1
|
Ferraioli G, Barr RG, Berzigotti A, Sporea I, Wong VWS, Reiberger T, Karlas T, Thiele M, Cardoso AC, Ayonrinde OT, Castera L, Dietrich CF, Iijima H, Lee DH, Kemp W, Oliveira CP, Sarin SK. WFUMB Guidelines/Guidance on Liver Multiparametric Ultrasound. Part 2: Guidance on Liver Fat Quantification. ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE & BIOLOGY 2024; 50:1088-1098. [PMID: 38658207 DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2024.03.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2024] [Revised: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
The World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (WFUMB) has promoted the development of this document on multiparametric ultrasound. Part 2 is a guidance on the use of the available tools for the quantification of liver fat content with ultrasound. These are attenuation coefficient, backscatter coefficient, and speed of sound. All of them use the raw data of the ultrasound beam to estimate liver fat content. This guidance has the aim of helping the reader in understanding how they work and interpret the results. Confounding factors are discussed and a standardized protocol for measurement acquisition is suggested to mitigate them. The recommendations were based on published studies and experts' opinion but were not formally graded because the body of evidence remained low at the time of drafting this document.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanna Ferraioli
- Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
| | - Richard Gary Barr
- Department of Radiology, Northeastern Ohio Medical University, Youngstown, OH, USA
| | - Annalisa Berzigotti
- Department for Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Ioan Sporea
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Center for Advanced Research in Gastroenterology and Hepatology, "Victor Babeș" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timișoara, Romania
| | - Vincent Wai-Sun Wong
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Medical Data Analytics Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China; State Key Laboratory of Digestive Disease, Institute of Digestive Disease, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Thomas Reiberger
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Christian-Doppler Laboratory for Portal Hypertension and Liver Fibrosis, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Thomas Karlas
- Department of Medicine II, Division of Gastroenterology, Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Maja Thiele
- Center for Liver Research, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Department for Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Ana Carolina Cardoso
- Hepatology Division, School of Medicine, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Clementino, Fraga Filho Hospital, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | - Oyekoya Taiwo Ayonrinde
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, WA, Australia; Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia; Curtin Medical School, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia
| | - Laurent Castera
- Université Paris-Cité, Inserm UMR1149, Centre de Recherche sur l'Inflammation, Paris, France; Service d'Hépatologie, Hôpital Beaujon, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Clichy, France
| | - Christoph Frank Dietrich
- Department Allgemeine Innere Medizin (DAIM), Kliniken Hirslanden Beau Site, Salem and Permancence, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Hiroko Iijima
- Department of Gastroenterology, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Disease, Hyogo Medical University, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, Japan; Ultrasound Imaging Center, Hyogo Medical University, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Dong Ho Lee
- Department of Radiology, College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - William Kemp
- Department of Gastroenterology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Medicine, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Claudia P Oliveira
- Gastroenterology Department, Laboratório de Investigação (LIM07), Hospital das Clínicas de São Paulo, HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Shiv Kumar Sarin
- Department of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hänni O, Ruby L, Paverd C, Frauenfelder T, Rominger MB, Martin A. Confounders of Ultrasound Attenuation Imaging in a Linear Probe Using the Canon Aplio i800 System: A Phantom Study. Diagnostics (Basel) 2024; 14:271. [PMID: 38337786 PMCID: PMC10855333 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14030271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2023] [Revised: 01/17/2024] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024] Open
Abstract
There have been studies showing attenuation imaging (ATI) with ultrasound as an approach to diagnose liver diseases such as steatosis or cirrhosis. So far, this technique has only been used on a convex probe. The goal of the study was to investigate the feasibility of ATI measurements using the linear array on a canon Aplio i800 scanner on certified phantoms. Three certified liver tissue attenuation phantoms were measured in five different positions using a linear probe. The effects of positioning and depth were explored and compared. The values were compared to the certified expected value for each phantom as well as the different measurement values for each measurement position. The ATI measurements on phantoms showed significant effect for the different probe positions and region of interest (ROI) depths. Values taken in the center with the probe perpendicular to the phantom were closest to certified values. Median values at 2.5-4.5 cm depth for phantoms 1 and 2 and 0.5-2.5 cm for phantom 3 were comparable with certified values. Measurements taken at a depth greater than 6 cm in any position were the least representative of the certified values (p-value < 0.01) and had the widest range throughout the different sessions. ATI measurements can be performed with the linear probe in phantoms; however, careful consideration should be given to depth dependency, as it can significantly affect measurement values. Remaining measurements at various depths within the 0.5-6.0 cm range showed deviation from the certified values of approximately 25%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivia Hänni
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Dekanat Pestalozzistrasse 3, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland (M.B.R.)
| | - Lisa Ruby
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland (M.B.R.)
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Catherine Paverd
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland (M.B.R.)
| | - Thomas Frauenfelder
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland (M.B.R.)
| | - Marga B. Rominger
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland (M.B.R.)
| | - Alexander Martin
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland (M.B.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zeng KY, Bao WYG, Wang YH, Liao M, Yang J, Huang JY, Lu Q. Non-invasive evaluation of liver steatosis with imaging modalities: New techniques and applications. World J Gastroenterol 2023; 29:2534-2550. [PMID: 37213404 PMCID: PMC10198053 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i17.2534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2023] [Revised: 02/26/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 05/23/2023] Open
Abstract
In the world, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) accounts for majority of diffuse hepatic diseases. Notably, substantial liver fat accumulation can trigger and accelerate hepatic fibrosis, thus contributing to disease progression. Moreover, the presence of NAFLD not only puts adverse influences for liver but is also associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. Therefore, early detection and quantified measurement of hepatic fat content are of great importance. Liver biopsy is currently the most accurate method for the evaluation of hepatic steatosis. However, liver biopsy has several limitations, namely, its invasiveness, sampling error, high cost and moderate intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility. Recently, various quantitative imaging techniques have been developed for the diagnosis and quantified measurement of hepatic fat content, including ultrasound- or magnetic resonance-based methods. These quantitative imaging techniques can provide objective continuous metrics associated with liver fat content and be recorded for comparison when patients receive check-ups to evaluate changes in liver fat content, which is useful for longitudinal follow-up. In this review, we introduce several imaging techniques and describe their diagnostic performance for the diagnosis and quantified measurement of hepatic fat content.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ke-Yu Zeng
- Department of Medical Ultrasound, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Wu-Yong-Ga Bao
- Department of Medical Ultrasound, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Yun-Han Wang
- Department of Medical Ultrasound, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Min Liao
- Department of Medical Ultrasound, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Jie Yang
- Department of Medical Ultrasound, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Jia-Yan Huang
- Department of Medical Ultrasound, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Qiang Lu
- Department of Medical Ultrasound, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Taru MG, Neamti L, Taru V, Procopciuc LM, Procopet B, Lupsor-Platon M. How to Identify Advanced Fibrosis in Adult Patients with Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) and Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH) Using Ultrasound Elastography-A Review of the Literature and Proposed Multistep Approach. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:diagnostics13040788. [PMID: 36832276 PMCID: PMC9955630 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13040788] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2022] [Revised: 02/15/2023] [Accepted: 02/16/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), and its progressive form, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), represent, nowadays, real challenges for the healthcare system. Liver fibrosis is the most important prognostic factor for NAFLD, and advanced fibrosis is associated with higher liver-related mortality rates. Therefore, the key issues in NAFLD are the differentiation of NASH from simple steatosis and identification of advanced hepatic fibrosis. We critically reviewed the ultrasound (US) elastography techniques for the quantitative characterization of fibrosis, steatosis, and inflammation in NAFLD and NASH, with a specific focus on how to differentiate advanced fibrosis in adult patients. Vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) is still the most utilized and validated elastography method for liver fibrosis assessment. The recently developed point shear wave elastography (pSWE) and two-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) techniques that use multiparametric approaches could bring essential improvements to diagnosis and risk stratification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madalina-Gabriela Taru
- Hepatology Department, Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology “Octavian Fodor”, 400162 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
- Faculty of Medicine, “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
| | - Lidia Neamti
- Hepatology Department, Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology “Octavian Fodor”, 400162 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
- Faculty of Medicine, “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Vlad Taru
- Hepatology Department, Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology “Octavian Fodor”, 400162 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
- Faculty of Medicine, “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
- Christian Doppler Lab for Portal Hypertension and Liver Fibrosis, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Lucia Maria Procopciuc
- Faculty of Medicine, “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Bogdan Procopet
- Hepatology Department, Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology “Octavian Fodor”, 400162 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
- Faculty of Medicine, “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Monica Lupsor-Platon
- Faculty of Medicine, “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
- Medical Imaging Department, Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology “Octavian Fodor”, 400162 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Muacevic A, Adler JR. Accuracy of Ultrasonography vs. Elastography in Patients With Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Systematic Review. Cureus 2022; 14:e29967. [PMID: 36381908 PMCID: PMC9637432 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.29967] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Accepted: 10/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Ultrasonography and elastography are the most widely used imaging modalities for diagnosing non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. This study aimed to assess and compare the diagnostic accuracy in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease/non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. This systematic review was based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A systematic search was done for the past seven years using Pubmed, Pubmed Central, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases on Jun 29, 2022. Studies were included based on the following predefined criteria: observational studies, randomized controlled trial (RCT), comparative studies, studies using liver biopsy or MRI proton density fat fraction (MRI PDFF) as a reference standard, ultrasonography, and elastography with measures of their diagnostic accuracy like sensitivity (SN), specificity (SP), area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve, and English language. The data were extracted on a predefined template. The final twelve eligible studies were assessed using the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy tool (QUADS-2). Most studies focused on elastography techniques, and the remaining focused on quantitative ultrasonography methods like the controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) and attenuation coefficient (AC). Only one study was available for the evaluation of qualitative ultrasonography. MRI was generally found superior to other diagnostic tests for determining liver stiffness through magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) and steatosis through MRI PDFF. Data assessing the comparative diagnostic accuracy of the two tests were inconclusive.
Collapse
|
6
|
Bozic D, Podrug K, Mikolasevic I, Grgurevic I. Ultrasound Methods for the Assessment of Liver Steatosis: A Critical Appraisal. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:2287. [PMID: 36291976 PMCID: PMC9600709 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12102287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Revised: 09/14/2022] [Accepted: 09/17/2022] [Indexed: 08/10/2023] Open
Abstract
The prevalence of the non-alcoholic fatty liver disease has reached major proportions, being estimated to affect one-quarter of the global population. The reference techniques, which include liver biopsy and the magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction, have objective practical and financial limitations to their routine use in the detection and quantification of liver steatosis. Therefore, there has been a rising necessity for the development of new inexpensive, widely applicable and reliable non-invasive diagnostic tools. The controlled attenuation parameter has been considered the point-of-care technique for the assessment of liver steatosis for a long period of time. Recently, many ultrasound (US) system manufacturers have developed proprietary software solutions for the quantification of liver steatosis. Some of these methods have already been extensively tested with very good performance results reported, while others are still under evaluation. This manuscript reviews the currently available US-based methods for diagnosing and grading liver steatosis, including their classification and performance results, with an appraisal of the importance of this armamentarium in daily clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dorotea Bozic
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Center Split, Spinčićeva 1, 21 000 Split, Croatia
| | - Kristian Podrug
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Center Split, Spinčićeva 1, 21 000 Split, Croatia
| | - Ivana Mikolasevic
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Center Rijeka, Krešimirova 42, 51 000 Rijeka, Croatia
| | - Ivica Grgurevic
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Nutrition, University Hospital Dubrava, Avenija Gojka Šuška 6, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia
- School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Šalata 2, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Alves VPV, Dillman JR, Tkach JA, Bennett PS, Xanthakos SA, Trout AT. Comparison of Quantitative Liver US and MRI in Patients with Liver Disease. Radiology 2022; 304:660-669. [PMID: 35608446 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.212995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Background Quantitative US techniques can be used to identify changes of liver disease, but data regarding their diagnostic performance and relationship to MRI measures are sparse. Purpose To define associations between quantitative US and MRI measures of the liver in children, adolescents, and young adults with liver disease and to define the predictive ability of quantitative US measures to detect abnormal liver stiffening and steatosis defined with MRI. Materials and Methods In this prospective study, consecutive patients aged 8-21 years and known to have or suspected of having liver disease and body mass index less than 35 kg/m2 underwent 1.5-T MRI and quantitative liver US during the same visit at a pediatric academic medical center between April 2018 and December 2020. Acquired US parameters included shear-wave speed (SWS) and attenuation coefficient, among others. US parameters were compared with liver MR elastography and liver MRI proton density fat fraction (PDFF). Pearson correlation, multiple logistic regression, and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were performed to assess associations and determine the performance of US relative to that of MRI. Results A total of 44 study participants (mean age, 16 years ± 4 [SD]; age range, 8-21 years; 23 male participants) were evaluated. There was a positive correlation between US SWS and MR elastography stiffness (r = 0.73, P < .001). US attenuation was positively correlated with MRI PDFF (r = 0.45, P = .001). For the prediction of abnormal (>2.8 kPa) liver shear stiffness, SWS (1.56 m/sec [7.3 kPa] cutoff) had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.95 with 91% sensitivity (95% CI: 71, 99) (20 of 22 participants) and 95% specificity (95% CI: 76, 99) (20 of 21 participants). For the prediction of abnormal (>5%) liver PDFF, US attenuation (0.55 dB/cm/MHz cutoff) had an AUC of 0.75 with a sensitivity of 73% (95% CI: 39, 94) (eight of 11 participants) and a specificity of 73% (95% CI: 55, 86) (24 of 33 participants). Conclusion In children, adolescents, and young adults with known or suspected liver disease, there was moderate to high correlation between US shear-wave speed (SWS) and MR elastography-derived stiffness. US SWS predicted an abnormal liver shear stiffness with high performance. © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Khanna and Alazraki in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vinicius P V Alves
- From the Department of Radiology (V.P.V.A, J.R.D., J.A.T., P.S.B., A.T.T.) and Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (S.A.X.), Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave, Kasota Building MLC 5031, Cincinnati, OH 45226; and Departments of Radiology (J.R.D., A.T.T.) and Pediatrics (S.A.X., A.T.T.), University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Jonathan R Dillman
- From the Department of Radiology (V.P.V.A, J.R.D., J.A.T., P.S.B., A.T.T.) and Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (S.A.X.), Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave, Kasota Building MLC 5031, Cincinnati, OH 45226; and Departments of Radiology (J.R.D., A.T.T.) and Pediatrics (S.A.X., A.T.T.), University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Jean A Tkach
- From the Department of Radiology (V.P.V.A, J.R.D., J.A.T., P.S.B., A.T.T.) and Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (S.A.X.), Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave, Kasota Building MLC 5031, Cincinnati, OH 45226; and Departments of Radiology (J.R.D., A.T.T.) and Pediatrics (S.A.X., A.T.T.), University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Paula S Bennett
- From the Department of Radiology (V.P.V.A, J.R.D., J.A.T., P.S.B., A.T.T.) and Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (S.A.X.), Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave, Kasota Building MLC 5031, Cincinnati, OH 45226; and Departments of Radiology (J.R.D., A.T.T.) and Pediatrics (S.A.X., A.T.T.), University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Stavra A Xanthakos
- From the Department of Radiology (V.P.V.A, J.R.D., J.A.T., P.S.B., A.T.T.) and Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (S.A.X.), Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave, Kasota Building MLC 5031, Cincinnati, OH 45226; and Departments of Radiology (J.R.D., A.T.T.) and Pediatrics (S.A.X., A.T.T.), University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Andrew T Trout
- From the Department of Radiology (V.P.V.A, J.R.D., J.A.T., P.S.B., A.T.T.) and Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (S.A.X.), Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave, Kasota Building MLC 5031, Cincinnati, OH 45226; and Departments of Radiology (J.R.D., A.T.T.) and Pediatrics (S.A.X., A.T.T.), University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|