Genetics providers' experiences using telehealth: A grounded theory approach

Satisfaction with mode of delivery of genomic sequencing results in a diverse national sample of research participants through the Clinical Sequencing Evidence-Generating Research Consortium

PURPOSE

Research that includes diverse patient populations is necessary to optimize implementation of telehealth.

METHODS

As part of a Clinical Sequencing Evidence-Generating Research Consortium cross-site study, we assessed satisfaction with mode of return of results (RoR) delivery across a diverse sample of participants receiving genetic testing results in person vs telemedicine (TM).

RESULTS

Ninety-eight percent of participants were satisfied with their mode of results delivery. Participants receiving results by TM were more likely to report a preference for receiving results in a different way and challenges with providers noticing difficulties with understanding. More than 90% reported satisfaction across all items measuring support and interaction during sessions. Participants self-reporting Hispanic/Latino or Black/African American race and ethnicity compared with White/European American, fewer years of education, and having lower health literacy were more likely to report challenges with understanding the information or asking questions. Participants who were White/European American, had more years of education, and higher health literacy reported higher communication scores, reflecting more positive evaluations of the communication experience.

CONCLUSION

TM is an acceptable mode of return of results delivery across diverse settings and populations. Research optimizing approaches for underrepresented populations, populations with lower levels of education and health literacy, and multilingual populations is necessary.

Direct-to-patient telemedicine: Expanding access to regional pediatric specialty care

Telemedicine is seen as a useful tool in reducing gaps in health care but this technology-enabled care can also exacerbate health inequity if not implemented with a focus on inclusivity. Though many studies have reported improvements as well as exacerbation of disparities in access to care in their telehealth programs, there does not exist a common evaluation tool to assess these programs. To mitigate the impact of COVID-19 on health care workers and protect medically vulnerable children, in March 2020 we expanded our pre-established specialty and subspecialty direct-to-patient pediatric telemedicine program in a high volume urban pediatric health system. Our program aimed to prevent disparities in pediatric health care. In this study, using a "Pillars of Access" approach as a model to evaluate impact and access to care of our direct-to-patient telemedicine program, we analyzed the patients that were seen pre-COVID versus post-COVID. Our study demonstrated an increase in telemedicine visits for patients from diverse socioeconomic and racial backgrounds, and geographically underserved communities. We also observed an increase in telemedicine visits for mental health complaints and for certain categories of high-risk patients. This study was not designed to identify language and cultural barriers to telemedicine. Future identification of these specific barriers is needed. The tool to evaluate telehealth impact/access to care through a "Pillars of Access" approach presented here could serve as a model for implementation of telehealth programs. Our study highlights telemedicine programs as a mechanism to address healthcare inequity and overcome barriers to care.

Antecedents and Consequences of Online Healthcare Community Usage: A Grounded Theory Approach

The online healthcare community has grown rapidly in recent years. However, the antecedents and consequences of the use of online healthcare community platforms have not been systematized. Using grounded theory, this study collects first-hand data on the use of online healthcare communities through in-depth interviews and analyzes the interview data using a three-level coding approach including open coding, axial coding, and selective coding. The results showed the following. (1) Doctors, hospitals, and the online platforms themselves, along with the impact of healthcare environmental factors, affect patients using the online healthcare community. (2) The use of an online healthcare platform affects patient-related factors, such as emotional dependence and patient satisfaction, as well as factors related to doctor–patient interactions, such as the perception of healthcare quality and the doctor–patient relationship, through mediating factors, including doctor–patient communication, treatment processes, and healthcare costs. (3) Improving patients’ healthcare experience and the doctor–patient relationship may feed back into operation quality and the operating environment of the online healthcare community, thus promoting the promotion and use of an online healthcare community platform.