Comparing swallowing of capsule to endoscopic placement of capsule endoscopy in children

Clinical assessment of small bowel capsule endoscopy in pediatric patients

Introduction

Small bowel capsule endoscopy is a first-line examination method for small bowel diseases, which can find small intestinal lumen and mucosal lesions.

Methods

We retrospectively assessed patients who underwent small bowel capsule endoscopy between September 2020 and May 2023 to examine their clinical and small bowel capsule endoscopic data, aiming to provide insights into the application of this technique in pediatric patients with small intestinal diseases.

Results

All instances of capsule retention were successfully resolved through enteroscopy. Of the 1140 children who completed the capsule endoscopy, 97.46% (1111/1140) underwent a comprehensive examination of the entire small intestine without experiencing any discomfort. Capsule endoscopy yielded abnormal findings in 672 cases, with a positive detection rate of 58.95%. Among the positive results, intestinal mucosal inflammatory lesions were the most prevalent, occurring in 292 cases (43.45%), followed by ulcerative or erosive lesions in 236 cases (35.12%), diverticulum in 54 cases (8.04%), and vascular lesions in 30 cases (4.46%). Lymphangiectasis was observed in 16 cases (2.38%). The distribution of positive lesions did not exhibit significant gender-based differences, but there were variations among different age groups. Among all children who completed the small bowel capsule endoscopy, the most frequently reported symptom was abdominal pain (815/1140 cases, 71.49%), followed by 130 cases (11.40%) of bloody stools or melena.

Discussion

Small bowel capsule endoscopy is well-tolerated and safe in children, carrying significant clinical importance for diagnosing abdominal pain and obscure gastrointestinal bleeding in pediatric patients.

Age Is a Risk Factor for Gastroscopy-Assisted Capsule Endoscopy in Children

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The aim of this study was to explore the risk factors for the incidence of gastroscopy-assisted capsule endoscopy and the small bowel transit time in pediatric patients who underwent capsule endoscopy examination.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed to analyze the clinical data collected from pediatric patients who underwent capsule endoscopy examination.

RESULTS

A total of 239 pediatric patients were enrolled in this study. About 196 (82.0%) patients completed the entire small bowel capsule endoscopy examination, while 3 (1.3%) patients were subjected to capsule retention. Only age, not gender, height, body weight, body mass index, chief complaint, and intestinal preparation medications, has been identified as a risk factor for the incidence of gastroscopy-assisted capsule endoscopy (P < .05) by multivariate logistic regression. Further analysis showed that the small bowel transit time in the self-swallowed group was shorter than that in the gastroscopy-assisted group, while no significant difference was obtained in other factors, including intestinal preparation medications, metoclopramide, and lesions in the small intestine, which did not significantly affect small bowel transit time compared with the corresponding control group (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

A comprehensive assessment is required before performing capsule endoscopy, because age has been identified as a critical risk factor for the incidence of gastroscopy-assisted capsule endoscopy in pediatric patients.

Predictors of Small Bowel Transit Time for Capsule Endoscopy in Children with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Purpose

The development of assistive devices has allowed for the performance of capsule endoscopy in children. Anticipating the capsule's transit time could affect the efficacy of the investigation and potentially minimize the fasting period. This study determined the predictors of small bowel transit time for small-bowel capsule endoscopy in children and adolescents with inflammatory bowel disease.

Methods

We retrospectively examined children and adolescents with inflammatory bowel disease who underwent capsule endoscopy by the age 18 at a Japanese tertiary care children's hospital. Small bowel transit time predictors were analyzed using multiple regression with explanatory variables.

Results

Overall, 92 patients, aged 1-17 years, with inflammatory bowel disease (63 Crohn's disease and 29 ulcerative colitis cases) were examined for factors affecting small bowel transit time. In the simple regression analysis, diagnosis, age, height, weight, serum albumin, general anesthesia, and small intestine lesions were significantly associated with small bowel transit time. In the multiple regression analyses, serum albumin (partial regression coefficient: -58.9, p=0.008), general anesthesia (partial regression coefficient: 127, p<0.001), and small intestine lesions (partial regression coefficient: 30.1, p=0.037) showed significant associations with small bowel transit time.

Conclusion

Hypoalbuminemia, the use of general anesthesia for endoscopic delivery of the capsule, and small intestine lesions appeared to be predictors of prolonged small bowel transit time in children and adolescents with inflammatory bowel disease. Expecting the finishing time may improve examination with a fasting period reduction, which benefits both patients and caregivers.

Small-sized versus standard magnetic capsule endoscopy in adults: a two-center, double-blinded randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND : Certain patients experience difficulty swallowing a video capsule endoscopy (VCE) device owing to its relatively large size. The newly developed small-sized magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy (MCE) device is the smallest VCE device ever reported. We aimed to evaluate the performance of the small-sized MCE device in terms of ingestion and examination efficacy. METHODS : Patients in two centers were prospectively enrolled and randomized to the small-sized or standard MCE groups. Differences in capsule ingestion difficulties, visualization of the gastrointestinal tract, and capsule transit times were compared. RESULTS : 96 patients were enrolled (48 in each group). In the small-sized MCE group, the mean (SD) difficulty score and time to swallow the capsule, and success rate for swallowing the capsule at the first attempt were 0.6 (1.0), 3.4 (1.3) seconds, and 89.6 %, which was significant better compared with the standard MCE group with 3.1 (1.7), 12.0 (14.3) seconds and 60.4 %, respectively (all P < 0.001). Visualization of the esophagus, stomach, and small bowel were comparable between the two groups. The small-sized MCE group had a significantly shorter gastric transit time (49.4 minutes vs. 66.2 minutes; P = 0.04) and longer small-bowel transit time (5.8 hours vs. 5.0 hours; P = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS : The small-sized MCE device is feasible and safe for gastrointestinal examination, alleviating difficulties in capsule ingestion, improving gastric emptying under magnetic control, and prolonging the small-bowel transit time.

Capsule Endoscopy in Children

Since its clearance for use throughout the world, capsule endoscopy (CE) has become an important diagnostic tool, helping us to understand and document both normal and abnormal findings in the small intestine, especially in children, since CE usually can be employed without sedation or radiation. The indications in children and adults are similar, though their relative frequencies are different, with evaluation of potential and known inflammatory bowel disease the most common in the pediatric population, with CE also yielding increased diagnostic certainty compared to radiographic studies and surrogate biomarkers. Newer capsules now create opportunities to expand that understanding and our practices so that we can learn when and how to employ CE and pan-enteric CE to better monitor and guide therapy. It will take further studies to determine the best uses for CE and how to select the appropriate candidates, especially with ongoing concern about capsule ingestion vs. placement, the potential for capsule retention (particularly in known Crohn's disease), still elusive optimal methods for bowel cleansing, and the most meaningful scoring for research and clinical use.

Adverse events of video capsule endoscopy over the past two decades: a systematic review and proportion meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

A full spectrum of video capsule endoscopy (VCE) adverse events over the past two decades has not been evaluated. We aimed to determine pooled rates, predictors and temporal-trend of VCE adverse events over the past two decades.

METHODS

Systematic search of PubMed and EMBASE for English-language publications reporting VCE adverse events (January 1, 2000 to March 31, 2019). Data were extracted independently by two investigators. Pooled VCE adverse event rates were calculated using the random or fixed model as appropriate. Predictors and temporal-trend of each adverse event were performed by meta-regression analyses.

RESULTS

In total, 402 studies were identified, including 108,079 VCE procedures. Rate of retention, swallow disorder, aspiration, technical failure, and procedural adverse events were 0.73% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59-0.89%), 0.75% (95% CI 0.43-1.13%), 0.00% (95% CI 0.00-0.00%), 0.94% (95% CI 0.65-1.28%), 0.67% (95% CI 0.32-1.10%), respectively; incomplete examination rate of esophagus, stomach, small bowel, and colon were 9.05%, 7.69%, 12.08%, 19.19%, respectively. Patency capsule reduced retention rate by 5.04%, whereas known inflammatory bowel disease increased retention rate by 4.29%. Elder was the risk and protective factor for small bowel incomplete examination (0.30%) and swallow disorder (- 0.72%), respectively. Rates of retention and small bowel incomplete examination significantly declined over time (P = .0006 and P < .0001)..

CONCLUSIONS

VCE adverse event rates were generally low, and retention and small bowel incomplete examination rates declined over the past two decades. Patients with known inflammatory bowel disease or elder should be alerted to high risk of retention or small bowel incomplete examination (PROSPERO: CRD42019139595).