Immunophenotyping of lymphocyte subsets in the third eyelid tissue in dogs (Canis familiaris): Morphological, microvascular, and secretory aspects of this ocular adnexa

Comparative study of the eyelids and orbital glands morphology in the okapi (Okapia johnstoni, Giraffidae), Père David's deer (Elaphurus davidianus, Cervidae) and the Philippine mouse-deer (Tragulus nigricans, Tragulidae)

The accessory organs of the eye represent part of the protective system of the eyeball. In the present study, an examination of the accessory organs of the eye of three species of captive ruminants was performed using light microscopy. In the okapi, the superficial gland of the third eyelid and lacrimal gland were complex branched multilobar tubular glands formed by mucous units with tubular secretory portions and no plasma cells. The deep gland of the third eyelid was absent in the okapi and present in both the Père David's deer and the Philippine mouse-deer. In the Philippine mouse-deer, the deep gland had a very thick connective capsule and thick interlobar septae. It contained fewer lobes forming the gland parenchyma compared to Père David's deer and other ruminants. Organized lymphoid follicles were present within the upper and lower eyelids only in the okapi and Père David's deer, while diffuse lymphocytes were observed in the Philippine mouse-deer. The orbital glands in the Père David's deer had a multilobar tubuloacinar structure with numerous plasma cells and a mucoserous character. In contrast to the Philippine mouse-deer, these glands had a serous character. The presence of several macroscopic and microscopic structural differences of the examined accessory organs of the eye in the three captive ruminant species may be understood within an ecological context and may be associated with different habitat-specific environmental conditions.

Seasonal Changes in Testes Vascularisation in the Domestic Cat (Felis domesticus): Evaluation of Microvasculature, Angiogenic Activity, and Endothelial Cell Expression

Some male seasonal breeders undergo testicular growth and regression throughout the year. The objective of this study was to understand the effect of seasonality on: (i) microvasculature of cat testes; (ii) angiogenic activity in testicular tissue in vitro; and (iii) testicular endothelial cells expression throughout the year. Testicular vascular areas increased in March and April, June and July, being the highest in November and December. Testes tissue differently stimulated in vitro angiogenic activity, according to seasonality, being more evident in February, and November and December. Even though CD143 expression was higher in December, smaller peaks were present in April and July. As changes in angiogenesis may play a role on testes vascular growth and regression during the breeding and non-breeding seasons, data suggest that testicular vascularisation in cats is increased in three photoperiod windows of time, November/December, March/April and June/July. This increase in testicular vascularisation might be related to higher seasonal sexual activity in cats, which is in agreement with the fact that most queens give birth at the beginning of the year, between May and July, and in September.

Distribution of goblet cells and MUC5AC mRNA in the canine nictitating membrane

This study evaluated the distribution of goblet cells and the expression of MUC5AC mRNA in the canine nictitating membrane. The distribution of goblet cells in the nictitating membrane and temporal bulbar conjunctiva of beagle dogs was examined by histochemical analysis of impression cytology specimens and frozen sections. MUC5AC mRNA was detected by the reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The distribution of MUC5AC mRNA was also examined by in situ hybridization using digoxigenin-labeled antisense and sense RNA probes. Histochemical analysis showed that the canine nictitating membrane epithelium contained many more periodic acid-Schiff positive goblet cells, particularly on the palpebral side, compared with the temporal bulbar conjunctiva. RT-PCR revealed that MUC5AC was expressed in both the nictitating membrane and in conjunctival tissue. When the distribution of MUC5AC mRNA was assessed by in situ hybridization, its expression was high on the palpebral side of the nictitating membrane and low in the temporal bulbar conjunctiva. MUC5AC mRNA expression corresponded with the distribution of goblet cells by histochemical examination. In conclusion, there were numerous goblet cells in the canine nictitating membrane epithelium, particularly on the palpebral side, and MUC5AC mRNA was expressed in the nictitating membrane epithelium at locations corresponding to the goblet cells.