Sequence and domain conservation of the coelacanth Hsp40 and Hsp90 chaperones suggests conservation of function: THE COELACANTH CHAPERONE MACHINERY

CHIP: A Co-chaperone for Degradation by the Proteasome and Lysosome

Protein homeostasis relies on a balance between protein folding and protein degradation. Molecular chaperones like Hsp70 and Hsp90 fulfill well-defined roles in protein folding and conformational stability via ATP-dependent reaction cycles. These folding cycles are controlled by associations with a cohort of non-client protein co-chaperones, such as Hop, p23, and Aha1. Pro-folding co-chaperones facilitate the transit of the client protein through the chaperone-mediated folding process. However, chaperones are also involved in proteasomal and lysosomal degradation of client proteins. Like folding complexes, the ability of chaperones to mediate protein degradation is regulated by co-chaperones, such as the C-terminal Hsp70-binding protein (CHIP/STUB1). CHIP binds to Hsp70 and Hsp90 chaperones through its tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR) domain and functions as an E3 ubiquitin ligase using a modified RING finger domain (U-box). This unique combination of domains effectively allows CHIP to network chaperone complexes to the ubiquitin-proteasome and autophagosome-lysosome systems. This chapter reviews the current understanding of CHIP as a co-chaperone that switches Hsp70/Hsp90 chaperone complexes from protein folding to protein degradation.

Hsp70/Hsp90 Organising Protein (Hop): Coordinating Much More than Chaperones

The Hsp70/Hsp90 organising protein (Hop, also known as stress-inducible protein 1/STI1/STIP1) has received considerable attention for diverse cellular functions in both healthy and diseased states. There is extensive evidence that intracellular Hop is a co-chaperone of the major chaperones Hsp70 and Hsp90, playing an important role in the productive folding of Hsp90 client proteins, although recent evidence suggests that eukaryotic Hop is regulatory within chaperone complexes rather than essential. Consequently, Hop is implicated in many key signalling pathways, including aberrant pathways leading to cancer. Hop is also secreted, and it is now well established that Hop interacts with the prion protein, PrP^C, to mediate multiple signalling events. The intracellular and extracellular forms of Hop most likely represent two different isoforms, although the molecular determinants of these divergent functions are yet to be identified. There is also a growing body of research that reports the involvement of Hop in cellular activities that appear independent of either chaperones or PrP^C. While the various cellular functions of Hop have been described, its biological function remains elusive. However, recent knockout studies in mammals suggest that Hop has an important role in embryonic development. This review provides a critical overview of the latest molecular, cellular and biological research on Hop, critically evaluating its function in healthy systems and how this function is adapted in diseased states.

Induction of Heat Shock Protein Genes is the Hallmark of Egg Heat Tolerance in Agasicles hygrophila (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)

Insects are ecotothermic organisms. Their development, survival, reproduction as well as distribution and abundance are affected by temperature. Heat shock protein (HSP) gene expression is closely associated with temperature variation and influences the adaptation of organisms to adverse environments. The beetle Agasicles hygrophila has successfully been used for biological control of the invasive plant alligator weed (Alternanthera philoxeroides). As A. hygrophila populations are substantially inhibited by high temperatures in the summer, increasing global temperatures may limit the efficacy of this control agent. We previously established that A. hygrophila eggs have low tolerance to heat and this factored into the decreased numbers of A. hygrophila beetles at temperatures of 37.5°C and above. Here, we identified 26 HSP genes in A. hygrophila and examined the relationship between the transcript levels of these genes and heat tolerance. The temperature at which the expression of these 21 HSP genes peaked (Tpeak) was 37.5°C, which is in line with the limit of the high temperatures that A. hygrophila eggs tolerate. Therefore, we speculate that the Tpeak of HSP gene expression in eggs indicates the upper limit of temperatures that A. hygrophila eggs tolerate. This study identifies HSP genes as potential robust biomarkers and emphasizes that determining species' heat tolerance in their natural habitats remains an important consideration for biocontrol. HSP gene expression data provide information about a species' heat tolerance and may be used to predict its geographical distribution.

Molecular cloning, characterization of Pomacea canaliculata HSP40 and its expression analysis under temperature change

Heat shock proteins (HSPs) play important roles in the adaption of Pomacea canaliculata to unsuitable environments. In the present study, a cDNA encoding HSP40 in P. canaliculata (PocaHSP40) was cloned and characterized. The PocaHSP40 cDNA was 1466 bp, containing an ORF of 954 bp encoding 317 amino acids. Bioinformatics analysis showed that PocaHSP40 belonged to type II HSP40s and had four predicted phosphorylation sites. Phylogenetic analysis proved the conservation of HSP40s in mollusks. PocaHSP40 was widely expressed in the gill, digestive gland, kidney, and foot muscle of P. canaliculata. Challenged by different temperatures, the expression of PocaHSP40 was up-regulated under low temperatures but not high temperatures, which was contrary to the expression change of PocaHSP70 under low and high temperatures. These results implied that P. canaliculata evolved different strategies for survival under low temperature and high temperature through the regulation of HSPs.

Dynamics-based community analysis and perturbation response scanning of allosteric interaction networks in the TRAP1 chaperone structures dissect molecular linkage between conformational asymmetry and sequential ATP hydrolysis

Allosteric interactions of the Hsp90 chaperones with cochaperones and diverse protein clients can often exhibit distinct asymmetric features that determine regulatory mechanisms and cellular functions in many signaling networks. The recent crystal structures of the mitochondrial Hsp90 isoform TRAP1 in complexes with ATP analogs have provided first evidence of significant asymmetry in the closed dimerized state that triggers independent activity of the chaperone protomers, whereby preferential hydrolysis of the buckled protomer is followed by conformational flipping between protomers and hydrolysis of the second protomer. Despite significant insights in structural characterizations of the TRAP1 chaperone, the atomistic details and mechanics of allosteric interactions that couple sequential ATP hydrolysis with asymmetric conformational switching in the TRAP1 protomers remain largely unknown. In this work, we explored atomistic and coarse-grained simulations of the TRAP1 dimer structures in combination with the ensemble-based network modeling and perturbation response scanning of residue interaction networks to probe salient features underlying allosteric signaling mechanism. This study has revealed that key effector sites that orchestrate allosteric interactions occupy the ATP binding region and N-terminal interface of the buckled protomer, whereas the main sensors of allosteric signals that drive functional conformational changes during ATPase cycle are consolidated near the client binding region of the straight protomer, channeling the energy of ATP hydrolysis for client remodeling. The community decomposition analysis of the interaction networks and reconstruction of allosteric communication pathways in the TRAP1 structures have quantified mechanism of allosteric regulation, revealing control points and interactions that coordinate asymmetric switching during ATP hydrolysis.

Human, vector and parasite Hsp90 proteins: A comparative bioinformatics analysis

•

Cytosolic Hsp90s are more conserved than those from mitochondrial and ER.

•

Cell environment plays a role in the overall physicochemical properties of Hsp90s.

•

Serine and tyrosine are favored phosphorylated residues of Hsp90s.

•

Mitochondrial and ER Hsp90s have motifs unique to specific organisms.

The treatment of protozoan parasitic diseases is challenging, and thus identification and analysis of new drug targets is important. Parasites survive within host organisms, and some need intermediate hosts to complete their life cycle. Changing host environment puts stress on parasites, and often adaptation is accompanied by the expression of large amounts of heat shock proteins (Hsps). Among Hsps, Hsp90 proteins play an important role in stress environments. Yet, there has been little computational research on Hsp90 proteins to analyze them comparatively as potential parasitic drug targets. Here, an attempt was made to gain detailed insights into the differences between host, vector and parasitic Hsp90 proteins by large-scale bioinformatics analysis. A total of 104 Hsp90 sequences were divided into three groups based on their cellular localizations; namely cytosolic, mitochondrial and endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Further, the parasitic proteins were divided according to the type of parasite (protozoa, helminth and ectoparasite). Primary sequence analysis, phylogenetic tree calculations, motif analysis and physicochemical properties of Hsp90 proteins suggested that despite the overall structural conservation of these proteins, parasitic Hsp90 proteins have unique features which differentiate them from human ones, thus encouraging the idea that protozoan Hsp90 proteins should be further analyzed as potential drug targets.

CHIP: a co-chaperone for degradation by the proteasome

Protein homeostasis relies on a balance between protein folding and protein degradation. Molecular chaperones like Hsp70 and Hsp90 fulfil well-defined roles in protein folding and conformational stability via ATP dependent reaction cycles. These folding cycles are controlled by associations with a cohort of non-client protein co-chaperones, such as Hop, p23 and Aha1. Pro-folding co-chaperones facilitate the transit of the client protein through the chaperone mediated folding process. However, chaperones are also involved in ubiquitin-mediated proteasomal degradation of client proteins. Similar to folding complexes, the ability of chaperones to mediate protein degradation is regulated by co-chaperones, such as the C terminal Hsp70 binding protein (CHIP). CHIP binds to Hsp70 and Hsp90 chaperones through its tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR) domain and functions as an E3 ubiquitin ligase using a modified RING finger domain (U-box). This unique combination of domains effectively allows CHIP to network chaperone complexes to the ubiquitin-proteasome system. This chapter reviews the current understanding of CHIP as a co-chaperone that switches Hsp70/Hsp90 chaperone complexes from protein folding to protein degradation.

Hsp70/Hsp90 organising protein (hop): beyond interactions with chaperones and prion proteins

The Hsp70/Hsp90 organising protein (Hop), also known as stress-inducible protein 1 (STI1), has received considerable attention for diverse cellular functions in both healthy and diseased states. There is extensive evidence that intracellular Hop is a co-chaperone of the major chaperones Hsp70 and Hsp90, playing an important role in the productive folding of Hsp90 client proteins. Consequently, Hop is implicated in a number of key signalling pathways, including aberrant pathways leading to cancer. However, Hop is also secreted and it is now well established that Hop also serves as a receptor for the prion protein, PrP(C). The intracellular and extracellular forms of Hop most likely represent two different isoforms, although the molecular determinants of these divergent functions are yet to be identified. There is also a growing body of research that reports the involvement of Hop in cellular activities that appear independent of either chaperones or PrP(C). While Hop has been shown to have various cellular functions, its biological function remains elusive. However, recent knockout studies in mammals suggest that Hop has an important role in embryonic development. This review provides a critical overview of the latest molecular, cellular and biological research on Hop, critically evaluating its function in healthy systems and how this function is adapted in diseases states.

Molecular chaperones, cochaperones, and ubiquitination/deubiquitination system: involvement in the production of high quality spermatozoa

Spermatogenesis is a complex process in which mitosis, meiosis, and cell differentiation events coexist. The need to guarantee the production of qualitatively functional spermatozoa has evolved into several control systems that check spermatogenesis progression/sperm maturation and tag aberrant gametes for degradation. In this review, we will focus on the importance of the evolutionarily conserved molecular pathways involving molecular chaperones belonging to the superfamily of heat shock proteins (HSPs), their cochaperones, and ubiquitination/deubiquitination system all over the spermatogenetic process. In this respect, we will discuss the conserved role played by the DNAJ protein Msj-1 (mouse sperm cell-specific DNAJ first homologue) and the deubiquitinating enzyme Ubpy (ubiquitin-specific processing protease-y) during the spermiogenesis in both mammals and nonmammalian vertebrates.