance. 114 items of antiretrovirals and antimicrobials from the National List of Essential Medicines of Thailand 2018 were used in the study. However, 21 items were not recognised by Micromedex, Drugs.com, and Liverpool HIV interactions. Only 93 items were available for the detection of potential DDIs by the three databases. Potential DDIs detected from the three databases included 292 pairs. Liverpool showed the highest number of DDIs with 285 pairs compared with 259 pairs by drugs.com and 133 pairs by Micromedex. Regarding the severity classifications, Liverpool reported 10% Contraindicated; Micromedex reported 14% contraindicated and 59% major; Drugs.com reported 21% major. The Fleiss’ kappa agreements were fair to poor among the three databases, higher agreement was observed for DDIs classified as severe. This study highlights the need to harmonize the evaluation and interpretation of DDI risk in order to produce standardized information to support prescribers.

An update on drug-drug interactions between antiretroviral therapies and drugs of abuse in HIV systems

INTRODUCTION

While considerable progress has been made in the fight against HIV/AIDS, to date there has not been a cure, and millions of people around the world are currently living with HIV/AIDS. People living with HIV/AIDS have substance abuse disorders at higher rates than non-infected individuals, which puts them at an increased risk of drug-drug interactions.

AREAS COVERED

Potential drug-drug interactions are reviewed for a variety of potential drugs of abuse, both licit and illicit. These drugs include alcohol, cigarettes or other nicotine delivery systems, methamphetamine, cocaine, opioids, and marijuana. Potential interactions include decreased adherence, modulation of drug transporters, or modulation of metabolic enzymes. We also review the relative incidence of the use of these drugs of abuse in People living with HIV/AIDS.

EXPERT OPINION

Despite considerable improvements in outcomes, disparities in outcomes between PLWHA who use drugs of abuse, vs those who do not still exist. It is of critical necessity to improve outcomes in these patients and to work with them to stop abusing drugs of abuse.

Prevalence of opportunistic infections in insured patients with HIV and their association with socioeconomic and clinical factors in Colombia, 2012

Introduction: Despite advances in treatment, opportunistic infections are the major cause of morbidity and mortality among patients with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Objectives: To estimate the prevalence of opportunistic infections among insured HIV patients, and to establish its association with socio-demographic and clinical factors. Materials and methods: This was an observational study with an analytical focus. We analysed 37,325 records of insured people with HIV. A bivariate analysis using chi square and ANOVA, adjusted by Bonferroni, and multiple logistic regression for the adult population were carried out to explore the association among any opportunistic infections as the response variable and socio-demographic and clinical factors. Results: From the total, at least 18% experienced an opportunistic infection. The most frequent were tuberculosis and brain toxoplasmosis for adults, and pneumonia and diarrhea for patients under 13 years of age. The prevalence of any opportunistic infection was significantly higher in men (OR=1.5; CI95% 1.4-1.6), in those more than 40 years of age (OR=1.6; CI95% 1.3-2.0), in people subjected to forced displacement (OR=1.7; CI95% 1.5-1.9), and in those belonging to the subsidized or exception health affiliation regimes (OR= 2.7; CI95% 2.1-3.4). Regarding clinical factors, opportunistic infections were significantly associated to time since diagnosis (>10 years) (OR=1.6; CI95% 1.5-1.7), administration of antiretroviral treatment (OR=4.4; CI95% 3.9-5.1), and discontinuity of treatment (OR=1.7; CI95% 1.6-1.8). The multivariate analysis for adults in clinical stage A showed similar results. Conclusions: Despite the preventable nature of opportunistic infections, their prevalence is high and they predominantly affect the most disadvantaged people.