Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of solitary pulmonary nodules

Ultrasound-guided transthoracic needle biopsy of the lung: sensitivity and safety variables

OBJECTIVES

Variables affecting the performance of ultrasound-guided transthoracic needle biopsy (US-TTNB) are not well established. We examined clinical and imaging variables affecting the sensitivity and the complication rates of US-TTNB.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed a consecutive series of 528 US-TTNBs performed from 2008 to 2017. Univariate analyses were used to assess the influence of clinical and imaging variables on sensitivity and complication rates. Multivariate logistic regression was used to account for possible confounding variables.

RESULTS

In 397 malignant lesions, the sensitivity of US-TTNB was 72% (95% CI 68-77%; 285/397). The overall pneumothorax rate was 15% (95% CI 12-18%; 77/528), leading to a chest tube in 2% (95% CI 1-3%; 9/528). Multivariate analysis showed that increasing pleural contact length (up to 30 mm) was associated with increased sensitivity (OR 1.08 per mm; 95% CI 1.04-1.12; p < 0.001), and pleural contact length (OR 0.98 per mm; 95% CI 0.97-0.99; p = 0.013), lesion size (OR 0.98 per mm; 95% CI 0.96-0.99; p = 0.006), and core needle diameter of 18G (OR 0.47 as compared with 20G; 95% CI 0.26-0.83; p = 0.010) were associated with a decreased pneumothorax rate. Graphical inspection of cubic splines showed that the probability of a positive biopsy rose sharply with increasing pleural contact length up to 30 mm and was stable thereafter. A similar, but inverse, relationship was observed for the probability of a pneumothorax.

CONCLUSION

Pleural contact length is a key variable predicting the sensitivity of US-TTNB and pneumothorax rate after US-TTNB. Lesion size also predicts pneumothorax rates.

KEY POINTS

• US-TTNB has a high sensitivity and a low complication rate for pleural and pulmonary lesions with pleural contact. • Pleural contact length is a key variable predicting the sensitivity of US-TTNB and pneumothorax rate after US-TTNB. • This study suggests that relying on US-TTNB may not be optimal for lesions < 10 mm for which the risk of pneumothorax is as high as the chance of obtaining diagnosis.

Transthoracic needle biopsy of the lung

BACKGROUND

Image guided transthoracic needle aspiration (TTNA) is a valuable tool used for the diagnosis of countless thoracic diseases. Computed tomography (CT) is the most common imaging modality used for guidance followed by ultrasound (US) for lesions abutting the pleural surface. Novel approaches using virtual CT guidance have recently been introduced. The objective of this review is to examine the current literature for TTNA biopsy of the lung focusing on diagnostic accuracy and safety.

METHODS

MEDLINE was searched from inception to October 2015 for all case series examining image guided TTNA. Articles focusing on fluoroscopic guidance as well as influence of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) on yield were excluded. The diagnostic accuracy, defined as the number of true positives divided by the number of biopsies done, as well as the complication rate [pneumothorax (PTX), bleeding] was examined for CT guided TTNA, US guided TTNA as well as CT guided electromagnetic navigational-TTNA (E-TTNA). Of the 490 articles recovered 75 were included in our analysis.

RESULTS

The overall pooled diagnostic accuracy for CT guided TTNA using 48 articles that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria was 92.1% (9,567/10,383). A similar yield was obtained examining ten articles using US guided TTNA of 88.7% (446/503). E-TTNA, being a new modality, only had one pilot study citing a diagnostic accuracy of 83% (19/23). Pooled PTX and hemorrhage rates were 20.5% and 2.8% respectively for CT guided TTNA. The PTX rate was lower in US guided TTNA at a pooled rate of 4.4%. E-TTNA showed a similar rate of PTX at 20% with no incidence of bleeding in a single pilot study available.

CONCLUSIONS

Image guided TTNA is a safe and accurate modality for the biopsy of lung pathology. This study found similar yield and safety profiles with the three imaging modalities examined.

Accuracy of Transthoracic Sonography in Detection of Pneumothorax After Sonographically Guided Lung Biopsy: Prospective Comparison with Chest Radiography

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the accuracy of transthoracic sonography in the detection of pneumothorax after transthoracic sonographically guided lung biopsy.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Transthoracic sonography was performed on 285 patients after transthoracic sonographically guided lung biopsy. Disappearance of the sliding lung and comettail artifacts and appearance of reverberation artifacts were considered evidence of pneumothorax. Upright chest radiography was performed within 30 minutes of transthoracic sonography. If a discrepancy between transthoracic sonographic and chest radiographic findings occurred, CT was performed. When it was diagnosed, pneumothorax was sonographically monitored. After visualization of resolution of pneumothorax, chest radiography was performed to confirm the resolution.

RESULTS

Pneumothorax occurred in eight (2.8%) of the patients. Transthoracic sonography depicted all cases of pneumothorax and excluded pneumothorax in the other cases. Chest radiography did not depict one case of pneumothorax, which was confirmed on CT. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and overall accuracy were all 100% for transthoracic sonography and 87.5%, 100%, 100%, 99.6%, and 99.6%, respectively, for chest radiography. The 95% confidence intervals (CI) of the differences in sensitivity, negative predictive value, and overall accuracy were -10% to 35%, -0.1 to 0.9%, and -0.1 to 0.9%. Transthoracic sonographic visualization of resolution of pneumothorax was always confirmed with chest radiography.

CONCLUSION

These preliminary results suggest that transthoracic sonography is as effective as chest radiography in the detection of pneumothorax after transthoracic sonographically guided lung biopsy and may become the method of choice for excluding, diagnosing, and monitoring pneumothorax after transthoracic sonographically guided biopsy. Chest radiography may be needed only for assessment of the extent of pulmonary collapse after transthoracic sonographic diagnosis of pneumothorax or in the presence of discrepancy between transthoracic sonographic findings and clinical presentation.