Utility of the inside stent as a preoperative biliary drainage method for patients with malignant perihilar biliary stricture

Comparison of the preoperative transpapillary unilateral biliary drainage methods for the future remnant liver in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma with liver resection: a retrospective cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Transpapillary preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) only for the future remnant liver (FRL) in hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA) can be performed minimally invasively, with the expectation of swelling of the FRL. However, verification of the appropriate transpapillary unilateral PBD method for FRL is limited as the cases of liver resection are insufficient.

METHODS

A total of 63 patients with resectable HCCA were evaluated. Of note, 12 unilateral across-the-papilla plastic stent (PS) placement cases (PS group), 14 unilateral intraductal PS (IS) placement cases (IS group), and 11 unilateral endoscopic nasobiliary drainage cases (ENBD group) met the inclusion criteria. Each group was compared in terms of the hospital stay duration for the endoscopic procedure, recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO), time to RBO (TRBO), overall survival (OS), and surgical outcomes.

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed in the patient characteristics between the groups. Hospital stay for the endoscopic procedure was significantly longer in the ENBD group (50 days [IQR, 33-163]) than in the PS group (14 days [IQR, 2-36]; P <.01) or IS group (21 days [IQR, 6-118]; P <.01). There were no significant differences in the RBO, TRBO, OS, surgical time, amount of intraoperative blood loss, or postsurgical adverse events (AEs) between the groups. In the multivariate analysis, there were no significantly related factors for RBO, TRBO, OS, and postsurgical AEs.

CONCLUSION

The PS, IS, and ENBD groups showed similar clinical outcomes in liver resection cases for HCCA, excluding the hospital stay duration for the endoscopic procedure. Considering the hospital stay duration, unilateral PS and IS placement can be considered acceptable for transpapillary PBD.

Efficacy and safety of sequential cutting of nasobiliary tubes as an alternative to stent placement after nasobiliary drainage for the treatment of hilar malignant biliary stricture: a retrospective cohort study

Background

The rising incidence of hilar malignant bile duct strictures poses challenges for diagnosis and treatment. While endoscopic treatment is essential for relieving obstruction, it carries a high risk of postoperative cholangitis. Sequential cutting of nasobiliary tubes as an alternative to stent placement after nasobiliary drainage may emerge as an effective strategy to mitigate these complications.

Objectives

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nasobiliary tube cutting after nasobiliary drainage versus conventional stent placement in reducing postoperative cholangitis in patients with hilar malignant biliary strictures.

Design

A retrospective cohort study.

Methods

From 2015 to 2023, 208 patients were divided into two groups: nasobiliary tube cutting group (n = 103) and conventional stent group (n = 105). The primary outcome was postoperative cholangitis, with secondary outcomes including drainage success, bilirubin reduction, re-interventions, complications, and hospital stay.

Results

Cholangitis occurred in 11.7% of the nasobiliary tube cutting group and 26.7% of the conventional stent group (p = 0.006). Successful drainage was achieved in 84 patients (81.6%) in the nasobiliary tube cutting group and 78 patients (74.3%) in the conventional stent group, with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.207). Patients whose total bilirubin reduction >50% within 7 days were significantly higher in the nasobiliary tube cutting group (48.5% vs 27.6%, p = 0.002). There were no significant differences between the groups in the number of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography procedures or re-interventions required (p > 0.05). Except for postoperative cholangitis, other postoperative complications were comparable between the groups (p > 0.05). The postoperative hospital stay was significantly longer in the nasobiliary tube cutting group, with a median duration of 10.0 (7.0, 14.0) days compared to 7.0 (5.5, 12.5) days in the conventional stent group (p = 0.024). Bismuth-Corlette Type IV was identified as an independent risk factor for cholangitis (OR = 3.207, 95%CI: 1.253-8.210, p = 0.015).

Conclusion

For patients with hilar malignant biliary stricture, sequential cutting of nasobiliary tubes as an alternative to stent placement after nasobiliary drainage may reduce the incidence of postoperative cholangitis and achieve early successful drainage, but it may result in a prolonged postoperative hospital stay. Bismuth-Corlette Type IV is an independent risk factor for the development of postoperative cholangitis.

Efficacy of a Novel Dual-Layer Plastic Stents for Malignant Biliary Obstruction

Objectives: In hepatopancreatic diseases, stenting is widely employed to manage cholangitis and obstructive jaundice. Stent materials are primarily categorized as plastic or metal. Plastic stents have notable advantages, such as reduced likelihood of peripheral bile duct obstruction, a lower cost, and the ease of replacement compared to metallic stents. However, their patency period is shorter due to narrower diameters. Plastic stents are typically composed of materials like polyurethane or polyethylene. To improve patency, new dual-layer stents combine polyurethane with polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE). PTFE, used in the inner layer, is expected to prevent biofilm formation. This study aimed to assess the clinical efficacy of this dual-layer stent. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 48 cases (Group R) using REGULUS® from November 2022 to November 2023 and 30 cases (Group IS) using inside-type plastic stents from January 2020 to November 2023 for malignant hilar and intrahepatic bile duct obstructions. Stent patency and clinical outcomes were compared between the groups. Results: There was no significant difference in the recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) rate between the groups (p = 0.644). The time to recurrent biliary obstruction (TRBO) was 74 days in Group R and 118 days in Group IS, with no significant difference (p = 0.219). Conclusions: The dual-layer stent placed across the papilla demonstrated comparable clinical outcomes to inside-type stents. The PTFE inner layer likely reduces biofilm formation, enhancing patency. Across-the-papilla placement may facilitate reinterventions in challenging cases, broadening stent options.

Risk factors for recurrent biliary obstruction following suprapapillary placement of a plastic stent as preoperative biliary drainage for perihilar biliary malignancy

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

The usefulness of endoscopic biliary stenting by deploying a plastic stent suprapapillary, called inside-stent (IS) placement, as preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) for perihilar biliary malignancy (PHBM) has been demonstrated. This study investigated risk factors for recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) after IS placement.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with potentially resectable PHBM treated with IS placement as PBD between 2017 and 2023 at Nagoya University Hospital were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

A total of 157 patients were included, with RBO occurring in 34 (22%) patients. The non-RBO rates were 83% at 30 days, 77% at 60 days, and 57% at 90 days. The most common cause of RBO was stent occlusion (n = 14), followed by segmental cholangitis (n = 12) and stent migration (n = 8). Stent migration and occlusion occurred more frequently within and after 1 week post-stenting, respectively. In multivariate analysis, biliary infection before IS was the sole risk factor for RBO, with a hazard ratio of 2.404 (95% confidence interval 1.163-4.972; p = .018). This risk was reduced by temporary endoscopic nasobiliary drainage prior to definitive IS placement.

CONCLUSIONS

Biliary infection before IS was identified as an independent risk factor for RBO in patients with PHBM with IS as PBD.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTER

Clinical trial registration number: UMIN000025631.

Inside stent placement is suitable for preoperative biliary drainage in patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Endoscopic biliary stenting (EBS) is commonly used for preoperative drainage of localized perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (LPHC). This study retrospectively compared the utility of inside stent (IS) and conventional stent (CS) for preoperative EBS in patients with LPHC.

METHODS

EBS was performed in 56 patients with LPHC. EBS involved the placement of a CS (n = 32) or IS (n = 24). Treatment outcomes were compared between these two groups.

RESULTS

Preoperative recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) occurred in 23 patients (71.9%) in the CS group and 7 (29.2%) in the IS group, with a significant difference (p = 0.002). The time to RBO (TRBO) was significantly longer in IS than in CS (log-rank: p < 0.001). The number of stent replacements was significantly lower in IS than CS [0.38 (0-3) vs. 1.88 (0-8), respectively; p < 0.001]. Gemcitabine-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) was administered to 26 patients (46.4%). Among patients who received NAC, TRBO was longer in IS than in CS group (log-rank: p < 0.001). The IS group had a significantly shorter preoperative and postoperative hospital stay than the CS group (20.0 vs. 37.0 days; p = 0.024, and 33.5 vs. 41.5 days; p = 0.016).　 Both the preoperative and the postoperative costs were significantly lower in the IS group than in the CS group (p = 0.049 and p = 0.0034, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Compared with CS, IS for preoperative EBS in LPHC patients resulted in fewer complications and lower re-intervention rates. The fact that the IS group had shorter preoperative and postoperative hospital stays and lower costs both preoperatively and postoperatively compared to the CS group may suggest that the use of IS has the potential to benefit not only the patient but also the healthcare system.

Clinical usefulness of inside stents in anastomotic biliary strictures after liver transplantation

Background

Endoscopic biliary stenting is a standard treatment for biliary strictures after liver transplantation. Plastic stents are often replaced before stent dysfunction to prevent the development of cholangitis and jaundice. Therefore, the precise duration of stent patency is unclear.

Methods

We compared retrospectively the stent patency period and stent dysfunction rate between inside stents (IS) and conventional plastic stents (PS) in 48 patients with post-transplant strictures, distinguishing endoscopic biliary stenting with and without stent dysfunction at stent replacement.

Results

In observations focused on the first treatment, the median patency periods were 369 days for IS (n = 18) and 154 days for PS (n = 30; p = 0.01), significantly longer for IS. The 1-year cholangitis incidence rate was lower for IS (20% vs. 43%, p = 0.04). Additionally, no stent dislocation was observed for IS, but this occurred for 33.3% of PS (p = 0.004). Comparing all endoscopic biliary stenting, including second and subsequent procedures, IS again had a longer patency period than PS (356 days, n = 89, vs. 196 days, n = 127, p = 0.009).

Conclusions

IS had a significantly longer patency period than PS, suggesting that IS replacement could be reduced to once per year for patients who prefer less frequent stent replacement.

Meta-analysis on clinical outcomes of suprapapillary versus transpapillary stent insertion in malignant biliary obstruction

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Endoscopic biliary stenting is an essential treatment for malignant biliary obstruction (MBO). However, the optimal location for the placement of metal stents (MS) or plastic stents (PS) during the management of MBO, whether above (suprapapillary) or across (transpapillary) the sphincter of Oddi (SO), has not been thoroughly evaluated. This meta-analysis aims to compare the clinical outcomes associated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-guided biliary stents placed above and across the SO in patients with MBO.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of electronic databases was carried out to identify studies published from inception to April 2022. The clinical outcomes examined including stent patency, stent occlusion, and overall adverse events (AEs) such as cholangitis, post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP), cholecystitis, stent migration, and bleeding. The selection of a random-effects model or fixed-effects model was based on the presence of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

A total of 12 articles involving 751 patients were analyzed. The findings showed that the suprapapillary approach had longer stent patency compared to the transpapillary approach (mean difference: 38.58; 95% confidence interval 16.02-61.14, P < 0.0001). Additionally, the suprapapillary approach was associated with a lower risk of stent occlusion and overall AEs (P = 0.04, P = 0.002, respectively), particularly in the incidence of PEP (P = 0.009). The incidence of cholangitis, cholecystitis, stent migration, and bleeding were similar between the suprapapillary and transpapillary approaches. The subgroup analyses indicated that suprapillary PS had a significant decrease in the incidence of stent occlusion and longer stent patency, while suprapillary MS had a significant decrease in the incidence of overall AEs and PEP than the transpapillary approach.

CONCLUSION

Compared with the transpapillary approach, the suprapapillary stent had superiority in longer stent patency, lower rates of stent occlusion and overall AEs, and notably, a lower incidence of PEP. The incidence of cholangitis, cholecystitis, stent migration, and bleeding were similar between the suprapapillary and transpapillary approaches. Further large-scale randomized controlled studies are needed to confirm our findings.

REGISTRATION NO

CRD42022336435.

Essential updates 2021/2022: Update in surgical strategy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma

Resection is the only potential curative treatment for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC); however, complete resection is often technically challenging due to the anatomical location. Various innovative approaches and procedures were invented to circumvent this limitation but the rates of postoperative morbidity (20%-78%) and mortality (2%-15%) are still high. In patients diagnosed with resectable PHC, deliberate and coordinated preoperative workup and optimization of the patient and future liver remnant are crucial. Biliary drainage is recommended to relieve obstructive jaundice and optimize the clinical condition before liver resection. Biliary drainage for PHC can be performed either by endoscopic biliary drainage or percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage. To date there is no consensus about which method is preferred. The volumetric assessment of the future remnant liver volume and optimization mainly using portal vein embolization is the gold standard in the management of the risk to develop post hepatectomy liver failure. The improvement of systemic chemotherapy has contributed to prolong the survival not only in patients with unresectable PHC but also in patients undergoing curative surgery. In this article, we review the literature and discuss the current surgical treatment of PHC.

Clinical Outcomes of Inside Stents and Conventional Plastic Stents as Bridge-to-Surgery Options for Malignant Hilar Biliary Obstruction

BACKGROUND

The appropriate method of preoperative endoscopic biliary drainage (EBD) for cholangiocarcinoma with hilar biliary obstruction remains controversial. The inside-stent technique is a method of placing plastic stents entirely inside the bile duct. Several studies of patients with unresectable stage have reported longer stent patency compared with conventional endoscopic biliary stenting (EBS). Inside-stent techniques have been introduced as a bridge-to-surgery option and as an alternative to conventional EBS.

AIMS

We aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of inside stent use and conventional EBS.

METHODS

During this retrospective multicenter study, we reviewed consecutive patients with cholangiocarcinoma who underwent radical surgery after conventional EBS or inside-stent insertion. Adverse event (AE) rates after EBD and post-surgical AEs were compared. A multivariable analysis was performed to identify factors affecting cholangitis after EBD.

RESULTS

Conventional EBS and inside-stent procedures were performed for 56 and 73 patients, respectively. Patient backgrounds were similar between groups, except for percutaneous transhepatic portal vein embolization. The waiting time before surgery was similar between groups (28.5 days vs. 30 days). There were no significant differences in the cholangitis rate (21.4% vs. 26.0%; P = 0.68) and all AEs (25.0% vs. 30.1%; P = 0.56) between groups. The post-surgical AE rate was similar between the groups. The multivariable analysis found that preprocedural cholangitis was a risk factor for cholangitis after EBD (odds ratio: 5.67; 95% confidence interval: 1.61-19.9).

CONCLUSIONS

The outcomes of inside-stent techniques and conventional EBS for the management of preoperative EBD are comparable for patients with cholangiocarcinoma.

Long-term follow-up of a randomized trial of biliary drainage in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The DRAINAGE trial was a randomized controlled trial comparing preoperative endoscopic (EBD) and percutaneous biliary drainage (PTBD) in patients with potentially resectable, perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA). The aim of this study was to compare the long-term outcomes.

METHODS

Patients were randomized in four tertiary referral centers. Follow-up data were available for all included patients. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes were readmissions, and re-interventions not including in-trial interventions.

RESULTS

A total of 54 patients were randomized; 27 in both groups. Median follow-up for both groups was 62 months (95% CI 54-70). The median OS was 13 months (95% CI 7.9-18.1) in the EBD and 7 months (95% CI 0.0-17.2) in the PTBD group (P = 0.28). Twenty (37%, n = 8 EBD vs n = 12 PTBD, P = 0.43) of 54 patients were readmitted at least once, mostly due to drainage-related complications (n = 13, 24%). Of note, 14 out of the 54 patients died within the trial. A total of 76 drainage procedures (32 EBD and 44 PTBD) were performed in 28 patients. The median number of stent or drain placements was 2 (2-4) for the EBD group and 2 (1-3) for the PTBD group (P = 0.77).

DISCUSSION

Although this follow-up study represented a small cohort, no long-term differences in survival, readmissions, and drainage procedures for EBD and PTBD were found, even when comparing the resected and unresected group. However, this study demonstrates the complexity of biliary drainage for patients with potentially resectable pCCA, even in tertiary referral centers.

Current endoscopic approaches to biliary strictures

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To summarize the current status and future perspectives of the endoscopic management of biliary strictures.

RECENT FINDINGS

In addition to conventional diagnostic modalities, such as cross-sectional imaging and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), per-oral cholangioscopy is helpful for indeterminate biliary strictures. It allows direct visualization of the biliary tract and targeted biopsy. For distal malignant biliary obstruction (MBO), a self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) via endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a standard of care. EUS-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) is an emerging alternative to percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage in cases with failed ERCP. EUS-BD is also an effective salvage option for perihilar MBO, which can not be managed via ERCP or percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage. Preoperative drainage is necessary for most jaundiced patients as neoadjuvant chemotherapy is widely administered for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer, and a SEMS is preferred in this setting, too. For benign biliary strictures, a covered SEMS can improve stricture resolution and reduce the number of endoscopic sessions as compared to plastic stents.

SUMMARY

ERCP and EUS play a central role in the diagnosis and drainage for both malignant and benign biliary strictures.

Endoscopic management of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma

Endoscopic management for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHCC) is evolving toward more accurate diagnosis and safer drainage. In imaging, it is important to diagnose the entire lesion using multidetector-row computed tomography to determine resectability and optimal surgical planning, followed by local diagnosis using endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Video peroral cholangioscopy and probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy have been newly introduced as diagnostic imaging methods and are being applied clinically. In transpapillary forceps biopsy for PHCC diagnosis, the location in the bile duct (for mapping biopsy) and the number of biopsy samples should be determined depending on resectability, the morphological type, and future surgical planning. Preoperative drainage has shifted from percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage to endoscopic nasobiliary drainage given the possibility of seeding metastasis. In addition, considering potential patient discomfort from a nasal tube, the usefulness of the placement of a plastic stent above the papilla (inside stent) as a bridging therapy for surgery has been reported. For drainage of unresectable PHCC, the improved prognosis due to advances in chemotherapy has necessitated a strategy that accounts for reintervention. Thus, in addition to uncovered self-expandable metallic stents (SEMS), exchangeable slim fully covered SEMS and inside stents have started to be used. In addition to the conventional transpapillary approach, an endoscopic ultrasonography-guided approach has been introduced, and a combination of both methods has also been proposed. To improve the quality of life and prognosis of PHCC patients, endoscopists need to understand and be able to use the various methods of endoscopic management for PHCC.