The goldilocks conundrum: Disclosing discrimination risks in informed consent

Community concerns about genetic discrimination in life insurance persist in Australia: A survey of consumers offered genetic testing

Fears of genetic discrimination in life insurance continue to deter some Australians from genetic testing. In July 2019, the life insurance industry introduced a partial, self-regulated moratorium restricting the use of genetic results in underwriting, applicable to policies up to certain limits (eg AUD$500,000 for death cover).We administered an online survey to consumers who had taken, or been offered, clinical genetic testing for adult-onset conditions, to gather views and experiences about the moratorium and the use of genetic results in life insurance, including its regulation.Most respondents (n = 367) had undertaken a genetic test (89%), and had a positive test result (76%; n = 243/321). Almost 30% (n = 94/326) reported testing after 1 July 2019. Relatively few respondents reported knowing about the moratorium (16%; n = 54/340) or that use of genetic results in life insurance underwriting is legal (17%; n = 60/348). Only 4% (n = 14/350) consider this practice should be allowed. Some respondents reported ongoing difficulties accessing life insurance products, even after the moratorium. Further, discrimination concerns continue to affect some consumers' decision-making about having clinical testing and applying for life insurance products, despite the Moratorium being in place. Most respondents (88%; n = 298/340) support the introduction of legislation by the Australian government to regulate this issue.Despite the introduction of a partial moratorium in Australia, fears of genetic discrimination persist, and continue to deter people from genetic testing. Consumers overwhelmingly consider life insurers should not be allowed to use genetic results in underwriting, and that federal legislation is required to regulate this area.

Genetic polymorphisms as potential pharmacogenetic biomarkers for platinum-based chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer

Platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) is a widely used treatment for various solid tumors, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, its efficacy is often compromised by the emergence of drug resistance in patients. There is growing evidence that genetic variations may influence the susceptibility of NSCLC patients to develop resistance to PBC. Here, we provide a comprehensive overview of the mechanisms underlying platinum drug resistance and highlight the important role that genetic polymorphisms play in this process. This paper discussed the genetic variants that regulate DNA repair, cellular movement, drug transport, metabolic processing, and immune response, with a focus on their effects on response to PBC. The potential applications of these genetic polymorphisms as predictive indicators in clinical practice are explored, as are the challenges associated with their implementation.

Genetic Influences on Outcomes of Psychotherapy in Borderline Personality Disorder: A Narrative Review of Implications for Personalized Treatment

Borderline personality disorder (BPD) manifests as instability in mood, relationships, self-image, and behavior, representing a challenging mental health issue. This review scrutinizes genetic factors influencing BPD and the corresponding treatment outcomes. The primary objective of this narrative review is to illuminate the association between genetic factors and BPD treatment outcomes, discussing the potential of genetic testing for personalized therapy. The review is derived from observational and experimental studies on BPD, genetic factors, and psychotherapy from 2000 to 2023, sourced primarily through PubMed. Reviews and meta-analyses were excluded. Our review suggests that genetic factors account for 40-60% of BPD variation, with significant roles played by epigenetic alterations like DNA methylation and microRNAs, particularly in the context of childhood trauma. Gene-environment interactions are also vital for BPD's development. Treatments such as dialectical behavior therapy, mentalization-based therapy, and schema therapy have shown efficacy, with success variability possibly linked to genetic factors. However, existing research is constrained by recall bias, diverse methodologies, and limited sample sizes. Future research necessitates long-term follow-up, diverse populations, and controlled variables to enhance our comprehension of BPD treatment outcomes' genetic foundations. The review underlines the promise of personalized medicine in BPD treatment, driven by genetic insights.