Seracchiani M, Reda R, Zanza A, D'Angelo M, Russo P, Luca T. Mechanical performance and Metallurgical Characteristic of Five Different Single-File Reciprocating Instruments: a Comparative in Vitro and Laboratory Study.
J Endod 2022;
48:1073-1080. [PMID:
35667568 DOI:
10.1016/j.joen.2022.05.009]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2022] [Revised: 04/16/2022] [Accepted: 05/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
Since there are no data regarding an instrument recently introduced on the market (OneRECI), the aim of the study was to assess its mechanical and metallurgical properties comparing them with those of widespread reciprocating instruments such as Reciproc, Reciproc Blue, EdgeOne Fire and WaveOne Gold.
METHODS
A total of 65 NiTi files from five different reciprocating systems (OneRECI, Reciproc, Reciproc Blue, EdgeOne Fire and WaveOne Gold) were evaluated throughout a combined mechanical and metallurgical method. Mechanical performances of the selected file were examined subjecting each specimen to cyclic fatigue, torsional and bending resistance tests, whilst their metallurgical properties were assessed analyzing the nickel-titanium alloy composition and the phase transformation temperatures respectively through an energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) and a differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). One-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey's was performed with significance level set to a 95% confidence level.
RESULTS
The EDX showed a similar alloy composition for all of the tested files, with nickel percentage of about 52-53% and a corresponding percentage of titanium of 47-48%, whilst the DSC analysis, although evidenced martensitic characteristics for all files, showed differences in terms of phase transformation temperatures. Overall, OneRECI showed the best mechanical performances in terms of cyclic fatigue and torsional resistance (respectively of 32.95 ± 2.33 s and 0.76 ± 0.03 Ncm) and flexibility (48.4 ± 4.1 g), with statistically significant differences for all tests (p<0.05). Reciproc files showed the worst flexibility and cyclic fatigue resistance, respectively of 157.2 ± 8.3 g and 9.27 ± 1.18 s, whilst the EdgeOne Fire showed the lowest torsional resistance (0.39 ± 0.12 Ncm), whit statistically significant differences (p<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
Within the limitation of this study, the recently introduced file OneRECI showed the best mechanical performance in comparison to the tested instruments, with an equiatomic composition of the NiTi alloy and a martensitic behavior.
Collapse