Sirolimus versus cyclosporine in haploidentical stem cell transplantation with posttransplant cyclophosphamide and mycophenolate mofetil as graft‐versus‐host disease prophylaxis

COMPARISON OF THREE STRATEGIES OF GVHD PROPHYLAXIS AFTER T-CELL REPLETE HAPLOIDENTICAL HEMATOPOIETIC TRANSPLANTATION: TACROLIMUS vs. CALCINEURIN INHIBITORS-MMF vs. SIROLIMUS-MMF

Since the introduction of post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy), haploidentical HSCT (HaploSCT) has become a real alternative for patients who lack other eligible donors. The standard GvHD prophylaxis after PTCy has been a calcineurin inhibitor plus MMF (up to day+35), but promising results with sirolimus (+/- MMF) and single-agent tacrolimus have been recently published. The current multicenter retrospective study compared the outcomes of 372 adult HaploSCT recipients who received TBF conditioning; PTCY and additional GVHD prophylaxis with one of three strategies, cohort-A: single-agent tacrolimus (N 222), cohort-B: CNI-MMF (N 49) and cohort-C: sirolimus-MMF (N 101). No differences in terms of grade II-IV (20%, 25%, and 30%) and III-IV (9%, 6%, and 15%) aGvHD at 100 days were found. However, cohort A had the lowest incidence of overall cGvHD [24%, 47%, and 52%, respectively (p 0.001)] and moderate-severe cGvHD [13%, 35%, and 33%, respectively (p 0.001)]. There were no differences in the 3-year overall survival, progression-free survival, NRM nor relapse among the cohorts. In conclusion, our study suggests that single-agent tacrolimus, CNI+MMF and sirolimus+MMF GvHD prophylaxis lead to similar outcomes following HaploSCT with TBF and PTCy, with low incidence of grade III-IV aGvHD, albeit possible differences in cGVHD require further investigation.

Cytomegalovirus Reactivations in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation from HLA-Matched and Haploidentical Donors with Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivations cause significant morbidity in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) is associated with an increased risk of CMV infections. Data are limited comparing HSCT with PTCy performed from matched sibling donors (MSDs), matched unrelated donors (MUDs), and haploidentical (Haplo) donors. In the present study, we aimed to characterize CMV reactivation and recurrence in patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing HSCT from MSD, MUD, and Haplo donors using PTCy as GVHD prophylaxis in the pre-letermovir era. We also analyzed risk factors of CMV reactivation, including GVHD as a time-dependent variable, on the incidence and mortality associated with CMV infections. We analyzed CMV reactivation in patients undergoing HSCT from 160 MSDs, 124 MUDs, and 82 Haplo donors from a single institution. Uniform GVHD prophylaxis with PTCy, sirolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil was given irrespective of donor type. Overall, 46% of patients had at least 1 CMV reactivation. The 1-year cumulative incidence of CMV infection was 39% for MSD, 44% for MUD, and 62% for Haplo donors (P < .001), with 96% of reactivations occurring before day +100. Multivariate analysis identified factors associated with the first CMV reactivation, including Haplo donor, positive recipient CMV serology, older patient age, and grade II-IV acute GVHD. The 1-year cumulative incidence of second reactivation from HSCT was 13%. Recipient CMV seropositivity, older patient age, and grade II-IV acute GVHD, but not type of donor, were identified as adverse factors for second CMV reactivation in multivariate analysis. The 1-year cumulative incidence of a third reactivation post HSCT was 4.4%. Ten cases of CMV disease were recorded, with no attributable deaths. Nevertheless, the risk for nonrelapse mortality was greater for patients who experienced CMV reactivation in multivariate time-dependent Cox model analysis. CMV reactivation is frequent in HSCT with PTCy in patients not receiving letermovir prophylaxis. Identified risk factors include the use of a Haplo donor, recipient CMV seropositivity, and grade II-IV acute GVHD. The prevalence of recurrent CMV reactivations is a noteworthy issue, especially after acute GVHD, warranting trials of secondary prophylaxis strategies.

Reduced Incidence of Neurologic Complications after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation with Calcineurin-Free Graft-versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis

Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs), including cyclosporine and tacrolimus, are frequently associated with neurologic complications after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). However, there is a lack of studies comparing the incidence and characteristics of neurologic complications in patients undergoing HSCT based on CNI-free or CNI-based GVHD prophylaxis. This retrospective single-center study analyzed the neurologic complications in 2 cohorts of patients undergoing HSCT with either CNI-based GVHD prophylaxis (n = 523) or CNI-free prophylaxis with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide, sirolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil (n = 371). The latter cohort included older patients and received more reduced-intensity conditioning and transplants from matched unrelated and haploidentical donors. The 2-year cumulative incidence of neurologic complications was significantly lower in the CNI-free cohort (6.9% versus 11.9%; P = .016), and GVHD prophylaxis was the sole statistically significant variable in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio, 2.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], .25 to 3.13; P = .0017). The distribution of neurologic types was similar in the 2 cohorts, with encephalopathy the most prevalent complication, except for headaches and myopathy, which decreased equally from 15% in the CNI-based cohort to 4% in the CNI-free cohort. Neurologic complications had negative impacts on mortality and survival rates, with a significantly higher 2-year cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) (44% [95% CI, 34% to 54%] versus 16% [95% CI, 13% to 18%]; P < .0001) and inferior overall survival (66% [95% CI, 62% to 69%] versus 46% [95% CI, 37% to 58%]; P < .0001) in patients with neurologic complications. This study suggests that CNI-free GVHD prophylaxis with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide, sirolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil may reduce not only the incidence of GVHD incidence, but also the rates of neurologic complications and NRM, leading to improved survival outcomes in patients undergoing HSCT.

Impact of GVHD prophylaxis on CMV reactivation and disease after HLA-matched peripheral blood stem cell transplantation

The kinetics of early and late cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation after hematopoietic cell transplantation using various methods of graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) prophylaxis are poorly defined. We retrospectively compared CMV reactivation and disease among 780 seropositive patients given HLA-matched peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) grafts and calcineurin inhibitor plus posttransplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy; n = 44), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF; n = 414), or methotrexate (MTX; n = 322). Transplantation occurred between 2007 and 2018; CMV monitoring/management followed uniform standard practice. Hazards of CMV reactivation at various thresholds were compared. Spline curves were fit over average daily viral load and areas under the curve (AUC) within 1 year were calculated. PTCy and MMF were associated with an increased risk of early (day ≤100) CMV reactivation ≥250 IU/mL after multivariate adjustment. The viral load AUC at 1 year was highest with MMF (mean difference = 0.125 units vs MTX group) and similar between PTCy and MTX (mean difference = 0.016 units vs MTX group). CMV disease risk was similar across groups. There was no interaction between GVHD prophylaxis and CMV reactivation on chronic GVHD risk. Despite PTCy-associated increased risk of early CMV reactivation, the CMV disease risk by 1 year was low in HLA-matched PBSC transplant recipients. In contrast, MMF was associated with higher overall CMV viral burden in the 1 year posttransplant. Although different mechanisms of immunosuppressive agents may affect CMV reactivation risk, effective prevention of GVHD may reduce corticosteroid exposure and mitigate infection risk over time.

A single-center experience of haploidentical stem cell transplantation in hematological malignancies

BACKGROUND

Since well-designed prospective comparative trials are lacking, haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantations approach should be based on the expertise of a particular center. In this study, we aimed to report the results and outcomes of patients who underwent haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

METHODS

: Thirty-nine patients who underwent transplantation in our clinic between 2015 and 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Primary end point of this study is to find out the survival rates of the patients.

RESULTS

The overall survival of patients was 29.9 ± 4.9 months. The disease-free survival of the patients was 37.8 ± 5.7 months. The 3-year overall survival rate of the patients was %50 and the 3-year disease-free survival rate of the patients was %53. Nineteen patients were nonsurvivors among a total of 39 patients. Busulfan-fludarabine-thiotepa was the most frequently used conditioning regimen for transplantation. Busulfan-fludarabin-antithymocyte globulin regimen is the second preferred conditioning regimen. Cyclosporine- cyclophosphamide-mycophenolate mofetil was the most widely used graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis regimen. Sixteen patients had graft-versus-host disease, 28% of the patients had acute graft-versus-host disease, and 13% had chronic graft-versus-host disease. Gastrointestinal system consists of the most involved organs in graft-versus-host disease since 15% of the patients had gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease. First-degree relatives (parent/child) were the most frequent donor source for haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Sepsis was the most frequent reason of death among transplant patients.

DISCUSSION

In our center, we prefer to use high dose posttransplantation cyclophosphamide after haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis. With this approach, our center's overall survival and disease-free survival rates are comparable and compatible with the literature findings.

Post-transplant cyclophosphamide and sirolimus based graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis after allogeneic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia

Post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) has emerged as a promising graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). However, no studies have reported the efficacy of a GvHD prophylaxis based on PTCy with sirolimus (Sir-PTCy) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In this retrospective study, we analyze the use of sirolimus in combination with PTCy, with or without mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), on 242 consecutive adult patients with AML undergoing a myeloablative first allo-HSCT from different donor types, in three European centers between January 2017 and December 2020. Seventy-seven (32%) patients received allo-HSCT from HLA-matched sibling donor, 101 (42%) from HLA-matched and mismatched unrelated donor, and 64 (26%) from haploidentical donor. Except for neutrophil and platelet engraftment, which was slower in the haploidentical cohort, no significant differences were observed in major transplant outcomes according to donor type in univariate and multivariate analysis. GvHD prophylaxis with Sir-PTCy, with or without MMF, is safe and effective in patients with AML undergoing myeloablative allo-HSCT, resulting in low rates of transplant-related mortality, relapse/progression, and acute and chronic GvHD in all donor settings.