1
|
Kim DS, Yoon YI, Kim BK, Choudhury A, Kulkarni A, Park JY, Kim J, Sinn DH, Joo DJ, Choi Y, Lee JH, Choi HJ, Yoon KT, Yim SY, Park CS, Kim DG, Lee HW, Choi WM, Chon YE, Kang WH, Rhu J, Lee JG, Cho Y, Sung PS, Lee HA, Kim JH, Bae SH, Yang JM, Suh KS, Al Mahtab M, Tan SS, Abbas Z, Shresta A, Alam S, Arora A, Kumar A, Rathi P, Bhavani R, Panackel C, Lee KC, Li J, Yu ML, George J, Tanwandee T, Hsieh SY, Yong CC, Rela M, Lin HC, Omata M, Sarin SK. Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver clinical practice guidelines on liver transplantation. Hepatol Int 2024; 18:299-383. [PMID: 38416312 DOI: 10.1007/s12072-023-10629-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 02/29/2024]
Abstract
Liver transplantation is a highly complex and challenging field of clinical practice. Although it was originally developed in western countries, it has been further advanced in Asian countries through the use of living donor liver transplantation. This method of transplantation is the only available option in many countries in the Asia-Pacific region due to the lack of deceased organ donation. As a result of this clinical situation, there is a growing need for guidelines that are specific to the Asia-Pacific region. These guidelines provide comprehensive recommendations for evidence-based management throughout the entire process of liver transplantation, covering both deceased and living donor liver transplantation. In addition, the development of these guidelines has been a collaborative effort between medical professionals from various countries in the region. This has allowed for the inclusion of diverse perspectives and experiences, leading to a more comprehensive and effective set of guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong-Sik Kim
- Department of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Young-In Yoon
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Beom Kyung Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | | | - Jun Yong Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jongman Kim
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Dong Hyun Sinn
- Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Dong Jin Joo
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - YoungRok Choi
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jeong-Hoon Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ho Joong Choi
- Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ki Tae Yoon
- Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University College of Medicine, Yangsan, Republic of Korea
| | - Sun Young Yim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Cheon-Soo Park
- Department of Surgery, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Deok-Gie Kim
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hae Won Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
| | - Won-Mook Choi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Liver Center, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Young Eun Chon
- Department of Internal Medicine, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
| | - Woo-Hyoung Kang
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jinsoo Rhu
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae Geun Lee
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yuri Cho
- Center for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, National Cancer Center, Ilsan, Republic of Korea
| | - Pil Soo Sung
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Han Ah Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ji Hoon Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Si Hyun Bae
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jin Mo Yang
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| | - Kyung-Suk Suh
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| | - Mamun Al Mahtab
- Department of Hepatology, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Soek Siam Tan
- Department of Medicine, Hospital Selayang, Batu Caves, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Zaigham Abbas
- Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Ananta Shresta
- Department of Hepatology, Alka Hospital, Lalitpur, Nepal
| | - Shahinul Alam
- Crescent Gastroliver and General Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Anil Arora
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital New Delhi, New Delhi, India
| | - Ashish Kumar
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital New Delhi, New Delhi, India
| | - Pravin Rathi
- TN Medical College and BYL Nair Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Ruveena Bhavani
- University of Malaya Medical Centre, Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
| | | | - Kuei Chuan Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jun Li
- College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Ming-Lung Yu
- Department of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | | | | | | | | | | | - H C Lin
- Endoscopy Center for Diagnosis and Treatment, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Masao Omata
- Department of Gastroenterology, Yamanashi Central Hospital, Yamanashi, Japan
- University of Tokyo, Bunkyo City, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yoon KC, Seo S, Lee KW, Oh SC, Park MY, Hong SK, Choi Y, Yi NJ, Suh KS. Hepatitis B immunoglobulin inhibits the secretion of HBV via antigen-antibody precipitation in the multivesicular body. Am J Transl Res 2023; 15:5908-5920. [PMID: 37854220 PMCID: PMC10579012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Although the main action of human hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) is to neutralize hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) in serum, HBIG is known to be localized in the cell. However, the effect of intracellularly located HBIG is poorly understood because of the low purity of conventional plasma-derived HBIG (cHBIG). We attempted to elucidate the mechanism of action of internalized HBIG using recombinant HBIG (lenvervimab). METHODS We used HBsAg producing cell lines, non-HBsAg cell lines and human HBsAg-producing hepatocytes. The autophagosome lysis pathway-related proteins Rab5, calnexin, giantin, and Rab7 were used to localize HBsAg and anti-HBs-IgG in the cytoplasm using Western blotting and confocal microscopy. RESULTS Intracellular anti-HBs-IgG (lenvervimab and cHBIG) transported via Fc receptor-mediated endocytosis increased the number of autophagosomes. However, there was no change in autolysis. HBsAg and anti-HBs-IgG co-localized in the multivesicular body and precipitated in the cytoplasm. HBsAg secretion into culture medium decreased after lenvervimab treatment. Simultaneously, the amount of cellular HBsAg increased in the cell lines but decreased in human hepatocytes. Furthermore, intracellular lenvervimab is not easily removed from HBsAg cell lines. CONCLUSIONS Lenvervimab decreases HBsAg secretion, and HBsAg antibody precipitation in the multivesicular body may play an important role.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyung Chul Yoon
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of MedicineSeoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Boramae Medical CenterSeoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sooin Seo
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of MedicineSeoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kwang-Woong Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of MedicineSeoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seung Cheol Oh
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of MedicineSeoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Min Young Park
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of MedicineSeoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Suk Kyun Hong
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of MedicineSeoul, Republic of Korea
| | - YoungRok Choi
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of MedicineSeoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Nam-Joon Yi
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of MedicineSeoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyung-Suk Suh
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of MedicineSeoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Orfanidou A, Papatheodoridis GV, Cholongitas E. Antiviral prophylaxis against hepatitis B recurrence after liver transplantation: Current concepts. Liver Int 2021; 41:1448-1461. [PMID: 33656809 DOI: 10.1111/liv.14860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2020] [Revised: 01/20/2021] [Accepted: 02/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The advance in treatment against hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection with the development of nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) with high genetic barrier to resistance, including entecavir and tenofovir, has improved clinical outcomes of patients transplanted for HBV infection, by preventing HBV recurrence after liver transplantation (LT) effectively. Currently, after LT, the combination of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and a high-barrier NA is considered as the standard of care for prophylaxis against HBV recurrence. However, because of the high cost of intravenous high-dose HBIG, other routes of HBIG administration, such as intramuscular or subcutaneous, have come to the foreground. In addition, several transplant centres tend to use a NA as monoprophylaxis, following a short post-LT period of HBIG and NA combination. Lately, studies using HBIG-free prophylactic regimens with entecavir or tenofovir have shown promising outcomes in preventing HBV recurrence, mostly regarding patients with undetectable HBV DNA at the time of LT. Although vaccination against HBV has been an attractive prophylactic approach, its efficacy has been controversial. Moreover, further studies are needed regarding long-term outcomes of complete withdrawal anti-HBV prophylaxis. For patients transplanted for HBV/HDV co-infection, combined regimen should be administered for a longer period post-LT. Finally, the use of grafts from hepatitis B core antibody-positive donors is safe for HBV-negative recipients, with the administration of lifelong antiviral prophylaxis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Afroditi Orfanidou
- Academic Department of Gastroenterology, Laiko General Hospital, Medical School of National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - George V Papatheodoridis
- Academic Department of Gastroenterology, Laiko General Hospital, Medical School of National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Evangelos Cholongitas
- First Department of Internal Medicine, Laiko General Hospital, Medical School of National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Li J, Ma M, Wang X, Jiang W. Prevention and treatment of new hepatitis B after living donor liver transplantation in children. Transl Pediatr 2021; 10:1610-1617. [PMID: 34295775 PMCID: PMC8261585 DOI: 10.21037/tp-20-485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2020] [Accepted: 04/29/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to explore the prevention and treatment of new hepatitis B in children after liver transplantation with livers positive for HBcAg and to examine the treatment of new hepatitis B. METHODS A total of 22 children who received livers positive for HBcAg between January 2013 and December 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. After their operations, the children were given lamivudine for anti-hepatitis B virus (HBV) treatment, a hepatitis B vaccine or intermittent supplements of hepatitis B immunoglobulins to prevent recurrence of the infection, and entecavir for anti-hepatitis B treatment. The children were categorized into two groups: one group of children stopped taking lamivudine one year after operation (n=7) by themselves, while the other group did not (n=15). RESULTS Of the seven children who stopped lamivudine anti-HBV treatment, six developed hepatitis B at 24.33±13.95 months after operation. Of these children, five were treated with entecavir, resulting in their HBV DNA decreasing to undetectable levels (<50 IU/mL). HBsAg turned negative in four of these patients, but in one patient it did not. The other patient with new hepatitis B continued to use lamivudine, resulting in their HBV DNA decreasing to normal levels (<50 IU/mL) but without their HBsAg turning negative. No new cases of hepatitis B were found in the 15 children who did not stop anti-HBV treatment. CONCLUSIONS The long-term prophylactic therapy of nucleoside analogues combined with hepatitis B immunoglobulins should be used for a long time after liver transplantation with a liver positive for HBcAg. Discontinuation of nucleoside analogues is associated with a higher risk of the new onset of hepatitis B. Entecavir has a significant effect on the treatment of postoperative new hepatitis B in children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junjie Li
- Department of Liver Transplantation, Tianjin First Center Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Ming Ma
- Department of Liver Transplantation, Tianjin First Center Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Xiaodong Wang
- Department of Liver Transplantation, Tianjin First Center Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Wentao Jiang
- Department of Liver Transplantation, Tianjin First Center Hospital, Tianjin, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nasir M, Wu GY. Prevention of HBV Recurrence after Liver Transplant: A Review. J Clin Transl Hepatol 2020; 8:150-160. [PMID: 32832395 PMCID: PMC7438351 DOI: 10.14218/jcth.2020.00003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2020] [Revised: 04/16/2020] [Accepted: 04/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Globally, hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is recognized as a major risk factor for the development of hepatocellular carcinoma, and HBV-induced liver failure is one of the leading indications for liver transplantation. Until about two decades ago, liver transplantation in patients with chronic HBV infection was a relative contraindication, due to high risk of viral replication with the use of immunosuppressants which could result in graft infection. In the 1990s, hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIg) use significantly reduced the risk of graft infection, improving outcomes of liver transplant in patients with chronic HBV infection. However, very high costs, especially with the need for long-term use, became a major concern. With the advent of nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs), there was less need for high-dose, long-term HBIg use to prevent HBV recurrence. Lamivudine was initially used but resistance soon became a major issue. This was followed by more potent NAs, such as entecavir and tenofovir, emerging as the more preferred agents. Additionally, the use of these antiviral agents (HBIg and/or NAs) have made it possible to use the grafts from donors with positivity for hepatitis B core antibody, allowing for expansion of the donor pool. Nevertheless, there is no consensus on management protocols, which vary significantly amongst centers. In this review, we appraise studies on management strategies used and the role of active vaccination in the prevention of HBV recurrence in post-liver transplant patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Myra Nasir
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology-Hepatology, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT, USA
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology-Hepatology, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT, USA
| | - George Y. Wu
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology-Hepatology, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Dobrindt EM, Keshi E, Salim Y, Gillespie A, Saipbaev A, Schöning W, Öllinger R, Pratschke J, Eurich D. Hepatitis B Immunoglobulin discontinuation in long-term liver transplant patients. Transpl Infect Dis 2020; 22:e13303. [PMID: 32367631 DOI: 10.1111/tid.13303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2020] [Revised: 03/16/2020] [Accepted: 04/25/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG)-as a monotherapy or combined with nucleos(t)ide analogs (NUCs)-has effectively lowered Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reinfection after liver transplantation. However, it is associated with high costs and viral resistance. HBIG-free prophylaxis with novel NUCs (tenofovir, entecavir) composes a viable alternative. We evaluated reinfection rate, histological changes, and outcome associated with HBIG discontinuation. METHODS A retrospective analysis was performed of patients undergoing liver transplantation due to HBV-induced liver disease at our center since 1988. A controlled HBIG discontinuation was conducted between 2015 and 2017 in 65 patients. Recurrent infection was determined by HbsAg values. Fibrosis and inflammation were evaluated by routine biopsy. The survival of patients after HBIG discontinuation was compared to a control population on HBIG for prophylaxis. RESULTS From 1988 to 2013, 352 patients underwent liver transplantation due to HBV-induced liver disease. 169 patients could be included for analysis. 104 (51.5%) patients continued a prophylaxis containing HBIG. HBIG was discontinued in 65 (38.5%) patients in a controlled manner, maintaining an oral NUC. None of those patients showed HBV reinfection or graft dysfunction. No significant changes of inflammation grades (P = .067) or fibrosis stages (P = .051) were detected. The survival of patients after HBIG discontinuation was comparable to the control (P = .95). CONCLUSION HBIG withdrawal under continuation of oral NUC therapy is safe and not related to graft dysfunction, based on blood tests and histology. HBIG-free prophylaxis is not associated with a worse outcome and displays a financial relief as well as a logistic simplification during long-term follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Maria Dobrindt
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Eriselda Keshi
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Yones Salim
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Allan Gillespie
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Akylbek Saipbaev
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Wenzel Schöning
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Robert Öllinger
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Dennis Eurich
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Charlton MR, Alam A, Shukla A, Dashtseren B, Lesmana CRA, Duger D, Payawal DA, Duy Cuong D, Jargalsaikhan G, Cua IHY, Sollano JD, Singh KR, Madan K, Win KM, Kyi KP, Tun KS, Salih M, Rastogi M, Saraf N, Thuy PTT, Hien PTD, Gani RA, Mohamed R, Tanwandee T, Piratvisuth T, Sukeepaisarnjaroen W, Naing W, Hashmi ZY. An expert review on the use of tenofovir alafenamide for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection in Asia. J Gastroenterol 2020; 55:811-823. [PMID: 32666200 PMCID: PMC7452871 DOI: 10.1007/s00535-020-01698-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2020] [Accepted: 05/25/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Asia has intermediate-to-high prevalence and high morbidity of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. The use of guideline-recommended nucleos(t)ide analogs with high barrier to resistance, such as entecavir (ETV), tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), and tenofovir alafenamide (TAF), is one of the key interventions for curbing HBV infection and associated morbidity in Asia. However, there are some challenges to the use of ETV and TDF; while ETV is associated with high resistance in lamivudine (LAM)-exposed (especially LAM-refractory) patients; bone and renal safety issues are a major concern with TDF. Hence, a panel of twenty-eight expert hepatologists from Asia convened, reviewed the literature, and developed the current expert opinion-based review article for the use of TAF in the resource-constrained settings in Asia. This article provides a comprehensive review of two large, phase 3, double-blind, randomized controlled trials of TAF versus TDF in HBeAg-negative (study 0108) and HBeAg-positive (study 0110) chronic HBV patients (> 70% Asians). These studies revealed as follows: (1) non-inferiority for the proportion of patients who had HBV DNA < 29 IU/mL; (2) significantly high rate of normalization of alanine aminotransferase levels; (3) no incidence of resistance; and (4) significantly better bone and renal safety, with TAF vs. TDF up to 144 weeks. Considering the benefits of TAF, the expert panel proposed recommendations for optimizing the use of TAF in Asia, along with guidance on specific patient groups at risk of renal or bone disease suitable for TAF therapy. The guidance provided in this article may help clinicians optimize the use of TAF in Asia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael R. Charlton
- Transplant Institute, Center for Liver Diseases, University of Chicago Biological Sciences, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, Chicago, Illinois USA
| | | | - Akash Shukla
- Department of Gastroenterology, LTM Medical College and Sion Hospital, Maharashtra Mumbai, India
| | | | - Cosmas Rinaldi Adithya Lesmana
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hepatobiliary Division, Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Davadoorj Duger
- Mongolian National University of Medical Sciences, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
| | - Diana Alcantara Payawal
- Department of Medicine, Cardinal Santos Medical Center, Mandaluyong, Metro, Manila, Philippines
| | - Do Duy Cuong
- Department of Infectious Diseases and HIV Outpatient Clinic, Bach Mai Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Ganbolor Jargalsaikhan
- Department Liver Center, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia ,Department International Graduate Program in Medicine (IGPM) Institution, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia ,College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ian Homer Yee Cua
- Research Committee and Social Committee, Institute of Digestive and Liver Diseases, St. Luke’s Medical Center, Taguig, Philippines
| | - Jose Decena Sollano
- Department of Medicine, University of Santo Tomas Hospital, Manila, Philippines
| | | | - Kaushal Madan
- Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Max Smart Super Speciality Hospital, Saket, New Delhi, India
| | | | - Khin Pyone Kyi
- Myanmar Liver Foundation, Liver Foundation, Yangon, Myanmar
| | | | - Mohd. Salih
- Department of Hepatology, Quaid e Azam International Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan
| | - Mukul Rastogi
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Fortis Hospital, Noida, India ,Department of Transplant Hepatology, Fortis Hospital, Noida, India
| | - Neeraj Saraf
- Clinical/Transplant Hepatology Institute of Digestive and Hepatobiliary Sciences Medanta, The Medicity, Gurgaon, New Delhi India
| | | | - Pham Tran Dieu Hien
- Department of Infectious Disease, Pham Ngoc Thach University of Medicine, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam
| | - Rino Alvani Gani
- Liver Transplantation team, Ciptomangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Rosmawati Mohamed
- Department of Medicine, University Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Tawesak Tanwandee
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Teerha Piratvisuth
- Department of Medicine, NKC Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Songklanagarind Hospital, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Thailand
| | - Wattana Sukeepaisarnjaroen
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medicine, Srinagarind Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
| | - Win Naing
- Department of Hepatology, Yangon General Hospital, University of Medicine (1), Yangon, Myanmar
| | | |
Collapse
|