1
|
Regulation of Quality of Life and Immune Function in Patients with Thyroid Cancer Treated by Deep Learning Technology. CONTRAST MEDIA & MOLECULAR IMAGING 2022; 2022:3281039. [PMID: 36110975 PMCID: PMC9448623 DOI: 10.1155/2022/3281039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2022] [Revised: 07/16/2022] [Accepted: 07/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Background In order to explore the regulation of quality of life and immune function in patients with thyroid cancer after radiotherapy, a method based on deep learning technology was proposed. A deep learning detection method for thyroid cancer is proposed. Methods It mainly includes three main modules: data preprocessing, thyroid cancer regional detection module, and thyroid cancer benign and malignant classification module. The data set in the experiment comes from LIDC-IDRI and is processed by the data preprocessing module to generate a standard data format that can be processed by the framework. The treatment of thyroid cancer can help patients relapse malignant thyroid cancer and prevent recurrence in advance. Results The results showed that most patients are diagnosed because of obvious swelling of local thyroid mass and conscious compression symptoms in the neck. At this time, they often miss the best treatment time, so as to reduce the surgical effect. Conclusions The metastasis and invasion of cancer cells are fast, the cancerous lesions are easy to form adhesion with the surrounding tracheal tissue, and the cancer cells invade the surrounding soft tissue, which is also easy to cause the cancerous tissue not to be completely removed. Clinical Trial Registration. Therefore, deep learning technology is used to treat residual cancerous lesions to ensure the surgical effect.
Collapse
|
2
|
Kamal M, Peeler CR, Yepes P, Mohamed AS, Blanchard P, Frank S, Chen L, Jethanandani A, Kuruvilla R, Greiner B, Harp J, Granberry R, Mehta V, Rock C, Hutcheson K, Cardenas C, Gunn G, Fuller C, Mirkovic D. Radiation-Induced Hypothyroidism After Radical Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Oropharyngeal Carcinoma. Adv Radiat Oncol 2019; 5:111-119. [PMID: 32051897 PMCID: PMC7005113 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2019.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2019] [Revised: 08/15/2019] [Accepted: 08/20/2019] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate 2 published normal tissue complication probability models for radiation-induced hypothyroidism (RHT) on a large cohort of oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPC) patients who were treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS OPC patients treated with retrievable IMRT Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOMs) data and available baseline and follow-up thyroid function tests were included. Mean dose (Dmean) to the thyroid gland (TG) and its volume were calculated. The study outcome was clinical HT at least 6 months after radiation therapy, which was defined as grade ≥2 HT per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grading system (symptomatic hypothyroidism that required thyroid replacement therapy). Regression analyses and Wilcoxon rank-sum test were used. Receiver operating characteristic curves and area under the curve for the fitted model were calculated. RESULTS In the study, 360 OPC patients were included. The median age was 58 years. Most tumors (51%) originated from the base of tongue. IMRT-split field was used in 95%, and median radiation therapy dose was 69.96 Gy. In the study, 233 patients (65%) developed clinical RHT that required thyroid replacement therapy. On multivariate analysis higher Dmean and smaller TG volume maintained the statistically significant association with the risk of clinical RHT (P < .0001). Dmean was significantly higher in patients with clinical RHT versus those without (50 vs 42 Gy, P < .0001). Patients with RHT had smaller TG volume compared with those without (11.8 compared with 12.8 mL, P < .0001). AUC of 0.72 and 0.66 were identified for fitted model versus for the applied Boomsma et al and Cella et al models, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Volume and Dmean of the TG are important predictors of clinical RHT and shall be integrated into normal tissue complication probability models for RHT. Dmean and thyroid volume should be considered during the IMRT plan optimization in OPC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mona Kamal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas,Department of Clinical Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Christopher Ryan Peeler
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Pablo Yepes
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas,Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rice University, Houston, Texas
| | - Abdallah S.R. Mohamed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas,Department of Clinical Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Alexandria, Alexandria, Egypt,MD Anderson Cancer Center/UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, Texas
| | - Pierre Blanchard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Steven Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Lei Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Amit Jethanandani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Rohit Kuruvilla
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Benjamin Greiner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jared Harp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Robin Granberry
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Vivek Mehta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Crosby Rock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Katherine Hutcheson
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Carlos Cardenas
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - G.Brandon Gunn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Clifton Fuller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas,MD Anderson Cancer Center/UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, Texas
| | - Dragan Mirkovic
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas,Corresponding author: Dragan Mirkovic, PhD
| |
Collapse
|