Current status of pediatric deceased donor liver transplantation: Lessons learned from a high-volume center in Japan where living donation remains predominant

Tailoring allocation policies and improving access to paediatric liver transplantation over a 16-year period

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Mortality on the paediatric liver transplantation (pLT) waiting list (WL) is still an issue. We analysed the Italian pLT WL to evaluate the intention-to-treat (ITT) success rate and to identify factors influencing success.

METHODS

All children (<18 years) listed for pLT in Italy between 2002-2018 were included (Era 1 [2002-2007]: centre-based allocation; Era 2 [2008-2014]: national allocation; Era 3 [2015-2018]: national allocation+mandatory-split policy).

RESULTS

A total of 1,424 patients (median age: 2.0 [IQR 1.0-9.0] years; median weight: 12.0 kg [IQR 7-27]) were listed for pLT. Median WL time was 2 days (IQR 1-5) for Status 1 and 44 days (IQR 15-120) for non-Status 1 patients; 1,302 children (91.4%) were transplanted (67.3% with split grafts), while 50 children (3.5%) dropped off the WL (2.5% death, 1.0% clinical deterioration). Predictive factors for receiving LT included Status 1 (hazard ratio [HR] 1.66, p = 0.001), Status 1B (HR 1.96, p = 0.016), Status 2A (HR 2.15, p = 0.024) and each 1-point increase in PELD/MELD score. Children with recipient's weight >25 kg, blood group O or awaiting pLT combined with other organs had less chance of being transplanted. ITT patient survival rates were 90.5% at 1 year and 87.5% at 5 years, remaining stable across eras. Risk factors for ITT survival were re-transplantation (HR 5.83, p <0.001), Status 1 (HR 2.28, p = 0.006), Status 1B (HR 2.90, p = 0.014), Status 2A (HR 9.12, p <0.001), recipient weight <6 kg (HR 4.53, p <0.001) and low-volume activity (HR 4.38, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In Italy, continuous adaption of paediatric organ allocation policies via the introduction of national allocation, paediatric prioritisation rules and a mandatory-split policy have helped maximise the use of donors for paediatric candidates and to minimise WL mortality without compromising outcomes.

IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS

Globally, paediatric liver transplant candidates still suffer from high mortality. Over recent decades, the continuous adaption of organ allocation policies in Italy has led to excellent outcomes for children awaiting liver transplantation. The mortality rate of paediatric liver transplant candidates has been minimised to almost zero, mainly using grafts from deceased donors. Paediatric prioritisation rules, national organ exchange organisation and a mandatory-split liver policy have resulted in a unique allocation model for paediatric liver transplant candidates and represent a landmark for the paediatric transplant community.

Allocation to pediatric recipients around the world: An IPTA global survey of current pediatric solid organ transplantation deceased donation allocation practices

BACKGROUND

There has not been a comprehensive global survey of pediatric-deceased donor allocation practices across all organs since the advent of deceased donor transplantation at the end of the 20th century. As an international community that is responsible for transplanting children, we set out to survey the existing landscape of allocation. We aimed to summarize current practices and provide a snapshot overview of deceased donor allocation practices to children across the world.

METHODS

The International Registry in Organ Donation and Transplantation (IRODAT, www.irodat.org) was utilized to generate a list of all countries in the world, divided by continent, that performed transplantation. We reviewed the published literature, published allocation policy, individual website references and associated links to publicly available listed allocation policies. Following this, we utilized tools of communication, relationships, and international fellowship to confirm deceased donation pediatric centers and survey pediatric allocation practices for liver, kidney, heart, and lung across the world. We summarize pediatric allocation practices by organ when available using source documents, and personal communication when no source documents were available.

RESULTS

The majority of countries had either formal or informal policies directed toward minimizing organ distribution disparity among pediatric patients.

CONCLUSION

Children have long-term life to gain from organ donation yet continue to die while awaiting transplantation. We summarize global strategies that have been employed to provide meaningful and sustained benefit to children on the waitlist.

Recent advances in surgical strategies and liver transplantation for hepatoblastoma

Hepatoblastoma (HB) is the most common malignant liver tumor in children. Although the development of treatment strategies with advances in chemotherapy has greatly improved the prognosis of HB, surgical resection and liver transplantation still play a vital role in the treatment of HB. In recent years, technological innovations have led to the development of new surgical approaches for HB. In this review, we describe the latest research on the surgical management of HB, including new imaging technologies, minimally invasive approaches, and the application of associating liver partition portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy. We also discuss the current role of liver transplantation, use of ante-situm or ex-situ liver resection with auto-transplantation, and management of metastatic HB.

Patients with liver cirrhosis due to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis have lesser chances for liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

The main causes of liver cirrhosis have changed over the past decade. In Japan, the number of deceased donors is increasing but is still insufficient relative to the number of patients awaiting a liver transplant. This study aimed to assess the outcomes of candidates for liver transplantation.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of adult patients who visited our department for consultation regarding liver transplantation from January 2009 to December 2020. Of a total of 601 patients, 336 were followed-up. The following data were collected and analyzed: patient's characteristics, liver etiology, Child-Pugh and MELD scores, and the eventual outcome, that is, whether liver transplantation was performed.

RESULTS

Only 153 of 336 (45.5%) patients underwent liver transplantation, of which 42 (27.5%) received deceased donor liver transplantation, and 129 (38.4%) died without transplantation. The proportion of patients who underwent liver transplantation was low among patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) (10.7%) (P<0.001). The rate of qualified living donors was the lowest for patients with NASH (28.6%) and that for the other etiologies ranged from 55.6% to 67.4% (P=0.050).

CONCLUSION

Patients with liver cirrhosis due to NASH may have a lesser chance of undergoing liver transplantation from both living and deceased donors.

Are split liver grafts a suitable option in high-risk liver transplant recipients?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To assess the outcomes of split liver transplantation (SLT) in adults and children and evaluate its role in high-risk recipients with a high model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, an urgent indication or requiring retransplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Split liver grafts in general have equivalent long-term survival outcomes to whole grafts despite an increase in biliary complications. Recent success and technical advances have encouraged use of these grafts in high-risk recipients. Split liver grafts can be used successfully in recipients with a high MELD score if there is adequate weight-matching. There are mixed results in urgent indication recipients and for retransplantation such that use in this group of patients remains controversial.

SUMMARY

SLT addresses donor shortages by facilitating the transplant of two recipients from the same donor liver. By using careful donor and recipient selection criteria, SLT can achieve equivalent long-term outcomes to whole grafts. These grafts have been used successfully in recipients with a high MELD score, but should be used selectively in urgent indication recipients and for retransplantation.