Toward a better understanding of the experience of patients with moderate penetrance breast cancer gene pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants: A focus on ATM and CHEK2

"I don't need any more unknowns hanging over my head": Views of patients with cancer on variants of uncertain significance and low/moderate risk results from genomic sequencing

PURPOSE

We sought to explore patient-reported utility of all types of cancer results from genomic sequencing (GS).

METHODS

Qualitative study, using semi-structured interviews with patients who underwent GS within a trial. Thematic analysis employing constant comparison was used. Two coders coded transcripts, with use of a third coder to resolve conflicts.

RESULTS

25 patients participated: female (22), >50 years (18), European (12), Ashkenazi Jewish (5), Middle Eastern (3), or other ethnicity (5), with breast cancer history (20). Patients' perceptions of the utility of cancer GS results hinged on whether they triggered clinical action. For example, when patients were enrolled into high-risk breast cancer surveillance programs for low/moderate risk breast cancer genes, they perceived the results to be very "useful" and of moderate-high utility. In contrast, patients receiving low/moderate risk or primary variants of uncertain significance results without clinical action perceived results as "concerning," leading to harms, such as hypervigilance about cancer symptoms. Overall, having supportive relatives or providers enhanced perceptions of utility.

CONCLUSION

Patients' perceptions of cancer GS results hinged on whether they triggered clinical management. Consequently, patients who received results without clinical action became hypervigilant, experiencing harms. Our findings call for a need to develop practice interventions to support patients with cancer undergoing GS.

Screening Practices for Breast and Nonbreast Cancers in High-Risk Mutation Carriers

INTRODUCTION

Women with breast cancer often undergo genetic testing and may have a pathogenic variant associated with multiple cancers. This study examines the current screening practices for breast and nonbreast cancers in mutation carriers.

METHODS

An institutional retrospective chart review of patients with BRCA1, BRCA2, ATM, CHEK2, BARD1, BRIP1, PALB2, and TP53 mutations were identified. Adherence to recommended screening based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines was analyzed.

RESULTS

Six hundred sixty-two patients met inclusion criteria: 220 patients with BRCA1, 256 patients with BRCA2, 58 patients with PALB2, 51 patients with ATM, 48 patients with CHEK2, 14 patients with BRIP1, 10 patients with BARD1, and 5 patients with TP53. Overall, 214 (46%) of eligible patients completed recommended breast imaging. Of 106 patients eligible for pancreatic cancer screening, 20 (19%) received a magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and 16 (15%) received an endoscopic ultrasound. On multivariable analysis, age was associated with improved breast imaging adherence: patients in age groups 40-55 (adjusted odds ratio 2.05, 95% confidence interval 1.18-3.55) and age 56-70 (adjusted odds ratio 2.16, 95% confidence interval 1.18-3.95, P = 0.012) had better adherence than younger patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Increases in genetic testing and updates to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines provide an opportunity for improved cancer screening. While recommended breast cancer screenings are being completed at higher rates, there is a need for clear protocols in this high-risk population.

A qualitative study of unaffected ATM and CHEK2 carriers: How participants make meaning of 'moderate risk' genetic results in a population breast cancer screening trial

Relatively little is known about experiences of individuals with a pathogenic variant in a moderately penetrant breast cancer gene, particularly those without a personal history of cancer. The WISDOM trial is testing a model of risk-based breast cancer screening that integrates genomic (nine genes and polygenic risk) and other risk factors. In the context of an embedded Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications (ELSI) study of WISDOM, we conducted qualitative interviews at two timepoints post-result disclosure with 22 ATM and CHEK2 carriers. Results disclosure and interview recordings were transcribed and analyzed using a grounded theory analysis framework. We found that participants minimized the significance of their results in comparison to BRCA; were surprised but not alarmed by the results in the absence of family history; did not fundamentally change their perception of their breast cancer risk despite the new genomic information; exhibited variable responses to WISDOM's screening and risk reduction recommendations; and shared test results with family but did not strongly encourage cascade testing. Participants viewed the results as having limited utility and responded accordingly. Our study offers important insights into how genetic test results for moderate-risk genes are received, understood, and acted upon in population screening context.