Deng H, Li D, Panta K, Wertz A, Priya S, Cheng B. Effects of caudal fin stiffness on optimized forward swimming and turning maneuver in a robotic swimmer.
BIOINSPIRATION & BIOMIMETICS 2024;
19:036003. [PMID:
38430560 DOI:
10.1088/1748-3190/ad2f42]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 03/01/2024] [Indexed: 03/04/2024]
Abstract
In animal and robot swimmers of body and caudal fin (BCF) form, hydrodynamic thrust is mainly produced by their caudal fins, the stiffness of which has profound effects on both thrust and efficiency of swimming. Caudal fin stiffness also affects the motor control and resulting swimming gaits that correspond to optimal swimming performance; however, their relationship remains scarcely explored. Here using magnetic, modular, undulatory robots (μBots), we tested the effects of caudal fin stiffness on both forward swimming and turning maneuver. We developed six caudal fins with stiffness of more than three orders of difference. For aμBot equipped with each caudal fin (andμBot absent of caudal fin), we applied reinforcement learning in experiments to optimize the motor control for maximizing forward swimming speed or final heading change. The motor control ofμBot was generated by a central pattern generator for forward swimming or by a series of parameterized square waves for turning maneuver. In forward swimming, the variations in caudal fin stiffness gave rise to three modes of optimized motor frequencies and swimming gaits including no caudal fin (4.6 Hz), stiffness <10-4Pa m4(∼10.6 Hz) and stiffness >10-4Pa m4(∼8.4 Hz). Swimming speed, however, varied independently with the modes of swimming gaits, and reached maximal at stiffness of 0.23 × 10-4Pa m4, with theμBot without caudal fin achieving the lowest speed. In turning maneuver, caudal fin stiffness had considerable effects on the amplitudes of both initial head steering and subsequent recoil, as well as the final heading change. It had relatively minor effect on the turning motor program except for theμBots without caudal fin. Optimized forward swimming and turning maneuver shared an identical caudal fin stiffness and similar patterns of peduncle and caudal fin motion, suggesting simplicity in the form and function relationship inμBot swimming.
Collapse