1
|
McVeigh TP, Monahan KJ, Christopher J, West N, Scott M, Murray J, Hanson H. Extent of investigation and management of cases of 'unexplained' mismatch repair deficiency (u-dMMR): a UK Cancer Genetics Group consensus. J Med Genet 2024; 61:707-715. [PMID: 38531626 PMCID: PMC11228216 DOI: 10.1136/jmg-2024-109886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2024] [Accepted: 03/09/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) is a characteristic feature of cancers linked to Lynch syndrome. However, in most cases, it results from sporadic somatic events rather than hereditary factors. The term 'Lynch-like syndrome' (LLS) has been used to guide colorectal cancer surveillance for relatives of individuals with a dMMR tumour when somatic and germline genomic testing is uninformative. As the assessment of mismatch repair through immunohistochemistry and/or microsatellite instability is increasingly applied across various tumour types for treatment planning, dMMR is increasingly detected in tumours where suspicion of hereditary aetiology is low. Our objective was to establish current practices and develop national guidance for investigating, and managing relatives of, patients with cancers demonstrating unexplained dMMR. METHODS This was achieved through a virtual consensus meeting involving key stakeholders from the UK, through premeeting surveys, structured discussions and in-meeting polling to formulate best practice guidance. RESULTS We identified variability in the availability of diagnostic technologies across specialist centres. It was agreed that equitable access to baseline testing is required, acknowledging the need for a pragmatic approach to investigating dMMR cancers not traditionally associated with Lynch syndrome. Factors such as family history, age, tumour type, protein loss pattern and extent of the investigation were deemed crucial in guiding family management. The term 'unexplained dMMR' was recommended over LLS. CONCLUSION Decisions regarding investigations and future cancer risk management in patients and relatives should be nuanced, considering factors like clinical suspicion of hereditary predisposition to allocate limited resources efficiently and avoid unnecessary investigations in low-suspicion families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Terri Patricia McVeigh
- Cancer Genetics Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Kevin J Monahan
- St Mark's Academic Institute Polyposis Registry, Harrow, UK
- Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Joseph Christopher
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Nick West
- University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Department of Histopathology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Malcolm Scott
- Familial Cancer Clinic, Department of Gynaecology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jennie Murray
- Southeast Scotland Genetics Service, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Helen Hanson
- Peninsula Regional Genetics Service, Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhao L, Lynch L, Eiriksson L. Information needs of Lynch syndrome and BRCA 1/2 mutation carriers considering risk-reducing gynecological surgery: a qualitative study of the decision-making process. Hered Cancer Clin Pract 2024; 22:5. [PMID: 38698439 PMCID: PMC11067152 DOI: 10.1186/s13053-024-00278-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 05/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Risk-reducing gynecological surgery (RRGS) is a prophylactic procedure that may be offered to BRCA1, BRCA2, and Lynch syndrome (LS) mutation carriers to reduce the risk of developing gynecological cancer. This study was conducted to better understand patients' information needs and evaluate how patients weigh different sources of information in their decision-making process surrounding RRGS. METHODS This study used a qualitative approach to understanding women's perspectives towards RRGS. Semi-structured interviews were conducted virtually with 8 women. Women offered RRGS between 35 and 70 years of age who are English-speaking and have an identifiable BRCA or LS mutation were included. Data from interviews was coded with constant comparative analysis to develop themes. RESULTS Of the eight women, six had selected to undergo either prophylactic hysterectomy or oophorectomy: 5 decided yes to RRGS; 1 decided no; 2 were undecided. Thematic analysis found that the key factors affecting women's decisions around prophylactic surgery were cancer risk, surgical menopause, and psychological readiness. To make an informed decision, women relied most heavily on information provided by healthcare professionals (e.g. doctors, genetic counselors) and family members with prior cancer experience. However, some women reported that they did not feel adequately informed enough to make a decision and identified COVID-19 as a significant barrier affecting access to information. CONCLUSION This qualitative study revealed the key sources of information influencing attitudes regarding RRGS and how women consulted different sources of information to reach a decision. Results underscore the need for greater attention to women's information needs in the context of psychological readiness, particularly amidst the pandemic. Research involving a larger sample size may help to better inform how support can be provided to individuals with BRCA and LS mutations considering RRGS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy Zhao
- Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
| | - Lorrie Lynch
- Cancer Genetics Clinic, Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Lua Eiriksson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Canada
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ioffe D, McSweeny M, Hall MJ. Precision Medicine in the Era of Genetic Testing: Microsatellite Instability Evolved. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2024; 37:157-171. [PMID: 38617845 PMCID: PMC11007599 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1770385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/16/2024]
Abstract
The recognized importance of microsatellite instability (MSI) in cancer has evolved considerably in the past 30 years. From its beginnings as a molecular predictor for Lynch syndrome, MSI first transitioned to a universal screening test in all colorectal and endometrial cancers, substantially increasing the identification of patients with Lynch syndrome among cancer patients. More recently, MSI has been shown to be a powerful biomarker of response to immune checkpoint blockade therapy across a diversity of tumor types, and in 2017 was granted Food and Drug Administration approval as the first tumor histology-agnostic biomarker for a cancer therapy. Focusing on colorectal cancer specifically, immune checkpoint blockade therapy has been shown to be highly effective in the treatment of both MSI-high (MSI-H) colon and rectal cancer, with data increasingly suggesting an early role for immune checkpoint blockade therapy in MSI-H colorectal tumors in the neoadjuvant setting, with the potential to avoid more toxic and morbid approaches using traditional chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and surgery. The success of MSI as an immune checkpoint blockade target has inspired ongoing vigorous research to identify new similar targets for immune checkpoint blockade therapy that may help to one day expand the reach of this revolutionary cancer therapy to a wider swath of patients and indications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dina Ioffe
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Michelle McSweeny
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Michael J. Hall
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wen T, Ehivet F, Stanislaw C, Mao R, Hegde M. Hereditary Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis by Next-Generation Sequencing. Curr Protoc 2023; 3:e941. [PMID: 38112503 DOI: 10.1002/cpz1.941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2023]
Abstract
Pathogenic germline variants causally contribute to the etiology of colorectal cancer (CRC) and polyposis. The era of massively parallel sequencing, also known as next-generation sequencing (NGS), make it highly possible, effective, and efficient to offer rapid and cost-effective diagnosis for CRC. To aid clinical laboratories in testing the most clinically significant genes, along with the published ACMG CRC technical standard guidelines, this protocol aims to provide a step-by-step technical workflow for carrying out the NGS-panel based CRC molecular diagnosis focusing on the wet lab portion of library preparation and massively parallel sequencing. Using the most popular pull-down-based target enrichment, the chapter particularly encompasses genomic DNA (gDNA) fragmentation, adapter ligation, indexing, hybridization, and capture, which is the most variable and technically challenging part of NGS testing involving at least 3 quality control (QC) checkpoints plus the pre- and post-capture PCR. The gDNA extraction and sequencing is less covered because they are relatively standard technologies with little variations and choices. Although this protocol also introduces pertinent testing algorithms and a brief guideline for pre- and post-testing genetic counselling, the audiences are required to refer to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) clinical practice guidelines to determine the most appropriate testing strategies. Since NGS panel-based testing is a highly complex and dynamic platform with multiple choices from different technology and commercial resources, this technical benchtop-based protocol also aims to cover some of the key ramification points for decision-making by each laboratory at the discretion of the directors. © 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol: Hereditary colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosis by next-generation sequencing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ting Wen
- University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
- ARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Fabienne Ehivet
- Department of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Christine Stanislaw
- Department of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Rong Mao
- University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
- ARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Madhuri Hegde
- Department of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
- Revvity, Waltham, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hodan R, Rodgers-Fouche L, Chittenden A, Dominguez-Valentin M, Ferriss J, Gima L, Hamnvik OPR, Idos GE, Kline K, Koeller DR, Long JM, McKenna D, Muller C, Thoman M, Wintner A, Bedrick BS. Cancer surveillance for transgender and gender diverse patients with Lynch syndrome: a practice resource of the Collaborative Group of the Americas on Inherited Gastrointestinal Cancer. Fam Cancer 2023; 22:437-448. [PMID: 37341816 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-023-00341-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/31/2023] [Indexed: 06/22/2023]
Abstract
Transgender and gender diverse (TGD) populations with hereditary cancer syndromes face unique obstacles to identifying and obtaining appropriate cancer surveillance and risk-reducing procedures. There is a lack of care provider knowledge about TGD health management. Lynch syndrome (LS) is one of the most common hereditary cancer syndromes, affecting an estimated 1 in 279 individuals. There are no clinical guidelines specific for TGD individuals with LS, highlighting a need to improve the quality of care for this population. There is an urgent need for cancer surveillance recommendations for TGD patients. This commentary provides recommendations for cancer surveillance, risk-reducing strategies, and genetic counseling considerations for TGD patients with LS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Hodan
- Cancer Genetics, Stanford Health Care and Department of Pediatrics (Genetics), Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
| | - Linda Rodgers-Fouche
- Center for Cancer Risk Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anu Chittenden
- Division of Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mev Dominguez-Valentin
- Department of Tumor Biology, Institute of Cancer Research, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - James Ferriss
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Lauren Gima
- Division of Clinical Cancer Genomics, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Ole-Petter R Hamnvik
- Center for Transgender Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Gregory E Idos
- Division of Gastroenterology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Kevin Kline
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Diane R Koeller
- Division of Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jessica M Long
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Danielle McKenna
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Charles Muller
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Maxton Thoman
- Department of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anton Wintner
- Department of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Bronwyn S Bedrick
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bolivar AM, Duzagac F, Sinha KM, Vilar E. Advances in vaccine development for cancer prevention and treatment in Lynch Syndrome. Mol Aspects Med 2023; 93:101204. [PMID: 37478804 PMCID: PMC10528439 DOI: 10.1016/j.mam.2023.101204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2023] [Revised: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/23/2023]
Abstract
Lynch Syndrome (LS) is one of the most common hereditary cancer syndromes, and is caused by mutations in one of the four DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes, namely MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2. Tumors developed by LS carriers display high levels of microsatellite instability, which leads to the accumulation of large numbers of mutations, among which frameshift insertion/deletions (indels) within microsatellite (MS) loci are the most common. As a result, MMR-deficient (MMRd) cells generate increased rates of tumor-specific neoantigens (neoAgs) that can be recognized by the immune system to activate cancer cell killing. In this context, LS is an ideal disease to leverage immune-interception strategies. Therefore, the identification of these neoAgs is an ongoing effort for the development of LS cancer preventive vaccines. In this review, we summarize the computational methods used for in silico neoAg prediction, including their challenges, and the experimental techniques used for in vitro validation of their immunogenicity. In addition, we outline results from past and on-going vaccine clinical trials and highlight avenues for improvement and future directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana M Bolivar
- Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Fahriye Duzagac
- Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Krishna M Sinha
- Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Eduardo Vilar
- Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; Clinical Cancer Genetics Program, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gill S, Ahmed S, Anderson B, Berry S, Lim H, Phang T, Sharma A, Solar Vasconcelos JP, Gill K, Iqbal M, Tankel K, Chan T, Recsky M, Nuk J, Paul J, Mahmood S. Report from the 24th Annual Western Canadian Gastrointestinal Cancer Consensus Conference on Colorectal Cancer, Richmond, British Columbia, 28-29, October 2022. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:7964-7983. [PMID: 37754494 PMCID: PMC10529884 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30090579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Revised: 08/10/2023] [Accepted: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023] Open
Abstract
The 24th annual Western Canadian Gastrointestinal Cancer Consensus Conference (WCGCCC) was held in Richmond, British Columbia, on 28-29 October 2022. The WCGCCC is an interactive multidisciplinary conference attended by healthcare professionals from across Western Canada (British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba) who are involved in the care of patients with gastrointestinal cancer. Surgical, medical, and radiation oncologists; pathologists; radiologists; and allied health care professionals such as dieticians, nurses and a genetic counsellor participated in presentation and discussion sessions for the purpose of developing the recommendations presented here. This consensus statement addresses current issues in the management of colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharlene Gill
- British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada; (H.L.); (J.P.S.V.); (K.G.)
| | - Shahid Ahmed
- Saskatchewan Cancer Agency, Saskatoon, SK S4W 0G3, Canada;
| | - Brady Anderson
- Western Manitoba Cancer Center, Brandon, MB R7A 5M8, Canada;
| | - Scott Berry
- Department of Oncology, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada;
| | - Howard Lim
- British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada; (H.L.); (J.P.S.V.); (K.G.)
| | - Terry Phang
- Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada;
| | - Ankur Sharma
- Central Alberta Cancer Centre, School of Medicine, University of Calgary Cumming, Red Deer, AB T4N 6R2, Canada;
| | | | - Karamjit Gill
- British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada; (H.L.); (J.P.S.V.); (K.G.)
| | | | - Keith Tankel
- Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB T6G 1Z2, Canada; (K.T.); (S.M.)
| | - Theresa Chan
- British Columbia Cancer Agency, Surrey, BC V3V 1Z2, Canada;
| | | | - Jennifer Nuk
- British Columbia Cancer Hereditary Cancer Program, Victoria, BC V8R 6V5, Canada;
| | - James Paul
- CancerCare Manitoba, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0V9, Canada;
| | - Shazia Mahmood
- Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB T6G 1Z2, Canada; (K.T.); (S.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Carsote M, Turturea IF, Turturea MR, Valea A, Nistor C, Gheorghisan-Galateanu AA. Pathogenic Insights into DNA Mismatch Repair (MMR) Genes-Proteins and Microsatellite Instability: Focus on Adrenocortical Carcinoma and Beyond. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:diagnostics13111867. [PMID: 37296718 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13111867] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Revised: 05/19/2023] [Accepted: 05/24/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
DNA damage repair pathways, including mismatch repair (MMR) genes, are prone to carcinoma development in certain patients. The assessment of the MMR system is widely recognized as part of strategies concerning solid tumors (defective MMR cancers), especially MMR proteins (through immunohistochemistry), and molecular assays for microsatellite instability (MSI). We aim to highlight the status of MMR genes-proteins (including MSI) in the relationship with ACC (adrenocortical carcinoma) according to current knowledge. This is a narrative review. We included PubMed-accessed, full-length English papers published between January 2012 and March 2023. We searched studies on ACC patients for whom MMR status was assessed, respectively subjects harboring MMR germline mutations, namely Lynch syndrome (LS), who were diagnosed with ACC. MMR system assessments in ACCs involve a low level of statistical evidence. Generally, there are two main types of endocrine insights: 1. the role of MMR status as a prognostic marker in different endocrine malignancies (including ACC)-which is the topic of the present work, and 2. establishing the indication of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPIs) in selective, mostly highly aggressive, non-responsive to standard care forms upon MMR evaluation (which belongs to the larger chapter of immunotherapy in ACCs). Our one-decade, sample-case study (which, to our knowledge, it is the most comprehensive of its kind) identified 11 original articles (from 1 patient to 634 subjects per study diagnosed with either ACC or LS). We identified four studies published in 2013 and 2020 and two in 2021, three cohorts and two retrospective studies (the publication from 2013 includes a retrospective and a cohort distinct section). Among these four studies, patients already confirmed to have LS (N = 643, respective 135) were found to be associated with ACC (N = 3, respective 2), resulting in a prevalence of 0.0046%, with a respective of 1.4% being confirmed (despite not having a large amount of similar data outside these two studies). Studies on ACC patients (N = 364, respective 36 pediatric individuals, and 94 subjects with ACC) showed that 13.7% had different MMR gene anomalies, with a respective of 8.57% (non-germline mutations), while 3.2% had MMR germline mutations (N = 3/94 cases). Two case series included one family, with a respective four persons with LS, and each article introduced one case with LS-ACC. Another five case reports (between 2018 and 2021) revealed an additional five subjects (one case per paper) diagnosed with LS and ACC (female to male ratio of 4 to 1; aged between 44 and 68). Interesting genetic testing involved children with TP53-positive ACC and further MMR anomalies or an MSH2 gene-positive subject with LS with a concurrent germline RET mutation. The first report of LS-ACC referred for PD-1 blockade was published in 2018. Nevertheless, the use of ICPI in ACCs (as similarly seen in metastatic pheochromocytoma) is still limited. Pan-cancer and multi-omics analysis in adults with ACC, in order to classify the candidates for immunotherapy, had heterogeneous results, and integrating an MMR system in this larger and challenging picture is still an open issue. Whether individuals diagnosed with LS should undergo surveillance for ACC has not yet been proven. An assessment of tumor-related MMR/MSI status in ACC might be helpful. Further algorithms for diagnostics and therapy, also taking into consideration innovative biomarkers as MMR-MSI, are necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mara Carsote
- Department of Endocrinology, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy & C.I. Parhon National Institute of Endocrinology, 011461 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Ionut Florin Turturea
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Cluj Emergency County Hospital, 400347 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | | | - Ana Valea
- Department of Endocrinology, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy & Clinical County Hospital, 400347 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Claudiu Nistor
- Department 4-Cardio-Thoracic Pathology, Thoracic Surgery II Discipline, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy & Thoracic Surgery Department, Dr. Carol Davila Central Emergency University Military Hospital, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Ancuta-Augustina Gheorghisan-Galateanu
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, and Histology, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy & Department of Endocrinology, C.I. Parhon National Institute of Endocrinology, 011461 Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mighton C, Lerner‐Ellis J. Principles of molecular testing for hereditary cancer. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2022; 61:356-381. [DOI: 10.1002/gcc.23048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2021] [Revised: 04/03/2022] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Chloe Mighton
- Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health Toronto ON Canada
- Lunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health Toronto ON Canada
- Genomics Health Services Research Program Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto Toronto ON Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health University of Toronto Toronto ON Canada
| | - Jordan Lerner‐Ellis
- Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health Toronto ON Canada
- Lunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health Toronto ON Canada
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology University of Toronto Toronto ON Canada
| |
Collapse
|