Sonographic diagnosis of appendicitis: A pictorial essay and a new diagnostic maneuver

Improving sonographic visualisation of the appendix in a regional referral hospital

Ultrasound is a first-line and often preferred imaging modality in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. When the appendix is not visualised during a dedicated appendix ultrasound study, patients may require a CT study, which uses ionising radiation, or undergo conservative clinical observation with the inherent risk of clinical deterioration, perforation and sepsis. Median baseline data, at our hospital imaging department, revealed a rate of combined normal and abnormal appendix visualisation of 34.5% which is below the reported visualisation rates in the North American literature and well below the rates reported in the global literature. We embarked on a formal quality improvement (QI) project to improve the rates of appendix visualisation in our hospital ultrasound department. Using the Model of Improvement framework and a team approach, we generated and trialled multiple plan-do-study-act interventions over a project term of 12 months. In the second half of the project term, we saw a sustained rise in appendix visualisation exceeding our original stretch goal of 75% visualisation which was sustained 6 months after the formal project end (p<0.001). This rise was accompanied by a commensurate increase in sonographer confidence in appendix visualisation. In our case, the Model of Improvement methodology proved successful in solving our complex problem of sonographic appendix under-visualisation. The learnings of this QI project have been widely shared and spread according to the ethos of QI.

Update on acute appendicitis: Typical and untypical findings

Acute appendicitis is the most common indication for emergency abdominal surgery throughout the world and a common reason for consultation in emergency departments. In recent decades, diagnostic imaging has played a fundamental role in identifying acute appendicitis, helping to reduce the rate of blind laparotomies and hospital costs. Given the results of clinical trials supporting the use of antibiotic therapy over surgical treatment, radiologists need to know the diagnostic criteria for complicated acute appendicitis to be able to recommend the best treatment option. This review aims not only to define the diagnostic criteria for appendicitis in different imaging modalities (ultrasonography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging), but also to explain the diagnostic protocols, atypical presentations, and other conditions that can mimic appendicitis.

Gastrointestinal Ultrasound in Emergency Setting

Acute bowel diseases are responsible for more than one third of subjects who were referred to the emergency department for acute abdominal pain and gastrointestinal evaluation. Gastrointestinal ultrasound (GIUS) is often employed as the first imaging method, with a good diagnostic accuracy in the setting of acute abdomen, and it can be an optimal diagnostic strategy in young females due to the radiation exposure related to X-ray and computed tomography methods. The physician can examine the gastrointestinal system in the area with the greatest tenderness by ultrasound, thus obtaining more information and data on the pathology than the standard physical examination. In this comprehensive review, we have reported the most relevant indications and advantages to using ultrasound in the investigation of abdominal acute pain.

Intestinal ultrasound detects an increased diameter and submucosal layer thickness in the appendix of patients with ulcerative colitis compared to healthy controls - a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Increasing evidence suggests that appendicectomy as alternative treatment for ulcerative colitis (UC), especially in patients with histopathological appendiceal inflammation. Intestinal ultrasound (IUS) is a non-invasive diagnostic modality to characterise appendiceal inflammation.

AIMS

To assess appendiceal IUS characteristics in UC patients and compare findings to healthy controls (HC).

METHODS

In this prospective study, appendiceal IUS was performed in consecutive UC patients with active (A; n = 35) or quiescent (Q; n = 30) disease and in HC (n = 30). Transverse appendiceal diameter (TAD) and additional IUS parameters (bowel wall thickness, submucosal layer thickness and colour Doppler signal) were assessed.

RESULTS

The appendix was visualised in 41/65 UC patients (63.1%; A vs. Q: 23/35 vs. 18/30, p = 0.67) and 18/30 (60%) HC. UC patients had a higher TAD (A: 5.5 mm, Q: 5.0 mm, HC: 4.3 mm; A-HC p < 0.01; Q-HC p = 0.01, A-Q p = ns) and submucosal layer thickness (A: 1.0 mm, Q: 1.0 mm, HC: 0.7 mm; A-HC p < 0.01, Q-HC: p = 0.01, A-Q: p = ns) when compared to HC. A TAD ≥6 mm corresponding to an ultrasonographic suspicion of acute appendicitis was mainly reported in A-UC patients (A: 43%; Q: 6%; HC: 0%, p = 0.01) and occurred irrespective of disease extent. However, none of the patients had a clinical suspicion of acute appendicitis.

CONCLUSION

A TAD ≥6 mm was predominantly seen in A-UC. TAD was higher in UC patients compared to HC irrespective of disease activity and was characterised by an increased submucosal layer thickness. IUS therefore has the potential to identify UC patients with appendiceal inflammation.